Not flash, just Gordon

Not flash, just Gordon was an advertising slogan and campaign used by the British Labour Party in September and October 2007. The campaign was created by advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi in preparation for a speculated snap general election after Labour Party leader Gordon Brown succeeded Tony Blair as prime minister in June. The campaign intended to win over the electorate by implicitly comparing Brown with Blair, dissociating the former from the latter's demonstrative self-presentation, and also implicitly compared Brown with Conservative Party leader David Cameron. It made Brown's perceived awkward persona a strength and his perceived lack of charisma and limited communication skills a virtue. The campaign ended after Brown said he would not call a snap election on 6 October.

Campaign poster with Labour Party leader and prime minister Gordon Brown

Background

Political background

Gordon Brown
Tony Blair
Brown (left) succeeded Tony Blair (right) as prime minister on 27 June 2007

Labour Party leader Gordon Brown became prime minister on 27 June 2007, succeeding previous party leader Tony Blair.[1][2] He served as Chancellor of the Exchequer throughout Blair's premiership for ten years.[3] Blair was known for his perceived charismatic personality, skilful rhetoric and communication, and usage of political spin.[4][5][6] However, Brown was known for his perceived awkward persona.[7] He pledged "a new era of spin-free politics" and made attempts to separate himself from Blair.[8][9][10]

In Blair's final months in office, the official opposition party the Conservative Party had established an opinion poll lead.[11][12] Its leader David Cameron was young and, like Blair, also viewed as charismatic.[13][14] He was admired because of his perceived communication skills.[15] In his first months as prime minister, Brown benefited from a polling bounce, with Labour taking the lead back from the Conservatives.[16][12] Speculation grew that Brown would take advantage of his popularity and call a snap general election as early as autumn 2007 or sometime in 2008,[17][18] and this speculation was encouraged by Brown's aides.[19] In August, both major parties began searching for an advertising agency.[18]

Saatchi & Saatchi

Saatchi & Saatchi was founded in 1970 by brothers Charles and Maurice Saatchi. In March 1978, the brothers were appointed by the Conservative Party to run its advertising campaign in the 1979 general election, leading to the creation of the "famous"[20] Labour Isn't Working advertising campaign, which rose the brothers from obscurity to household names.[21] Saatchi & Saatchi continued to work for the Conservatives in the 1983 and 1987 general elections; the Conservatives won all three elections.[21] Margaret Thatcher, the Conservative leader at the time, considered Saatchi & Saatchi her favourite advertising agency.[22] In 1994, the brothers were removed from the agency in a shareholder rebellion.[23]

In 1995 the brothers set up a new agency, M&C Saatchi, where they continued to work for the Conservatives until 1999.[24][25] A subsidiary of the new agency was recruited by the party and continued to work for them until 2006.[26] Saatchi & Saatchi lost much of its market when the brothers left the original agency and it lost its prominent status in the advertising industry.[27] Several Saatchi clients dropped the original agency and employed M&C Saatchi instead.[28] The Conservatives dropped Saatchi & Saatchi in December 1995.[29]

Campaign

Competing against three other agencies, Saatchi & Saatchi presented fifty posters to the party, with a favourite being selected by party officers.[30] Designed by the agency, this poster involved an image of Brown looking modest, thoughtful, and wearing a lightly creased suit beside the advertising slogan[31] "Not flash, just Gordon".[27][32] On 12 September 2007, because of the poster,[33][34] Labour and Saatchi signed a contract worth several million pounds, and the agency was given control over the party's advertising for the next general election.[35][36] This was announced on the party's website in a statement by Labour's general election co-ordinator Douglas Alexander, with the poster appearing above the announcement.[37] By 16 September, an advertising campaign for the slogan had been launched by the agency,[38] with the poster displayed on billboards and used in political adverts in preparation for a 2007 snap election.[39]

At the Labour Party Conference held in late September, more posters for the slogan were unveiled.[40] However, Labour's lead in the opinion polls decreased following the Conservative Party Conference in early October.[41] On 5 October, an opinion poll held by the News of the World had the Conservatives with a six-point lead over Labour in 83 swing seats.[42] On 6 October, Brown publicly said he would not call a snap election in autumn.[43][44] The next election would not have to be called until 2010.[19] The slogan was subsequently disused and the posters for it were taken down.[45][46]

In 2017, an article in the Prospect magazine revealed that Saatchi had drafted other campaign posters for the Labour Party, which were then shown to focus groups of swing voters in August 2007. These compared Brown with Conservative leader David Cameron, with the best received posters displaying a "Brown strength" and a "Cameron weakness", but these were not shown to the general public.[47]

Analysis

The slogan was interpreted as a reference to comic strip protagonist Flash Gordon

Saatchi & Saatchi created the slogan in preparation for a possible snap election,[48][49] using it to make Brown's serious personality attractive to voters.[50] The initial poster was the first Labour Party poster published following the Blair–Brown handover.[51] The campaign was used by the party to win over the electorate by implicitly[47] comparing Brown with Blair,[52] disassociating him from Blair's demonstrative self-presentation.[5] It put forward Brown's serious-minded approach to working in the role of prime minister, as opposed to Blair who was viewed as having worked in the role superficially.[53] It made a virtue of Brown's perceived lack of charisma, a trait that was central to Blair's political persona,[51] and also depicted him as truthful instead of spinful.[54][55] Blair was known for his dependence on political spin as prime minister, and Brown wanted to distance himself from this dependency through the slogan.[5] The Labour Party advertised his lack of spin as an "antidote" against the Blair era.[15]

The slogan also implicitly[47] compared Brown with Conservative leader David Cameron, who shared Blair's perceived superficiality.[56] Cameron was admired because of his perceived communication skills whereas Brown was viewed as having limited communication skills, so the advertising campaign was used by the Labour Party to make this trait seem virtuous.[15] The slogan was also used to make Brown's perceived awkward persona seem like a strength, not a weakness.[7] Other traits that the advert intended to convey about Brown were conviction and solidity.[57] David Stringer of NBC News said the slogan "[sought] to define [Brown] as serious and statesmanlike".[58]

In an article for The Independent, the Campaign's Claire Beale said: "If the 'not flash' line is anything to go by, Labour's approach will be to ditch the hyperbole and focus on Brown's integrity. By implication, being 'not flash' distances Brown from the Blair era and paves the way for a rebranding of the party."[59] Writing about Saatchi & Saatchi's employment by Labour, Andy McSmith of The Independent and Andrew Pierce of The Daily Telegraph said it was "another break" with the Blair era of the Labour Party. Trevor Beattie's advertising agency Beattie McGuinness Bungay worked for Blair in the 1997, 2001 and 2005 general elections and unsuccessfully competed with Saatchi for the contract.[27][36]

The phrase was also interpreted as a reference to comic strip protagonist Flash Gordon.[37][60][61] Philip Gould, who worked on the campaign, claimed that the slogan was a word play on the character in his 2011 book The Unfinished Revolution: How New Labour Changed British Politics Forever.[62][63] Brown dismissed comparisons with the character when he was prime minister, saying he was "Just Gordon, I can assure you".[64][65]

Reception

The employment of Saatchi & Saatchi by the Labour Party surprised the advertising industry.[27][36] The Campaign's Claire Beale said the original poster was "a great start" for any attempts by Saatchi to regain its 1980s prominence.[66] The Independent's Andy McSmith echoed her opinion, saying that the poster gave Saatchi "the prospect of recapturing some of its former prominence".[27] The slogan itself saw some success before its disuse.[67][68][69] Brown liked the slogan.[70] In his 2017 autobiography My Life, Our Times, he approved of the campaign.[71]

The initial poster was well received by swing voters. Although only implied, voters found its comparison of Brown with Blair and Cameron clear. The poster took advantage of the voters' positive views of Brown in his first months as prime minister, with his awkward traits making them believe that he was truthful and straightforward, and that he did not use spin.[47]

The campaign was perceived by Labour Party supporters and opposition parties as a skilled attempt at forming a political image for Brown while remaining in the limits of his actual personality.[72] In response to the campaign, the Conservatives launched their own advertising campaign with posters asking "Who gets a say on the European Constitution? Not you, just Gordon", in reference to Labour's refusal to call a referendum for the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, which affected the constitutional foundations of the European Union.[73]

References

  1. Kettle, Martin (5 April 2010). "The Gordon Brown years, through highs and lows to grinding endurance". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  2. "History of The Rt Hon Gordon Brown". GOV.UK. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  3. "Gordon Brown – Who is The Former Prime Minister?". Politics.co.uk. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  4. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro; Barnhurst, Kevin G.; Ikeda, Ken'ichi; Maia, Rousiley C. M.; Wessler, Hartmut (14 December 2015). The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. John Wiley & Sons. p. 1065. ISBN 978-1-118-29075-0.
  5. Rush, Michael; Giddings, Philip (13 November 2008). When Gordon Took the Helm: The Palgrave Review of British Politics 2007-08. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 222. ISBN 978-0-230-00260-9.
  6. Quinault, Roland (17 March 2011). British Prime Ministers and Democracy: From Disraeli to Blair. A&C Black. p. 275. ISBN 978-1-4411-1227-9.
  7. "Profile: Gordon Brown". BBC News Election 2010. 23 March 2010. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  8. "Newsnight poll suggests most voters think Brown spins as much as Blair". BBC. 12 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  9. Goodman, Sam (24 October 2016). The imperial premiership: The role of the modern Prime Minister in foreign policy making, 1964–2015. Manchester University Press. p. 209. ISBN 978-1-5261-0845-6.
  10. "First 100 days: Gordon Brown". BBC News Online. 5 October 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  11. "Blair bows out after 10 years". Reuters. 11 May 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  12. Woodward, Will (23 November 2007). "Brown bounce wiped out, poll shows". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  13. Barczewski, Stephanie; Eglin, John; Heathorn, Stephen; Silvestri, Michael; Tusan, Michelle (30 October 2014). Britain since 1688: A Nation in the World. Routledge. p. 355. ISBN 978-1-317-60660-4.
  14. Beckett, Andy (7 October 2012). "David Cameron: where did it all go wrong?". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  15. Heppell, T.; Theakston, K. (30 July 2013). How Labour Governments Fall: From Ramsay Macdonald to Gordon Brown. Springer. p. 150. ISBN 978-1-137-31421-5.
  16. Denver, David; Garnett, Mark (February 2014). British General Elections Since 1964: Diversity, Dealignment, and Disillusion. OUP Oxford. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-19-967333-9.
  17. Hindmoor, Andrew (11 July 2019). Twelve Days That Made Modern Britain. Oxford University Press. p. 261. ISBN 978-0-19-883178-5.
  18. Sweney, Mark (14 September 2007). "Saatchi is working again - this time for Labour". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  19. Croft, Adrian (10 October 2007). "UK's Brown faces jibes over election U-turn". Reuters. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  20. "Like a Hammer film, Thatcher proves you can't keep a good old mummy down". The Herald. 15 September 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  21. Fallon, Ivan (17 September 2007). "Saatchi & Saatchi: The agency that made Tory history". The Independent. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  22. Woods, Ben (20 December 2020). "M&C Saatchi's doubters prove a tough sell for new chief". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  23. "The story of Saatchi & Saatchi". The Economic Times. 21 September 2010. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  24. Sweney, Mark (25 March 2010). "M&C Saatchi working on Tory ad campaign". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  25. Dillon, Jo (5 December 1999). "Tories ditch Saatchi brothers". The Independent. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  26. Sweney, Mark (4 September 2006). "Conservative party over for M&C Saatchi". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  27. Smith, Andy (14 September 2007). "They said Labour isn't working. Now Saatchi & Saatchi works for Labour". The Independent. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  28. Armstrong, Stephen (6 September 2010). "Saatchi brothers mark 40 years since the foundation of their ad agency". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 December 2022.
  29. Goldman, Kevin (4 December 2018). Conflicting Accounts: The Creation and Crash of the Saatchi and Saatchi Advertising Empire. Simon and Schuster. p. 318. ISBN 978-1-4391-4514-2.
  30. Delaney, Sam (3 February 2015). Mad Men & Bad Men: What Happened When British Politics Met Advertising. Faber & Faber. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-571-31239-9.
  31. Assinder, Nick (6 November 2007). "What to make of Brown's plans?". BBC News Online. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  32. Pfanner, Eric (2 October 2007). "A Page From Thatcher's Playbook". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 December 2022.Hines, Nico (13 September 2007). "Saatchis find slogan to sum up Brown". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 3 December 2022."Labour takes on Saatchi agency". The Herald. 14 September 2007. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  33. Hurst, Greg (14 September 2007). "Gordon Brown's double whammy: two old foes come into the fold". The Sunday Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  34. Watt, Nicholas (24 September 2010). "Selling Gordon Brown: how Saatchi tried to market the former PM". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  35. "Saatchis land Labour ad account". BBC News Online. 13 September 2007. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  36. Pierce, Andrew (13 September 2007). "Saatchi & Saatchi wins Labour Party account". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  37. Haycock, Gavin (13 September 2007). "Labour turns to 1979 nemesis for election ads". Reuters. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  38. Robinson, James (16 September 2007). "Has Number 10 really closed its doors to the culture of spin?". The Observer. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  39. "PM's misjudgment over election that never was". The Scotsman. 10 January 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  40. Harris, Tom (1 March 2018). Ten Years In The Death Of The Labour Party. Biteback Publishing. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-78590-375-5.
  41. Majendie, Paul (5 October 2007). "Opinion polls show Brown's lead evaporating". Reuters. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  42. Wintour, Patrick; Watt, Nicholas (26 June 2008). "A huge price paid for election that never was". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  43. Draper, Derek (7 October 2007). "Election? What election? Why Brown lost his bottle". The Independent. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  44. "Brown rules out autumn election". BBC News. 6 October 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  45. Martin, Iain (24 August 2008). "Gordon Brown may lose it on a sprint". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  46. Baldwin, Tom (19 July 2018). Ctrl Alt Delete: How Politics and the Media Crashed Our Democracy. Hurst. p. 139. ISBN 978-1-78738-100-1.
  47. Shimshon, Ben (10 December 2017). "Poster-truth politics: the Gordon Brown posters for the election that never was". Prospect Magazine. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  48. Sandison, Nikki (3 March 2008). "Labour under fire over discounted Saatchi deal". Campaign. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  49. Middleton, Alia F (2014). "'Election, what election?' Low level campaigns and detrimental electoral outcomes in safe constituencies" (PDF). University of Edinburgh. p. 139. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  50. Parker, George (25 July 2014). "Ed Miliband admits he cannot compete with PM on photo-ops". Financial Times. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  51. Campbell, John (2009). Pistols at Dawn: Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry, from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown. Jonathan Cape. p. 399. ISBN 978-0-224-08066-8.
  52. Prince, Rosa (9 April 2010). "General Election 2010: Gordon Brown admits he is 'guilty of being too serious'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  53. Seldon, Anthony (3 October 2011). Brown at 10. Biteback Publishing. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-84954-089-6.
  54. Turner, Alwyn (17 June 2021). All In It Together: England in the Early 21st Century. Profile. p. 198. ISBN 978-1-78283-786-2.
  55. Dean, Malcolm (2013). Democracy under attack: How the Media Distort Policy and Politics. Policy Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-1-84742-849-3.
  56. Pearce, Robert; Goodlad, Graham (2 September 2013). British Prime Ministers From Balfour to Brown. Routledge. p. 254. ISBN 978-1-135-04538-8.
  57. McGarvey, Neil (25 November 2014). "Gordon Brown: political giant and wasted talent at the same time". The Conversation. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  58. Stringer, David (27 June 2008). "Bad year for Britain's Prime Minister Brown". NBC News. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  59. Beale, Claire (17 September 2007). "Claire Beale On Advertising". The Independent. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  60. Rentoul, John (15 October 2021). "The Top 10: Pop Culture References by Leading Politicians". The Independent. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  61. Hüetlin, Thomas (30 April 2008). "The Trouble with Mr. Bean: British Voters Set to Punish Hapless Gordon Brown". Der Spiegel. ISSN 2195-1349. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  62. De Malmanche, Brett Raymond (September 2014). "Political Marketing and the British Labour Party 1994-2010: Applying the Product Life-Cycle Model to a Political Party" (PDF). Victoria University of Wellington. p. 147. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  63. Gould, Philip (22 September 2011). The Unfinished Revolution: How New Labour Changed British Politics Forever. Little, Brown. p. 504. ISBN 978-0-349-13857-2.
  64. "Britain's Brown in 'save the world' slip". ABC News and Current Affairs. 10 December 2008. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  65. "I'm not Flash Gordon, Brown insists". Independent Online. 14 October 2008. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  66. Beale, Claire (13 September 2007). "Labour turns to Saatchis". Campaign. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  67. Pearson, Allison (12 November 2017). "Allison Pearson on Gordon Brown's My Life, Our Times: 'Punishing proof that Blair was right'". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  68. Button, James (8 October 2007). "A snap UK election is not such a flash idea". The Age. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  69. Hardy, James (1 March 2008). "Brown steadies the Labour ship". BBC News Online. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  70. Rawnsley, Andrew (11 May 2008). "Gordon Brown's reputation has collapsed on every front". The Observer. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
  71. Powell, Jonathan (17 November 2017). "The fatal ambition of Gordon Brown". New Statesman. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  72. Schnee, Christian (17 December 2014). Political Reputation Management: The Strategy Myth. Routledge. p. 82. ISBN 978-1-317-63433-1.
  73. Oakley, Robin (2007). "The Oakley Column". The Parliamentary Monitor. No. 152–155. p. 8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.