Mechanically gradient polymers

Polymer gradient materials (PGM) are a class of polymers with gradually changing mechanical properties along a defined direction creating an anisotropic material. These materials can be defined based upon the direction and the steepness of the gradient used and can display gradient or graded transitions.[1] A wide range of methods can be used to create these gradients including gradients in reinforcing fillers, cross-link density or porosity to name a few. 3D printing has been used to combine several of these methods in one manufacturing technique.[2]

These materials can be inspired by nature where mechanical gradients are used commonly to improve interfaces between two dissimilar surfaces. When two materials that have different moduli are connected together in a bilayer, this can create a weak junction, whereas a mechanical gradient can reduce the stress and strain of the connection. In contrast, a butt joint that gives a junction between materials with little to no gradient has been shown to be weaker than the homogenous components.[3]

Mechanically gradient polymers are not manufactured as extensively as can be found in nature, and there can also be unintended gradients during the manufacturing process. Materials are not always completely uniform despite the intentions of the manufacturer, and these unintended gradients may weaken the material rather than improve. Therefore, mechanical gradients must be properly applied to the particular application to prevent introduction of instabilities.[4]

Methods

Gradient in reinforcing filler

Reinforcing fillers such as carbon nanotubes that have high mechanical moduli have been used commonly to create polymer composites with high strength and toughness.[5] Since the modulus and filler amount are linked, by varying the amount of filler across the polymer the modulus will similarly change.[6] Additionally, since long nanofillers create anisotropic moduli, if the direction of the nanofiller could be modified along the length of the polymer, the modulus gradient could also be tuned in this manner.

A common approach to increasing the mechanical strength of polymers includes changing the crosslinking density of the polymer. Crosslinks connect the polymer chains creating a web that resists deformation. Therefore, increasing the crosslinking density in a section of a polymer will increase the modulus in this location. This can be used to create a mechanical gradient if the crosslinking density changes across the polymer. A common approach to achieving this is using a photopolymerization process which with changes in UV exposure you can change the degree of crosslinking or polymerization in the area exposed.[7] In a similar manner, the amount of initiator or crosslinker could be varied across the sample creating a similar effect.

Gradient in porosity

Porosity can be used to decrease the modulus of a polymer as seen in polymer foams, and as seen in bone, a change in porosity and therefore density can also be used to create a mechanical gradient along its cross-section.[8]

Applications

Nature

There are many examples in nature where soft tissue and hard surfaces are connected by a mechanical gradient to improve the fracture and impact resistance. Examples include mussels that connect to hard rocks by the mussel byssus which connects back to the soft muscle of the foot.[9] A more extreme example is the squid beak which has an extremely hard tip required to kill and dismember its prey which connects back to the soft flesh of the body of the squid. Without the mechanically gradient in the beak, the squid would be unable to withstand the high impacts despite its hardness since it would break off from the body at the junction between the materials.[10]

Biomedical Implants

As mentioned above, many systems in nature incorporate mechanical gradients, and similarly for biomedical implants these gradients can be useful. Many implants are stiff and can cause damage to the surrounding tissues due to this difference in stiffness. This is a problem for instance in microelectrodes implanted into the brain which is extremely soft. The damage caused can create a buildup of fibrous tissue which can then interfere with the signal between the electrode and the brain.[11] Similarly, in knee and hip implants, there is a need for high integration between the strong bone and the cartilage and tissue. Otherwise problems such as stress shielding can occur where the bone degenerates due to the implant having too strong of a modulus.[12]

References
  1. Claussen, K. U.; Giesa, R.; Schmidt, H. W., Longitudinal polymer gradient materials based on crosslinked polymers. Polymer 2014, 55 (1), 29-38.
  2. Dizon, J. R. C.; Espera, A. H.; Chen, Q.; Advincula, R. C., Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manufacturing 2018, 20, 44-67.
  3. Claussen, K. U.; Giesa, R.; Schmidt, H. W., Longitudinal polymer gradient materials based on crosslinked polymers. Polymer 2014, 55 (1), 29-38.
  4. Callister, W.; Rethwisch D. Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: An Integrated Approach, 2012, 4, 466.
  5. Andrews, R.; Weisenberger, M. C., Carbon nanotube polymer composites. Curr Opin Solid St M 2004, 8 (1), 31-37.
  6. Fox, J. D.; Capadona, J. R.; Marasco, P. D.; Rowan, S. J., Bioinspired Water-Enhanced Mechanical Gradient Nanocomposite Films That Mimic the Architecture and Properties of the Squid Beak. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2013, 135 (13), 5167-5174.
  7. Sunyer, R.; Jin, A. J.; Nossal, R.; Sackett, D. L., Fabrication of Hydrogels with Steep Stiffness Gradients for Studying Cell Mechanical Response. PLOS One 2012, 7 (10).
  8. Sherwood, J.K.; Griffith, L.G.; Brown, S. U.S. Patent No. 6454811, 2002.
  9. Harrington, M. J.; Waite, J. H., How Nature Modulates a Fiber's Mechanical Properties: Mechanically Distinct Fibers Drawn from Natural Mesogenic Block Copolymer Variants. Adv Mater 2009, 21 (4), 440-+.
  10. Tan, Y. P.; Hoon, S.; Guerette, P. A.; Wei, W.; Ghadban, A.; Hao, C.; Miserez, A.; Waite, J. H., Infiltration of chitin by protein coacervates defines the squid beak mechanical gradient. Nat Chem Biol 2015, 11 (7), 488-+.
  11. Tate, M. L. K.; Detamore, M.; Capadona, J. R.; Woolley, A.; Knothe, U., Engineering and commercialization of human-device interfaces, from bone to brain. Biomaterials 2016, 95, 35-46.
  12. Huiskes, R.; Weinans, H.; Vanrietbergen, B., The Relationship between Stress Shielding and Bone-Resorption around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials. Clin Orthop Relat R 1992, (274), 124-134.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.