Mobile Act
The Mobile Act was the popular name of a bill signed into law in early 1804 by United States President Thomas Jefferson. The law defined revenue boundaries for the newly acquired territories that the United States had gained from its purchase of La Louisiane from France.[1] The act anticipated that Mobile would be designated as a port of entry for a new revenue district. Mobile was, however, at the time a part of the Spanish province of West Florida.
Background
Following the Louisiana Purchase from France, the U.S. had quickly established the Louisiana[2] and Orleans Territories.[3] President Jefferson displayed an active interest in the area to the east of New Orleans, the Spanish province of West Florida (which included the "Florida Parishes" and the area surrounding the mouth of the Mobile River in today's state of Alabama).[4] The U.S. claimed that the purchase was based on the former boundaries of French Louisiana as they existed in 1762, which included all the lands west of the Perdido River (today the boundary between Alabama and Florida).[4] Spain, however, disagreed with this position because the purchase treaty specified the boundaries of Louisiana as France possessed it and as Spain received it,[5][6]p. 48 which occurred in 1769 when Spain took title to and possession of Louisiana, during the time that West Florida was a British colony.[4][7][8] Contesting and strongly objecting to the U.S. position, Spain, with France's backing, continued to exercise control over its West Florida province.[7][8]p. 109–118
The act
In November, 1803, John Randolph, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, introduced into the House of Representatives a bill to carry into effect the laws of the United States within its new acquisition. On February 24, 1804, President Jefferson signed it into law.[4] Its fourth and eleventh sections gave it its popular name, the Mobile Act. The act defined revenue boundaries for the newly acquired territories and gave Jefferson the opportunity to apply its provisions to a new district that would include Mobile, which was part of Spanish West Florida.
With regard to watersheds that discharge their waters to the Gulf of Mexico, the act authorized the president (1) to annex to the Mississippi revenue district all such navigable waters wholly within the United States east of the Mississippi River and (2) to place all such waters to the east of the Pascagoula River into a separate revenue district and to designate suitable ports of entry and delivery. "These two sections placed a full legislative interpretation on the theories of Livingston, Monroe and Jefferson, and there remained only the open or tacit acquiescence of Spain to make good the title of the United States as far as the Perdido.
"In a violent personal interview which [the Spanish minister to the U.S.,] Marqués de Casa Yrujo held with him, Madison speedily learned that Spain would by no means consent to this interpretation. The incensed Spaniard demanded the annulment of these offending sections, and gave at great length the Spanish interpretation of the obscure territorial clauses. … As neither he nor Jefferson had demanded possession of the territory at the time Louisiana was transferred, the situation was an awkward one for both of them. … As Madison rendered him no adequate explanation of the administration's course, Yrujo withdrew from Washington in anger.
"The president then cleared the situation by his proclamation of May 30, 1804," in which he placed all of the waterways and shores mentioned in the Mobile Act, lying within the boundaries of the United States, in a separate revenue district, with Fort Stoddert as its port of entry and delivery. Fort Stoddert had been built in 1799 in the Mississippi Territory to the north of Mobile and West Florida. Thus Jefferson virtually annulled the act. According to the British minister to Washington, this course was "perfectly satisfactory" to Casa Yrujo, who nevertheless "continued to harp upon it as a characteristic example of American duplicity."[8][9][10] pp. 97–100
Jefferson "had evidently permitted Congress to pass the act in order to test Spanish resistance to [the U.S.] claim. When this proved unexpectedly strong, he wavered … and, by implication, threw upon Randolph the major part of the blame for the unfortunate legislation." The testy Ways and Means Committee chairman did not forget the affront.[8] p. 100
Results
When Napoleon gave no support to the American border claims, Jefferson did not have the power to contest the situation and did not press the issue, letting it lie for the time being.[4] In the following years the U.S. negotiated for trade passage rights through the port of Mobile using diplomatic channels.[4] Spain remained the dominant government and military power in the area for several years. Then, following a revolt resulting in the short-lived Republic of West Florida, the U.S. occupied and forcibly annexed the Florida Parishes in 1810.[12]
Two years later, during the War of 1812, General James Wilkinson occupied the remainder of Spanish West Florida, including Mobile.[13] From 1813 on there was a continual American presence in the city. The U.S. formally purchased the lands through the 1819 Adams–Onís Treaty with Spain,[8] taking legal possession of the entire Florida Territory on July 17, 1821.[14]
See also
References
- La Louisiane française 1682-1803; (2002); Website; Culture of France; accessed July 2020. Note: Although named, "La Louisiane", that name became the French term for the U.S. state of Louisiana, so, by 1879, the colonial region was referred to as La Louisiane française.
- An Act for the Admission of the State of Louisiana..."; Government website; Library of Congress; accessed July 2020
- "An Act Erecting Louisiana into Two Territories..."; Government website; Library of Congress; accessed July 2020
- Mobile, Alabama; "Thomas Jefferson – Monticello" online webpage; via "The Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia;" accessed July 2020.
- The quoted phrase, "Louisiana as France possessed it, and as Spain received it," paraphrases a key term in Article III of the Third Treaty of San Ildefonso (1800): "Louisiana, with the same extent that it now has in the hands of Spain and that it had when France possessed it".
- Chambers, Henry E. (May 1898). West Florida and its relation to the historical cartography of the United States. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press.
- "Treaty of Amity, Settlement, and Limits Between the United States of America and His Catholic Majesty". Avalon Project, Yale University. 1819. Retrieved July 26, 2020.
By the treaty of Saint Ildefonso, made October 1, 1800, Spain had ceded Louisiana to France and France, by the treaty of Paris, signed April 30, 1803, had ceded it to the United States. Under this treaty the United States claimed the countries between the Iberville and the Perdido. Spain contended that her cession to France comprehended only that territory which, at the time of the cession, was denominated Louisiana, consisting of the island of New Orleans, and the country which had been originally ceded to her by France west of the Mississippi.
— excerpt of website's Footnote #1 - Cox, Isaac Joslin (1918). The West Florida Controversy, 1798-1813: A Study in American Diplomacy. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press.
- Adams, Henry, History of the United States, II, p. 260–263. (as cited in Cox, 1918)
- Letter, Merry to Hawkesbury, Mar. 13, 1804, MS., British Foreign Office, America, II, p, 5, Vol. 41.
- Smith, James Morton, ed. (1995). The Republic of Letters: The Correspondence Between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, 1776-1826. Vol. 2. New York: Norton. p. 1328.
- "Proclamation 16 – Taking Possession of Part of Louisiana (Annexation of West Florida)"; UCSB online; accessed July 2020
- Bell, William Gardner (2005). "James Wilkinson". Commanding Generals and Chiefs of Staff: Portraits and Biographical Sketchs. United States Army Center of Military History. pp. 64–65.
- Ireland, Gordon (1941). Boundaries, Possessions, and Conflicts in Central and North America and the Caribbean. New York: Octagon Books. p. 298.