Lingaa loss issue

The 2014 Tamil film Lingaa, despite being one of the highest-grossing Tamil films of the year, was considered a box-office bomb due to the high production and distribution costs involved.[1] The distributors faced huge losses and asked for their money back, with few of them submitted petitions to go on a hunger strike to protest against the losses incurred. Many of them claimed that the film had incurred only 30 percent of the down payment after 25 days of its release. Rajinikanth later refunded one-third of the 33 crore (US$4.1 million) loss reportedly incurred by distributors and exhibitors. He decided to pay them 10 crore (US$1.3 million) 'on a humanitarian basis', who demanded a full refund and had threatened a "begging protest" in front of the actor's residence.[2]

Overview

According to R. Singaravelan, who acquired the distribution rights of the film in Trichy and Thanjavur areas stated about the film's losses in an online interview on 19 December 2014. He added that the film failed to collect 20% of their investments during the first week of its release, further citing that the excessive hype for the film led to higher prices for distribution rights. He also condemned the makers' decision to release the film on actor Rajinikanth's birthday (12 December 2014), due to the ongoing half-yearly examinations in schools.[3][4] Few industry sources revealed that Rajinikanth's compulsion to do Lingaa is because of the failure of Kochadaiiyaan, which resulted in a police case filed against his wife Latha Rajinikanth accusing for financial fraud.[5][6] Vijayabhargavi Entertainers stated that they suffered losses in Chengalpet region.[7] Capricorn Pictures incurred losses in North Arcot and South Arcot (Cuddalore-Villupuram) circles. Sukra Films and Chandrakala Movies lost money in Coimbatore and Tirunelveli-Tuticorin respectively. The distributors claimed Lingaa recovered only 30 percent of the down payment after 25 days of its release.[7]

Distributor's protests

On 3 January 2015, Singaravelan released an audio note citing that all the distributors will go on a hunger strike in order to protest against the losses they incurred.[8] They submitted a petition in the Madras High Court to seek permission to go on fast at Valluvar Kottam,[9] as they initially demanded to fast in front of Rajinikanth's residence in Poes Garden which was denied due to security reasons.[10][11] The protest saw the likes of political activists with Seeman of Naam Tamilar Katchi supported the distributors.[12]

While the move saw various reactions from politicians and members of the film fraternity, Rockline Venkatesh, the film producer insisted Singaravelan and other distributors not to malign Rajinikanth's image, whereas T Siva of Vendhar Movies who purchased the film's Tamil Nadu theatrical rights stated that "Many distributors faced losses due to the poor performance of the film, but it is not right to talk about the losses while the film is still running in theatres. When it is completely out of theatres by Pongal, we will sit together with all parties concerned, including Rajinikanth, and find a solution".[1] The distributors then planned for an indefinite hunger strike starting from 27 January,[13][14] but was later withdrawn after the producers assured the parties that the losses should be compensated.[15][16]

After a discussion with film exhibitor Tiruppur Subramanian, Venkatesh on 12 February announced that he agreed to settle only 10 percent of the losses which the distributors declined and later asked for a full refund.[17] On 17 February 2015, distributor Singaravelan had announced a 'mass begging protest' in front of Rajinikanth's residence.[18][19]

Reactions

Following the distributors protests, on 18 February, the Tamil Film Producers Council (TFPC) condemned their decision as well as holding Rajinikanth accountable for the film's losses.[20] They also claimed that it is "unethical to harass Rajinikanth and the producer Venkatesh" and stated that "the issue should be resolved amicably".[21] Rajinikanth's fans also planned to stage counter protests against the distributors in response to the begging protest staged by distributors.[22][23][24]

Compensation

On 21 March 2015, Rajinikanth announced that he agreed to pay one-third of the 33 crore (US$4.1 million) loss incurred by film distributors.[25] Rajinikanth along with Rockline Venkatesh had decided to pay an amount of 5 crore (US$630,000) each to the distributors, and a press-release from TFPC said that an amount of 12.5 crore (US$1.6 million) has been handed over to the council, which was later disbursed to the distributors and theatre owners.[26] Confirming the news, President Kalaipuli S. Thanu of TFPC stated that the "matter has been resolved and the distributors called off their protests".[27]

Although distributors received only ₹6 crore of the ₹12.5 crore compensation,[28] with Rockline Venkatesh paid ₹4.5 crore to the distributors, Tiruppur Subramanian volunteered to contribute the remaining ₹1.5 crore payable to distributors and theatre owners.[29]

Aftermath

The controversies surrounding over Lingaa loss had severely impacted other Tamil films. On 27 August 2015, the Tamil Nadu Theatre Owners Association announced the stalling of the release of Paayum Puli (2015),[30] citing Vendhar Movies' inability to compensate the losses incurred by the distributors from North and South Arcot, Chengalpet and Trichy due to Lingaa.[31] They stated that only half of the promised settlement had been reached in aggregate.[32][33] The Producer's Council later filed a complaint to the city commissioner against distributor Singaravelan and other theatre owners who stalled the film's release, alleging that Singaravelan had been paid the compensation amount, and that he had made this announcement at the last minute to acquire more money from Vendhar Movies.[34] The Council further announced that it would halt the release of any new film across all languages in Tamil Nadu until the issue is resolved.[35][36] Later, actor Vishal and Madhan of Escape Artists Motion Pictures held a meeting with the distributors in Chengalpet area, who withdrew the red card after a financial settlement, although the screening was delayed due to lateness in the settlement.[37][38] Similarly, K. S. Ravikumar's Kannada film Kotigobba 2, which was made in Tamil as Mudinja Ivana Pudi had to face financial tussles before the release due to Lingaa loss issue.[39]

References

  1. "Lingaa flops at box office: Is superstar Rajinikanth losing his magic?". Firstpost. 12 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  2. Udhav Naig (20 March 2015). "Lingaa distributors get Rs. 10 cr". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 9 June 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2015.
  3. "Is Rajinikanth's Lingaa a box office turkey?". Firstpost. 20 December 2014. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  4. Naig, Udhav (21 December 2014). "Lingaa's distributors claim loss". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  5. Kandavel, Sangeetha (27 December 2014). "Now, Kochadaiyaan producers in financial tangle". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 13 February 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  6. "Kochadaiyaan producers assure bank to repay loan dues". Business Standard India. Press Trust of India. 30 December 2014. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  7. "Distributors ask Rajinikanth to refund loss after Lingaa flops at box office". Firstpost. 8 January 2015. Archived from the original on 8 January 2015. Retrieved 8 January 2015.
  8. "Distributors of 'Lingaa' come together for a hunger strike?". Sify. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  9. "Lingaa distributor seeks court's nod to go on hunger strike". Hindustan Times. 7 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  10. A. Subramani (7 January 2015). "Four more distributors of Rajinikanth-starrer Lingaa move Madras high court". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  11. "Rajinikanth film Lingaa caused huge loss, distributor tells Madras high court – Times of India". The Times of India. 5 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  12. Seeman Supports Movie Distributors' One Day Hunger Strike over Lingaa Movie Loss – Thanthi TV. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  13. "Rajinikanth's 'Lingaa' failure has distributors in a soup, is the South God losing his touch?". The Indian Express. 22 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  14. "Lingaa: Distributors of Rajnikanth starrer plan to fast again". India Today. 22 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  15. "Distributors demand their happy ending from Rajinikanth film 'Lingaa'". The Indian Express. 23 January 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  16. Naig, Udhav (28 January 2015). "Distributors of Lingaa to be compensated for loss". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  17. "Distributors of Rajinikanth's Lingaa resort to begging for compensation". India Today. 16 February 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  18. Peter, Petlee (16 February 2015). "Lingaa distributors plan begging protest". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  19. "Lingaa's distributors to go on a 'mass begging' protest outside Rajinikanth's house". Firstpost. 16 February 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  20. "Unfair to hold Rajinikanth responsible for 'Lingaa' losses: Producers Council". The Indian Express. 22 February 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  21. "Rajinikanth not responsible for Lingaa losses: Producers Council". India Today. 17 February 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  22. "Rajinikanth fans counter protest in 'Lingaa' issue". Sify. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  23. "Rajini fans to take charge against Lingaa distributors?- News". IndiaGlitz. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  24. "Fans Torn Between Love for Rajini And Ticket Money Over Lingaa Flop". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  25. Nurullah, Abdullah (23 March 2015). "Rajini pays for distribution losses as bankability drops". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  26. Parameswaran, Prathibha (24 March 2015). "Rajinikanth Compensates 'Lingaa' Distributors". TheQuint. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  27. "High time: Rajinikanth steps in to sort Lingaa issue". India Today. IANS. 21 March 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  28. "Lingaa Distributors Give Rajinikanth a Week to Compensate Losses". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  29. "A voluntary contribution putting an end to 'Lingaa' controversy". IndiaGlitz. 22 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  30. "Paayum Puli: Vishal's upcoming film release stalled over Lingaa issue". India Today. 27 August 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  31. "Rajini 'Lingaa' to affect Vishal's 'Paayum Puli' Release". IndiaGlitz. 27 August 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  32. "Lingaa loss issue: Red card for Vendhar Movies 'Paayum Puli'". Sify. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  33. "'Paayum Puli' release stalled". The Indian Express. 27 August 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  34. "Paayum Puli in trouble; Singaravelan threatens release". The Times of India. 1 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  35. "Post Paayum Puli, no new film to be released across all languages in Tamil Nadu". India Today. 3 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  36. "Tamil Nadu cinema body says wont allow release of new films". Hindustan Times. 3 September 2015. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  37. Naig, Udhav (4 September 2015). "Ahead of Friday, a crisis averted". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  38. "Paayum Puli Chengalpet issue solved". Sify. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  39. Lingaa Problem Continues... Now Its K. S. Ravikumar's Turn – Mudinja Ivana Pudi – Must Watch. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.