My Name Is Khan

Having worked on a number of romantic dramas and consequently become known for these,[11] Karan Johar desired to experiment with a new genre.[12] He wanted it to be one that would attract critical and commercial success, as well as help prove his ability of making non-romantic films to his audience.[13] Eventually, the idea of making a socially relevant film came to his mind, "because that is what those kinds of people like".[10] He chose to depict Islam as a main topic of discussion — an action that he described as a "conscious decision" — since he felt there is an international unawareness and negative generalization towards the religion.[14] While himself belonging not to the religion, he called himself educated and open-minded enough to understand that misconceptions against Islam exist.[10][14] As a filmmaker, Johar wanted to communicate with his audience of his message, which is "correcting the world's misconceptions about Islam", in an emotional, yet effective, manner.[14]

In November 2007, Bollywood Hungama reported a then-untitled upcoming project by Johar.[15] The filmmaker told the entertainment portal that there would be possibility it would be rather titled My Name Is Khan or simply Khan.[15] In a July 2008 article in his personal blog, Johar confirmed the title as My Name Is Khan, breaking his tradition of initiating his works' titles with the letter "K".[16] He said, "While deciding upon the title, I just went by my gut and decided on something which brings to fore the spirit of the film and the story that I wanted to tell. Everything was decided in true earnest. The right title of the film was and stays on as My Name Is Khan."[17]

Danville, California (pictured) was the inspiration behind the fictional town Banville

Shibani Bathija wrote the story and screenplay while penning the dialogues with Johar's then-regular collaborator Niranjan Iyengar,[8] thus making My Name Is Khan Johar's first film he did not write himself,[18] though he still helped her in the research.[19] According to Johar, it gave him "a level of detachment from the proceedings and yet, a lot of attachment" and released "unexplored emotions".[20] In preparation, Bathija and Johar met a lot of people with autism, including those who have Asperger's syndrome; Bathija also read books about their condition, including An Asperger Marriage and Aspergers in Love, non-fictions about the life of a woman with his husband, who suffers from Asperger.[14][21] Johar suggested to have a Muslim character in the lead and set the film in the September 11 attacks, which Bathija eventually agreed with.[22]

Geographically, the story is set in the San Francisco Bay Area, which came to Bathija's inspirations because of her familiarity with the place while finishing her communication study at the San Francisco State University between 1998 and 2000.[23] Her motivation to use it as the film's backdrop increased in 2007 after seeing many Bollywood films also being shot there.[23] A fictional town, Banville, which she described as "a stereotypically white, upper-class Bay Area suburb", was also added into the story.[23] In an interview to the East Bay Express, Bathija recounted that while researching for the San Francisco Bay by Google Maps from Mumbai, she spotted Danville, California, which fitted her criteria of a location that resembles a "small, very rich suburban town".[23] Beside that, Bathija also wrote the English-language dialogues, while Niranjan Iyengar wrote the Hindi ones.[22][24] A number of Arabic phrases, mostly in religious context, were also added.[25]

The film was co-produced by Hiroo Yash Johar of Karan Johar's Dharma Productions and Gauri Khan of Shah Rukh Khan's Red Chillies Entertainment.[8] The partnership was announced in February 2009;[26] on co-producing the film under his own banner, Shah Rukh Khan said he disliked to presell films, especially non-commercial ones, like My Name Is Khan, and wanted Johar to finish it without taking a loan as well as to collectively own the film.[27] The budget was estimated to have been ₹550 million (US$12.03 million), according to the financial newspaper Mint.[28] The production was also handled in part with the American production houses Fox Star Studios and Fox Searchlight Pictures.[8] Fox Star's involvement to distribute the film was announced in August;[29] however, the company's exact paid amount for the rights was disputed, with unconfirmed estimations ranging from ₹810 million (US$17.71 million) to ₹1 billion (US$21.87 million), and its executives refused to disclose the number.[30][31] In February 2010, the Abu Dhabi-based Image Nation joined to distributed the film,[32] and nine months later, the Hong Kong-based Huaxia Film Distribution followed.[33]

Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol were cast in the lead roles and also made their Hollywood debut.

Shanoo Sharma and Robi Reed handled the casting of My Name Is Khan.[34] The earliest press reports appeared in October 2007,[35] when Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol were reported to be cast in the lead.[36] Karan Johar, however, clarified that while Shah Rukh Khan had accepted the offer, he had not been able to confirm whether Kajol would be in the casting, saying that he had not talked with her yet.[15] During this period, Kareena Kapoor was reported to have offered herself to play opposite Shah Rukh Khan, until May 2008 at the time Kajol confirmed her presence.[37] My Name Is Khan became Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol's sixth collaboration, after Baazigar (1993), Karan Arjun (1995), Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (1995), Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1998) and Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham... (2001), the latter two were also directed by Karan Johar.[38][39]

Before Jimmy Sheirgill, Aamir Bashir and then R. Madhavan were originally chosen to play the role of Zakir, Rizwan's younger brother.[40] The latter left the film to prioritise his role in 3 Idiots (2009).[41] When filming began in December 2008, the United States authority refused to give Bashir a visa to travel to that because he did not mention his travel to Iran in the application form;[42] since the Mumbai attacks, the country had been cautious of foreigners.[43] The incident attracted considerable media attention, which led to his exclusion from the casting.[40][44] Shabana Azmi was initially cast for portraying Rizwan's mother, Razia. However, owing to a delay caused by Shah Rukh Khan's shoulder surgery in January 2009, Azmi opted out;[45] she continued to shoot for Gurinder Chadha-directed comedy-drama, It's a Wonderful Afterlife (2010).[46][47] The role eventually went to Zarina Wahab.[8]

In January 2009, Pakistani actress Sonya Jehan was reported to join the casting to play the supporting role of university professor Hasina Khan.[8][48] Unlike Jehan's previous films that shows her in revealing clothes, this one has her wearing a hijab, the traditional head-covering for Muslim women. She was particularly drawn to her character and expressed a desire to play similar roles in the future.[49] Child artist Tanay Chheda played the role of young Rizwan.[50] Chheda's performance in the widely-acclaimed drama Slumdog Millionaire (2008), his resemblance of Shah Rukh Khan's appearance and his familiarity with Mumbai slums were the basis for Karan Johar to cast him.[51] Instead of putting the footages of then-President Barack Obama, an actor physically similar to him was chosen.[52] Forest Whitaker was the original possibility for the role, but he declined owing to conflicting schedule and disinclination to play Obama who was still in his office.[53] The role eventually went to Christopher B. Duncan, who was cast two months after an audition.[54][55]

Shah Rukh Khan, who played the autistic Rizwan in My Name Is Khan, had his own research to the character

Karan Johar and Bathija researched extensively for Shah Rukh Khan's character in My Name Is Khan for two years, and this include their personal study of Asperger's syndrome and contacts with autistic people from various centers in London, New York, Los Angeles and India. When interviewed by Bollywood Hungama, he admitted to have helped her by "just executing her vision".[14][56] Karan Johar and Bathija met Christopher and Gisela Slater-Walker, who wrote An Asperger Marriage, and he described the former as having been their significant inspiration for the character.[14] They also had a rendezvous with Chris and Maxine Aston (Aspergers in Love's writers), whom Karan Johar said to have been the "basis" for Rizwan and Mandira's relationship. Their research also included gathering information related to the condition from YouTube videos.[57]

Shah Rukh Khan did his own research to his role, which Bathija stated to have been written specifically for him.[58] He said that he was nervous but at the same time excited to play the type of role, which he had never done before.[59] Karan Johar described him as being challenged, even considering Rizwan to be Shah Rukh Khan's "most challenging" character.[60] Shah Rukh Khan himself referred to it as "the most interesting part" of his career as an actor, seeing that he could spread awareness about a condition that is rarely suffered from.[61] His film characters are mainly secular; they are not especially focused on their religious background, but the one in My Name Is Khan is.[62] Alluding to its autism, he referred to his My Name Is Khan character as a "neuro-atypical mind, who could do less and say more".[63]

Karan Johar sent Shah Rukh Khan to the centers he had previously visited with Bathija;[14] the director wanted the actor to socialize with autistic people, predominantly those with Asperger, and make his own Rizwan based on these interactions.[14] Beside videos, Shah Rukh Khan continued his research with reading books about the syndrome, including the mystery novel The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time.[59] Karan Johar observed that Shah Rukh Khan's research for the character was particularly extensive, admitting that it astonished him: "I was zapped by how much he knew on the subject. And he brought all the knowledge on the sets."[64] While playing his character, the actor maintained expressionless eyes even when he was saying his dialogues, which he found difficult. To get it right, he practiced in bathroom for ten consecutive days.[65]

Los Angeles-based Robin Slater, who had worked in films including How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000), Memoirs of a Geisha (2005) and Dreamgirls (2006), was appointed to be Shah Rukh Khan's makeup artist by producer Prashant Shah.[67] Slater described his look as "a natural sun-kissed one, very natural. He looks fresh and they all thought he looked much younger."[67] She did his makeup in six steps and six minutes, starting with using a concealer to get rid of the flaws from his face.[67] She then airbrushed the foundation on, put sunburn stipple around his chin, cheekbones, forehead, jaw and nose, and shaded the nose and jawline.[67] After using powder gel to make him as if he wore no makeup, Slater removed airbrush overflow on his eyebrows and eyelashes.[67]

Kajol was given with the role of Mandira, Rizwan's Hindu wife with a son from her previous marriage. She found My Name Is Khan to be thematically similar to Karan Johar's previous films, noting Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham... for instance.[68] However, she added "there was more masala in them" in comparison to My Name Is Khan, which she called his deepest one.[68] The complexity of her character, Mandira, made her emotionally engaged to it, and Kajol stated that this experience eventually gave her a life lesson: "It is okay to be imperfect as a human being."[68] She described My Name Is Khan as an intense collaboration with her friend, Karan Johar, who asked her to lose weight for characterization.[69][70]

In an interview to Indo-Asian News Service, Johar said that Kajol had always been the one in his mind while casting for an actress to play Mandira. On her spontaneous nature, he commented, "There is no method to her madness. She is sheer brilliance. Her expressions connect you immediately. She is all real, all woman, all human on screen and I don't think any living actress has the quality that Kajol has."[71] His frequent collaborator, Manish Malhotra, was specifically chosen as her costume designer.[72] As to her role as a San Francisco-based hairstylist, Kajol wore colorful clothes, including jackets and trousers; while her character is at home, she would be given more tracks and sweaters.[73] In one of her scenes, she featured in a red sari, which was not Malhotra's design but was bought from a shop.[73] Johar said that she did not want the fashion to distract the film's messages.[74] Shiraz Siddique handled the rest of the cast's costumes.[8]

San Francisco, where an extensive portion of the film was shot

Principal photography was commenced by Ravi K. Chandran on 18 December 2008 in Los Angeles.[75] Farah Khan and Sham Kaushal provided the choreography; Sharmishta Roy served as the production designer; Mohammed Kasim and Mansi Dhruv Mehta were the art directors; Sidharth Malhotra and Varun Dhawan, who would later make their film debuts with Johar's next directorial venture Student of the Year, also presented by Shah Rukh Khan, served as assistant directors.[34][76] In January 2009, after a one-month schedule, Shah Rukh Khan went on to shoot an action scene in Dulha Mil Gaya (2010) but faced an accident that injured his shoulder.[77] He underwent a physical therapy,[77] and in the next month a surgery that made the shooting was delayed until the next month.[78][79] After filming was continued, he faced severe migraines but only taking pills to relieve these.[80] When the pain worsened he checked up to a doctor; his migraines were proven to have been the result of being in leaning position and raising his eyebrows for hours, which were required for his character.[80] In January 2010, he had another physical therapy.[80]

The Los Angeles schedule began in March 2009.[81] In the next month, the slum scenes were shot in Borivali.[82] The next two days, the film was shot at a mosque in Andheri.[82] Filming then moved to San Francisco in May 2009 for a 40-day schedule.[50] Coinciding with the start of the 2009 swine flu pandemic, it was done secretly to avoid public attention,[83] and finished a month afterwards.[50] In August 2009, the cast and crew moved to Film City for shooting the hurricane scene.[84] For the sets, Josh Maidain designed a dam of 135 by 240 metres (443 ft × 787 ft), along with churches and small houses.[85] A 150 by 150 feet (46 m × 46 m) tank was also made, and approximately 12 thousand liters of water were used for the scene.[86][87] This schedule, which was the last of the production, began on 1 September and was completed in a month.[84] During the filming, a snake reportedly entered the tank and panicked all the workers.[88] My Name Is Khan was edited by Deepa Bhatia, while Dileep Subramaniam and Anuj Mathur were involved in the sound design.[8] The film's final cut runs for 155 minutes.[89]

My Name Is Khan debuted in Abu Dhabi, UAE on 10 February 2010.[114] It released globally in cinemas on 12 February 2010.[4] MNIK had a two phase release. To begin with, it had a mainstream release in India coupled with a regular Diaspora release in UK, US, Gulf, Australia and various other countries. "After that in the months of April and May, we would be looking at a mainstream theatrical release in countries like Germany, Poland and other parts of North America," detailed Johar.[115]

On 7 August 2009, Johar signed a deal for ₹1 billion (equivalent to ₹2.5 billion or US$31 million in 2023) with Fox Searchlight Pictures, who will market and distribute it in worldwide (Fox Searchlight).[116][117] It covers all rights except music, which has been secured by Sony Music India.

The film was released in India on DVD on 21 April 2010, Blu-ray in India, plus a DVD release worldwide followed on 17 August 2010.

In the United Kingdom, it was 2012's sixth most-watched foreign-language film on television with 210,000 viewers on Channel 4, and the year's second most-watched Asian film (below the Chinese film Red Cliff).[118]

ASTPL, an Indian software developer, also released a mobile video game based on the film.[119]

My Name Is Khan received highly positive reviews from overseas publications, most of which echoed the same sentiments as of domestic critics.[120][121][122] On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 83% of 29 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.7/10. The website's consensus reads: "My Name Is Khan rests on powerful performances to tell an affecting story that blends timely themes and old-fashioned Bollywood melodrama."[123] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 50 out of 100, based on 7 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.[124]

My Name Is Khan received highly positive reviews upon release, with particular praise directed towards its direction and the leads' performances,[126][127][128][10][129] and has often been referred to as the director's magnum opus.[130]

In a 4+1⁄2-star review, Taran Adarsh wrote that Shah Rukh Khan's performance was his career's best so far and "no amount of praise can do sufficient justice to his portrayal".[131] Adarsh also praised the decision to cast Kajol, whom he regarded as the one with the strongest chemistry with Shah Rukh Khan, and described her as having given "a powerhouse performance".[131] Rediff.com's Raja Sen said Karan Johar had made "his first grown-up film", and described it as one "that will inspire, make aware, make happy".[132] Sudhish Kamath wrote of the character Rizwan as "the epitome of goodness and surprisingly, the filmmaker tones down his sense of drama several notches, showing great restraint for at least two-thirds of the film".[133]

Writing for The Hindu, Bhavishek Shah called the film a landmark to the careers of the director and its lead actors. The critic opined Shah Rukh Khan succeeded in playing his part: "Completely getting under the skin of the character, Shah Rukh has picked up every single nuance of an Asperger's syndrome patient without making it appear labored."[134] Savera R. Someshwar of Rediff.com wrote that Kajol delivered a fine performance, taking note of her "laughter, her determination, her joie de vivre, her grief, her anger — Kajol brings it all to life. And, if I may say so, Kajol, no one runs up a hill dressed in a night suit, wearing floppy slippers, with no make-up on, as well as you do."[135] Pratim D. Gupta of The Telegraph wrote that Shah Rukh Khan is outstanding and called his presence to be emotional equilibrium, and was excited to see him collaborating once again with Kajol.[136] Writing for the Bangalore Mirror, Minty Tejpal saw the film was intended for an international market, noting its story that includes Islamophobia and African-American community.[137]

BBC's Manish Gajjar believed Shah Rukh Khan had shown his versatility as an actor within his emotional performance and considered it to be his best. On Kajol, Gajjar thought she had given an equally commendable performance, especially in the second half where her character, Mandira, is shown as being egocentric after losing her son.[139] Minu Jain of The New Indian Express complimented Karan Johar for exploring a genre that is not romance-centric and labelled the film "a road journey through a troubled post 9/11 America towards humanism".[140] Mayank Shekhar of the Hindustan Times also praised his move to experiment outside the typically musical Bollywood cinema; Shekhar wrote positively of Bathija's screenplay, which he called compelling enough for praise.[141] Subhash K. Jha referred to the film as "a flawless work, as perfect in content, tone and treatment as any film can get".[142] Anna M. M. Vetticad lauded My Name Is Khan's story, claiming that it had been able to made her cry.[143]

Anupama Chopra said Shah Rukh Khan's character Rizwan as the greatest part of the film.[144] Sukanya Venkatraghavan of Filmfare asserted, "To say MNIK is a warm-the-cockles film about a man with Asperger syndrome who overcomes all odds and triumphs would be to pigeonhole it. The movie has a larger picture-one of humanity, tolerance, redemption and above all love."[145] Kaveree Bamzai of India Today said the film deserves to be watched not for its message but Shah Rukh Khan.[146] Alike views were shared by Rajeev Masand, who encouraged people to watch it for the cast; Masand further stated that the message of religious tolerance is significant but not unique.[147] Mid-Day's Sarita Tanwar argued, "In a near-perfect film, the only over-the-top part is Rizwan's return to a flood-hit small town to save the African-American family. It's stands out because everything else is so understated."[148] A scathing opinion was expressed by Ajit Duara of Open magazine, who labelled it "an expensive and empty vessel", attributing it to "the naivete of its treatment and the hack job that Karan Johar does with all the actors in this huge production".[149]

In a review to Ananda Bazar Patrika, Indroneil Sarkar disliked the film for its heavy subject and commented that the flood scene of the second half should have been edited out in entirety.[128] Vinod Mirani of Box Office India criticized the film as "an average film, lavishly made", and remarked, "As a director, Karan has treated the subject too leisurely, and consequently the pace slows down and the film drags at time. He's trying to say too many things."[128] Ajay Brahmatraj of Dainik Bhaskar, while commending Karan Johar for this time picking a complex subject, found the story not well written.[128] Man's World's Maithili Rao wrote, "It works only in the first half. Post interval there's too much drama, in particular the flood scene. They were trying to make a hero of an ordinary man. That spoilt the effect of the first half."[128] Deepa Gahlot of The Afternoon Despatch & Courier dismissed the film as being not one "that will evoke an instant reaction", concluding: "After a while, instead of feeling sympathetic, you are put off."[128]

In spite of being critical of the film's flood subplot and topics not fully explored, such as the Iraq War, Sight & Sound's Naman Ramachandran wrote Shah Rukh Khan carried out the film despite its flaws.[151] Itrath Syed of The Georgia Straight called My Name Is Khan "a multilayered, politically nuanced, and emotionally demanding film".[152] Syed noted there are "places where Johar leans too heavily on melodrama. Yet he does reveal an American experience in which fear and suspicion are commonplace, and to which people of color have simply adjusted."[152] Mark Jenkins of NPR wrote the film "transplants Bollywood's audacious style and brazen sentimentality to Hollywood's America".[153] Jenkins, however, was ambivalent of Shah Rukh Khan, whose characterization of Asperger syndrome the critic found to be dubious.[153]

In India, the film opened with a massive ₹295 million (US$6,356,688), which was the third-highest weekend net for a Bollywood film, behind 3 Idiots and Ghajini. It recorded the third-highest first day business across India, behind 3 Idiots and Ghajini at the time of release. The film broke the record of Race for the biggest opening weekend in the first quarter of the year. The film was reported to have done very well in multiplexes, but comparatively on the lower side in single screens. The film managed to net ₹460.8 million (equivalent to ₹1.0 billion or US$13 million in 2023) in its first week.

In rankings based on distributor share, My Name Is Khan comes in fifth behind Dabangg, Raajneeti, Golmaal 3 and Housefull;[156] in a way bearing out Sajid Khan's boast that Housefull will surpass MNIK in India.[157][158] The film managed to retain the No. 1 spot at the Indian box office for two consecutive weeks, and remained in the top five for six consecutive weeks. At the end of its theatrical run, the film earned ₹82.52 crore (US$18.05 million) in India.[7][159]

The film faced considerable falls in collections after its first week. The drops in collections became evident from the fact that 63% of the film's net collections came from the first week, as compared to 54% for Race, 56% for Ghajini, 49% for Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi and 39% for 3 Idiots. In spite of this, the film managed to retain the No. 1 position at the box office for two consecutive weeks. It was in the top 5 list of the Indian box office for six consecutive weeks. Though the mid-week collections saw a drop of 60% from the opening weekend, it held up well against other major releases and secured the highest first quarter collections, a record previously held by Race. Thus, the film is a financial success owing to its record-breaking overseas collections and healthy domestic collections.

My Name Is Khan grossed US$23.5 million in the overseas markets.[160] The film grossed the biggest opening day overseas, taking an estimated ₹990 million (US$21.65 million), beating the overseas opening day collections of 3 Idiots. The film also grossed the biggest opening weekend overseas, taking an estimated ₹255 million (US$5.58 million), again beating the overseas opening weekend collections of 3 Idiots which grossed ₹185 million (US$4.05 million). In its first week, it grossed ₹393 million (US$8.59 million). As of August 2010, the film has grossed $4,018,771 in the United States and $37,001,087 elsewhere for a worldwide total of $41,019,858.[161]

In the UK, it made £123,000 on its opening day,[162] which was more than the combined total of 3 Idiots in its first two days (£121,000). By the end of the second week, MNIK became only the third Bollywood film to cross the £2 million mark in the UK, after Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006) and Veer-Zaara (2004), according to the exchange rates prevailing at their respective times of release.[163] The film grossed a total of £2.6 million ($4,017,000) in the United Kingdom, making it the highest-grossing foreign-language film of 2010 in the UK.[164]

My Name Is Khan debuted in USA in 120 theatres, breaking the record set by 3 Idiots (2009) which debuted in 119 theatres. The film broke the record for an opening weekend in the US, earning US$1,994,027. The film debuted at No. 13 at the American box office. By the end of the first week, the film grossed US$2,552,283, second only to 3 Idiots which had a Christmas holiday week. By the fourth week, the film earned US$3,868,891 (₹193,820,016), breaking Shah Rukh Khan's previous record set by Om Shanti Om (2007). On the 51st day of screening in the US, My Name Is Khan broke the US$4 million barrier, and became only the second Bollywood film ever to cross this mark, after 3 Idiots.[161][165]

In Australia, the film earned A$39,000 (₹1610,000) on its opening day, and was ranked No. 11 in the market. By the first weekend, the film earned US$437,687, defeating the previous record set by 3 Idiots (US$350,000).[166] In New Zealand and Fiji, the film earned NZ$13,627 on its opening day, and earned NZ$144,831 (US$100,698) in its first week. By the end of its theatrical run, the film earned NZ$232,586.[167]

In the Middle East,[168][169] the response to the film has been described as "huge" and it earned approximately US$300,000 on its opening day.[170] In Egypt it earned LE 1,000,000.[171] By the end of its theatrical run, the film grossed US$517,018.[172]

My Name Is Khan also opened well in Sri Lanka, Pakistan and the Far East. The film is the highest-grossing film in Pakistan, breaking the records set by Avatar, 3 Idiots and Wanted.[173] By its third week, MNIK became the highest-grossing Bollywood film in the Middle East, earning US$3.3 million.[174] In South Africa, the film earned US$85,214 (₹39.28 lakh) in its opening weekend.[175] In Malaysia, it earned RM 105,527 (US$31,106) in its opening weekend, and by the second weekend, the film had earned RM 410,864 (US$120,452).[175] In Nigeria, the film earned an "impressive" ₦2,310,137 (US$15,362) in its opening weekend.[175] In Ghana, the film earned GH₵10,599 (US$7,443) by the second weekend. In Indonesia, the film grew from 6 to 14 screens and saw a jump of 300 percent in week three.[174] The film has also grossed $425,825 in 7 weeks at the Bahrain box office.[176] The film has also grossed an impressive $55,073 in Poland in its opening weekend.[177] The film grossed $270,698 in South Africa.[178] In South Korea, the film grossed $2,618,866. The film also made $58,683 in Lebanon.[179] My Name is Khan released in Hong Kong on 5 January 2012 and collected US$107,197.[180]

My Name Is Khan created several records, both in India and around the world. In India, the film smashed the record for a Bollywood release in the month of February, breaking the previous two-year record held by Jodhaa Akbar (2008). The film also broke the record for a Bollywood release in the first quarter of the year, breaking the previous two-year record held by Race (2008).

Overseas, it became the highest-grossing Indian film in overseas markets at the time,[181][182][183] and the first Indian film to gross over ₹1 billion (US$21.87 million) overseas.[183] In the UK, the film broke the four-year record of Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006), and became the highest-grossing Bollywood film in the UK. In the Middle East, it is also the highest-grossing Bollywood film.[181]

Professional ratings

Review scores
Source	Rating
Bollywood Hungama	link
Indo-Asian News Service	link
Planet Bollywood	link
Glamsham	link
rediff.com	link

Upon release, the album received positive reviews from music critics. Gianysh Toolsee of Planet Bollywood stated that the soundtrack was "very much about transcending the boundaries set by Bollywood by venturing into an emotional state through Sufism and spirituality." and gave the album 8/10.[188] Joginder Tuteja of Bollywood Hungama gave the album a three out of five stars, suggesting that Johar along with musicians Shankar–Ehsaan–Loy and lyricist Niranjan Iyengar "have brought not a partial but a substantial difference to the way music in [Johar's] films is being looked at."[189] Hindustan Times rated the album 3.5 out of 5 and stated "Every song in the album is above average. The composers have stuck to the theme of the film and the soundtrack has the potential to rock the charts."[190] Sukanya Verma of Rediff gave the album 3 out of 5 stating, "As for the soundtrack, it's neither fancy nor groundbreaking but warm enough to make us like it."[191] Glamsham rated the album 4/5 with a statement "Karan has crafted a beautiful film, while SRK has authored a marketing strategy that will be hard for even Aamir Khan to beat!"[192] The BBC review stated, "With four bonus songs taken from the director's box office successes that have featured Shah Rukh and Kajol together (plus a theatrical trailer for My Name Is Khan), there are plenty of extras goodies for hardcore Bollywood fans. But placed side by side, Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy's latest soundtrack may not seem as memorable as past collaborations."[193]

Khan has stated that due to his last name and religion, he (like Rizwan Khan) is frequently subject to excess security checks at airports. On 14 August 2009, Khan arrived in the United States to promote My Name Is Khan and to participate in South Asian-related events around the country (including Indian Independence Day). Upon arriving at Newark Airport in New Jersey, he was pulled aside by immigration officers after his name popped up on their computers,[194] questioned for over an hour (Khan claims it was at least two hours) about the nature of his visit, and was later released. According to the Times Online, "In Delhi, Timothy J. Roemer, the American Ambassador to India, said that the embassy was trying to 'ascertain the facts of the case.' He added: 'Shah Rukh Khan, the actor and global icon, is a welcome guest in the United States.'"[195][196]

Khan said he was told that it was because "they said my name was common to some name that popped up on the computer."[197][198] The officials asked if he could provide names of people to vouch for him. Khan noted that he "had all the documents; they were asking me where I was going to be staying. I gave the name of FOX people with whom I had finalised a deal a few days ago as contacts." However, because they wanted to check his luggage which the airline had lost, Khan said that he "was taken to a room where many people were awaiting a secondary check on visa, most were South Asians. In fact many officers were reluctantly vouching for me, some people were asking for autographs and a Pakistani fan even said he knew who I was. But the officers said it was procedure and kept taking numbers from me."[197][199]

While he was not allowed to use his own phone, Khan was permitted one phone call.[195] He was thus released after officials from the Indian Consulate intervened. Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel stated that the event will be further explored with U.S. officials.[198] According to the BBC, "Elmer Camacho, a spokesman for the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, said the questioning was part of the agency's routine process to screen foreign travellers."[200] When asked if he would demand an apology, Khan replied that he would not.

The director of My Name Is Khan, Karan Johar, was asked during an August 2009 interview with Mid-Day if the event was a publicity stunt for the film. Johar denied that it was and responded: "It's upsetting because I got a text message this morning asking me if it was a publicity plug for my movie. (Sarcastically) I mean, if I had that much power over the Homeland Security, why would I allow Shah Rukh to go through something like this? ... What's really shocking is the fact that when I was writing the film, I never thought that what happened to the protagonist of the film would happen to Shah Rukh."[201] During a January 2010 interview, Khan referred to the implication that the event was a publicity stunt for the film as "lowdown and cheap."[202] Christopher B. Duncan, who portrays President Obama in My Name Is Khan, also commented on the incident stating: "I was very disappointed with what SRK experienced at the airport. We're living in times where the levels of fear can sometimes spill over into paranoia. Here's a man who is an international superstar, being detained for an excessive amount of time at an airport in the United States. It had to be very upsetting for him. Imagine Oprah being detained at an airport in India for a long time, during a kind of interrogation."[203]

In addition, the incident sparked debate and commentary among Indian politicians, actors, and others.[204][205][206][207] It also led to demonstrations in India.[208] California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger later invited Khan to have dinner with him "in a bid to diffuse what has become a slight diplomatic row."[209]

In another event, on 5 February 2010, while promoting My Name Is Khan on the British talk show Friday Night with Jonathan Ross, Khan claimed that female security staff at Heathrow Airport in London had printed a naked image of him taken using the newly installed body scanner that he was asked to go through. He said that he autographed it for them, though it is not clear if his comments were intended as a joke. In relation to Khan's comments, The Economic Times has raised concerns over the new body scanners and the possibilities of it being abused to distribute naked pictures of celebrities.[210] His comments have restarted the debate in Britain over whether the new scanners violate individual privacy.[211]

After Shah Rukh Khan (who owns the Kolkata Knight Riders cricket team) criticized the fact that members of the Pakistani Cricket Team were not bought by the clubs competing in the 2010 Indian Premier League (IPL), he was condemned by Shiv Sena, a Hindu nationalist political party. There were consequent protests and demonstrations against him and demands that cinemas in India refuse to screen My Name Is Khan. Khan responded by stating, "What did I say that was wrong? All I said was that I wanted people to come to my country."[212] Khan continued by stating that: "I have no idea what I am supposed to apologize for ... If I am in the wrong I would like to apologize but someone needs to explain to me what is wrong."[213] He also stated that he does "not want any confrontation. I am trying to explain myself on every platform ... I have not said anything that is anti-national." Khan said that he was willing to meet with Bal Thackeray to discuss the issue.[214]

Initially, Shiv Sena rescinded its demand to block release of My Name Is Khan after it was announced that Khan would be allowed to release it "in as many theatres" as he would like.[215] However, on 17 February 2010, when cinemas opened for advanced bookings, individuals disguised as "cinegoers" began to attack cinemas and booking centers. Director Karan Johar and distributors met with police to ask for additional security.[216] In response, Chief Minister of Maharashtra Ashok Chavan threatened to withdraw security cover for party leader Uddhav Thackeray.[217] Later, some security was withdrawn and the Maharashtra government has "called in five battalions of the State Reserve Police Force to protect 63 cinemas in the city that will screen the film directed by Karan Johar from this Friday." There were multiple arrests and leave of all police officials were cancelled.[218] The distributor, Fox Star, stated that the film would still be released on its scheduled opening date, 12 February.[219] It opened to full cinema houses across India.[220][221][222][223]