Period (algebraic geometry)

A real number is a period if it is of the form

${\displaystyle \int _{P(x,y,z,\ldots )\geq 0}Q(x,y,z,\ldots )\mathrm {d} x\mathrm {d} y\mathrm {d} z\ldots }$

where ${\displaystyle P}$ is a polynomial and ${\displaystyle Q}$ a rational function on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ with rational coefficients. A complex number is a period if its real and imaginary parts are periods.[3]

An alternative definition allows ${\displaystyle P}$ and ${\displaystyle Q}$ to be algebraic functions;[4] this looks more general, but is equivalent. The coefficients of the rational functions and polynomials can also be generalised to algebraic numbers because irrational algebraic numbers are expressible in terms of areas of suitable domains.

In the other direction, ${\displaystyle Q}$ can be restricted to be the constant function ${\displaystyle 1}$ or ${\displaystyle -1}$, by replacing the integrand with an integral of ${\displaystyle \pm 1}$ over a region defined by a polynomial in additional variables. In other words, a (nonnegative) period is the volume of a region in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ defined by a polynomial inequality.

Besides the algebraic numbers, the following numbers are known to be periods:

• The natural logarithm of any positive algebraic number a, which is ${\displaystyle \int _{1}^{a}{\frac {1}{x}}\ \mathrm {d} x}$
• π ${\displaystyle =\int _{0}^{1}{\frac {4}{x^{2}+1}}\ \mathrm {d} x}$
• Elliptic integrals with rational arguments
• All zeta constants (the Riemann zeta function of an integer) and multiple zeta values
• Special values of hypergeometric functions at algebraic arguments
• Γ(p/q)^q for natural numbers p and q.

An example of a real number that is not a period is given by Chaitin's constant Ω. Any other non-computable number also gives an example of a real number that is not a period. Currently there are no natural examples of computable numbers that have been proved not to be periods, however it is possible to construct artificial examples.[5] Plausible candidates for numbers that are not periods include e, 1/π, and the Euler–Mascheroni constant γ.

The periods are intended to bridge the gap between the algebraic numbers and the transcendental numbers. The class of algebraic numbers is too narrow to include many common mathematical constants, while the set of transcendental numbers is not countable, and its members are not generally computable.

The set of all periods is countable, and all periods are computable,[6] and in particular definable.

Many of the constants known to be periods are also given by integrals of transcendental functions. Kontsevich and Zagier note that there "seems to be no universal rule explaining why certain infinite sums or integrals of transcendental functions are periods".

Kontsevich and Zagier conjectured that, if a period is given by two different integrals, then each integral can be transformed into the other using only the linearity of integrals (in both the integrand and the domain), changes of variables, and the Newton–Leibniz formula

${\displaystyle \int _{a}^{b}f'(x)\,dx=f(b)-f(a)}$

(or, more generally, the Stokes formula).

A useful property of algebraic numbers is that equality between two algebraic expressions can be determined algorithmically. The conjecture of Kontsevich and Zagier would imply that equality of periods is also decidable: inequality of computable reals is known recursively enumerable; and conversely if two integrals agree, then an algorithm could confirm so by trying all possible ways to transform one of them into the other one.

It is conjectured that Euler's number e and the Euler–Mascheroni constant γ are not periods.

The periods can be extended to exponential periods by permitting the integrand ${\displaystyle Q}$ to be the product of an algebraic function and the exponential of an algebraic function. This extension includes all algebraic powers of e, the gamma function of rational arguments, and values of Bessel functions.

Kontsevich and Zagier suggest that there are "indications" that periods can be naturally generalized even further, to include Euler's constant γ. With this inclusion, "all classical constants are periods in the appropriate sense".

• Jacobian variety
• Gauss–Manin connection
• Mixed motives (math)
• Tannakian formalism

• Kontsevich, Maxim; Zagier, Don (2001). "Periods" (PDF). In Engquist, Björn; Schmid, Wilfried (eds.). Mathematics unlimited—2001 and beyond. Berlin, New York City: Springer. pp. 771–808. ISBN 9783540669135. MR 1852188.

• Marcolli, Matilde (2010). "Feynman integrals and motives". European Congress of Mathematics. Eur. Math. Soc. Zürich. pp. 293–332. arXiv:0907.0321.

Footnotes

• Belkale, Prakash; Brosnan, Patrick (2003), "Periods and Igusa local zeta functions", International Mathematics Research Notices, 2003 (49): 2655–2670, doi:10.1155/S107379280313142X, ISSN 1073-7928, MR 2012522
• Waldschmidt, Michel (2006), "Transcendence of periods: the state of the art" (PDF), Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, 2 (2): 435–463, doi:10.4310/PAMQ.2006.v2.n2.a3, ISSN 1558-8599, MR 2251476

• PlanetMath: Period