Parental dividend


The parental dividend is a policy proposal first suggested by economist Shirley P. Burggraf[1][2] during a Bunting Fellowship at Radcliffe College. It proposes replacing the current generalized labor market funding apparatus of the US Social Security system with one that preferentially rewards parental labor and investment.[3][4][5] While the current US Social Security system collects payroll taxes from working adults and redistributes them to retirees in amounts based on pre-retirement earnings,[6] the parental dividend is a retirement benefit calculated according to the income of one's own adult children.[7][8][9]


Background

Shirley P. Burggraf's parental dividend is described in The Feminine Economy and Economic Man: Reviving the Role of the Family in the Post-Industrial Age (1997).[7] The proposal has been described as an atypical feminist approach to solving crises of the American family unit by relying on market forces.[10] According to sociologist David Popenoe on the topic of the parental dividend, “We should launch a society wide discussion of what would be the most far-reaching family policy of all: restructuring the national Social Security system.”[11]

Theory

Parental dividend theory is based on the idea that the future productivity of children can be helped or harmed by Social Security payments made in real-time by families to retirees.[12] Financial knock-on effects of the parental dividend depend on a link between the long term successes of children and the amount of time parents spend rearing them.[13] The greater the parental investment in terms of time and money, the greater a child's income is likely to be in adulthood.[14] By changing the financial system supporting Social Security to preferentially assist parents in retirement, the work and costs of parenting become valuable[15] and children raised in this environment would have a greater potential to earn more as adults, therefore resulting in greater retirement benefits for their parents.[16][17]

According to economists Burggraf and Grossbard-Shechtman, Social Security with a parental dividend would remove the burden of paying for retirement twice, first in payroll taxes for one's own retirement through the US Social Security System, and simultaneously paying for the retirement of one's parents receiving low Social Security benefits thanks to their own opportunity costs of childcare.[18] The concept links expenses associated with raising children, especially the opportunity costs of lost wages, to workers' time outside the work force resulting in reduced Social Security benefits. In this way, the parental dividend seeks to address a potential financial problem in the current US Social Security system, namely that the largest Social Security payments currently go to retirees who spent the least amount of time raising children.[19][20]

References
  1. Folbre, Nancy; Wolf, Douglas (2013). "The Intergenerational Welfare State". Population and Development Review. 38: 36–51. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00550.x.
  2. "The Feminine Economy and Economic Man. - Free Online Library". www.thefreelibrary.com. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  3. Burggraf, Shirley (1997). The Feminine Economy and Economic Man: Reviving the Role of the Family in the Postindustrial Age (Updated ed.). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0738200361.
  4. Ball, Debra A. ; Periard (Winter 1996). "Book Reviews". Michigan Family Review. 02 (2): 111. doi:10.3998/mfr.4919087.0002.210. hdl:2027/spo.4919087.0002.210. ISSN 1558-7258.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. Peterson, Janice; Lewis, Margaret (2001). The Elgar Companion to Feminist Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 52. ISBN 1843768682. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
  6. "Learn About Retirement Benefits | SSA". www.ssa.gov. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  7. "Splitsville". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  8. Tice, D. J. "OPINION EXCHANGE | Making parenting pay again: Of leave policy and social trends". Star Tribune. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  9. Goodwin, Neva (2005). "The limitations of markets: Background essay". mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de. Retrieved 2022-10-26.
  10. King, Mary C. (1998). "Review of The Feminine Economy and Economic Man: Reviving the Role of Family in the Post-Industrial Age". Eastern Economic Journal. 24 (3): 376–378. ISSN 0094-5056. JSTOR 40325882.
  11. Hughes, James W.; Seneca, Joseph J. (1999). America's Demographic Tapestry: Baseline for the New Millennium. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-2647-8.
  12. Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana (1998-07-01). "The Feminine Economy and Economic Man". The Journal of Socio-Economics. 27 (4): 573–575. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(98)80009-7.
  13. Wax, Amy (1999-01-01). "Is There a Caring Crisis?". Yale Journal on Regulation.
  14. "Sun Journal - Google News Archive Search". news.google.com. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  15. Wolf, Douglas A.; Lee, Ronald D.; Miller, Timothy; Donehower, Gretchen; Genest, Alexandre (2011). "Fiscal Externalities of Becoming a Parent". Population and Development Review. 37 (2): 241–266. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00410.x. ISSN 0098-7921. PMC 3134288. PMID 21760651.
  16. "WHAT IS A HOMEMAKER'S WORTH TO SOCIETY? NOT MUCH". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  17. Lewis, Margaret; Peterson, Janice (2012). The Elgar companion to feminist economics. Edward Elgar. ISBN 978-1-84972-370-1. OCLC 858902372.
  18. Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana A. (2003). Marriage and the economy theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-89143-4. OCLC 1097150004.
  19. Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana (April 28, 2003). Marriage and the Economy: Theory and Evidence from Advanced Industrial Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 336. ISBN 0521814545. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
  20. Murray, Stephanie H. (2021-10-03). "The Social Security Trap". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.