Gays Mills, Wisconsin

Flood damage in 2010

Relocation beginning in mid-2010

Almost 60 homes were substantially damaged by flooding on the Kickapoo River in 2007 and 2008.[7] In 2008, a meeting was held to discuss moving the village to higher ground because of repeated flooding, which damaged the local economy.[8] In October 2008, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) released a 72-page report asking residents and businesses to relocate from the Kickapoo River flood plain.[7] Relocation is estimated to cost $1.7 million to purchase 30 acres (120,000 m²) 1-mile (1.6 km) north of the existing location.[7] About 150 of the village's 230 houses lie in the flood plain.[7] As of October 2008, village leaders were considering what course to take.[7]

In March 2010, a grant of $4.31 million was awarded by the Economic Development Administration to the Village of Gays Mills and the Redevelopment Authority of Gays Mills to develop a strategy for relocating the Village’s commercial district outside of the floodplain. Archived 2010-03-28 at the Wayback Machine

In September 2016, July 2017, and August 2018 Gays Mills was once again hit by flooding.

In July 1951, Wilma Gander, Chief Operator at the Utica Farmers Telephone Company, stayed at the switchboard for 21 hours alerting residents as the Kickapoo River flooded. In 1952, she received The Theodore H. Vail Medal, awarded to telephone employees “in recognition of unusual acts or services."

As of the census[3] of 2010, there were 491 people, 226 households, and 132 families residing in the village. The population density was 100.8 inhabitants per square mile (38.9/km²). There were 270 housing units at an average density of 55.4 per square mile (21.4/km²). The racial makeup of the village was 97.1% White, 1.4% African American, 0.2% Native American, and 1.2% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.2% of the population.

There were 226 households, of which 25.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 40.3% were married couples living together, 12.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.8% had a male householder with no wife present, and 41.6% were non-families. 38.5% of all households were made up of individuals, and 18.6% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.17 and the average family size was 2.88.

The median age in the village was 47.5 years. 23.8% of residents were under the age of 18; 5.6% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 18.1% were from 25 to 44; 32.4% were from 45 to 64; and 20.2% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the village was 45.8% male and 54.2% female.

As of the census[5] of 2000, there were 625 people, 261 households, and 169 families residing in the village. The population density was 136.0 people per square mile (52.5/km²). There were 289 housing units at an average density of 62.9 per square mile (24.3/km²). The racial makeup of the village was 99.68% White, 0.16% African American and 0.16% Asian. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.48% of the population.

There were 261 households, out of which 32.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 50.6% were married couples living together, 11.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 35.2% were non-families. 32.2% of all households were made up of individuals, and 19.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.39 and the average family size was 3.04.

In the village, the population was spread out, with 27.0% under the age of 18, 6.4% from 18 to 24, 25.1% from 25 to 44, 23.0% from 45 to 64, and 18.4% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 40 years. For every 100 females, there were 82.7 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 79.5 males.

The median income for a household in the village was $29,250, and the median income for a family was $36,607. Males had a median income of $32,875 versus $18,295 for females. The per capita income for the village was $17,786. About 11.2% of families and 15.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 16.0% of those under age 18 and 13.2% of those age 65 or over.