Serum-ascites albumin gradient
The serum-ascites albumin gradient or gap (SAAG) is a calculation used in medicine to help determine the cause of ascites.[1] The SAAG may be a better discriminant than the older method of classifying ascites fluid as a transudate versus exudate.[2]
BMP/ELECTROLYTES: | |||
Na+ = 140 | Cl− = 100 | BUN = 20 | / Glu = 150 \ |
K+ = 4 | CO2 = 22 | PCr = 1.0 | |
ARTERIAL BLOOD GAS: | |||
HCO3− = 24 | paCO2 = 40 | paO2 = 95 | pH = 7.40 |
ALVEOLAR GAS: | |||
pACO2 = 36 | pAO2 = 105 | A-a g = 10 | |
OTHER: | |||
Ca = 9.5 | Mg2+ = 2.0 | PO4 = 1 | |
CK = 55 | BE = −0.36 | AG = 16 | |
SERUM OSMOLARITY/RENAL: | |||
PMO = 300 | PCO = 295 | POG = 5 | BUN:Cr = 20 |
URINALYSIS: | |||
UNa+ = 80 | UCl− = 100 | UAG = 5 | FENa = 0.95 |
UK+ = 25 | USG = 1.01 | UCr = 60 | UO = 800 |
PROTEIN/GI/LIVER FUNCTION TESTS: | |||
LDH = 100 | TP = 7.6 | AST = 25 | TBIL = 0.7 |
ALP = 71 | Alb = 4.0 | ALT = 40 | BC = 0.5 |
AST/ALT = 0.6 | BU = 0.2 | ||
AF alb = 3.0 | SAAG = 1.0 | SOG = 60 | |
CSF: | |||
CSF alb = 30 | CSF glu = 60 | CSF/S alb = 7.5 | CSF/S glu = 0.6 |
The formula is as follows:
Ideally, the two values should be measured at the same time.
This phenomenon is the result of Starling's forces between the fluid of the circulatory system and ascitic fluid. Under normal circumstances the SAAG is < 1.1 because serum oncotic pressure (pulling fluid back into circulation) is exactly counterbalanced by the serum hydrostatic pressure (which pushes fluid out of the circulatory system). This balance is disturbed in certain diseases (such as the Budd–Chiari syndrome, heart failure, or liver cirrhosis) that increase the hydrostatic pressure in the circulatory system. The increase in hydrostatic pressure causes more fluid to leave the circulation into the peritoneal space (ascites). The SAAG subsequently increases because there is more free fluid leaving the circulation, concentrating the serum albumin. The albumin does not move across membrane spaces easily because it is a large molecule. A rare cause of ascites, with elevated SAAG, and without change in hydrostatic/osmotic pressure is urinary bladder rupture with leakage of urine into the peritoneal space.
Differential
High gradient
A high gradient (> 1.1 g/dL, >11 g/L) indicates the ascites is due to portal hypertension, either liver related or non-liver related, with approximately 97% accuracy.[2] This is due to increased hydrostatic pressure within the blood vessels of the hepatic portal system, which in turn forces water into the peritoneal cavity but leaves proteins such as albumin within the vasculature.
Important causes of high SAAG ascites (> 1.1 g/dL, >11 g/L) include: cirrhosis of the liver, heart failure, Budd–Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis, and idiopathic portal fibrosis.[3]
Low gradient
A low gradient (< 1.1 g/dL, <11 g/L) indicates causes of ascites not associated with increased portal pressure such as: tuberculosis, pancreatitis, infections, serositis, various types of peritoneal cancers (peritoneal carcinomatosis) and pulmonary infarcts.
SAAG | |||
---|---|---|---|
<1.1 g/dL | >1.1 g/dL | ||
Total Protein | <2.5 g/dL | Tuberculous Peritonitis, Nephrotic syndrome | Cirrhosis, Budd-Chiari (late) |
>2.5 g/dL | Cancer, Tuberculosis, Chylous ascites, Pancreatitis | Right HF, Budd-Chiari (early), veno-occlusive disease | |
References
- Wong CL, Holroyd-Leduc J, Thorpe KE, Straus SE (March 2008). "Does this patient have bacterial peritonitis or portal hypertension? How do I perform a paracentesis and analyze the results?". JAMA. 299 (10): 1166–78. doi:10.1001/jama.299.10.1166. PMID 18334692.
- Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA, McHutchison JG (August 1992). "The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites". Annals of Internal Medicine. 117 (3): 215–20. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-3-215. PMID 1616215. S2CID 24317271.
- Ginès, Pere; Cárdenas, Andrés; Arroyo, Vicente; Rodés, Juan (15 April 2004). "Management of Cirrhosis and Ascites". New England Journal of Medicine. 350 (16): 1646–1654. doi:10.1056/NEJMra035021. PMID 15084697.