Mackerel as food
Mackerel is an important food fish that is consumed worldwide.[1] As an oily fish, it is a rich source of omega-3 fatty acids.[2] The flesh of mackerel spoils quickly, especially in the tropics, and can cause scombroid food poisoning. Accordingly, it should be eaten on the day of capture, unless properly refrigerated or cured.[3]
Nutritional value per 100 g (3.5 oz) | |
---|---|
Energy | 858 kJ (205 kcal) |
13.89 g | |
18.60 g | |
Vitamins | Quantity %DV† |
Vitamin A | 167 IU |
Vitamin D | 107% 643 IU |
Minerals | Quantity %DV† |
Calcium | 1% 12 mg |
Iron | 13% 1.63 mg |
Magnesium | 21% 76 mg |
Phosphorus | 31% 217 mg |
Potassium | 7% 314 mg |
Sodium | 6% 90 mg |
Zinc | 7% 0.63 mg |
Other constituents | Quantity |
Water | 63.55 g |
| |
†Percentages are roughly approximated using US recommendations for adults. Source: USDA FoodData Central |
Preservation
Mackerel preservation is not simple. Before the 19th-century development of canning and the widespread availability of refrigeration, salting and smoking were the principal preservation methods available.[4] Historically in England, this fish was not preserved, but was consumed only in its fresh form. However, spoilage was common, leading the authors of The Cambridge Economic History of Europe to remark: "There are more references to stinking mackerel in English literature than to any other fish!"[5] In France mackerel was traditionally pickled with large amounts of salt, which allowed it to be sold widely across the country.[5]
In Japan mackerel is commonly cured with salt and vinegar to make a type of sushi known as saba-zushi. Historically saba-zushi originated in Kyoto as a solution for transporting mackerel to the inland city, which otherwise would not have made the journey from the coast still fresh.[6] The road linking Obama bay and Kyoto is now also called "mackerel road" (saba-kaido).
Popularity
For many years mackerel was regarded as unclean in the UK and elsewhere due to folklore which suggested that the fish fed on the corpses of dead sailors.[7] A 1976 survey of housewives in Britain undertaken by the White Fish Authority indicated a reluctance to departing from buying the traditional staples of cod, haddock or salmon. Less than 10% of the survey's 1,931 respondents had ever bought mackerel and only 3% did so regularly. As a result of this trend many UK fishmongers during the 1970s did not display or even stock mackerel.[7]
Mercury
There is a large variation in the mercury levels found in mackerel. These levels differ markedly for different species, and even for the same species in different locations; however, the strongest positive correlation seems to be connected to the species' size (the larger species being higher on the food chain).[8] According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, king mackerel is one of four fishes, along with swordfish, shark, and tilefish, that children and pregnant women should avoid due to high levels of methylmercury found in these fish and the consequent risk of mercury poisoning.[9][10]
Species | Mean ppm | Comments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tilefish | 1.450 | Gulf of Mexico | |||||
Swordfish | 0.995 | ||||||
Shark | 0.979 | ||||||
King mackerel | 0.730 | ||||||
Bigeye tuna | 0.689 | Fresh/frozen | |||||
Atlantic Spanish mackerel | 0.454 | Gulf of Mexico | |||||
Spanish mackerel | 0.182 | South Atlantic | |||||
Chub mackerel | 0.088 | Pacific | |||||
Herring | 0.084 | ||||||
Flatfish * | 0.056 | Flounder, plaice and sole | |||||
Atlantic mackerel | 0.050 | ||||||
Catfish | 0.025 | ||||||
Salmon * | 0.022 | Fresh/frozen | |||||
Sardine | 0.013 | ||||||
Tilapia * | 0.013 | ||||||
* indicates methylmercury only was analyzed (all other results are for total mercury) |
Gallery
References
Citations
- Croker, Richard Symonds (1933). The California mackerel fishery. Division of Fish and Game of California. pp. 9–10.
- Jersey Seafood Nutrition and Health, State of New Jersey Department of Agriculture, archived from the original on 2017-07-01, retrieved 2012-04-06
- "Scombrotoxin (Histamine)". Food Safety Watch. November 2007. Archived from the original on 2010-12-09.
- Croker (1933), pages 104–105
- Clapham JH, Postan MM and Rich EE (1941) The Cambridge economic history of Europe CUP Archive, pp. 166–168. ISBN 978-0-521-08710-0.
- Itou, K; Kobayashi, S; Ooizmi, T; Akahane, Y (2006). "Changes of proximate composition and extractive components in narezushi, a fermented mackerel product, during processing". Fisheries Science. 72 (6): 1269–1276. doi:10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01285.x. S2CID 24004124.
- McFarlane, Andrew (2010-08-24). "Why is Britain braced for a mackerel war?". BBC News. Retrieved 2022-08-02.
- Storelli MM, Barone G, Piscitelli G, Marcotrigiano GO (2007). "Mercury in fish: concentration vs. fish size and estimates of mercury intake" (PDF). Food Addit Contam. 24 (12): 1353–7. doi:10.1080/02652030701387197. PMID 17852384. S2CID 30973040.
- FDA. "Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2010)". Food and Drug Administration. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2011-09-14.
- Natural Resources Defense Council. "Protect Yourself and Your Family". Archived from the original on 2017-11-06. Retrieved 2019-04-18.
- The mercury levels in the table, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from: Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990–2010) U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Accessed 8 January 2012.
Sources
- Keay JN (2001) Handling and processing mackerel Torry advisory note 66.