Merei-Tiale language
Merei or Malmariv is an Oceanic language spoken in north central Espiritu Santo Island in Vanuatu.
| Merei | |
|---|---|
| Malmariv | |
| Region | Espiritu Santo Island, Vanuatu |
Native speakers | (800 cited 1997–2001)[1] |
Austronesian
| |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | Either:mnl – Tialelmb – Merei |
| Glottolog | tial1239 Tialemere1242 Merei |
| ELP | Merei |
 Malmariv is classified as Vulnerable by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger | |
There are two varieties, Tiale, or Malmariv, and Merei, or Lametin. They are mutually intelligible according to a comparison of 234 words, which showed 94.87% cognate similarity.[2] There are an estimated 800 speakers of Malmariv-Merei or Tiale-Lametin.[3] Merei, as well as Tiale, are both spoken by roughly 60% of the children in the villages. The members of the population have a positive attitude towards the threatened language, with Merei being spoken by approximately 400 people as a mother tongue.[4] There are at least four villages where Merei is spoken, Angoru, Navele, Tombet and Vusvogo. These villages are located between the Ora and Lape rivers in the central area of Espiritu Santo Island.[4]
Merei is an SVO language, aligning itself with many of the typical Oceanic features. Subject pronouns, modality, and aspect markers occur preverbally, object pronouns and aspect adverbs follow the verb, and possessives are divided into direct and indirect (or inalienable and alienable respectively).[4]
Phonology
Merei has a phoneme inventory consisting of sixteen consonants and five vowels. The combinations of vowels can form nine diphthongs.[4]
Morphology
Pronouns and person markers
The pronominal system contains two free-form categories, independent pronouns and preverbal subject pronouns, and two bound categories, object pronominal suffix and possessive pronominal suffix. No gender or animate distinction is made. Pronouns only have animate reference.[4]
The pronominal system makes a distinction between first, second and third persons. Singular, dual, and plural are marked by number. First person dual and plural makes the distinction between inclusive and exclusive.[4]
Independent pronouns
| Singular | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st person | inclusive | nao | de rua | de |
| exclusive | gamau rua | gamau | ||
| 2nd person | go | gami rua | gami | |
| 3rd person | nie | ire rua | ire | |
In this example we see the 2nd person independent pronoun being used as a speech act of invitation.
Example 2 shows use of the first person plural exclusive independent pronoun gamau.
Kam
2PL
ta
REAL
usi
ask
ko
2SG
arongo/
today
ko
2SG
sio
down
peser
with
i
ART.PN
gamau
EX.PL
tui.
PER
'We asked you today for you to stay with us.'
Preverbal subject pronouns and suffixes
| Singular | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st person | inclusive | na/nam | tera | te |
| exclusive | kamara | kama | ||
| 2nd person | ko | kamra | kam | |
| 3rd person | Ø | |||
| Singular | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st person | inclusive | -iau | -da rau | -da |
| exclusive | -mau rua | -mau | ||
| 2nd person | -ko | -mi rua | -mi | |
| 3rd person | Ø | -ra rua | -ra | |
Example 3 below uses the preverbal subject pronoun nam and the possessive pronominal suffix -gu.
Nam
1SG
ta
REAL
tai
make
ia
ART.CN
jingo-m
mouth-2SG
ko
2SG
ta
REAL
tai
make
ia
ART.CN
sala-gu.
road-1SG.
‘I make your mouth and you make my road.’
Example 4 below demonstrates the absence of a 3rd person singular preverbal subject pronoun and also contains the 3rd person plural pronominal suffix -ra.
Reflexive pronouns
Reflexive pronouns are formed from the root nese- followed by a possessive pronominal suffix. It can be used in concurrence with the free pronoun and is often followed by the free particle nga 'only' as seen in example 5 and 6 below.
Demonstrative pronouns
Demonstrative pronouns consist of a mix of locational adverbs and third person pronouns. They have three possible functions: they can occupy the whole noun phrase slot, act as an independent nominal argument or be placed at the end of a noun phrase to modify the noun-head.[4] The classifications of demonstrative adverbs are based on two aspects: speaker-hearer reference and spatial reference.[4]
| Singular | Plural | |
|---|---|---|
| close to both speaker and hearer | get-nie | get-ire |
| close to the speaker | na-nie | na-ire |
| close to the hearer | gata-nie | gata-ire |
| uncertain/not visible | ani-nie | ani-ire |
Shows get-nie a speaker hearer referenced demonstrative pronoun:
Shows get-ire a speaker hearer referenced demonstrative pronoun:
Spatial reference demonstrative pronouns are formed by the third person independent pronouns, nie and ire when linked to spatial adverbial adverbs.[4]
| Proximal | Intermediate | Distal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ascending direction | singular | ai-sa-nie | ma-ja-nie | le-sa-nie |
| plural | ai-sa-ire | ma-ja-ire | le-sa-ire | |
| at same level | singular | ai-va-nie | ai-va-nie/le-va-nie | le-va-nie |
| plural | ai-va-ire | ai-va-ire/le-va-ire | le-va-ire | |
| descending direction | singular | ai-sio-nie | ma-jio-nie | le-sio-nie |
| plural | ai-sio-ire | ma-jio-ire | e-sio-ire | |
la
ART.CN
tese
man
leva-nie
far.horizontal-3SG
Ø
3SG
ta
REAL
logologo.
bad.
'That man is bad' (referring to a man who is a long way from the speaker)
Possessive constructions
| Singular | Dual | Plural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st person | inclusive | -gu | -da rua | -da |
| exclusive | -mau rua | -mau | ||
| 2nd person | -m | -mi rua | -mi | |
| 3rd person | -na | -ra rua | -ra | |
In the Malmariv language, there are two possessive formations, direct and indirect. In certain situations, both of them are simultaneously possible. When in this predicament, if the possessed is more closely linked to the possessor, then it is classed as direct poIndirect Possessiond to indirect possession.
The possessive construction of the Merei language is typical Oceanic. There are different types of the classifiers and genitive prepositions of indirect possessive according to the edibility of the noun heads,[4] however the word for tattoo ‘bur’ is an exception to the edible noun class.
Pronominal object suffixes and non-singular pronominal possessive suffixes are practically identical.
Direct possession
In direct pronominal possession a possessed inalienable noun head is followed by a poBoth Direct and Indirect Possession shown in table 4 above.[4] This type of formation is normally related with body parts, familial terms, and relationships between location and part-whole connections.
Examples 11, 12 and 13 show the relative possessive pronominal suffix pairing with the possessed noun.
The directly possessed noun is followed by the possessor noun phrase when the possessor is a nominal. This is shown in examples 14, 15 and 16.
Indirect Possession
With indirect pronominal possession, there is a Possessive Classifier that precedes the indirectly possessed alienable noun head. The Possessive Classifier for inedible nouns is nou- (POSSC.I), and a- (or less commonly na-) for edible and drinkable nouns (POSSC.E), followed by the possessive pronominal suffix.[4]
Example 17 shows the Possessive Classifier for inedible nouns
Example 18 shows the Possessive Classifier for edible and drinkable nouns
In indirect nominal possession the indirectly possessive noun head is followed by a genitive preposition, nui for inedible (GEN.I) and nai for edible (GEN.E), which are followed by the possessor noun.[4]
Example 19 shows the genitive preposition for inedible nouns
Example 20 shows the genitive preposition for edible nouns
The benefactive preposition sei can also function as genitive preposition. it operates as part of the noun phrase and functions like a descriptive normal modifier or a possessive construction.[4]
Both Direct and Indirect Possession
Many Oceanic languages have the ability to possess nouns both directly and indirectly. This difference in possession changes the meaning of the nouns affected. In indirect possession, the relationship between the possessed and the possessor is not as close as the direct possessive.[4]
Examples 22 and 23 below show the difference that indirect and direct possession have on the noun 'night'.
The following examples show the difference that indirect and direct possession have on the noun 'road'.
Negation and Modality
Negation is closely related to Modality in Merei, and negation can be considered a propositional modality[5] (cited in,[4]: 27 ). Thus it is useful to discuss the two in the same section. There are three modalities in Merei, realis (R), presupposition (PSP), and irrealis (IRR).[4]: 28
| Positive | Negative | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Realis | Presupposition | Irrealis | Presupposition | Realis/Irrealis | ||
| Non-third person | ta | ø | tei | |||
| Third Person | Singular | ta | a | mo | atei | motei/mutei |
| Dual | tara | ara | mora | aratei | moratei | |
| Plural | tato | ato | moto | ateita | moteita/muteita | |
All non-third person forms of negative modality markers share the same form tei. The third person singular and dual negative forms can be formed by adding tei to the end of the positive form, whereas in the plural tei is added to the suffix -ta.[4]: 29
Negative third person dual irrealis modality:
Ia
ART.CN
esio
kingfisher
peser
with
ia
ART.CN
maji
fish
moratei
IRR.3D.NEG
vai
do
'The kingfisher and the fish did not do (it)'[4]
Negation in verbless equative clauses is marked by the irrealis marker mo or mu followed by the negative marker tei. This comes before the second noun phrase, the particle mo or mu is used for all persons.[4]: 31
I
ART.PN
nau
1
motei
IRR.3.NEG
na
ART.CN
tasale
white-man
'I am not a white-man'
I
ART.PN
nie
3
motei
IRR.3.NEG
na
ART.CN
tija
teacher
'He is not a teacher'
Negative existential clauses are formed in Merei by following the basic intransitive structure of a verbal clause.
| (Subject noun phrase) | Verb phrase | (Object noun phrase) | (Prepositional phrase) | (Location phrase) | (Time phrase) |
To form a negative existential clause the predicate slot is replaced by the verb va 'go' which is followed by the negative deictic merei and the clause takes only a single subject.[4] : 38
Existential clause[4]
Ia
ART.CN
bo
pig
ø
3SG
ta
REAL
dauva
exist
'There is a pig'
Negative existential clause[4]
Ia
ART.CN
bo
pig
va
g
merei
use
‘There is no pig’
By adding the particle of prohibition tla after the subject pronoun, imperative and hortative clauses can be negated. This can function as either prohibition or pleading, depending on context and intonation. The distinction between prohibition and pleading depends on the meaning of the verbs and intonation or it may require a more specific declaration.
References
- Tiale at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
Merei at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required) - Tryon, Darrell T. (1973). "Linguistic subgrouping in the new Hebrides: a preliminary approach". Oceanic Linguistics. 12 (1/2): 303–352. doi:10.2307/3622859. JSTOR 3622859.
- Lynch, John; Crowley, Terry (2001). Languages of Vanuatu: a new survey and bibliography. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. p. 54.
- Chung (2005).
- Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 321. doi:10.1075/z.17. ISBN 9789027230133.