Loafers Lodge fire

The four-storey building was constructed in 1971 as an office and warehouse building called Mertex House. Since 2006, the building has been occupied by Loafers Lodge.[3]

The building previously served as a place of emergency residential housing contracted by the New Zealand Government.[4] A deportee advocate said the hostel was used by Prison Aid and Rehabilitation, and by the government to house deportees returned from Australia.[5]

The building's Warrant of Fitness (BWoF) was renewed in March 2023. BWoF records show the building had a "type 3" fire alarm system (automatic system with heat detectors and manual call points) supplemented by smoke detectors.[6] Fire sprinklers were not installed in the building,[7] nor were they required to be installed by the building code. A fire engineer was quoted as saying the rules were "too slack and need tightening".[8][9]

A fire broke out on the top floor of the 92-room lodge around 12:25 am (NZST).[7] Earlier in the night, a couch fire occurred about two hours before the later fire; it was not reported to authorities.[10] It was initially unclear how many people were in the hostel when the fire occurred,[11] however, 52 people were evacuated from the building and at least five were rescued from the roof by Fire and Emergency.[12] Later reports stated that there were 92 people who had been evacuated from the hostel and fewer than 20 people were counted as missing.[13]

A long-term resident of the hostel said that he had noticed the fire while heading back to his room from the bathroom, and that the smoke, crowds and darkness were disorienting before he was able to escape via a stairwell. Other residents said that, due to multiple false fire alarms throughout the past months, there were delays in responding and evacuating.[5]

The five deceased victims were identified as: Kenneth Barnard, 67;[14] Liam James Hockings, 50;[14] Peter Glenn O'Sullivan, 64;[15] Melvin Joseph Parun, 68;[15] and Mike Eric Wahrlich, 67.[16] It was reported that Parun was the brother of tennis player Onny Parun.[15]

On 17 May 2023, police announced they were treating the fire as arson and had launched a homicide inquiry.[17] At the time, police would not say whether accelerants were used on the fire or why they believe it was deliberately lit.[18]

On 18 May 2023, a 48-year-old man was arrested and charged with two counts of arson. He was arraigned in the Wellington District Court on 19 May 2023, where he entered no plea and was remanded in custody until 19 June 2023. The man's name was suppressed until his next appearance.[2][19][20] On 1 June, he was charged with five counts of murder.[21]

On 23 June, Judge Christine Grice of the Wellington High Court granted the murder suspect name suppression until mid-August 2023. The suspect's trial is scheduled to take place in August 2024.[22][23]

Prime Minister Chris Hipkins called the fire an absolute tragedy.[24] He said that the government will investigate whether regulations for high density accommodation are fit for purpose.[25][26]

Wellington Central MP Grant Robertson said the fire was absolutely devastating.[12] Wellington mayor Tory Whanau called the fire "one of the darkest days in the city".[27]

By 7 June, the Wellington City Mission had raised NZ$360,000 for residents who had lost possessions during the fire. However, only NZ$92,000 of this amount had been given out to displaced residents who received an initial payment of NZ$500, followed by a further payment of NZ$1,000.[28]

On 15 June, hundreds of people attended a remembrance ceremony at Wellington's Cathedral of St Paul for the victims.[29]

On 23 June, lawyers representing displaced residents filed an interim injunction to stop the owners from demolishing the structure in order to retrieve their belongings. Residents had previously been told that the building would be demolished and their possessions would be dumped due to the risk of toxic contamination. Under the injunction, residents will be allowed to conduct their own inspection to determine if their belongings could be retrieved. The owner would also have to take action to prevent further damage to the residents' belongings and would have to provide daily updates.[30]