Minuscule 346

Minuscule 346 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), ε 226 (in the Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts),[1] is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. Using the study of comparative handwriting styles (palaeography) it has been assigned to the 12th century.[2] It has notes in the margin (known as marginalia).

Minuscule 346
New Testament manuscript
TextGospels
Date12th century
ScriptGreek
Now atBiblioteca Ambrosiana
CiteScholz, Biblisch-kritische Reise (1823)
Size22.3 cm by 16.5 cm
TypeCaesarean text-type
CategoryIII
Handcarelessly written
Notemember of ƒ13

Description

The manuscript is a codex (precursor to the modern book), containing the complete text of the four Gospels on 168 parchment leaves (22.3 cm by 16.5 cm), with one large gap (John 3:26–7:52).[2] It also has the liturgical book with hagiographies: Synaxarion (a list of saint's days) and Menologion (a list of readings to be read each calendar month).[3]

The text is written in one column per page, with 31–32 lines per page.[2] According to Biblical scholar F. H. A. Scrivener, it was carelessly written.[4]

The text is divided according to the chapters (known as κεφαλαια / kephalaia), whose numbers are given at the margin, and their titles (known as τιτλοι / titles) at the top of the pages. There is also a division according to the Ammonian Sections (in Mark 234 Sections – the last in 16:9), whose numbers are given at the margin, but without references to the Eusebian Canons (an early system of dividing the four Gospels into different sections).[3]

It contains the tables of contents (also known as κεφαλαια) before each Gospel, lectionary markings in the margin (for liturgical use), subscriptions at the end of each Gospel, numbers of "remata", and numbers of στιχοι / stichoi (the list of lines written in each gospel).[3]

Text

The Greek text of the codex has been considered a representative of the Caesarean text-type. The text-types are groups of different New Testament manuscripts which share specific or generally related readings, which then differ from each other group, and thus the conflicting readings can separate out the groups. These are then used to determine the original text as published; there are three main groups with names: Alexandrian, Western, and Byzantine.[5] The Caesarean text-type however (initially identified by biblical scholar Burnett Hillman Streeter) has been contested by several text-critics, such as Kurt and Barbara Aland.[6]: 55–56  Aland placed it in Category III of his New Testament manuscript classification system.[6] Category III manuscripts are described as having "a small but not a negligible proportion of early readings, with a considerable encroachment of [Byzantine] readings, and significant readings from other sources as yet unidentified."[6]: 335 

It is a member of the textual family ƒ13.[3] According to the Claremont Profile Method it belongs to ƒ13 as a core member.[7]

It has many unusual readings (e.g. Matt 1:16 — ω μνηστευθεισα παρθενος Μαριαμ εγεννησεν Ιησουν τον λεγομενον χριστον (to whom the virgin Mary had been betrothed, begat Jesus, the one called Christ)).[4]

History

Gregory dated the manuscript to the 12th century.[3] It is currently dated by the INTF to the 12th century.[2]

The manuscript was bought in 1606 at "Callipoli in Salentinis" (Calabria).[3] The manuscript was examined by Scholz and Burgon. It was added to the list of New Testament manuscripts by Scholz (1794–1852).[4]: 225  Text of the codex was collated by Abbott and edited by Ferrar.[8] C. R. Gregory saw it in 1886.[3]

The manuscript is currently housed at the Biblioteca Ambrosiana (S. 23 sup.) in Milan.[2]

See also

References
  1. Gregory, Caspar René (1908). Die griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testament. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs. p. 60.
  2. Aland, Kurt; M. Welte; B. Köster; K. Junack (1994). Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. p. 67. ISBN 3-11-011986-2.
  3. Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Hinrichs. p. 181.
  4. Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose; Edward Miller (1894). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament. Vol. 1 (4 ed.). London: George Bell & Sons. p. 231.
  5. Metzger, Bruce Manning; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 205–230. ISBN 0-19-516667-1.
  6. Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-8028-4098-1.
  7. Wisse, Frederik (1982). The Profile Method for the Classification and Evaluation of Manuscript Evidence, as Applied to the Continuous Greek Text of the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 59. ISBN 0-8028-1918-4.
  8. Ferrar, William Hugh (1877). T. K. Abbott (ed.). A Collation of Four Important Manuscripts of the Gospels. Dublin: Macmillan & Co.

Further reading
  • J. M. A. Scholz, Biblisch-kritische Reise (Leipzig, 1823), p. 70–73.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.