Sandwich (UK Parliament constituency)
Sandwich was a parliamentary constituency in Kent, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1366 until 1885, when it was disfranchised for corruption.
Sandwich | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1366–1885 | |
Seats | two |
Replaced by | Isle of Thanet |
History
Sandwich like most of the other Cinque Ports, was first enfranchised in the 14th century. As a Cinque Port it was technically of different status from a parliamentary borough, but the difference was in most respects purely a nominal one. (The writ for election was directed to the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, rather than the sheriff of the county, and its MPs were termed "barons" rather than "burgesses" as in boroughs.) Until 1832, the constituency consisted of the three parishes making up the town of Sandwich; it had once been a flourishing port but by the 19th century the harbour had silted up and there was only a limited maritime trade.
The right to vote was reserved to the freemen of the town, whether or not they were resident within the borough. In 1831 this amounted to 955 qualified voters, of whom only 320 lived in Sandwich. The freedom could be obtained by inheritance, by serving an apprenticeship, or by marrying the daughter or widow of a freeman; the corporation apparently did not, as in some boroughs, have the power to create unlimited numbers of honorary freemen so as to swamp the rights of the genuine freemen. At one period in the 17th century, the town corporation attempted to annex the right of voting to itself (as was the case in many other boroughs) on the grounds of "the avoidance of popular tumults common at elections", and in 1621 the Lord Warden ordered with the consent of the Privy Council that this should be so. However, the inhabitants of the town not only petitioned against the election result, but informed the Lord Warden that they intended to present a bill to Parliament to annul the result of that year's election and to restore their former privileges. In the event the petition against the election result was upheld and the election declared void, and a decision of the Commons in another dispute election, in 1690, confirmed that the right of voting was in the freemen.
For most of its existence, no single interest had a predominant influence in Sandwich so as to reduce it to a pocket borough, but the power of official patronage sometimes exerted some leverage. In Tudor times, the Lord Warden expected to be able to nominate one of the two MPs, but - unlike most of the other Cinque Ports - Sandwich consistently defied him, and made its own choice of both MPs throughout Queen Elizabeth's reign. In the 18th and 19th centuries, though, the influence of the navy (through the employment it provided) was sufficient that the Admiralty could be sure of choosing at least one MP at most elections.[1] Nevertheless, Sandwich fell short of being a true "Admiralty borough", and generally elected members who would benefit the town. (They were, however, no less venal than in other boroughs: the committee investigating a disputed election in 1695 was told that the elected member had promised that if after election he were to gain paid office he would give half his salary to the corporation, that he would contribute £20 a year for the poor of the town and a treat to the corporation on the anniversary of his election.)
In 1831, the population of the constituency was 3,084, and the town contained 610 houses. This would not have been sufficient for the borough to retain both its MPs under the Great Reform Act, but the boundaries were extended so as to include the neighbouring towns of Deal and Walmer, which quadrupled the population. Even so, and despite the extension of the franchise, the revised constituency had only 916 qualified voters for the 1832 general election.
At a by-election in 1880, evidence of widespread bribery in Sandwich emerged. Its writ was suspended, and a Royal Commission appointed to investigate. It was found that out of an electorate of 2115, 1850 voted, of whom 900 admitted they had been bribed and 100 admitted they had bribed.[2] As a result of its report, Sandwich was abolished as a constituency with effect from 25 June 1885, being incorporated into the Eastern Kent county division.
Members of Parliament
1366–1640
Parliament | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1386 | John Godard | William Ive[3] |
1388 (Feb) | William Jordan | Stephen Reyner[3] |
1388 (Sep) | John Berham | Peter Cundy[3] |
1390 (Jan) | John Berham | Stephen Reyner[3] |
1390 (Nov) | ||
1391 | John Edward | William Jordan[3] |
1393 | Stephen Reyner | Thomas atte Welle[3] |
1394 | ||
1395 | John Godard | John atte Nessche[3] |
1397 (Jan) | Richard Benge | John Godard[3] |
1397 (Sep) | ||
1399 | John Godard | Stephen Peyntour[3] |
1401 | ||
1402 | John Godard | John atte Nessche[3] |
1404 (Jan) | ||
1404 (Oct) | ||
1406 | Henry Loveryk | John Norton[3] |
1407 | Richard Mildenale | John Norton[3] |
1410 | John Gyllyng | Robert Haddon[3] |
1411 | ||
1413 (Feb) | ||
1413 (May) | John Geldeford | John Gyllyng[3] |
1414 (Apr) | ||
1414 (Nov) | Simon Halle | Richard Mildenale[3] |
1415 | ||
1416 (Mar) | ||
1416 (Oct) | ||
1417 | William Gayler | Richard Mildenale[3] |
1419 | Laurence Cundy | Thomas Loveryk[3] |
1420 | John Bolle | Laurence Cundy[3] |
1421 (May) | Simon Halle | Laurence Cundy[3] |
1421 (Dec) | John Bolle | Laurence Cundy[3] |
1485 | Thomas Overton[4] | |
1491 | John Naseby[4] | |
1510 | John Westcliff | John Cock[5] |
1512 | John Westcliff | John Hobard[5] |
1515 | John Westcliff | John Hobard[5] |
1523 | John Somer | Roger Manwood[5] |
1529 | Vincent Engeham | John Boys, died and replaced Dec 1553 by Thomas Wingfield[5] |
1536 | Thomas Wingfield | Vincent Engeham[5] |
1539 | Thomas Patche | Nicholas Peake[5] |
1542 | John Lee | Thomas Rolfe[5] |
1545 | John Master | Thomas Menys[5] |
1547 (first election) | Thomas Pinnock | John Seer[5] |
1547 (second election) | Thomas Patche | Thomas Ardern[5][note 1] |
1553 (Mar) | Thomas Patche | Thomas Menys[5] |
1553 (Oct) | Sir John Perrot | Simon Linch[5] |
1554 (Apr) | John Master | Simon Linch[5] |
1554 (Nov) | John Tysar | Nicholas Crispe[5] |
1555 | Nicholas Peake | Sir John Perrot[5] |
1558 | Roger Manwood | Nicholas Crispe[5] |
1559 | Roger Manwood | John Tysar[5] |
1562–3 | Roger Manwood | Rice Perrot[5] |
1571 | Roger Manwood | John Manwood[5] |
1572 | Roger Manwood, made a judge replaced Jul 1576 by Edward Peake | John Boys[5] |
1584 | Edward Peake | Edward Wood[5] |
1586 | Edward Peake | Edward Wood[5] |
1588–9 | Peter Manwood | Edward Peake[5] |
1593 | Peter Manwood | Edward Peake[5] |
1597 | Peter Manwood | Edward Peake[5] |
1601 | Peter Manwood | Edward Peake[5] |
1604-1611 | Sir George Fane | Edward Peake died replaced by John Griffith |
1614 | Thomas Smythe | Sir Samuel Peyton, 1st Baronet |
1621-1622 | Sir Edwin Sandys | Sir Robert Hatton election voided - replaced by John Burroughes |
1624 | Sir Robert Hatton | Francis Drake |
1625 | Sir Henry Wotton | Sir Robert Hatton |
1626 | Sir John Suckling sat for Norwich, replaced by Sir Edward Boys | Peter Peake |
1628 | John Philipot | Peter Peake |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments summoned |
1640–1885
Notes
- This election was called at request of the borough Mayor, with Patche and Ardern returned but the return was declared invalid by Privy Council after appeal.
- Created a baronet, June 1707
- Created a baronet, July 1716
- Created a baronet, March 1795
- On petition the result of the 1880 by-election was declared void
Election results
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | Unopposed | |||
Whig gain from Nonpartisan | |||||
Tory hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | 498 | 41.8 | ||
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 397 | 33.3 | ||
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | 297 | 24.9 | ||
Majority | 100 | 8.4 | |||
Turnout | 700 | c. 75.3 | |||
Registered electors | c. 930 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Joseph Marryat (1790–1876) | 495 | 30.8 | −11.0 | |
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 485 | 30.2 | −3.1 | |
Tory | Samuel Grove Price | 361 | 22.5 | +10.1 | |
Tory | Edward Owen | 265 | 16.5 | +4.1 | |
Majority | 124 | 7.7 | −0.7 | ||
Turnout | 847 | 92.5 | c. +17.2 | ||
Registered electors | 916 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −9.1 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | −5.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Grove Price | 551 | 41.0 | +18.5 | |
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 405 | 30.1 | −30.9 | |
Conservative | Edward Owen | 389 | 28.9 | +12.4 | |
Turnout | 841 | 90.0 | −2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 934 | ||||
Majority | 66 | 10.9 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +17.0 | |||
Majority | 16 | 1.2 | −6.5 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −30.9 | |||
Troubridge was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Admiralty, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | 416 | 27.4 | +12.4 | |
Whig | James Rivett-Carnac | 401 | 26.4 | +11.4 | |
Conservative | Samuel Grove Price | 370 | 24.4 | −16.6 | |
Conservative | Brook Bridges | 330 | 21.8 | −7.1 | |
Majority | 31 | 2.0 | +0.8 | ||
Turnout | 769 | 84.4 | −5.6 | ||
Registered electors | 911 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +12.1 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +11.6 | |||
Rivett-Carnac resigned after being appointed Governor of Bombay, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Rufane Shaw Donkin | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Elections in the 1840s
Donkin's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hugh Hamilton Lindsay | 406 | 53.0 | +6.8 | |
Whig | Charles Richard Fox[18] | 360 | 47.0 | −6.8 | |
Majority | 46 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 766 | 80.5 | −3.9 | ||
Registered electors | 952 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +6.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Troubridge | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Hugh Hamilton Lindsay | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 952 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Clarence Paget | 459 | 35.6 | N/A | |
Whig | Charles Grenfell | 437 | 33.9 | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles Pelham-Clinton | 392 | 30.4 | N/A | |
Majority | 45 | 3.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 840 (est) | 89.1 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 943 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1850s
Grenfell resigned in order to contest a by-election at Windsor, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Charles Clinton | 460 | 64.2 | +33.8 | |
Whig | John Tracy William French[19][20] | 257 | 35.8 | −33.7 | |
Majority | 203 | 28.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 717 | 74.7 | −14.4 | ||
Registered electors | 960 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +33.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Charles Clinton | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Macgregor | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 960 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 547 | 39.2 | New | |
Whig | Clarence Paget | 503 | 36.0 | New | |
Conservative | James Macgregor | 322 | 23.1 | N/A | |
Whig | John Lang[21][22] | 24 | 1.7 | New | |
Majority | 181 | 12.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 847 (est) | 84.0 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,008 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 497 | 29.5 | −9.7 | |
Liberal | Clarence Paget | 458 | 27.1 | −8.9 | |
Conservative | James Fergusson | 404 | 23.9 | +12.3 | |
Conservative | William David Lewis[23] | 328 | 19.4 | +7.8 | |
Majority | 54 | 3.2 | −9.7 | ||
Turnout | 844 (est) | 81.9 (est) | -2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 1,030 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −9.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −9.5 | |||
Knatchbull-Hugessen was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 463 | 62.1 | +5.5 | |
Conservative | James Fergusson | 283 | 37.9 | −5.4 | |
Majority | 180 | 24.2 | +21.0 | ||
Turnout | 746 | 72.4 | −9.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,030 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +5.5 | |||
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 494 | 35.7 | +6.2 | |
Liberal | Clarence Paget | 477 | 34.5 | +7.4 | |
Conservative | Charles Capper | 413 | 29.8 | −14.5 | |
Majority | 64 | 4.7 | +1.5 | ||
Turnout | 899 (est) | 85.2 (est) | +3.3 | ||
Registered electors | 1,054 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +6.7 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +7.3 | |||
Paget resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Capper | 466 | 50.4 | +20.6 | |
Liberal | Thomas Brassey[24] | 458 | 49.6 | −20.6 | |
Majority | 8 | 0.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 924 | 87.7 | +2.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,054 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +20.6 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 933 | 36.4 | +0.7 | |
Liberal | Henry Brassey | 923 | 36.0 | +1.5 | |
Conservative | Henry Worms[25] | 710 | 27.7 | −2.1 | |
Majority | 213 | 8.3 | +3.6 | ||
Turnout | 1,638 (est) | 85.9 (est) | +0.7 | ||
Registered electors | 1,906 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +1.3 | |||
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Brassey | 1,035 | 30.3 | −5.7 | |
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | 1,006 | 29.4 | −7.0 | |
Conservative | Frederic C Hughes Hallett | 764 | 22.4 | +8.5 | |
Conservative | Hugh Sydney Baillie[26] | 611 | 17.9 | +4.0 | |
Majority | 242 | 7.0 | -1.3 | ||
Turnout | 1,708 (est) | 83.5 (est) | −2.4 | ||
Registered electors | 2,046 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −6.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −6.6 | |||
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Brassey | Unopposed | |||
Liberal | Edward Knatchbull-Hugessen | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,115 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Hugessen resigned in advance of being elevated to the peerage, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Henry Crompton-Roberts | 1,145 | 61.9 | New | |
Liberal | Julian Goldsmid | 705 | 38.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 440 | 23.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,850 | 87.5 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 2,115 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
A Royal Commission found proof of extensive bribery and the writ was suspended, with the by-election result being voided. The writ was never returned and the constituency was merged into East Kent on 25 June 1885, before that seat was then abolished for the 1885 general election.[17]
References
- Page 141, Lewis Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (2nd edition - London: St Martin's Press, 1957)
- "Election Commission At Sandwich". The Cornishman. No. 120. 28 October 1880. p. 4.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
- Cavill, P. R. (13 August 2009). The English Parliaments of Henry VII. ISBN 9780191610264. Retrieved 17 March 2012.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
- Fisher, David R. "Sandwich". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
- Fisher, David R. "OWEN, Sir Edward William Campbell Rich (1771-1849), of Deal, Kent". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
- Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 171–173, 240–242. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- Mosse, Richard Bartholomew (1838). The Parliamentary Guide: a concise history of the Members of both Houses, etc. pp. 144, 224. Retrieved 30 November 2018 – via Google Books.
- Arbuthnot, Alexander John (1887). Stephen, Leslie (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 9. London: Smith, Elder & Co. . In
- Gash, Norman (2013). Politics in the Age of Peel. A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830-1850. Faber & Faber. p. 450. ISBN 9780571302901. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
- Churton, Edward (1836). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1836. p. 57. Retrieved 30 November 2018 – via Google Books.
- "Saunders's News-Letter". 1 February 1839. p. 1. Retrieved 30 November 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The General Election". Morning Post. 24 July 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Sandwich and Deal Election". Kentish Gazette. 3 August 1847. p. 2. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- McIntyre, W. David (1967). The Imperial Frontier in the Tropics, 1865–75 (eBook ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 60. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00349-5. ISBN 978-1-349-00349-5. LCCN 67-19403. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via Google Books.
- Craig, F W S, ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Press. pp. 268–269. ISBN 978-0333171530.
- "West Kent Guardian". 15 May 1841. p. 8. Retrieved 30 November 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "West Kent Election". Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General Advertiser. 29 May 1852. p. 8. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Election Intelligence". Cambridge Independent Press. 5 June 1852. p. 3. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "South Eastern Gazette". 31 March 1857. p. 5. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Canterbury Journal, Kentish Times and Farmers' Gazette". 28 March 1857. p. 3. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The Coming Elections". South Eastern Gazette. 12 April 1859. p. 4. Retrieved 8 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Sandwich Election". Kentish Chronicle. 12 May 1866. p. 5. Retrieved 17 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The County Elections". Kentish Gazette. 17 November 1868. p. 4. Retrieved 17 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Sandwich and Deal". Western Daily Mercury. 27 January 1874. p. 3. Retrieved 19 January 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Election News". The Cornishman. No. 97. 20 May 1880. p. 8.
Sources
- Robert Beatson, A Chronological Register of Both Houses of Parliament (London: Longman, Hurst, Res & Orme, 1807)
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808)
- J. E. Neale, The Elizabethan House of Commons (London: Jonathan Cape, 1949)
- T. H. B. Oldfield, The Representative History of Great Britain and Ireland (London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy, 1816)
- J Holladay Philbin, Parliamentary Representation 1832 - England and Wales (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965)
- Edward Porritt and Annie G Porritt, The Unreformed House of Commons (Cambridge University Press, 1903)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "S" (part 2)