< Handbook of Management Scales

Relational identification (alpha = 0.84, 0.82)

Description

Based on different field samples, new measurements are developed for relational identification and collective identification, as two types of group identification (= employee identification developed in organizational workgroups).

Definition

When people’s experience within a workgroup plays an important role in shaping their self-concept, they develop identification with the workgroup (= group identification).

Relational identification refers to the extent to which one includes the connections and role relationships with group members in one’s self-concept.

Items

I feel strongly identified with this workgroup because ...

  • I frequently participate in the social events organized by this group. (0.73)
  • I share mutual respect with other members. (0.71)
  • I attend social occasions with other members on a regular basis. (0.68)
  • I coordinate my own work well with other members. (0.68)
  • I maintain a straightforward work relationship with other members. (0.68)
  • I communicate a lot with other members outside work. (0.67)
  • Other members are considerate of my non-work-related needs. (0.64)

Source

Comments

Strictly speaking, the word "because" in the introductory half-sentence makes the measurement of the items formative rather than reflective; this half-sentence might thus be re-worded in future studies. The mean of the scale was relatively large (study 1: 5.15, study 2: 5.47); given that a 7-point scale was used and the "ideal" mean of such a scale would be 4, words like "very" or "always" might be included in future studies to shift the mean towards this ideal value.

This article is issued from Wikibooks. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.