Personal Representative (CSRT)

Initially United States President George W. Bush asserted that captives taken during the "Global War on Terror":

• Did not qualify for Prisoner of War status, as defined by the Geneva Conventions.
• Were not entitled to the protection of having a "competent tribunal" convened, where their combatant status would be openly reviewed.

This assertion was criticized by many legal scholars, and lawyers who volunteered to represent Guantanamo captives mounted legal challenges in the US Court system. The first legal challenge to be heard before the United States Supreme Court was Rasul v. Bush.

The Supreme Court addressed some aspects of the case. In particular, it ruled that the Guantanamo captives were entitled to an opportunity to hear, and challenge, the allegations the DoD felt justified their continued extrajudicial detention.

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote that the Department of Defense should convene Tribunals similar to those described in Army Regulation 190-8.

Army Regulation 190-8 sets out the procedure officers of the United States armed forces should follow to determine whether captives taken during a war were:

1. lawful combatants, entitled to the protections of POW status.
2. innocent civilian refugees, who should be released immediately.
3. combatants who have acted in a manner that has stripped them of the protections of POW status.

Guantanamo captive's Personal Representatives duties included:

1. meeting with captive prior to their Tribunal, to explain the Combatant Status Review Tribunal procedure to them, including:
   • explaining that the Tribunals were administrative procedures, not judicial procedures.
   • explaining that captives were entitled to attend every Tribunal session where unclassified evidence was discusses;
   • explaining that captives were not obliged to testify at their Tribunals;
   • explaining that they would have an opportunity to respond to all the unclassified allegations presented at their Tribunal.
   • explaining that they could call upon the testimony of any witnesses they felt could address the allegations they faced, but that their Tribunal's President would then rule whether their witnesses were relevant and reasonably available.
   • explaining that they could call upon any documents they felt could address the allegations they faced, and as with their witness requests, their Tribunal's President would then rule whether those documents were relevant and reasonably available.

Andy Worthington, author of The Guantanamo Files, singled out the Personal Representatives of two captives who were notably active on their behalf.[3] The names of these officers has not been made public, but the captives they represented were: Farouq Saif and Muhammed Khan Tumani.

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunal

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Combatant Status Review Tribunal (fact sheet of October 17, 2006)

• Recorder (CSRT)
• Tribunal President (CSRT)
• Reporter (CSRT)
• Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants

• Gordon England (July 29, 2004). "Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba" (PDF). Department of Defense. Retrieved 2008-02-10.