United States v. Pace

United States v. Pace, 955 F.2d 270 (5th Cir. 1992),[1] cert. denied, 502 U.S. 883 (1992) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the scope of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

United States v. Pace
Court	United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Full case name	United States of America v. Charles D. Pace
Decided	February 24, 1992
Citation(s)	955 F.2d 270
Case history
Subsequent history	Cert. denied, 502 U.S. 883 (1992)
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting	Henry Anthony Politz, Carolyn Dineen King, Samuel D. Johnson Jr.
Case opinions
Majority	King, joined by a unanimous court
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

Acting on a tip, Texas investigators, entered onto the defendant's property in Travis County and peeked through a hole in a barn where they discovered marijuana being cultivated. With this information the officers gained a search warrant, which they used to search the property. The defendant was eventually arrested, tried and convicted for possession with intent to distribute. The defendant challenged on Fourth Amendment grounds, claiming that the barn was inside the "curtilage" of his home. The court found that it was not and that the search was legal pursuant to the "open fields" doctrine. The court held that the search was constitutional and that the barn was not within the curtilage of the appellant's home because the barn was located a significant distance from the house, was separated from the house by an interior fence, was not being used for activities associated with the intimacies of home life, and was readily visible from the surrounding area.[1]