Proto-Hmong–Mien language

Proto-Hmong–Mien (PHM), also known as Proto-Miao–Yao (PMY; Chinese: 原始苗瑶语), is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hmong–Mien languages. Lower-level reconstructions include Proto-Hmongic and Proto-Mienic.

Proto-Hmong-Mien
Proto-Miao–Yao
Reconstruction ofHmong-Mien languages
RegionYangtze River Basin
Erac. 500 BCE
Lower-order reconstructions

Historical chronology

Ratliff (2021) estimates that the split between Hmongic and Mienic had occurred before 2500 BP, since the Old Chinese words 鐵 tiě ‘iron’ and 下 xià ‘descend’ were both borrowed separately by Proto-Hmongic and Proto-Mienic.[1]

In earlier studies, the date of proto-Hmong-Mien has been estimated to be about 2500 BP by Sagart, Blench, and Sanchez-Mazas (2004),[2] as well as by Ratliff (2021:247).[1] It has been estimated to about 4243 BP by the Automated Similarity Judgment Program (ASJP),[3] however, ASJP is not widely accepted among historical linguists as a sufficiently rigorous method to establish or evaluate relationships between language families, since it only makes use of 40 basic vocabulary items.[4]

Reconstructions

Reconstructions of Proto-Hmong–Mien include the following.[5]

  • Herbert Purnell (1970)[6] is the first comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Hmong-Mien, Proto-Hmongic, and Proto-Mienic.
  • Wang Fushi & Mao Zongwu (1995)[7] is the first comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Hmong-Mien by Chinese scholars.
  • Chen Qiguang (2001)[8] reconstructs Proto-Hmong-Mien based on 15 datapoints: Hmu (Yanghao 养蒿), Qo Xiong (Layiping 腊乙坪), Hmong (Dananshan 大南山), Xijia (Shibanzhai 石板寨), Pa Hng (Gundong 滚董), Younuo (Huangluo 黄落), Dongnu (Qibainong 七百弄), Nunu (Xishan 西山), She (Xiashuicun 下水村), Jiongnai (Longhua 龙华), Pana (Xinle 新乐), Iu Mien (Dapingjiang 大坪江), Kim Mun (Yanyuan 烟园 in Qiongzhong County 琼中县, Hainan), Biao Min (Shuanglong 双龙), Zao Min (Daping 大坪). A revised reconstruction was later published as Chen (2013).[9]
  • Wu Anqi (2002)[10] reconstructs approximately 100 Swadesh list items for Proto-Hmong-Mien.
  • Martha Ratliff (2010) is the first comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Hmong-Mien by a Western scholar since Purnell (1970).
  • Weera Ostapirat (2016)[11] proposes sesquisyllables and velarization in Proto-Hmong-Mien initials, parallel to sesquisyllables and pharyngealization in Old Chinese.
  • Li Yunbing (2018)[12] reconstructs Proto-Hmong-Mien initials and finals, which are listed separately.

In China, the first comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Hmongic (Proto-Miao) was undertaken by Wang Fushi (1979).[13] Wang's 1979 manuscript was subsequently revised and published as Wang (1994).[14]

Proto-Mienic (Proto-Mjuenic; reconstruction excludes Biao Min and Zao Min) has been reconstructed by Luang-Thongkum (1993).[15] A comprehensive reconstruction of Proto-Mienic has been published by Liu (2021).[16]

Ratliff (2010)

Martha Ratliff (2010) used 11 criterion languages for her reconstruction.

  1. East Hmongic (Qiandong); Northern vernacular: Yanghao 养蒿, Yanghao Township, Taijiang County, Guizhou
  2. North Hmongic (Xiangxi); Western vernacular: Jiwei 吉卫, Jiwei Township, Huayuan County, Hunan
  3. West Hmongic (Chuanqiandian): White Hmong of Laos and Thailand
  4. West Hmongic (Chuanqiandian); Mashan subdialect, Central vernacular: Zongdi 宗地, Zongdi Township, Ziyun County, Guizhou
  5. West Hmongic (Chuanqiandian); Luobohe subdialect: Fuyuan 复员, Fuyuan County, Yunnan
  6. Hmongic; Jiongnai: Changdong Township 长垌, Jinxiu County, Guangxi
  7. Hmongic; Baiyun Pa-Hng: Baiyun 白云, Rongshui County, Guangxi
  8. Mienic; Mien, Luoxiang vernacular: Luoxiang Township 罗香, Jinxiu County, Guangxi
  9. Mienic; Mun: Lanjin Township 览金, Lingyun County, Guangxi
  10. Mienic; Biao Min: Dongshan Yao Township 东山, Quanzhou County, Guangxi
  11. Mienic; Zao Min: Daping Township 大平, Liannan County, Guangdong

Wang & Mao (1995)

Wang & Mao (1995) base their Proto-Hmong–Mien reconstruction on the following 23 criterion Hmong-Mien languages.

  1. Yanghao 养蒿; Hmu, North (ISO 639-3: [hea])
  2. Jiwei 吉卫; Qo Xiong, West [mmr]
  3. Xianjin 先进 ( = Dananshan 大南山); Chuanqiandian Miao, 1st lect [cqd]
  4. Shimenkan 石门坎; Diandongbei Miao [hmd]
  5. Qingyan 青岩;[lower-alpha 1] Guiyang Miao, North [huj]
  6. Gaopo 高坡; Huishui Miao, North [hmi]
  7. Zongdi 宗地; Mashan Miao, Central [hmm]
  8. Fuyuan 复员;[lower-alpha 2] Luobohe Miao, 2nd lect [hml]
  9. Fengxiang 枫香; Chong'anjiang Miao [hmj]
  10. Qibainong 七百弄; Bunu, Dongnu [bwx]
  11. Yaoli 瑶里;[lower-alpha 3] Nao Klao, Baonuo [bwx]
  12. Wenjie 文界; Pa-Hng, Sanjiang [pha]
  13. Changdong 长峒; Jiongnai [pnu]
  14. Duozhu 多祝;[lower-alpha 4] She [shx]
  15. Jiangdi 江底; Iu Mien, Guangdian [ium]
  16. Xiangjiang 湘江; Iu Mien, Xiangnan [ium]
  17. Luoxiang 罗香; Luoxiang Mien a.k.a. Ao Biao [ium]
  18. Changping 长坪; Changping Mien a.k.a. Biao Mon [ium]
  19. Liangzi 梁子; Kim Mun [mji]
  20. Lanjin 览金; Kim Mun [mji]
  21. Dongshan 东山; Biao Mon, Dongshan [bmt]
  22. Sanjiang 三江; Biao Mon, Shikou a.k.a. Chao Kong Meng [bmt]
  23. Daping 大坪; Dzao Min [bpn]

Phonology

Ratliff (2010)

Martha Ratliff's 2010 reconstruction contains the following phonemic inventory.

  • 51–54 consonants (including pre-glottalized and pre-nasalized consonants)
  • 9 monophthong vowels
  • 7 diphthongs
  • 11 nasal rimes

The full set of Proto-Hmong–Mien initial consonants is (Ratliff 2010: 31):

BilabialAlveolarPostalveolarPalatalVelarUvularGlottal
Plain stop aspirated pʰtʰtsʰcʰkʰ
voiceless pttsckq/(qʷ)ʔ
voiced bddzɟɡɢ
Pre-nasalized stop aspirated ᵐpʰⁿtʰⁿtsʰᶮcʰᵑkʰ
voiceless ᵐpⁿtⁿtsᶮcᵑkᶰq
voiced ᵐbⁿdⁿdzᶮɟᵑɡᶰɢ
Nasal voiced mnɲ/(ɲʷ)(ŋ)/(ŋʷ)
pre-glottalized ˀmˀnˀɲ
aspirated ʰmʰnʰɲ
Glide voiced wj
pre-glottalized ˀwˀj
aspirated (ʰw)ʰj
Fricative voiceless sɕh
voiced (ɣ)(ɦ)

The 3 medial consonants are *-j-, *-l-, and *-r-. The 6 final stop consonants are *-p, *-t, *-k, *-m, *-n, and *-ŋ.

The Proto-Hmong–Mien vowels are (11 total) (Ratliff 2010: 108):

FrontCentralBack
High iɨ, ʉu
Mid-high eo
Central ə
Mid-low ɛɔ
Near-low æ
Low a

Proto-Hmong–Mien has the following syllable structure (Ratliff 2010:10):

  (C) C [j/w/l] [i̯/u̯] (V) V C (C)T

Ratliff (2010) does not reconstruct vowel length for either Proto-Mienic or Proto-Hmong–Mien; in contrast, Li (2018) reconstructs vowel length for both.[12] Even though Mienic languages usually have vowel length, Ratliff ascribes this to areal features that were borrowed after the breakup of Proto-Mienic.[17] Neighboring languages with vowel length include Yue Chinese and Zhuang.

Ostapirat (2016)

Ostapirat (2016)[11] revises various reconstructed Proto-Hmong–Mien consonant initials proposed by Ratliff (2010). He suggests that many proto-initials are in fact sesquisyllables, in line with Baxter & Sagart's (2014) Old Chinese reconstruction and Pittayaporn's (2009) Proto-Tai reconstruction. Examples include reconstructing *m.l- and *m.r- where Ratliff (2010) reconstructs *mbl- and *mbr-, respectively. Hmong-Mien presyllables are further discussed in Strecker (2021).[18]

Ostapirat (2016) also reconstructs velarized initial consonants (*Cˠ-) where Ratliff (2010) reconstructs -j- or -w-. Similarly, Norquest (2020) also reconstructs velarized initial consonants for Proto-Kra–Dai.[19]

Additionally, Ostapirat revises Ratliff's uvulars (*q-, etc.) as velars (*k-, etc.), and her palatals as either alveolars or palatals.

Below are some reconstructions from Ostapirat (2016) compared with those of Ratliff (2010).

GlossProto-Hmong-Mien
(Ostapirat 2016)		Proto-Hmong-Mien
(Ratliff 2010)		Proto-Mienic
(Ratliff 2010)		Notes
fruit*pˠeuB*pji̯əuX
float*mbˠeuA*mbi̯əuA< OC 浮
bedbug*pˠiA*pji
three*pˠuA*pjɔu
burn*pˠuB*pɔuB
name*mpˠuC*mpɔuH
hand*bˠuB*-bɔuX
to know*peiA*pei
to dream*mpeiC*mpeiH
to sleep*pˠeiC*pu̯eiH
to boil*mpˠeiC*mpuæiH
to rake*baA*baA< OC 耙
thin*bˠeD*bi̯ɛkD< OC 薄
father*pˠeB*pjaX< OC 父
to mend*mpˠeB*mpjaX< OC 補
chaff*mphˠeD*mpʰi̯ɛk
dog*kluB*qluwX< OC 狗
cucumber*klˠaA*Kʷa< OC 瓜
to cross over*klˠaiC*KʷajH< OC 過
wide*klˠaŋB*Kʷi̯aŋX< OC 廣
far*klˠuA*qʷuw< OC 迂[lower-alpha 5]
bear*klˠepD*qrep

Taguchi (2023)

Taguchi (2023) discusses several revisions in the phonological reconstruction of Proto-Hmong–Mien and suggests a classification based on lexical evidence rather than phonological sound changes.[20] Rimes are simplified, while nasal codas in open rimes in Proto-Hmongic are posited to have derived from historical nasal initial consonants.[21] Taguchi (2023) also suggests that Ratliff's (2010) Proto-Hmongic *k- and *q- are in fact secondary developments from Proto-Hmong–Mien *kr- and *k-, respectively.

Vocabulary

Below are some words roughly belonging to the semantic domains of agriculture and subsistence from Ratliff (2004),[22] with the Proto-Hmong-Mien and Proto-Hmongic reconstructions from Ratliff (2010), and Old Chinese reconstructions from Baxter & Sagart (2014)[23] for comparison (note that the Old Chinese forms are not necessarily cognate with the Hmong–Mien forms). Terms for domesticated animals and non-rice crops are usually shared with Chinese, while vocabulary relating to hunting, rice crops, and local plants and animals are usually not shared with Chinese.

Proto-
Hmong–Mien		Proto-HmongicOld ChineseEnglish
*ntsʰʉC*s-daŋʔ (象)elephant
*ʔlinA*ɢʷan[lower-alpha 6] (猿)monkey
*ŋgu̯eiB*krun (麇)river deer
*tsjɔB*qʰˁraʔ (虎)tiger
*ɢləŋB*tsʰˁoŋ (蔥)Chinese onion
*NKan*C.mˁru (茅)cogon grass
*ʰnænB*C.nˁaʔ (弩)crossbow
*pənX*Cə.lak-s (射)to shoot
*ndroC*lriwk (逐)to track, follow
*Kəi*kˁe (雞)chicken
*m-nɔk*tˁiw (雕)bird
*qluwX*hmaŋC*Cə.kˁroʔ (狗)dog
*ʔap*qraːb[lower-alpha 7] (鴨)duck
*mpæC*pˁra (豝)pig
*juŋ*ɢaŋ (羊)sheep/goat
*ŋiuŋ*s.ɢijʔ (兕)water buffalo
*dup*N.tˁo-s (豆)bean
*N-peiX*s-t(ʰ)uk (菽)soybean
*wouH*ɢʷa-s (芋)taro
*mbləu*lˁuʔ (稻)rice plant;
growing/unhusked rice
*ntsuwC*(C.)mˤejʔ (米)husked rice
*hnrəaŋH*bonʔ-s (飯)cooked rice

The ethnonym Hmong is reconstructed as *hmʉŋA in Proto-Hmongic by Ratliff (2010), while Mien is reconstructed as *mjænA in Proto-Mienic. In comparison, William H. Baxter and Laurent Sagart (2014)[24] reconstruct the Old Chinese name of the Mán 蠻 (Nanman 南蠻, or southern foreigners) as 蠻 *mˤro[n]; additionally, Sidwell & Rau (2015) reconstruct the Proto-Austroasiatic word for 'person' as *mraʔ.[25]

External relationships

Proto-Hmong–Mien shares many lexical similarities with neighboring language families, including Austroasiatic, Kra-Dai (Tai-Kadai), Austronesian, and Tibeto-Burman (Ratliff 2010). Martha Ratliff (2010:233-237) lists the following lexical resemblances between Proto-Hmong–Mien (abbreviated below as PHM) and other language families. Proto-Hmongic and Proto-Mienic are provided if the Proto-Hmong–Mien form is not reconstructed.

Austroasiatic

Many lexical resemblances are found between the Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic language families (Ratliff 2010), some of which had earlier been proposed by Haudricourt (1951).[26] Proto-Austroasiatic (PAA) reconstructions are from Sidwell & Rau (2015).[25]

Lexical resemblances with Austroasiatic
  • PHM *ʔu̯əm 'water'
  • PHM *ntshjamX 'blood'; PAA *saːm 'to bleed'
  • PHM *ntju̯əŋH 'tree'
  • PHM *ʔɲæmX 'to weep, cry'
  • PHM *pənX 'to shoot'
  • PHM *tu̯eiX 'tail'; PAA *sntaʔ
  • PHM *mpeiH 'to dream'
  • PHM *ʔpu̯ɛŋX 'full'; PAA *biːŋ; *beːɲ
  • Proto-Hmongic *mbrɔD 'ant'
  • Proto-Mienic *səpD 'centipede'
  • PHM *klup 'grasshopper'
  • PHM *ntshjeiX 'head louse'; PAA *ciːʔ

Other Austroasiatic parallels listed by Kosaka (2002:94) are:[27]

  • PHM *tshuŋX 'bone'; PAA *cʔaːŋ
  • PHM *S-phreiX 'head'
  • PHM *pji̯əuX 'fruit'
  • PHM *pjɔu 'three'

Ostapirat (2018:116-117)[28] lists compares the following basic vocabulary items in Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic. Proto-Palaungic as reconstructed by Sidwell (2015) has also been reconstructed.[29]

GlossProto-Hmong–Mien
(Ratliff 2010)		Proto-Vietic
(Ferlus 1991)[30]		Proto-Wa
(Diffloth 1980)[31]		Proto-Palaungic
(Sidwell 2015)[29]
louse *ntshjeiX*ciʔ*siʔ*ciːʔ
fruit *pji̯əuX*pleʔ*pliʔ*pliːʔ
road *kləuX*khraʔ*kraʔ*kraːʔ
shoot *pənX*paɲʔ*pɤɲ*ɓaŋ
blood *ntshjamX*asaːmʔ*hnam*snaːm
weep *ʔɲæmX*jaːmʔ, *ɲaːmʔ*jam*jaːm
hawk *qlaŋX*klaːŋʔ*klaŋ*klaːŋ
cooked *sjenX (Proto-Hmongic)*ciːnʔ*sin*ciːn
heavy *hnjeinX*naŋʔ(*s-jen)*kəɟan
full *pu̯ɛŋXpɔiŋ (Mon)phoiɲ (Khasi)-
nose *mbruiH*muːs*mɨs*muːs
name *mpɔuHjhmoh (Middle Khmer)*mɨs*muːs
horn *klɛɔŋ*kərəŋ*ʔrɤŋ*-rɤŋ
water *ʔu̯əmʔom (Palaung)*rʔom*ʔoːm
live, alive *ʔjəmʔim (Palaung)*ʔem*ʔiːm
I *ʔja (Proto-Mienic)ʔoa (Mon)*ʔɨʔ*ʔɔːʔ
thou *mu̯eimày (Vietnamese)me (Khasi)*miːʔ
one *ʔɨ-ʔu (Palaung)(*moːh)
two *ʔu̯i-ʔa (Palaung)(*ləʔaːr)
three *pjɔupaj (Kui)-(*ləʔɔːj)

Further lexical resemblances between Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic are listed in Hsiu (2017).[32]

Kra-Dai

Many lexical resemblances are found between the Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai language families, although the tones often do not correspond (Ratliff 2010). Proto-Tai (abbreviated here as PT) reconstructions are from Pittayaporn (2009).[33] Many of the Proto-Tai forms also have close parallels with Proto-Austronesian.

Lexical resemblances with Kra-Dai
  • Proto-Hmongic *kɛŋB 'I, 1.SG'; PT *kuːA (strong form), *kawA (weak form)
  • PHM *mu̯ei 'thou, 2.SG'; PT *mɯŋA (strong form), *maɰA (weak form)
  • PHM *təjH 'to die', *dəjH 'to kill'; PT *p.taːjA 'to die'
  • PHM *ʔneinX 'this'; PT *najC
  • PHM *m-nɔk 'bird'; PT *C̬.nokD
  • PHM *mbrəuX 'fish'; PT *plaːA
  • Proto-Hmongic *hmaŋC 'wild dog'; PT *ʰmaːA 'dog'
  • Proto-Hmongic *ʔlinA 'monkey'; PT *liːŋA

Kosaka (2002)[27] lists many lexical resemblances between Kra-Dai and Hmong-Mien languages, and proposes that they form part of a larger Miao-Dai language family.

Austronesian

Many lexical resemblances are found between the Hmong-Mien and Austronesian language families, some of which are also shared with Kra-Dai and Austroasiatic (Ratliff 2010). Proto-Austronesian (abbreviated here as PAN) and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian (abbreviated here as PMP) reconstructions are from Blust (n.d.).[34]

Lexical resemblances with Austronesian and Kra-Dai
  • Proto-Hmongic *kɛŋB 'I, 1.SG'; PMP *-ku 'my'
  • PHM *mu̯ei 'thou, 2.SG'; PAN *-mu '2nd person'
  • PHM *mi̯əu 'you (plural), 2.PL'; PAN *-mu '2nd person'
  • PHM *təjH 'to die'; PAN *ma-aCay
  • PHM *dəjH 'to kill'; PAN *pa-aCay
  • PHM *m-nɔk 'bird'; PMP *manuk
Lexical resemblances with Austronesian and Austroasiatic
  • PHM *tu̯eiX 'tail'; PMP *buntut
  • PHM *pu̯ɛŋX 'full'; PMP *penuq
  • PHM *pənX 'to shoot'; PMP *panaq
  • PHM *mpeiH 'to dream'; PAN *Sepi, PMP *hi(m)pi
Other lexical resemblances with Austronesian
  • PHM *mlu̯ɛjH 'soft'; PMP *ma-lumu
  • PHM *dəp 'bite'; PMP *ketep
  • PHM *klæŋ 'insect, worm, maggot'; PAN *qulej 'maggot'
  • PHM *tɛmX 'body louse'; PAN *CumeS, PMP *tumah 'clothes louse'

Tibeto-Burman

Ratliff notes that the Hmong-Mien numerals from 4-9 and various culture-related vocabulary have been borrowed from Tibeto-Burman. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman (abbreviated as PTB) forms provided below are from James Matisoff (2003).[35]

Lexical borrowings from Tibeto-Burman
  • PHM *plei 'four' < PTB *b-ləy (STEDT #2409)
  • PHM *prja 'five' < PTB *b-ŋa (STEDT #1306)
  • PHM *kruk 'six' < PTB *d-k-ruk (STEDT #2621)
  • PHM *dzjuŋH 'seven'
  • PHM *jat 'eight' < PTB *b-r-gyat ~ *b-g-ryat (STEDT #2259)
  • PHM *N-ɟuə 'nine' < PTB *d/s-kəw (STEDT #2364)
  • Proto-Hmongic *hnɛŋA and Proto-Mienic *hnu̯ɔiA 'sun, day' < PTB *s-nəy (STEDT #85)
  • PHM *hlaH 'moon, month' < PTB *s-la (STEDT #1016)
  • PHM *hməŋH 'night' (also 'dark') < PTB *s-muːŋ 'dark' (STEDT #522; #2465)
  • PHM *ʔɲam 'sister-in-law' (also 'daughter-in-law') < PTB *nam 'daughter-in-law' (STEDT #2486)
  • PHM *ʔweiX 'son-in-law' < PTB *krwəy (STEDT #2348)
  • PHM *hlep 'to slice' < PTB *s-lep (STEDT #2401)
  • PHM *hmjænX 'footprint, track' < PTB *s-naŋ 'to follow' (STEDT #2488)
  • Proto-Hmongic *mjænB 'horse' < PTB *mraŋ (STEDT #1431)

Additionally, Paul K. Benedict (1987)[36] notes that Proto-Hmong–Mien contains loanwords from an unknown Tibeto-Burman language or branch, which Benedict refers to as Donor Miao-Yao. Benedict (1987:20) believes that these Tibeto-Burman loanwords predate Hmong-Mien's contact with Old Chinese. Some numerals that Benedict (1987) reconstructed for Proto-Donor Miao-Yao are given below.

  • *pliA 'four'
  • *praA 'five'
  • *truk 'six'
  • *znis 'seven'
  • *hryat 'eight'
  • *t-guA 'nine'
  • *gup 'ten'

Guillaume Jacques (2021) notes that there are Tibeto-Burman parallels for various Hmong-Mien words that are found specifically in rGyalrongic and neighboring Qiangic languages. These include the words for 'snow' (cf. Jiangdi Mien bwan5), 'scold' (Proto-Hmongic *qeC), 'walnut' (Proto-Hmongic *qlowC), and 'bamboo' (Proto-Hmong-Mien *hləwX).[37]

See also

Notes
  1. Baituo, Qingyan Township, Huaxi District, Guiyang 贵阳市花溪区青岩乡摆托寨
  2. Yejipo, Ganba Township, Fuquan County 福泉县甘坝乡野鸡坡寨
  3. Mangjiang, Yaoli Township, Nandan County 南丹县瑶里乡芒降村
  4. Chenhu, Duozhu Township, Huidong County 惠东县多祝乡陈湖村
  5. Ratliff (2021:253)
  6. Zhengzhang reconstruction
  7. Zhengzhang reconstruction

References

Citations
  1. Ratliff, Martha (2021). "Classification and historical overview of Hmong-Mien languages". The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia. De Gruyter. pp. 247–260. doi:10.1515/9783110558142-014. ISBN 9783110558142.
  2. Sagart, Laurent, Roger Blench, and Alicia Sanchez-Nazas (eds.) (2004). The peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics. London: RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 0-415-32242-1.
  3. "Automated Dating of the World's Language Families based on Lexical Similarity" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-11-27. Retrieved 2013-12-30.
  4. Cf. comments by Adelaar, Blust and Campbell in Holman, Eric W., et al. (2011) "Automated Dating of the World's Language Families Based on Lexical Similarity." Current Anthropology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 841–875.
  5. Taguchi, Yoshihisa (2021). "Historiography of Hmong-Mien linguistics". The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia. De Gruyter. pp. 139–148. doi:10.1515/9783110558142-008. ISBN 9783110558142.
  6. Purnell, Herbert C., Jr. 1970. Toward a reconstruction of Proto-Miao-Yao. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
  7. Wang Fushi 王辅世, Mao Zongwu 毛宗武. 1995. Miao-Yao yu guyin gouni 苗瑤语古音构拟. Beijing: China Social Sciences Academy Press 中国社会科学出版社.
  8. Chen, Qiguang 陈其光. 2001. Han-Zang, Miao-Yao tongyuanci zhuanti yanjiu 汉藏、苗瑶同源词专题研究 [A comparative study of Chinese and Miao-Yao]", pp.129–651. Vol. 2 in the series: Ting Pang-hsin 丁邦新 & Sun Hongkai 孙宏开 (eds.), Hanzangyu Tongyuanci Yanjiu 汉藏语同源词研究 [A Study of Sino-Tibetan cognate vocabulary]. Nanning: Guangxi Minzu Chubanshe 广西民族出版社. ISBN 9787536340343.
  9. Chen Qiguang [陈其光] (2013). Miao Yao yuwen [苗瑶语文]. Beijing: Ethnic Publishing House [民族出版社]. ISBN 9787566003263
  10. Wu, Anqi 吴安其. 2002. Hanzangyu tongyuan yanjiu 汉藏语同源研究. Beijing: Minzu University Press 中央民族大学出版社. ISBN 7-81056-611-3
  11. Ostapirat, Weera. 2016. Issues in the Reconstruction and Affiliation of Proto-Miao-Yao Archived 2019-11-13 at the Wayback Machine. Language and Linguistics 17(1): 133–145. doi:10.1177/1606822X15614522
  12. Li, Yunbing 李云兵 (2018). Miao Yaoyu bijiao yanjiu 苗瑶语比较研究 (A comparative study of Hmong-Mien languages). Beijing: The Commercial Press 商务印书馆. ISBN 9787100165068. OCLC 1112270585.
  13. Wang, Fushi. 1979. Miaoyu fangyan sheng yun mu bijiao 苗语方言声韵母比较 [The comparison of the initials and finals of the Miao dialects]. Unpublished manuscript. Beijing.
  14. Wang, Fushi 王輔世. 1994. Miaoyu guyin gouni 苗语古音構擬 / Reconstruction of Proto-Miao Language. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA) / Ajia Afurika Gengo Bunka Kenkyūjo 國立亞非語言文化硏究所.
  15. L-Thongkum, Theraphan. 1993. A view on Proto-Mjuenic (Yao). Mon-Khmer Studies 22:163-230.
  16. Liu, Wen 刘文 (2021). Yaoyu fangyan lishi bijiao yanjiu 瑶语方言历史比较研究. Beijing: Social Sciences Press 社会科学文献出版社. ISBN 9787520181464. OCLC 1294576509.
  17. Ratliff, Martha. 2007. "Contrastive Vowel Length in Mienic: Inheritance or Diffusion?" In SEALS XIII Papers from the 13th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 2003, edited by Iwasaki Shoichi et al. Canberra, Australia, 223-229. Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
  18. Strecker, David (2021). "The morphology and semantics of presyllables in Hmong-Mien languages". Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 44 (1): 55–74. doi:10.1075/ltba.20007.str. ISSN 0731-3500. S2CID 233535102. (Pre-print version)
  19. Norquest, Peter. 2020. A Hypothesis on the Origin of Preglottalized Sonorants in Kra-Dai. 38th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Vancouver: Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia. doi:10.14288/1.0389866
  20. Taguchi, Yoshihisa. 2023. Toward a new reconstruction of Proto-Hmong-Mien. 26th Himalayan Languages Symposium, 4-6 September 2023. Paris: INALCO.
  21. Taguchi, Yoshihisa. (2022) Nasal transfer in Hmongic. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45/1:72-92.
  22. Ratliff, Martha (2004). Tapp; Michaud; Culas; Lee (eds.). Vocabulary of environment and subsistence in the Hmong–Mien proto-language. pp. 147–165. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  23. Baxter, William H.; Sagart, Laurent. 2014. The Baxter-Sagart reconstruction of Old Chinese. College of LSA, University of Michigan. Accessed 19 February 2023.
  24. Baxter, William H. and Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-994537-5.
  25. Sidwell, Paul and Felix Rau (2015). "Austroasiatic Comparative-Historical Reconstruction: An Overview." In Jenny, Mathias and Paul Sidwell, eds (2015). The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004283572_005
  26. Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1951. Introduction à la phonologie historique des langues miao-yao [An introduction to the historical phonology of the Miao-Yao languages]. Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême-Orient 44(2). 555–576.
  27. Kosaka, Ryuichi. 2002. "On the affiliation of Miao-Yao and Kadai: can we posit the Miao-Dai Family?" In The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal, 32: 71-100.
  28. Ostapirat, Weera. 2018. "Macrophyletic Trees of East Asian Languages Re examined." In Let's Talk about Trees, ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa and Lawrence A. Reid. Osaka: Senri Ethnological Studies, Minpaku. doi:10.15021/00009006
  29. Sidwell, Paul. 2015. The Palaungic Languages: Classification, Reconstruction and Comparative Lexicon Archived 2019-10-23 at the Wayback Machine. München: Lincom Europa.
  30. Ferlus, Michel. 1991. Vocalisme du Proto-Viet-Muong. Paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Thailand, 7–11 October 1991.
  31. Diffloth, Gérard. 1980. The Wa Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 5(2): 1–182.
  32. Hsiu, Andrew. 2017. Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic look-alikes.
  33. Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2009. The Phonology of Proto-Tai. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
  34. Blust, Robert. n.d. Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. Manuscript.
  35. Matisoff, James A. (2003), Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-09843-5.
  36. Benedict, Paul K. 1987. "Early MY/TB Loan Relationships." In Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 10, no. 2: 12-21.
  37. Jacques, Guillaume (2021-05-20). "Chapter 11: Hmong-Mien and Rgyalrongic". In Kupchik, John; Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés; Miyake, Marc Hideo; Vovin, Alexander (eds.). Studies in Asian historical linguistics, philology and beyond: festschrift presented to Alexander V. Vovin in honor of his 60th birthday. Leiden: Brill. pp. 150–153. ISBN 978-90-04-44856-8. OCLC 1250436437. Retrieved 2023-01-19.

Sources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.