Racial classification of Indian Americans

The racial classification of Indian Americans has varied over the years and across institutions.[1] Originally, neither the courts nor the census bureau classified Indian Americans as a race because there were only negligible numbers of Indian immigrants in the United States. Early Indian Americans were often denied their civil rights, leading to close affiliations with African Americans. For most of America's early history, the government only recognized two racial classifications, white or colored. Due to immigration laws of the time, those deemed colored were often stripped of their American citizenship or denied the ability to become citizens. For these reasons, various South Asians in America took the government to court to try and be considered white instead of colored.[2] After advocacy from the Indian American community, the racial category of Asian Indian was finally introduced on the 1980 Census.

This article is about the racial classification of Americans with ancestry from India. For anthropological racial classifications of Indians in general, see Historical definitions of races in India.

Initial perceptions
Members of the Nansemond tribe, descendant of East Indian, Native American and African American people, c. 1900, Smithsonian Institution
A Punjabi Mexican American couple, Valentina Alarez and Rullia Singh, posing for their wedding photo in 1917.

Among one of the first recorded Indian in America was a mixed-race girl born to an Indian father and an Irish American mother in 1680 in Maryland. Due to her Indian American father being classified as "Negro", she was classified as a mulatto and later sold into slavery.[3][4][5][6] Court records from the 1700s indicate a number of "East Indians" were held as slaves in Maryland and Delaware.[7] Upon freedom, they are said to have blended into the free African American population - considered mulattoes within the African American community.[8] Three brothers from modern day "India or Pakistan" received their freedom in 1710 and married into a Native American tribe in Virgina.[9] The present-day Nansemond people trace their lineage to this intermarriage.[10]

The earliest Indian immigrants into the United States were called "Hindus" even though the majority of them were Sikhs. Court clerks classified these early immigrants from the Punjab region as being "black", "white", or "brown" based on their skin color for the purpose of marriage licenses. In addition to being racialized by their color, they were also racialized as being "foreigners".[1]

The perception of Indian Americans as foreigners sometimes helped provide for better treatment, especially in states where de jure segregation was in place.[11] As opposed to being seen as black, in some states Indians were seen as outside of the traditional American racial spectrum, and consequently freed from the encumbrances that system entailed.[12][13]

By the mid-1950s, those who remained settled in the then vibrant black neighborhoods of Tremé in New Orleans, Black Bottom in Detroit, West Baltimore, and Harlem in New York. Many started families with Creoles, Puerto Ricans, and African Americans.[11][14] An example is Indian-born Hucheshwar Gurusidha Mudgal, who became a prominent journalist in Harlem's African American community.[15] Punjabi Sikhs in California found a closer camaraderie with Mexicans, resulting in a unique mixed-race community in the Yuba City area - the Punjabi Mexican Americans.[16][17]

Identity

Self-identification

Indian independence movement fighter Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay wrote of the Indian racial identity in America as being Black.[18] After spending years studying and living with African-American families, Chattopadhyay wrote Indians in America should form ties with African Americans, believing they share a common ancestry and a common struggle for independence.[19] Following the George Floyd protests of the 2020s, some segments of the American-born South Asian community have renewed calls for camaraderie with African Americans.[15][20]

However, South Asians often try to distance themselves from African-Americans and Hispanics.[2] Even though South Asians "insist on being called 'brown', the plea of Indian immigrants not to be called black is what is most audible".[21] This is due to considerable anti-blackness and anti-Hispanic prejudice in some segments of the South Asian population. This prejudice is often accompanied by a fear of being mistaken for Black or Hispanic, described as "an almost paranoid response to even being thought of as black".[22]

Some South Asian Americans have identified themselves as being 'Brown Asians' or 'Brown South Asians',[23][24] while others, like Nikki Haley, a former governor of South Carolina and of Indian descent, identified as 'white' on her voter registration card in 2001.[25] Dick Harpootlian, chairman of the South Carolina Democrats, stated “Haley has been appearing on television interviews where she calls herself a minority—when it suits her... When she registers to vote she says she is white. She has developed a pattern of saying whatever is beneficial to her at the moment.”[26] While some Asian Americans (including South Asian descendants) may not identify with the "Asian American" label at all, due to the terms association with East Asian Americans.[27] As such, the 'Brown Asian' label sees some usage to further differentiate South and Southeast Asian Americans from those of East Asian descent.[23][28]

The official classification of South Asian as part of the "Asian American" racial category represents an agreement of convenience for South Asians on where they fit on the black-white racial spectrum in the United States, as American society is largely dominated by only a "white" and "black" racial and skin color classification system.[2] Depending on the social and legal context, some Indian Americans may identify as either "white" or "black".[2] South Asian Americans and other types of Asian Americans mutually feel that there exists "profound racial difference" between themselves and the other Asian ethnic group. Furthermore, "Working-class or state school-educated second generation Indian Americans do not see a natural alliance or unity with other Asian American groups."[2] Many South Asian Americans have noted that their perceived differences in cultural, religious and racial/physical appearance with other Asian American ethnic groups has often lead them to being excluded in Asian American studies, narratives and media representations.[28]

Identification by others

In 1989, the East–West Center published a research paper about Indian Americans that said that Americans find identifying South Asians by race and color to be difficult. The paper said that a 1978 survey of Americans asked the question, "Would you classify most people from India as being white, black, or something else?" The paper said that 38% of respondents classified most people from India as "other," 23% classified them as "brown," 15% classified them as "black," 13% did not know how to classify them, and 11% classified them as "white."[29]

In 2000, a series of interviews of second-generation Asian American college student leaders found that most of the interviewees who did not include Indian Americans as Asian Americans did not express a clear reason that was more than perceived difference in physical appearance and culture.[30]

Indian Americans have often been misidentified as being of Arabs or Middle Eastern origin, particularly after the September 11 attacks.[31] Assaults against turban-wearing Sikhs have become common since 9/11, due to Sikh turbans resembling the turban that Osama Bin Laden often wore in pictures.[32][33] After her win in 2013, Miss America winner Nina Davuluri was taunted online and called an "Arab" and a "terrorist" due to this misconception among the American public.[34]

In 2015, Sureshbhai Patel was described by a suspicious caller as a "skinny black guy" before he was beaten and severely injured by Alabama police officers.[35]

The 2017 book, Indians In America, stated that Indians and other South Asians are a part of Asian Americans, yet apart from Asian Americans. While they are admitted among Asian Americans, they are not acknowledged among Asian Americans. According to this book, other Asian Americans characterize Indians and other South Asians to be "ambiguously nonwhite."[36]

Some have attributed the general exclusion of South Asian Americans from the Asian American label due to the term being synonymous with people of East Asian origin.[24][37] In 2019, it was noted that there were several presidential candidates of Asian American or Pacific Islander origin, including Andrew Yang and Kamala Harris, who are of Taiwanese and Indian descent respectively. Frequently described by the media and campaigning himself as 'the' Asian American candidate,[38] Yang stated that his "Asian-ness [is] kind of obvious in a way that might not be true of Kamala or even Tulsi... That's not a choice. It's just a fairly evident reality."[39]

U.S. courts

Throughout much of the early 20th century, it was necessary for immigrants to be considered white in order to receive U.S. citizenship. U.S. courts classified Indians as both white and non-white through a number of cases.

In 1909, Bhicaji Balsara became the first Indian to gain U.S. citizenship. As a Parsi, he was ruled to be "the purest of Aryan type" and "as distinct from Hindus as are the English who dwell in India". Thirty years later, the same Circuit Court to accept Balsara ruled that Rustom Dadabhoy Wadia, another Parsi from Bombay, was colored and therefore not eligible to receive U.S. citizenship.[40]

Thind case and attempted revocations of citizenship

In 1923, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind that while Indians were classified as Caucasians by anthropologists, people of Indian descent were not white by common American definition, and thus not eligible to citizenship.[41] The court conceded that, while Thind was a high caste Hindu born in the northern Punjab region and classified by certain scientific authorities as of the Aryan race, he was not "White" since the word Aryan "has to do with linguistic and not necessarily with physical characteristics" and since "the average man knows perfectly well that there are unmistakable and profound differences" between Indians and White Americans. The court also clarified that the decision did not reflect or imply anything related to racial superiority or inferiority, but merely an observable difference.[42]

At the time, this decision began the process of retroactively stripping Indians of citizenship and land rights. The ruling also placated the Asiatic Exclusion League demands, spurned by growing outrage at the Hindoo Invasion alongside the pre-existing outrage at the Yellow Peril. As they became classified as colored, Indian Americans were not only denied American citizenship, but also banned by anti-miscegenation laws from marrying White Americans in the states of Arizona, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia.[43]

Following the Thind case, the Bureau of Naturalization began action to strip Thind and other Indian-Americans of their citizenship, arguing it had been "illegally procured".[44] However, these efforts were forced to end by the government's loss in court in the case against Thind's own lawyer, a Californian named Sakharam Ganesh Pandit. By the time Pandit's case came to trial in 1926, forty-two of sixty-nine citizenships granted to Indians had been revoked.[45][46] Pandit, a skilled lawyer, argued that under the doctrine of equitable estoppel, he would be irreversibly harmed by the revocation of his American citizenship, which he had reasonably relied upon - he would become stateless, lose his property and law license, and his wife would lose her citizenship as well.[44]

Judge Paul McCormick, the initial trial judge, ruled in Pandit's favor, accepting his arguments wholeheartedly. In 1927, the Ninth Circuit upheld McCormick's ruling under the doctrine of res judicata.[44][47] As a result of Pandit's case, the US government subsequently dropped its other denaturalization cases against Indian Americans.[46][48]

In 1935, Thind relied on his status as a veteran of the United States military during World War I to petition for naturalization through the State of New York under the Nye-Lea Act, which made World War I veterans eligible for naturalization regardless of race. The government objected his latest petition, but Thind was finally granted American citizenship; yet the Government attempted to revoke it after nearly two decades from his first petition for naturalization.[49]

After World War II

In 1946, Congress, beginning to recognize that India would soon be independent, passed a new law that allowed Indians to become citizens, while also establishing an immigration quota.[42]

As David E. Bernstein explains in the book Classified, The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America, by the early 1970s most federal agencies identified Indian Americans as part of the white group, partly because they were deemed to be a "successful" immigrant group not in need of minority status. When the Office of Management and Budget announced proposed official racial classifications in 1976, Asian Indians were put into the white category. However, a small Indian American group based in New York City got wind of this, and successfully lobbied the government to put South Asians into the Asian American/Pacific Islander classification. Not all Indian Americans agreed with this change, but no other organized group found out about it until the classification was final and official.[50]

In 1993, Dale Sandhu, an East Indian whose origin is from the Punjab, took his former employer, Lockheed, to court on grounds of wrongful dismissal due to racial grounds. Lockheed attempted to counter Sandhu's claims by stating he is Caucasian, so he cannot allege discrimination based on race. In 1993, the California Superior Court Judge overseeing the case initially accepted Lockheed's view. [51][52] However in 1994, the California Sixth District Court of Appeals reversed the 1993 decision for Dale Sandhu. Lockheed argued that the "common popular understanding that there are three major human races — Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid." The Court of Appeals denied this 19th century classification of race, stating that Indian people are a distinct ethnic group of their own. According to United States Census, "Asian Indian" is considered one of the distinct 15 races. The Court of Appeals affirmed that Sandhu was subject to discriminatory hostility, based on being a member of a distinct racial group. The Court of Appeals said that Sandhu could make a claim of racial discrimination under FEHA within the jurisdiction of the Court.

In 2015, in Dhar v. New York City Department of Transportation, Dhar, a former employee and a Christian Bangladeshi, alleged a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, based on his race, religion, and national origin. He alleged that his former supervisor, a Hindu Gujarati, illegally favored other Hindu Indian/Gujarati employees. The court dismissed the claim.[53][54]

U.S. census

Official classification
Further information: Race and ethnicity in the United States Census

The U.S. Census Bureau has changed over the years its own classification of Indians. In the 1930 and 1940 censuses, "Hindu" was listed as a racial category.[55] Following India's independence in 1947, the U.S. Census categorized individuals with Indian heritage, including Sikhs, as belonging to the "Other Race" category in both the 1950 and 1960 censuses, designating them as either "Asiatic Indian" or "Hindu." In 1975, the Ad Hoc Committee on Racial and Ethnic Definitions of the Federal Interagency Committee on Education made a report. The report describes how, as it was deliberating on how to classify groups for the 1970 U.S. census, South Asians presented a problem for the Ad Hoc Committee. The report presented the classification problem as how to classify South Asians, as there had been little discussion surronding their unique ethnic identity. While some anthropologists classified them as Caucasian, they were non-white, from Asia and could be subject to some discrimination in the United States. Unsure of their status, the Ad Hoc Committee failed to designate South Asians as a minority category, and any respondants were classified as White Americans in the 1970 U.S. census.[56]

Upon learning of the Ad Hoc Committee's decision, the Association of Indians in America (AIA) mobilized to seek better representation.[57] Indian American groups, through their own petitioning, successfully changed their racial classification to Asian in the 1970s to have themselves included in state and federal Asian racial categories to benefit from affirmative action.[2] Specifically, starting in the mid-1970s, the AIA made the argument that since Indian Americans were minorities and thus entitled to the benefits of affirmative action,[56] Indian Americans should have "minority" group status. Without their request to be designated as minorities, Indian Americans may not have been recognized as a unique ethnic group by the U.S government.[58]

In 1977, the Office of Management and Budget accepted the AIA's petition to have the "Asian Indian" category included in the census[58] Due to the efforts of the AIA leaders, a new census category, "Asian Indian," was introduced for the 1980 U.S. census.[56] In 1977, there were so few Indian Americans that the racial change of Indian Americans from White Americans to Asian American attracted little attention.[59][60]

In 1989, the East–West Center published a research paper about Indian Americans that said that the term, "Asian Indian," one of the fourteen "Races" in the 1980 US Census, is an "artificial census category and not a meaningful racial, ethnic, or ancestral designation."

Self-identification

In the US census, Indians display the highest likelihood of selecting the 'African-American or black' category, while Sri Lankans followed by Pakistanis are most likely to describe themselves as 'white'.[2] The 1990 US census classified write-in responses of "Aryan" as white even though write-in responses of "Indo-Aryan" were counted as Asian, and it also classified write-in responses of "Parsi" under Iranian American, who are classified as "White" along with Arab Americans and other Middle Eastern Americans.[61] The Asian American Institute proposed that the 2000 U.S. Census make a new Middle Easterner racial category and the Punjabi from Pakistan wanted Pakistani Americans to be included in it.[62]

Some Indian Americans who were unfamiliar with the ethnonymic conventions used in the United States, mistakenly indicated that they were "American Indian" as their race in the 1990 U.S. census, apparently unaware that this term is used in the United States to refer to Native Americans (Amerindians).[2]


See also

References
  1. Harpalani, Vinay, DesiCrit: Theorizing the Racial Ambiguity of South Asian Americans (August 12, 2013). 69 NYU Annual Survey of American Law 77 (2013); Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2013-30. pp. 123, 124 & 136. Available at SSRN: link
  2. Morning, Ann (2001). "The racial self-identification of South Asians in the United States" (PDF). Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 27: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13691830125692. S2CID 15491946. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  3. Francis C. Assisi (2005). "Indian-American Scholar Susan Koshy Probes Interracial Sex". INDOlink. Retrieved 2009-01-02.
  4. Meyers, Debra; Perreault, Melanie (2006). Colonial Chesapeake: New Perspectives. Lexington Books. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-7391-1092-8.
  5. Heinegg, Paul (2000). Free African Americans of Maryland and Delaware: From the Colonial Period to 1810. Clearfield. pp. 7, 123. ISBN 978-0-8063-5042-4.
  6. Assisi, Francis C. (2003). "First Indian-American Identified: Mary Fisher, Born 1680 in Maryland". Indolink. Archived from the original on 2003-12-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  7. Brown, Thomas; Sims, Leah (2006). Colonial Chesapeake : new perspectives. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. pp. 81–97. ISBN 0739110926.
  8. Heinegg, Paul (2021). Free African Americans of Maryland and Delaware : from the colonial period to 1810 (Second ed.). [Baltimore, Md.] ISBN 978-0806359281.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  9. Heinegg, Paul (1995). Free African Americans of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland, and Delaware: Indian Families Bass & Weaver. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing. Retrieved 24 December 2019.
  10. Dr. Helen C. Rountree, "Nansemond History" Archived 2011-07-23 at the Wayback Machine, Nansemond Tribal Association, accessed 16 Sep 2009
  11. "Indian Independence And The African American Struggle". Little India: Overseas Indian, NRI, Asian Indian, Indian American. 17 August 2007.
  12. New York Times. "Negro Pastor Traveled in the South in Turban". New York Times. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  13. Desai, Manan (8 July 2014). "The 'Tan Stranger' from Ceylon". South Asian American Digital Archive. SAADA. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  14. Bald, Vivek (23 March 2015). Bengali Harlem and the lost histories of South Asian America (First Harvard University Press paperbackition ed.). Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674503854.
  15. "Historical solidarity between South Asian and Black communities teaches way forward, says archive director". CBC News. Winston Szeto. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  16. Karen Leonard, PhD (May 1989). "The World & I". The Washington Times Corporation. Archived from the original on 2007-06-09. Retrieved 2019-03-12.
  17. Palhotra, Nishi. "The 'dirty Hindus' Archived 2019-06-30 at the Wayback Machine." Hardnews. March 2008. Retrieved on April 15, 2012.
  18. America,: The land of superlatives, Phoenix Publications, 1946.
  19. 'I am a colored woman': Kamaladevi Chattopadhyaya in the United States, 1939-1941. Slate, Nico. Routledge Publishing
  20. Jha, Priya; Rajgopal, Shoba Sharad (2 January 2021). "South Asians, social justice and the black lives matter movement". South Asian Popular Culture. 19 (1): 71–72. doi:10.1080/14746689.2021.1885112. S2CID 233916410.
  21. Rajagopal, A (1997). "Transnational networks and Hindu nationalism". Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars. 29 (3): 45–58. doi:10.1080/14672715.1997.10413093.
  22. Mazumdar, Sucheta (1 May 1989). "Racist Responses to Racism: The Aryan Myth and South Asians in the United States". Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 9: 47–55. doi:10.1215/07323867-9-1-47. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  23. Schiavenza, Matt (October 19, 2016). "Why Some 'Brown Asians' Feel Left Out of the Asian American Conversation". Asia Society. Retrieved April 22, 2022. And that, unfortunately, did not include any South Asians and only one Filipino. That caused a bit of an outcry. It raises a legitimate issue, of course, one about how 'brown Asians' often feel excluded from the Asian American conversation.
  24. Kulkarni, Saili S. (April 24, 2021). "South Asians Are Asians Too. When Will Our Racial Reckoning Be?". Ms. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
  25. "Indian Nikki Haley Says She Is White". Mother Jones. July 29, 2011.
  26. Mahanta, Siddhartha. "Indian Nikki Haley Says She Is White". Mother Jones. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  27. Schiavenza, Matt (October 19, 2016). "Why Some 'Brown Asians' Feel Left Out of the Asian American Conversation". Asia Society. Retrieved April 22, 2022. It's one of the reasons many brown Asians do not identify as Asian Americans. Perhaps we just don't feel connected to East Asian people, cultures, and lived realities. Perhaps we also don't feel welcomed and included.
  28. Nadal, Kevin L (February 2, 2020). "The Brown Asian American Movement: Advocating for South Asian, Southeast Asian, and Filipino American Communities". Asian American Policy Review. 29. Retrieved April 22, 2022. South Asian Americans have shared how they are excluded from the Asian American umbrella because of their cultural, religious, and racial/phenotypic differences – resulting in lack of representation in Asian American Studies, narratives, and media representations.
  29. Xenos, P., Barringer, H., & Levin, M.J. (1989). Asian Indians in the United States: A 1980 census Profile. Papers of the East-West Population Institute, (111). Pages 1, 9-12, 15 & 18. Wayback Machine link.
  30. Park, Jerry Z (2008). "Second-Generation Asian American Pan-Ethnic Identity: Pluralized Meanings of a Racial Label" (PDF). Sociological Perspectives. 51 (3): 549. doi:10.1525/sop.2008.51.3.541. S2CID 146327919.
  31. Bhatia, S (2008). "9/11 and the Indian Diaspora: Narratives of Race, Place and Immigrant Identity" (PDF). Journal of Intercultural Studies. 29 (1): 27, 30 & 32. doi:10.1080/07256860701759923. S2CID 73713945. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-07-21.
  32. Amanda Jackson and Chris Boyette (9 August 2018). "In the last week, two Sikh men have been viciously attacked in central California". CNN. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  33. "Being Sikh in Trump's America: 'You have to go out of your way to prove you're not a threat'". Los Angeles Times. 11 June 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  34. . 'Miss America Nina Davuluri brushes off racist remarks'. September 16, 2013.
  35. Harpalani, V (2015). "To be White, Black, or Brown? South Asian Americans and the Race-Color Distinction". Washington University Global Studies Law Review. 14 (4): 610. Archived from the original on 2019-08-03.
  36. Chakravorty, S., Kapur, D. & Singh, N. (2017). The Other One Percent: Indians in America. Page 179. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Books link.
  37. Kamhampaty, Anna Purna (March 12, 2020). "At Census Time, Asian Americans Again Confront the Question of Who 'Counts' as Asian. Here's How the Answer Got So Complicated". Time. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. But American culture tends not to think of all regions in Asia as equally Asian ... the SAT in 2016 tweaked its race categories, explaining to test-takers that "Asian" did include "Indian subcontinent and Philippines origin."
  38. Kamhampaty, Anna Purna (March 12, 2020). "At Census Time, Asian Americans Again Confront the Question of Who 'Counts' as Asian. Here's How the Answer Got So Complicated". Time. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. Andrew Yang, who is of Taiwanese descent, was frequently framed by the media and his own campaign as the Asian candidate, despite his rival Kamala Harris having Indian heritage
  39. Stevens, Matt (May 22, 2019). "At a Historic Moment for Asian-American Candidates, Andrew Yang Leans In". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 29, 2021.
  40. Postmodernism & a Sociology...(c). University of Arkansas Press. pp. 143–. ISBN 978-1-61075-322-7.
  41. United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, Certificate From The Circuit Court Of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit., No. 202. Argued 11, 12 January 1923.—Decided 19 February 1923, United States Reports, v. 261, The Supreme Court, October Term, 1922, 204–215.
  42. "Not All Caucasians Are White: The Supreme Court Rejects Citizenship for Asian Indians". History Matters. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  43. "Loving Day: Celebrate the Legalization of Interracial Couples". Archived from the original on 2007-12-31. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
  44. Coulson, Doug (2017). Race, nation, and refuge : the rhetoric of race in Asian American citizenship cases. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 76–82. ISBN 978-1-4384-6662-0. OCLC 962141092.
  45. Jacoby, Harold S. (1958-11-01). "More Thind Against Than Sinning". The Pacific Historian. Stockton, CA: College of the Pacific. II (4): 1–2, 8.
  46. Asian American history and culture : an encyclopedia. Ling, Huping, 1956-, Austin, Allan W. London: Routledge. 2015. ISBN 978-1-315-70630-6. OCLC 958107019.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  47. "United States v. Sakharam Ganesh Pandit, 15 F.2d 285 | Casetext". casetext.com. Archived from the original on 2019-07-29. Retrieved 2020-01-22.
  48. Rangaswamy, Padma (2007). Indian Americans. Johnston, Robert D. New York: Chelsea House. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-4381-0712-7. OCLC 228654847.
  49. Coulson, Doug (2015). "British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. Thind Revisited". Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives (7): 1–42. SSRN 2610266.
  50. Bernstein, David E. Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America (New York: Bombardier Books 2022)
  51. Baum, B. (2006). The Rise and Fall of the Caucasian Race: A Political History of Racial Identity. New York & London: New York University Press. Page 3. Google Books link.
  52. SANDHU v. LOCKHEED MISSILES AND SPACE COMPANY. (n.d.). FindLaw FOR LEGAL PROFESSIONALS. Wayback Machine link.
  53. Dhar v. New York City Department of Transportation. (2019). Casetext. Link.
  54. Banks, T.L. (2015). Colorism Among South Asians: Title VII and Skin Tone Discrimination. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, (14),4. Page 679. Wayback Machine link.
  55. Shankar, L.D. & Rajini Srikanth, R. (1998). A Part, Yet Apart: South Asians in Asian America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. xiv. ISBN 1-56639-577-1.
  56. Kurien, P. (2018). Shifting U.S. Racial and Ethnic Identities of Sikh American Activism. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(5). Page 88. Wayback Machine link.
  57. Banks, T.L. (1998). Both Edges of the Margin: Blacks and Asians in Mississippi Masala, Barriers to Coalition Building. Asian American Law Journal, 5(2). Page 22. Wayback Machine link.
  58. Smelser, N.J, Wilson, W.J., & Mitchell, F. (2001). America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences, Volume 1. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Page 255. Wayback Machine link.
  59. Prewitt, K. (2013). What Is "Your" Race?: The Census and Our Flawed Efforts to Classify Americans. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Page 101. Google Books link.
  60. Cohn, D'Vera. "Race and the Census: The "Negro" Controversy". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 8 January 2019.
  61. University of Michigan. Census 1990: Ancestry Codes. at the Wayback Machine (archived March 13, 2005)
  62. Menon, Sridevi. Duke University. "Where is West Asia in Asian America? Asia and the Politics of Space in Asian America." 2004. April 26, 2007.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.