Social grooming

Social grooming is a behavior in which social animals, including humans, clean or maintain one another's body or appearance. A related term, allogrooming, indicates social grooming between members of the same species. Grooming is a major social activity, and a means by which animals who live in close proximity may bond and reinforce social structures, family links, and build companionships. Social grooming is also used as a means of conflict resolution, maternal behavior and reconciliation in some species.[1][2] Mutual grooming typically describes the act of grooming between two individuals, often as a part of social grooming, pair bonding, or a precoital activity.

This article is about the social activity. For other uses, see Groom (disambiguation).

An adult olive baboon grooms a juvenile.

Evolutionary advantages

There are a variety of proposed mechanisms by which social grooming behavior has been hypothesized to increase fitness. These evolutionary advantages may come in the form of health benefits including reduced disease transmission and reduced stress levels, maintaining social structure, and direct improvement of fitness as a measure of survival.

Health benefits

It is often argued as to whether the overarching importance of social grooming is to boost an organism's health and hygiene or whether the social side of social grooming plays an equally or more important role. Traditionally, it is thought that the primary function of social grooming is the upkeep of an animal's hygiene. Evidence to support this statement involves the fact that all grooming concentrates on body parts that are inaccessible by autogrooming and that the amount of time spent allogrooming regions did not vary significantly even if the body part had a more important social or communicatory function.[3]

Social grooming behaviour has been shown to elicit an array of health benefits in a variety of species. For example, group member connection has the potential to mitigate the potentially harmful effects of stressors. In macaques, social grooming has been proven to reduce heart rate.[4] Social affiliation during a mild stressor was shown to correlate with lower levels of mammary tumor development and longer lifespan in rats, while lack of this affiliation was demonstrated to be a major risk factor.[5] On the other hand, it could be argued that the hygienic aspect to allogrooming does not play an as important role as the social aspect to it. Observational studies performed on 44 different primate species suggest that the number of times a species allogrooms, on average, correlates with its group size rather than with its body size.[6] If allogrooming was purely required from a hygienic standpoint, then the larger an animal, the more and more often it would be groomed by members of its group. However, we see instead that when group size increases, members ensure that they spend an appropriate amount of time grooming everyone. Hence, the fact that animals, particularly primates here, groom each other more frequently than necessary from a hygienic standpoint suggests that the social angle of allogrooming plays an equally, if not more, important role. Another point of evidence for the importance of the social aspect is that in comparison to how much and how a primate grooms itself (autogrooming), allogrooming involved longer periods of time and different techniques, some of which have connotations of being affectionate gestures.[7]

Creation and maintenance of social bonds
North American beaver family, with the center pair grooming one another

One of the most critical functions of social grooming is to establish social networks and relationships. In many species, individuals form close social connections dubbed "friendships"[8] due to long durations spent together doing activities. In primates especially, grooming is known to have major social significance and function in the formation and maintenance of these friendships.[9] Studies performed on rhesus macaques showed that fMRI scans of the monkeys' brains lit up more significantly at the perirhinial cortex (associated with recognition and memory) and the temporal pole (associated with social and emotional processing/analysis) when the monkeys were shown pictures of their friends' faces as compared to less familiar faces.[10] Hence, primates recognize familiar and well-liked individuals ('friends') and spend more time grooming them as compared to less favoured partners.[11] In species with a more tolerant social style, such as Barbary macaques, it is seen that females choose their grooming mates based on whom they know better rather than on social rank.[11] In addition to primates, animals such as deer, cows, horses, vole, mice, meerkats, coati, lions, birds, bats also form social bonds through grooming behaviour.[12]

Indian short-nosed fruit bats in a tight-knit cluster

Social grooming may also serve to establish and recognize mates or amorous partners. For example, in short-nosed fruit bats, the females initiate grooming with the males just before flight at dusk.[13] The male and his close-knit female harem apply bodily secretions on each other, which could possibly allow them to recognize the female's reproductive status.[13] The 2016 study by Kumar et al.[13] chemically analyzed these secretions, revealing that they may be required in chemosensory mediated communication[14] and mate choice. Similarly, in the less aggressive herb-field mice species, males are observed to groom females for longer durations and even allow females to not reciprocate.[15] Since the mating demands of males are greater than those of offered by females, the females use social grooming as a method to choose mates and males use it to incite mating.

Finally, kin selection is not as important a factor as friendship or mate preference when choosing a grooming mate as previously thought.[16] In the 2018 Phelps et al. captive study on chimpanzees, it was seen that the animals remembered interactions that were 'successful' or 'unsuccessful' and used that as a basis to choose grooming mates; they chose grooming mates based on who would reciprocate rather than who would not.[16] More importantly, if the delay between two chimpanzees grooming each other is very little, then the chimpanzees tend to 'time match', i.e. the second groomer grooms the first for the same amount of time that he/she was groomed. This 'episodic memory' requires a demanding amount of cognitive function and emotional recognition, and has been tested experimentally with respect to food preferences,[17] where apes chose between tasty perishable and non-tasty non-perishable food at shorter and longer delays respectively after trying the food. Hence, apes can distinguish between different events that occurred at different times.

Enforcing hierarchy and social structure

In general, social grooming is an activity that is directed up hierarchy, i.e. a lower ranking individual grooms a higher ranking individual in the group. In meerkats, social grooming has been shown to carry the role of maintaining relationships that increase fitness.[18] In this system, researchers have observed that dominant males receive more grooming while grooming others less, thereby indicating that less dominant males groom more dominant individuals to maintain relationships. In a study conducted on rhesus monkeys, it was seen that more dominant group members were 'stroked' more than they were 'picked at' when getting groomed, as compared to lower ranking group members.[7] From a utilitarian standpoint, stroking is a less effective technique for grooming than picking, but it is construed as being a more affectionate gesture. Hence, grooming a higher ranking individual could be conducted in order to placate a potential aggressor and reduce tension.[7] Moreover, individuals closer in rank tend to groom each other more reciprocally than individuals further apart in rank.

Grooming networks in black crested gibbons have been proven to contribute greater social cohesion and stability.[19] Groups of gibbons with more stable social networks formed grooming networks that were significantly more complex, while groups with low stability networks formed far fewer grooming pairs.

Interchange of favours

Grooming is often offered by an individual in exchange for a certain behavioural response or action. Social grooming is critical for vampire bats especially, since it is necessary for them to maintain food-sharing relationships in order to sustain their food regurgitation sharing behaviour.[20] In Tibetan macaques, infants are seen as a valuable commodity that can be exchanged for favours; mothers allow non-mothers to handle their infants for short durations in exchange for being groomed.[21] Tibetan macaques measure and perceive the value of the infants by noting the relative ratio of infants in the group; as the number of infants increase, their 'value' decreases and the amount of grooming in exchange for infant-handling performed by non-mothers for mothers decreases.

In male bonobos, it is suggested that grooming is exchanged in favour of some emotional component because grooming familiar individuals involves larger time differences (i.e. the duration for which each individual grooms the other is not equal) and reduced reciprocity (i.e. likelihood of grooming the other is unpredictable).[22] Hence, the presence of some sort of social bond between individuals results in greater 'generosity' and tolerance between them.

Direct fitness consequences

Social grooming relationships have been proven to provide direct fitness benefits to a variety of species. In particular, grooming in yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) has been studied extensively, with numerous studies showing an increase in fitness as a result of social bonds formed through social grooming behavior. One such study, which collected 16 years of behavioral data on wild baboons, highlights the effects that sociality has on infant survival.[23] A positive relationship is established between infant survival to one year and a composite sociality index, a measure of sociality based on proximity and social grooming. Evidence has also been provided for the effect of sociality on adult survival in wild baboons.[24] Direct correlations between measures of social connectedness (which focuses on social grooming) and median survival time for both female and male baboons were modeled.

The relationship between median survival time and social connectedness in female baboons[24]

Social bonds established by grooming may provide an adaptive advantage in the form of conflict resolution and protection from aggression. In wild savannah baboons, social affiliations are shown to augment fitness by increasing tolerance from more dominant group members[1] and increasing the chance of obtaining aid from conspecifics during instances of within-group contest interactions.[25] In the yellow baboon, adult females form relationships with their kin, who offer support during times of violent conflict within social groups.[26] In Barbary macaques, social grooming results in the formation of crucial relationships among partners. These social relationships serve to aid cooperation and facilitate protection against combative groups composed of other males, which can oftentimes cause physical harm.[27] Furthermore, social relationships have also been proven to decrease risk of infanticide in several primates.[28]

Altruism

Altruism, in the biological sense, refers to a behavior performed by an individual that increases the fitness of another individual while decreasing the fitness of the one performing the behavior.[29] This differs from the philosophical concept of altruism which requires the conscious intention of helping another. As a behavior, altruism is not evaluated in moral terms, but rather as a consequence of an action for reproductive fitness.[30] It is often questioned why the behavior persists if it is costly to the one performing it, however, Charles Darwin proposed group selection as the mechanism behind the clear advantages of altruism.[31]

Social grooming is considered a behavior of facultative altruism- the behavior itself is a temporary loss of direct fitness (with potential for indirect fitness gain), followed by personal reproduction.[32] This tradeoff has been compared to the Prisoner's Dilemma model, and out of this comparison came Robert Trivers reciprocal altruism theory under the title "tit-for-tat".[33] In conjunction with altruism, kin selection bears an emphasis on favoring the reproductive success of an organism's relatives, even at a cost to the organism's own survival and reproduction.[34] Because of this, kin selection is an instance of inclusive fitness, which combines the number of offspring produced with the number an individual can ensure the production of by supporting others, such as siblings.

Hamilton's rule

Developed by W.D. Hamilton, this rule governs the idea that kin selection causes genes to increase in frequency when the genetic relatedness (r) of a recipient to an actor multiplied by the benefit to the recipient (B) is greater than the reproductive cost to the actor (C).[35] Thus, it is advantageous for an individual to partake in altruistic behaviors, such as social grooming, so long as the individual receiving the benefits of the behavior is related to the one providing the behavior.[36]

Use as a commodity

It was questioned whether some animals are instead using altruistic behaviors as a market strategy to trade for something desirable. In olive baboons, Papio anubis, it has been found that individuals perform altruistic behaviors as a form of trade in which a behavior is provided in exchange for benefits, such as reduced aggression.[37] The grooming was evenly balanced across multiple bouts rather than single bouts, suggesting that females are not constrained to complete exchanges with single transactions and use social grooming to solidify long-term relationships with those in their social group.[37]

In addition, white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) males were more attentive to social grooming during estrus of the females in their group.[38] Though the behavior of social grooming itself was not beneficial to the one providing the service, the opportunity to mate and subsequent fertilization increases the reproductive fitness of those participating in the behavior. This study was also successful in finding that social grooming performance cycled with that of the females ovarian cycle,[38] similar to a courting behavior.

Ontogeny of social grooming

General learning and reciprocation of allogrooming

In most cases, allogrooming is an action that is learned from an individual's mother.[39] Infants are groomed by their mothers and mimic these actions on each other and the mother as juveniles. This action is reciprocated on other group members (non-mother or of a different rank) more often once the individual is a fully developed adult and can follow normal grooming patterns.[39]

Sex based differences in learning

Male and female members of a species may differ in learning how, when and whom to groom. In stump-tailed macaques, infant females mimic their mothers' actions by grooming their mothers more often than their males counterparts do and by grooming the same group members that their mothers groom.[40] This mimicry is suggested to indicate identification-based observational learning in infant stump-tailed macaques, and the daughters' penchants for maternal mimicry and kin-biased grooming versus the sons' penchants for rank-biased grooming falls in line with their social roles in groups, where adult males require alliances in order to gain and maintain rank.[40]

Tool usage

In nearly all instances of social grooming, individuals use their own body parts, such as hands, teeth or tongue, to groom a group member or infant. It is very rare to observe instances of tool usage in social grooming in non-human animals; however, a few such instances have been observed in primates. In a 1981 observational study of Japanese macaques at Bucknell University, a mother macaque was seen to choose a stone after observing several stones on the ground and then use this stone to groom her infant.[41] It was hypothesized that the stone was used as a distractor for the infant so that the mother could adequately clean her infant while his attention was occupied elsewhere. This was supported by the fact that the infant picked up the stone once the mother dropped it and allowed her to groom him while he played with it. This action was seen in a few other members in the colony, but was not seen throughout the species at all. At another instance, a female chimpanzee at the Delta Regional Primate Research Center created a 'toothbrush' by stripping a twig of its leaves and used this toothbrush to groom her infant over several instances.[42] However, both examples concern tool use in primates, which is already widely studied and scientifically backed.[43] The wide working memory capacities and causal understanding capabilities of primates permit them to fashion and utilize tools far more extensively than other non-human animals.[44] Apart from physical and mental constraints, perhaps a reason allogrooming animals do not use tools is because a major purpose of social grooming is social bonding and involves emotional exchanges, much of which is conveyed by touch.

Mutual grooming

Many animals groom each other in the form of stroking, scratching, and massaging. This activity often serves to remove foreign material from the body to promote the communal success of these socially active animals. There exists a wide array of socially grooming animals throughout the kingdom, including primates, insects,[45] birds,[46] and bats.[47] While thorough research has still yet to be engaged, much has been learned about social grooming in non-human animals via the study of primates. The driving force behind mammal social grooming is primarily believed to be rooted in adaptation to consolatory behavior as well as utilitarian purposes in the exchange of resources such as food, sex, and communal hygiene.[2][48][49][50]

Insects

In insects, grooming often involves the important role of removing foreign material from the body. The honey bee, for example, engages in social grooming by cleaning body parts that cannot be reached by the receiving bee. The receiving bee extends its wings perpendicular to its body while its wings, mouth parts, and antennae are cleaned in order to remove dust and pollen. This removal of dust and pollen allows for sharpening of olfactory senses in contributing to the overall well-being of the group.[45]

Bats

Recent studies have determined that vampire bats engage in social grooming much more than other types of bats to promote the well-being of the group. Facing higher levels of parasitic infection, vampire bats engage in cleaning one another as well as sharing food via regurgitation. This activity prevents ongoing infection while also promoting group success.[51]

Primates

Primates provide perhaps one of the best examples of mutual grooming due to the intensive research performed regarding their varying lifestyles, and the direct variation of means of social grooming across different species. Among primates, social grooming plays a significant role in animal consolation behavior whereby the primates engage in establishing and maintaining alliances through dominance hierarchies, pre-existing coalitions, and for reconciliation after conflicts. Primates groom socially in moments of boredom as well, and the act has been shown to reduce tension and stress.[52] This reduction in stress is often associated with observed periods of relaxed behavior, and primates have been known to fall asleep while receiving grooming.[53] Conflict among primates has been observed by researchers as increasing stress among the group, making mutual grooming very advantageous.[54]

There are benefits to initiating grooming. The one that starts the grooming will in return be groomed themselves, getting the benefit of being cleaned. Research has found that primates that are lower on the social ladder may initiate grooming with a higher ranked primate in order to increase their position.[55] Under times of higher conflict and competition, it has been found that this is less likely to occur. Researchers have suggested that primates may see a need to balance the uses of grooming, swapping between its use as a means to increase social standing and the use of grooming to keep oneself clean.[56]

Grooming in primates is not only utilized for alliance formation and maintenance, but to exchange resources such as communal food, sex, and hygiene. Wild baboons have been found to utilize social grooming as an activity to remove ticks and other insects from others. In this grooming, the body areas receiving significant attention appear to be the regions where the baboons themselves cannot reach. Grooming activity in these regions is used to remove parasites, dirt, dead skin, as well as tangled fur to help keep the animal's health in good condition despite an individual inability to reach and clean certain areas.[53]

Time primates spend grooming increases with group size, but too large of group sizes can lead to decreased group cohesion because time spent grooming is usually impacted by other factors. Consequently, some of these aspects that affect time spent grooming include ecological, phylogenetic, and life history. For example, the article states, "Cognitive constraints and predation pressure strongly affect group sizes and thereby have an indirect effect on primate grooming time".[57] By analyzing past data and studies done about this topic, the authors found that a primate group greater than 40 will face greater ecological problems and, thus, time spent during social grooming is affected.[57]

Recent studies regarding chimpanzees have determined the direct correlation of the release of oxytocin to consolatory behavior.[48] This behavior as well as release has been noted in primates such as the Vervet monkey, a primate species that actively engages in social grooming from early childhood to adulthood. Vervet monkey siblings often have conflict over grooming allocation by their mother, yet, grooming remains an activity that mediates tension and is low cost for alliance formation and maintenance. This grooming occurs both between the siblings as well as involving the mother.[49]

Recent studies regarding the crab-eating macaques have shown that males will groom females in order to procure sex. One study found that a female has a greater likelihood to engage in sexual activity with a male if he had recently groomed her, compared to males who had not groomed her.[58]

Birds
Main article: Preening (bird) § Allopreening

Birds engage in allopreening. Researchers believe that this practice builds pair bonds.[59] In 2010, researchers determined the existence of a form of social grooming as a consolation behavior within ravens via a form of bystander contact, whereby observer ravens would act to console a distressed victim via contact sitting, preening, as well as beak-to-beak touching.[60]

Horses

Horses engage in mutual grooming via the formation of 'pair bonds' where parasites and other contaminants on the surface of the body are actively removed. This removal of foreign material is primarily performed in hard-to-reach areas such as the neck via nibbling.[61]

Cattle

Allogrooming is a behavior commonly seen in many types of cattle, including dairy and beef breeds. The act of social licking can be seen specifically in heifers to initiate social dominance, emphasize companionship and improve hygiene of oneself or others. This behavior seen in cows may provide advantages including reduced parasite loads, social tension and competition at the feed bunk.[62] It is understood that social licking can provide long term benefits such as promoting positive emotions and a relaxed environment.[63]

Endocrine effects

Social grooming has shown to be correlated with changes in endocrine levels within individuals. Specifically, there is a large correlation between the brain's release of oxytocin and social grooming. Oxytocin is hypothesized to promote prosocial behaviors due to its positive emotional response when released.[64] Further, social grooming also releases beta-endorphins which promote physiological responses in stress reduction. These responses can occur from the production of hormones and endorphins, or through the growth or reduction in nerve structures. For example, in studies of suckling rats, rats who received warmth and touch when feeding had lower blood pressure levels than rats who did not receive any touch. This was found to be a result of an increased vagal nerve tone, meaning they had had higher parasympathetic nervous response and lower sympathetic nervous response to stimulus, resulting in a lower stress response.[65] Social grooming is a form of innocuous sensory activation. Innocuous sensory activation, characterized by non-aggressive contact, stimulates an entirely separate neural pathway from nocuous aggressive sensory activation.[66] Innocuous sensations are transmitted through the dorsal column-medial lemniscal system.

Oxytocin

Oxytocin is a peptide hormone known to help express social emotions such as altruism, which in turn provides a positive feedback mechanism for social behaviors.[64] For example, studies in vampire bats have shown that intranasal injections of oxytocin have increased the amount of allogrooming done by female bats.[47] The release of oxytocin, found to be stimulated by positive touch (such as allogrooming), positive smells and sounds, can have physiological benefits to the individual. Benefits can include: relaxation, healing, and digestion stimulation.[65] Further, reproductive benefits have been found such as studies in rats have shown that the release of oxytocin can increase male reproductive success. The role of oxytocin is important in maternal pair bonding, and is hypothesized to promote similar bonding in social groups as a result of positive feedback loops from social interactions.[67]

Beta-endorphins

Grooming stimulates the release of beta-endorphin, which is one physiological reason for why grooming appears to be relaxing.[68] Beta-endorphins are found in neurons in the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. Beta-endorphins are found to be opioid agonists. Opioids are molecules that act on receptors to promote feelings of relaxation, and reduce pain.[69] A study in monkeys shows the changes in opiate expression in the body, mirroring changes in beta-endorphin levels, influences desire for social grooming. In using opiate receptor blockades, which decrease the level of beta-endorphins, the monkeys responded with an increased desire to be groomed. In contrast, when the monkeys were given morphine, the desire to be groomed dropped significantly.[70] Beta- endorphins have been difficult to measure in animal species, differently from oxytocin which can be measured by sampling cerebrospinal fluid, and therefore have not been linked as strongly with social behaviors.[67]

Glucocorticoids receptors

Glucocorticoids are steroid hormones that are synthesized in the adrenal cortex and are a part of the group of corticosteroids. Glucocorticoids are involved in immune function, and are a part of the feedback system that reduces inflammation.[71] Further, glucocorticoids are involved in glucose metabolism. Studies in macaques have shown that increased social stress results in glucocorticoid resistance, further inhibiting immune function.[72] Macaques who participated in social grooming showed decreased levels of viral load, which points toward decreased levels of social stress resulting in increased immune function and glucocorticoid sensitivity. Additionally, an article published in 1997 concluded that an increase in maternal grooming resulted in a proportionate increase in Glucocorticoid receptors on target tissue in the neonatal rat.[73] In the study on neonatal rats, it was found that the receptor number was altered because of a change in both serotonin and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations. An increase in the number of receptors might influence the amount of negative feedback on corticosteroid secretion and prevent the undesirable side effects of an abnormal physiologic stress response.[74] Social grooming can change the number of glucocorticoid receptors, which can result in increased immune function.

Studies have also shown that male baboons who participate more in social grooming show lower basal cortisol concentrations.[75]

Faecal glucocorticoid (fGCs) is a hormone metabolite associated with stress that is seen to be present in lower levels in female baboons with stronger, well-established grooming networks.[76] When potentially infanticidal male baboons immigrate into a group, the females' fGC levels are seen to rise, indicative of higher stress; however, females with reliable and well-established grooming partners have less of a fGC rise than those with weaker grooming networks. Hence, the social support received from a 'friendship' aids baboons in stress management. Similarly, fGC levels are also seen to rise in females when a close 'friend' dies; however, these rising fGC levels are seen to decrease in females that form new grooming partners, replacing their deceased friends.

Opioids

Endogenous opioids are chemical molecules produced in the brains of organisms and serve to create feelings of relaxation, happiness and pain relief. In primates, laughter and social grooming trigger opioid release in the brain, which is thought to form and maintain social bonds.[77] In a study performed on rhesus monkeys, lactating females with 4- to 10-week-old infants were given low doses of naloxone, an opioid antagonist that blocks the opioid receptor and inhibits the effects of endogenous opioids.[78] In comparison to the control females, who were given saline solutions, the naloxone females groomed their infants and other members of their group less. The naloxone females were also observed to be less protective of their young, which is uncharacteristic of new mothers. This decline in social interactions upon naloxone injection suggests that opioid antagonists interfere with maternal involvement in social actions – here, social grooming. We could hypothesize therefore that higher levels of opioids in new rhesus mothers cause increased levels of social involvement and 'maternal' characteristics, aiding the development and learning of the newborn.

Criticism for studies quoted

Above all, the main criticism regarding studies concerning social grooming is that almost all of them focus on primates and a narrow range of species within primates themselves. This, therefore, does not give us a well-rounded idea of what the cognitive or behavioural basis for social grooming is, nor does it completely outline all the effects (benefits or costs) of it. Moreover, we may not have all the relevant data concerning social grooming even in a well-studied species.[11] Secondly, data for most species is derived based on the members of a single group. In primates, whose behaviour is highly flexible depending on the socio-environmental conditions, this poses as a particular challenge. Thirdly, most studies are observational and short-termed. Hence the direct link between social grooming and fitness or mate choice outcomes cannot be studied directly as in long-term direct or captive studies.

See also

References
  1. Henazi SP, Barrett L (January 1999). "The value of grooming to female primates". Primates; Journal of Primatology. 40 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1007/BF02557701. PMID 23179531. S2CID 34106634.
  2. Aureli F, Van Schaik CP, Van Hooff JA (1989). "Functional aspects of reconciliation among captive long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis)". American Journal of Primatology. 19 (1): 39–51. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350190105. PMID 31964021. S2CID 86673865.
  3. Barton, Robert (1 October 1985). "Grooming site preferences in primates and their functional implications". International Journal of Primatology. 6 (5): 519–532. doi:10.1007/BF02735574. S2CID 37114535.
  4. Aureli F, Waal FB (1 January 2000). Natural Conflict Resolution. University of California Press. pp. 193–224. ISBN 9780520223462.
  5. Yee JR, Cavigelli SA, Delgado B, McClintock MK (November 2008). "Reciprocal affiliation among adolescent rats during a mild group stressor predicts mammary tumors and lifespan". Psychosomatic Medicine. 70 (9): 1050–9. doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e31818425fb. PMC 5767077. PMID 18842748.
  6. Dunbar, Robin (1 January 1991). "Functional Significance of Social Grooming in Primates". Folia Primatologica. 57 (3): 121–131. doi:10.1159/000156574.
  7. Boccia, Maria (1 December 1983). "A functional analysis of social grooming patterns through direct comparison with self-grooming in rhesus monkeys". International Journal of Primatology. 4 (4): 399–418. doi:10.1007/BF02735602. S2CID 24431777.
  8. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (5 July 2011). "The evolutionary origins of friendship". Annual Review of Psychology. 63: 153–77. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100337. PMID 21740224.
  9. Schino G (1 August 2001). "Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis". Animal Behaviour. 62 (2): 265–271. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1750. S2CID 53145237.
  10. Woodward, Aylin. "Primate brains react differently to faces of friends and VIPs". New Scientist. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  11. Roubová, Veronika; Konečná, Martina; Šmilauer, Petr; Wallner, Bernard (10 February 2015). "Whom to Groom and for What? Patterns of Grooming in Female Barbary Macaques (Macaca sylvanus)". PLOS ONE. 10 (2): e0117298. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1017298R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117298. PMC 4323340. PMID 25668722.
  12. Carter G, Leffer L (7 October 2015). "Social Grooming in Bats: Are Vampire Bats Exceptional?". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): e0138430. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1038430C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138430. PMC 4596566. PMID 26445502.
  13. Kumar, Rathina; Cantor, Mauricio; Senthilkumar, K.; Panneerselvam, Vimal; Kaliraj, P.; Marimuthu, G. (1 January 2017). "Social grooming among short-nosed fruit bats". Behaviour. 154: 37–63. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003410.
  14. Yohe, Laurel R; Brand, Philipp (August 2018). "Evolutionary ecology of chemosensation and its role in sensory drive". Current Zoology. 64 (4): 525–533. doi:10.1093/cz/zoy048. ISSN 1674-5507. PMC 6084603. PMID 30108633.
  15. Stopka, Pavel; Stopková, Romana (1 September 2001). "Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse". Behavioral Ecology. 12 (5): 584–589. doi:10.1093/beheco/12.5.584.
  16. Phelps, Steve; Ng, Wing; Musolesi, Mirco; Russell, Yvan (11 September 2018). "Precise time-matching in chimpanzee allogrooming does not occur after a short delay". PLOS ONE. 13 (9): e0201810. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1301810P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201810. PMC 6133271. PMID 30204753.
  17. Martin-Ordas, Gema; Haun, Daniel; Colmenares, Fernando; Call, Josep (March 2010). "Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes". Animal Cognition. 13 (2): 331–340. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0282-4. ISSN 1435-9448. PMC 2822233. PMID 19784852.
  18. Kutsukake N, Clutton-Brock TH (1 February 2010). "Grooming and the value of social relationships in cooperatively breeding meerkats". Animal Behaviour. 79 (2): 271–279. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.014. S2CID 53203763.
  19. Guan ZH, Huang B, Ning WH, Ni QY, Sun GZ, Jiang XL (December 2013). "Significance of grooming behavior in two polygynous groups of western black crested gibbons: Implications for understanding social relationships among immigrant and resident group members". American Journal of Primatology. 75 (12): 1165–73. doi:10.1002/ajp.22178. PMID 23843246. S2CID 205330388.
  20. Carter G, Leffer L (7 October 2015). "Social Grooming in Bats: Are Vampire Bats Exceptional?". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): e0138430. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1038430C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138430. PMC 4596566. PMID 26445502.
  21. Jiang, Qi; Xia, Dong-Po; Wang, Xi; Zhang, Dao; Sun, Binghua; Li, Jin-Hua (2019). "Interchange between grooming and infant handling in female Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana)". Zoological Research. 40 (2): 139–145. doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.049. PMC 6378558. PMID 29955029.
  22. Surbeck, Martin; Hohmann, Gottfried (18 December 2014). "Social preferences influence the short-term exchange of social grooming among male bonobos". Animal Cognition. 18 (2): 573–579. doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0826-0. PMID 25519436. S2CID 16030429.
  23. Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (November 2003). "Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival". Science. 302 (5648): 1231–4. Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1231S. doi:10.1126/science.1088580. PMID 14615543. S2CID 24970809.
  24. Archie EA, Tung J, Clark M, Altmann J, Alberts SC (October 2014). "Social affiliation matters: both same-sex and opposite-sex relationships predict survival in wild female baboons". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 281 (1793): 20141261. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1261. PMC 4173677. PMID 25209936.
  25. Sterck EH, Watts DP, Schaik CP (1 November 1997). "The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates" (PDF). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 41 (5): 291–309. doi:10.1007/s002650050390. hdl:1874/1183. ISSN 0340-5443. S2CID 25163826.
  26. Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (1 March 2004). "Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya". Animal Behaviour. 67 (3): 573–582. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.001. S2CID 783193.
  27. Berghänel A, Ostner J, Schröder U, Schülke O (2011). "Social bonds predict future cooperation in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus". Animal Behaviour. 81 (6): 1109–1116. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.009. S2CID 53144146.
  28. van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (November 1997). "Infanticide risk and the evolution of male-female association in primates". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 264 (1388): 1687–94. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264.1687V. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0234. PMC 1688726. PMID 9404030.
  29. Graham B (1 January 2008). Selection : the mechanism of evolution. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198569725. OCLC 781154368.
  30. Okasha S (1 January 2013). Zalta EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  31. Darwin C (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.2092. hdl:2027/bc.ark:/13960/t96696g2b.
  32. Trivers RL (1 March 1971). "The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 46 (1): 35–57. doi:10.1086/406755. ISSN 0033-5770. S2CID 19027999.
  33. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (March 1981). "The evolution of cooperation". Science. 211 (4489): 1390–6. Bibcode:1981Sci...211.1390A. doi:10.1126/science.7466396. PMID 7466396.
  34. "Origin of Species : Chapter VIII. Instinct : Objections to the theory of natural selection as applied to instincts: neuter and sterile insects by Charles Darwin @ Classic Reader". www.classicreader.com. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  35. Wright S (1 July 1922). "Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship". The American Naturalist. 56 (645): 330–338. doi:10.1086/279872. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 83865141.
  36. Smith JM (1 January 1996). Evolutionary genetics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198542155. OCLC 954574132.
  37. Frank R (January 2009). "Impatient traders or contingent reciprocators? Evidence for the extended time-course of grooming exchanges in baboons" (PDF). Behaviour. 146 (8): 1123–1135. doi:10.1163/156853909x406455. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 October 2011 – via Brill.
  38. Barelli C, Reichard UH, Mundry R (1 October 2011). "Is grooming used as a commodity in wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar?". Animal Behaviour. 82 (4): 801–809. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.012. S2CID 53190848.
  39. "Social Grooming in Primates: Ontogeny". www.reed.edu. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  40. Mondragón-Ceballos, Ricardo; Chiappa, Pilar; Mayagoitia, Lilian; Lee, Phyllis (1 July 2010). "Sex differences in learning the allocation of social grooming in infant stumptailed macaques". Behaviour. 147 (9): 1073–1099. doi:10.1163/000579510X505436. hdl:1893/2990.
  41. Weinberg, Susan M.; Candland, Douglas K. (1981). ""Stone-grooming" in Macaca fuscata". American Journal of Primatology. 1 (4): 465–468. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350010412. ISSN 1098-2345. PMID 31995914. S2CID 85138037.
  42. Mcgrew, William; TUTIN, CAROLINE (16 February 1973). "Chimpanzee Tool Use in Dental Grooming". Nature. 241 (5390): 477–478. Bibcode:1973Natur.241..477M. doi:10.1038/241477a0. S2CID 4166467.
  43. "Tool Use by Non-Human Primates | Center for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny (CARTA)". carta.anthropogeny.org. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  44. "Primate Cognition | Learn Science at Scitable". www.nature.com. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  45. Moore D, Angel JE, Cheeseman IM, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE (1995). "A highly specialized social grooming honey bee(Hymenoptera: Apidae)". Journal of Insect Behavior. 8 (6): 855–861. doi:10.1007/BF02009512. S2CID 40236926.
  46. Spruijt BM, van Hooff JA, Gispen WH (July 1992). "Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior". Physiological Reviews. 72 (3): 825–52. doi:10.1152/physrev.1992.72.3.825. hdl:1874/3750. PMID 1320764.
  47. Wilkinson GS (1986). "Social grooming in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus" (PDF). Animal Behaviour. 34 (6): 1880–1889. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.539.5104. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80274-3. S2CID 11214563.
  48. van Lawick-Goodall J (1968). "The behavior of free living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve". Animal Behaviour Monographs. 1: 161–311. doi:10.1016/s0066-1856(68)80003-2.
  49. de Waal F (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674659209.
  50. Smuts B, Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Wrangham R, Struhsaker T (1987). Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  51. Carter, Gerald; Leffer, Lauren (7 October 2015). "Social Grooming in Bats: Are Vampire Bats Exceptional?". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): e0138430. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1038430C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138430. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4596566. PMID 26445502.
  52. Schino G, Scucchi S, Maestripieri D, Turillazzi PG (1988). "Allogrooming as a tension-reduction mechanism: a behavioral approach". American Journal of Primatology. 16 (1): 43–50. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350160106. PMID 31968881. S2CID 86566868.
  53. Smuts BB (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9781315129204. ISBN 978-1-315-12920-4.
  54. "Primate Sociality and Social Systems | Learn Science at Scitable". www.nature.com. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  55. "Social Grooming in Primates: Adaptive Value". www.reed.edu. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  56. Schino, Gabriele; Aureli, Filippo (1 November 2008). "Trade-offs in primate grooming reciprocation: testing behavioral flexibility and correlated evolution". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 95 (3): 439–446. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01067.x. ISSN 0024-4066.
  57. Lehmann, Johannes (December 2007). "Group size, grooming, and social cohesion in primates" (PDF). Animal Behaviour. 74 (6): 1617–1629. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.025. S2CID 14866172.
  58. de Waal, F. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  59. Kenny E, Birkhead TR, Green JP (1 August 2017). "Allopreening in birds is associated with parental cooperation over offspring care and stable pair bonds across years". Behavioral Ecology. 28 (4): 1142–1148. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx078. PMC 5873249. PMID 29622926.
  60. Fraser ON, Bugnyar T (May 2010). "Do ravens show consolation? Responses to distressed others". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10605. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510605F. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010605. PMC 2868892. PMID 20485685.
  61. Feh, C., De Mazieres, J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:1191–1194.
  62. Val-Laillet D, Guesdon V, Keyserlingk MA, Passillé AM, Rushen J (2009). "Allogrooming in cattle: Relationships between social preferences, feeding displacements and social dominance". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 116 (2–4): 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.005.
  63. Laister S, Stockinger B, Regner A, Zenger K, Knierim U, Winckler C (2011). "Social licking in dairy cattle—Effects on heart rate in performers and receivers". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 130 (3–4): 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.12.003.
  64. Kemp AH, Guastella AJ (8 August 2011). "The Role of Oxytocin in Human Affect". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20 (4): 222–231. doi:10.1177/0963721411417547. S2CID 145122328.
  65. Uvnäs-Moberg K (November 1998). "Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 23 (8): 819–35. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00056-0. PMID 9924739. S2CID 24789741.
  66. Uvnäs-Moberg K (January 1997). "Physiological and endocrine effects of social contact". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 807 (1): 146–63. Bibcode:1997NYASA.807..146U. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51917.x. PMID 9071348. S2CID 46171612.
  67. Dunbar RI (February 2010). "The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioral function and neurobiological mechanisms". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. Touch, Temperature, Pain/Itch and Pleasure. 34 (2): 260–8. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001. PMID 18662717. S2CID 30450770.
  68. Keverne EB, Martensz ND, Tuite B (1989). "Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 14 (1–2): 155–61. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(89)90065-6. PMID 2525263. S2CID 24350695.
  69. Hemmings HC (1 January 2013). Physiology and Pharmacology for Anesthesia: Foundations and Clinical Application: Expert Consult – Online and Print. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1437716795. OCLC 830351627.
  70. Keverne EB, Martensz ND, Tuite B (1 January 1989). "Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 14 (1–2): 155–61. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(89)90065-6. PMID 2525263. S2CID 24350695.
  71. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (February 2000). "How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions". Endocrine Reviews. 21 (1): 55–89. doi:10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389. PMID 10696570.
  72. Capitanio JP, Mendoza SP, Lerche NW, Mason WA (April 1998). "Social stress results in altered glucocorticoid regulation and shorter survival in simian acquired immune deficiency syndrome". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (8): 4714–9. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.4714C. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.8.4714. PMC 22556. PMID 9539804.
  73. Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, et al. (September 1997). "Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress". Science. 277 (5332): 1659–62. doi:10.1126/science.277.5332.1659. PMID 9287218.
  74. Sapolsky RM (September 1997). "The importance of a well-groomed child". Science. 277 (5332): 1620–1. doi:10.1126/science.277.5332.1620. PMID 9312858. S2CID 45145411.
  75. Ray JC, Sapolsky RM (1 January 1992). "Styles of male social behavior and their endocrine correlates among high-ranking wild baboons". American Journal of Primatology. 28 (4): 231–250. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350280402. ISSN 1098-2345. PMID 31941207. S2CID 196609839.
  76. Platt, Michael L.; Seyfarth, Robert M.; Cheney, Dorothy L. (5 February 2016). "Adaptations for social cognition in the primate brain". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 371 (1687): 20150096. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0096. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 4745018. PMID 26729935.
  77. Manninen, Sandra; Tuominen, Lauri; Dunbar, Robin I.; Karjalainen, Tomi; Hirvonen, Jussi; Arponen, Eveliina; Hari, Riitta; Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.; Sams, Mikko; Nummenmaa, Lauri (21 June 2017). "Social Laughter Triggers Endogenous Opioid Release in Humans". The Journal of Neuroscience. 37 (25): 6125–6131. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0688-16.2017. ISSN 0270-6474. PMC 6596504. PMID 28536272.
  78. Martel, Frances L.; Nevison, Claire M.; Rayment, F. David; Simpson, Michael J. A.; Keverne, Eric B. (1 January 1993). "Opioid receptor blockade reduces maternal affect and social grooming in rhesus monkeys". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 18 (4): 307–321. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(93)90027-I. ISSN 0306-4530. PMID 8391149. S2CID 11262534.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.