Stressor

A stressor is a chemical or biological agent, environmental condition, external stimulus or an event seen as causing stress to an organism.[1] Psychologically speaking, a stressor can be events or environments that individuals might consider demanding, challenging, and/or threatening individual safety.[2]

Not to be confused with Stresser.

Events or objects that may trigger a stress response may include:

Stressors can cause physical, chemical and mental responses internally. Physical stressors produce mechanical stresses on skin, bones, ligaments, tendons, muscles and nerves that cause tissue deformation and (in extreme cases) tissue failure. Chemical stresses also produce biomechanical responses associated with metabolism and tissue repair. Physical stressors may produce pain and impair work performance. Chronic pain and impairment requiring medical attention may result from extreme physical stressors or if there is not sufficient recovery time between successive exposures.[4][5] A recent study shows that physical office clutter could be an example of physical stressors in a workplace setting.[3]

Stressors may also affect mental function and performance. One possible mechanism involves stimulation of the hypothalamus, CRF (corticotropin release factor) -> pituitary gland releases ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) -> adrenal cortex secretes various stress hormones (e.g., cortisol) -> stress hormones (30 varieties) travel in the blood stream to relevant organs, e.g., glands, heart, intestines -> flight-or-fight response. Between this flow there is an alternate path that can be taken after the stressor is transferred to the hypothalamus, which leads to the sympathetic nervous system; after which the adrenal medulla secretes epinephrine.[6] Mental and social stressors may affect behavior and how individuals respond to physical and chemical stressors.

Life requires everyone to make sudden and planned adjustments to meet its demands, but greater demands come with a greater adjustment and possibly more stress. Determining the impact of these various stressors allow individuals to decide the relationship between the types of stressors and the degree of distress. Identifying the stressor-stress relationship must involve quantifying the impact of life demands and all stress spurred by it. To do this, the individual will use subjective measures and objective measures, depending on the situation. Individuals determine the degree of adjustment themselves in subjective measures, but a degree of adjustment will be or has already been assigned to the individual in an objective measure. The degrees of adjustment are measured by life change units, where one unit equals a degree of adjustment necessary to cope with the life change. The practice of measuring life change units led to the creation of many scales composed of these units that are tailored to certain life events or situations, such as social readjustment and college students.[7][8] Once the relationship between the stressor (event) and the stress, the individual can then begin to focus on the stress magnitude and the stress itself. For life events with a lower magnitude of impact, the ability to cope and adjust may not be very complex and relatively brief. But for others, life events with high magnitudes can impact lives in many ways for an extended amount of time. The various stressors listed above can all have events or stressors that range anywhere from minor to traumatic. Traumatic events involve very debilitating stressors, and oftentimes these stressors are uncontrollable. Traumatic events can deplete an individual's coping resources to an extent where the individual may develop acute stress disorder or even post-traumatic stress disorder. Acute stress disorder is a psychological disorder where a traumatic event that is life-threatening or threatens an injury causes a reaction of fear and helplessness lasting up to four weeks. Post-traumatic stress disorder has symptoms of lasting longer than one month, and the first symptom is a history of experiencing a traumatic event followed with a reaction of intense fear, helplessness, or horror. The traumatic event is persistently re-experienced in one of these ways: recurrent distressing recollections, dreams, flashbacks, illusions, or a sense of reliving the experience, and distress or physical arousal by reminders of this event. The individual suffers from a persistent avoidance of reminders of the event. People who have been abused, victimized, or terrorized are often more susceptible to stress disorders.[9][10] No matter the magnitude of the stressor and stress, most stressor-stress relationships can be evaluated and determined - either by the individual or a by psychologist. Without proper attention, stress can produce severe effects on mental health and the immune system, which can eventually lead to effects on the physical body. Therapeutic measures are often taken to help replenish and rebuild the individual's coping resources while simultaneously aiding the individual in dealing with the current stressor.

Psychological stressors

Stressors occur when an individual is unable to cope with the demands of their environment (such as crippling debt with no clear path to resolving it).[2] Generally, stressors take many forms, such as: traumatic events, life demands, sudden medical emergencies, and daily inconveniences, to name a few. There are also a variety of characteristics that a stressor may possess (different durations, intensity, predictability, and controllability).[2]

Measuring psychological stress

Due to the wide impact and the far-reaching consequences of psychological stressors (especially their profound effects on mental well-being), it is particularly important to devise tools to measure such stressors. Two common psychological stress tests include the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)[11] devised by American psychologist Sheldon Cohen, and the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)[12] or the Holmes-Rahe Stress Scale. While the PSS is a traditional Likert scale, the SRRS assigns specific predefined numerical values to stressors.

Biological responses to stressors

Traumatic events or any type of shock to the body can cause an acute stress response disorder (ASD). The extent to which one experiences ASD depends on the extent of the shock. If the shock was pushed past a certain extreme after a particular period in time ASD can develop into what is commonly known as Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[13] There are two ways that the body responds biologically in order to reduce the amount of stress an individual is experiencing. One thing that the body does to combat stressors is to create stress hormones, which in turn create energy reservoirs that are there in case a stressful event were to occur. The second way our biological components respond is through an individual's cells. Depending on the situation our cells obtain more energy in order to combat any negative stressor and any other activity those cells are involved in seize.[14]

Predictability and controllability

When individuals are informed about events before they occur, the magnitude of the stressor is less than when compared to individuals who were not informed of the stressor.[15] For example, an individual would prefer to know when they have a deadline ahead of time in order to prepare for it in advance, rather than find out about the deadline the day of. In knowing that there is a deadline ahead of time, the intensity of the stressor is smaller for the individual, as opposed to the magnitude of intensity for the other unfortunate individual who found out about the deadline the day of. When this was tested, psychologists found that when given the choice, individuals had a preference for the predictable stressors, rather than the unpredictable stressors.[16]

Additionally, the degree to which the stressor can be controlled plays a variable in how the individual perceives stress.[2] Research has found that if an individual is able to take some control over the stressor, then the level of stress will be decreased. During this study, it was found that the individuals become increasingly anxious and distressed if they were unable to control their environment.[17] As an example, imagine an individual who detests baths in the Middle Ages, taking a bath. If the individual was forced to take the bath with no control over the temperature of the bath (one of the variables), then their anxiety and stress levels would be higher than if the individual was given some control over the environment (such as being able to control the temperature of the water).

Based on these two principles (predictability and control), there are two hypotheses that attempt to account for these preferences; the preparatory response hypothesis and safety hypothesis attempt to accommodate these preferences.

Preparatory response hypothesis

The idea behind this hypothesis is that an organism can better prepare for an event if they are informed beforehand, as this allows them to prepare for it (biologically).[2] In biologically preparing for this event beforehand, the individual is able to better decrease the event's aversiveness.[18] In knowing when a potential stressor will occur (such as an exam), the individual could, in theory, prepare for it in advance, thus decreasing the stress that may result from that event.

Safety hypothesis

In this hypothesis, there are two time periods, one in which is deemed safe (where there is no stressor), and one which is deemed unsafe (in which the stressor is present).[19] This is similar to procrastination and cramming; during the safe intervals (weeks before an exam) the individual is relaxed and not anxious, and during the unsafe intervals (the day or night before the exam) the individual most likely experiences anxiety.[2]

See also

References
  1. Sato, Tadatoshi; Yamamoto, Hironori; Sawada, Naoki; Nashiki, Kunitaka; Tsuji, Mitsuyoshi; o, Kazusa; Kume, Hisae; Sasaki, Hajime; Arai, Hidekazu; Nikawa, Takeshi; Taketani, Yutaka; Takeda, Eiji (October 2006). "Restraint stress alters the duodenal expression of genes important for lipid metabolism in rat". Toxicology. 227 (3): 248–261. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2006.08.009. PMID 16962226.
  2. Deckers, Lambert (2018). Motivation Biological, Psychological, and Environmental. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 208-212. ISBN 978-1-138-03632-1.
  3. Roster, Catherine A.; Ferrari, Joseph R. (2019-01-13). "Does Work Stress Lead to Office Clutter, and How? Mediating Influences of Emotional Exhaustion and Indecision". Environment and Behavior. 52 (9): 923–944. doi:10.1177/0013916518823041. ISSN 0013-9165. S2CID 149971077.
  4. National Research Council (2001). Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace: Low Back and Upper Extremities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Academy Press. pp. 512. ISBN 0-309-07284-0.
  5. National Research Council (199). Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Report, Workshop Summary, and Workshop Papers. National Academy Press. p. 240. ISBN 0-309-06397-3.
  6. "What is Stress?". S-Cool.
  7. Compare: Deckers, Lambert (2005). Motivation: Biological, Psychological, and Environmental (5 ed.). New York: Routledge (published 2018). ISBN 9781351713887. Retrieved 4 March 2020. The life change measures were associated with a declining GPA: as life change scores went up, GPA went down. [...] In addition, life changes in recreation, in work responsibilities, and in changing to a new line of work had a greater impact on students with lower GPAs.
  8. Deckers Page 215
  9. Deckers Page 216
  10. Nevid, Spencer, and Greene, et al., 2014
  11. Cohen, Sheldon; Kamarck, Tom; Mermelstein, Robin (1983). "A Global Measure of Perceived Stress". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 24 (4): 385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404. ISSN 0022-1465. JSTOR 2136404. PMID 6668417. S2CID 21357701.
  12. Holmes, Thomas H.; Rahe, Richard H. (August 1967). "The social readjustment rating scale". Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 11 (2): 213–218. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4. ISSN 0022-3999. PMID 6059863.
  13. Bryant, A; Richard (2017). "Acute stress disorder". Current Opinion in Psychology. 14: 127–131. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.01.005. PMID 28813311. S2CID 45053930.
  14. Schneiderman, N; Ironson, G; Siegel, SD (2005). "Stress and health: psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants". Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 1: 607–28. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141. PMC 2568977. PMID 17716101.
  15. Grillon, C.; Baas, J. P.; Lissen, S.; Smith, K.; Milstein, J. (2004). "Anxious responses to predictable and unpredictable aversive events". Behavioral Neuroscience. 118 (5): 916–924. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.916. PMID 15506874. S2CID 12907188.
  16. Lejuez, C. W.; Eifert, G. H.; Zvolensky, M. J.; Richards, J. B. (2000). "Preference between onset predictable and unpredictable administrations of 20 percent carbon-dioxide-enriched air: Implications for better understanding the etiology and treatment of panic disorder". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 6 (4): 349–358. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.6.4.349. PMID 11218343.
  17. Zvolensky, M. J.; Eifert, G. H.; Lejuez, C. W. (2001). "Offset control during recurrent 20 percent carbon-dioxide- enriched air induction: Relation to individual difference variables". Emotion. 1 (2): 148–165. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.2.148. PMID 12899194.
  18. Perkins, C. C. (1955). "The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses". Psychological Review. 62 (5): 341–348. doi:10.1037/h0040520. PMID 13254972.
  19. Seligman, M. E. P. (1971). "Phobias and preparedness". Behavior Therapy. 2 (3): 207–320. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(71)80064-3.

Further reading
  • National Research Council. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Report, Workshop Summary, and Workshop Papers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.