Ionometallurgy

Mineral processing and extraction of metals are very energy-intensive processes, which are not exempted of producing large volumes of solid residues and wastewater, which also require energy to be further treated and disposed. Moreover, as the demand for metals increases, the metallurgical industry must rely on sources of materials with lower metal contents both from a primary (e.g., mineral ores) and/or secondary (e.g., slags, tailings, municipal waste) raw materials. Consequently, mining activities and waste recycling must evolve towards the development of more selective, efficient and environmentally friendly mineral and metal processing routes.

Mineral processing operations are needed firstly to concentrate the mineral phases of interest and reject the unwanted material physical or chemically associated to a defined raw material. The process, however, demand about 30 GJ/tonne of metal, which accounts about 29% of the total energy spent on mining in the USA.[1] Meanwhile, pyrometallurgy is a significant producer of greenhouse gas emissions and harmful flue dust. Hydrometallurgy entails the consumption of large volumes of lixiviants such as H2SO4, HCl, KCN, NaCN which have poor selectivity.[2] Moreover, despite the environmental concern and the use restriction imposed by some countries, cyanidation is still considered the prime process technology to recover gold from ores. Mercury is also used by artisanal miners in less economically developed countries to concentrate gold and silver from minerals, despite its obvious toxicity. Bio-hydro-metallurgy make use of living organisms, such as bacteria and fungi, and although this method demands only the input of O2 and CO2 from the atmosphere, it requires low solid-to-liquid ratios and long contact times, which significantly reduces space-time yields.

Ionometallurgy makes use of non-aqueous ionic solvents such ionic liquids (ILs) and deep eutectic solvents (DESs), which allows the development of closed-loop flow sheet to effectively recover metals by, for instance, integrating the metallurgical unit operations of leaching and electrowinning. It allows to process metals at moderate temperatures in a non-aqueous environment which allows controlling metal speciation, tolerates impurities and at the same time exhibits suitable solubilities and current efficiencies. This simplify conventional processing routes and allows a substantial reduction in the size of a metal processing plant.

Metal extraction with ionic fluids

DESs are fluids generally composed of two or three cheap and safe components that are capable of self-association, often through hydrogen bond interactions, to form eutectic mixtures with a melting point lower than that of each individual component. DESs are generally liquid at temperatures lower than 100 °C, and they exhibit similar physico-chemical properties to traditional ILs, while being much cheaper and environmentally friendlier. Most of them are mixtures of choline chloride and a hydrogen-bond donor (e.g., urea, ethylene glycol, malonic acid) or mixtures of choline chloride with a hydrated metal salt. Other choline salts (e.g. acetate, citrate, nitrate) have a much higher costs or need to be synthesised,[3] and the DES formulated from these anions are typically much more viscous and can have higher conductivities than for choline chloride.[4] This results in lower plating rates and poorer throwing power and for this reason chloride-based DES systems are still favoured. For instance, Reline (a 1:2 mixture of choline chloride and urea) has been used to selectively recover Zn and Pb from a mixed metal oxide matrix.[5] Similarly, Ethaline (a 1: 2 mixture of choline chloride and ethylene glycol) facilitates metal dissolution in electropolishing of steels.[6] DESs have also demonstrated promising results to recover metals from complex mixtures such Cu/Zn and Ga/As,[7] and precious metals from minerals.[8] It has also been demonstrated that metals can be recovered from complex mixtures by electrocatalysis using a combination of DESs as lixiviants and an oxidising agent,[9] while metal ions can be simultaneously separated from the solution by electrowinning.[10]

Recovery of precious metals by ionometallurgy

Precious metals are rare, naturally occurring metallic chemical elements of high economic value. Chemically, the precious metals tend to be less reactive than most elements. They include gold and silver, but also the so-called platinum group metals: ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, and platinum (see precious metals). Extraction of these metals from their corresponding hosting minerals would typically require pyrometallurgy (e.g., roasting), hydrometallurgy (cyanidation), or both as processing routes. Early studies have demonstrated that gold dissolution rate in Ethaline compares very favourably to the cyanidation method, which is further enhanced by the addition of iodine as an oxidising agent. In an industrial process the iodine has the potential to be employed as an electrocatalyst, whereby it is continuously recovered in situ from the reduced iodide by electrochemical oxidation at the anode of an electrochemical cell. Dissolved metals can be selectively deposited at the cathode by adjusting the electrode potential. The method also allows better selectivity as part of the gangue (e.g., pyrite) tend to be dissolved more slowly.[11]

Sperrylite (PtAs2) and moncheite (PtTe2), which are typically the more abundant platinum minerals in many orthomagmatic deposits, do not react under the same conditions in Ethaline because they are disulphide (pyrite), diarsenide (sperrylite) or ditellurides (calaverite and moncheite) minerals, which are particularly resistant to iodine oxidation. The reaction mechanism by which dissolution of platinum minerals is taking place is still under investigation.

Metal recovery from sulfide minerals with ionometallurgy

Metal sulfides (e.g., pyrite FeS2, arsenopyrite FeAsS, chalcopyrite CuFeS2) are normally processed by chemical oxidation either in aqueous media or at high temperatures. In fact, most base metals, e.g., aluminium, chromium, must be (electro)chemically reduced at high temperatures by which the process entails a high energy demand, and sometimes large volumes of aqueous waste is generated. In aqueous media chalcopyrite, for instance, is more difficult to dissolve chemically than covellite and chalcocite due to surface effects (formation of polysulfide species,[12][13]). The presence of Cl− ions has been suggested to alter the morphology of any sulfide surface formed, allowing the sulfide mineral to leach more easily by preventing passivation.[14] DESs provide a high Cl− ion concentration and low water content, whilst reducing the need for either high additional salt or acid concentrations, circumventing most oxide chemistry. Thus, the electrodissolution of sulfide minerals has demonstrated promising results in DES media in absence of passivation layers, with the release into the solution of metal ions which could be recovered from solution.

During extraction of copper from copper sulfide minerals with Ethaline, chalcocite (Cu2S) and covellite (CuS) produce a yellow solution, indicating that [CuCl4]2− complex are formed. Meanwhile, in the solution formed from chalcopyrite, Cu2+ and Cu+ species co-exist in solution due to the generation of reducing Fe2+ species at the cathode. The best selective recovery of copper (>97 %) from chalcopyrite can be obtained with a mixed DES of 20 wt.% ChCl-oxalic acid and 80 wt.% Ethaline.[15]

Metal recovery from oxide compounds with Ionometallurgy

Recovery of metals from oxide matrixes is generally carried out using mineral acids. However, electrochemical dissolution of metal oxides in DES can allow to enhance the dissolution up to more than 10 000 times in pH neutral solutions.[16]

Studies have shown that ionic oxides such as ZnO tend to have high solubility in ChCl:malonic acid, ChCl:urea and Ethaline, which can resemble the solubilities in aqueous acidic solutions, e.g., HCl. Covalent oxides such as TiO2, however, exhibits almost no solubility. The electrochemical dissolution of metal oxides is strongly dependent on the proton activity from the HBD, i.e. capability of the protons to act as oxygen acceptors, and on the temperature. It has been reported that eutectic ionic fluids of lower pH-values, such as ChCl:oxalic acid and ChCl:lactic acid, allow a better solubility than that of higher pH (e.g., ChCl:acetic acid).[17] Hence, different solubilities can be obtained by using, for instance, different carboxylic acids as HBD.[18]

Outlook

Currently, the stability of most ionic liquids under practical electrochemical conditions is unknown, and the fundamental choice of ionic fluid is still empirical as there is almost no data on metal ion thermodynamics to feed into solubility and speciation models. Also, there are no Pourbaix diagrams available, no standard redox potentials, and bare knowledge of speciation or pH-values. It must be noticed that most processes reported in the literature involving ionic fluids have a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3 (experimental proof-of-concept) or 4 (technology validated in the lab), which is a disadvantage for short-term implementation. However, ionometallurgy has the potential to effectively recover metals in a more selective and sustainable way, as it considers environmentally benign solvents, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and avoidance of corrosive and harmful reagents.

References
  1. Norgate (2010). "Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations". Journal of Cleaner Production. 18 (3): 266–274. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.020.
  2. Binnemans, Koen (2017). "Solvometallurgy: An Emerging Branch of Extractive Metallurgy". Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 3 (3): 571–600. doi:10.1007/s40831-017-0128-2. S2CID 52203805.
  3. Endres, F; MacFarlane, D; Abbott, A (2017). Electrodeposition from Ionic Liquids. Wiley-VCH.
  4. Bernasconi, R.; Zebarjadi, Z.; Magagnin, L. (2015). "Copper electrodeposition from a chloride free deep eutectic solvent". Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 758 (1): 163–169. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.10.024. hdl:11311/987216.
  5. Abbott, A.; Collins, J.; Dalrymple, I.; Harris, R.C.; Mistry, R.; Qiu, F.; Scheirer, J.; Wise, W.R. (2009). "Processing of Electric Arc Furnace Dust using Deep Eutectic Solvents". Australian Journal of Chemistry. 62 (4): 341–347. doi:10.1071/CH08476.
  6. Abbott, A.; Capper, G.; McKenzie, K.J.; Glidle, A.; Ryder, K.S. (2006). "Electropolishing of stainless steels in a choline chloride based ionic liquid: an electrochemical study with surface characterisation using SEM and atomic force microscopy". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (36): 4214–4221. Bibcode:2006PCCP....8.4214A. doi:10.1039/B607763N. hdl:2381/628. PMID 16971989.
  7. Abbott, A.; Harris, R.C.; Holyoak, F.; Frisch, G.; Hartley, J.; Jenkin, G.R.T. (2015). "Electrocatalytic recovery of elements from complex mixtures using deep eutectic solvents". Green Chem. 17 (4): 2172–2179. doi:10.1039/C4GC02246G. hdl:2381/31850.
  8. Jenkin, G.R.T.; Al-Bassam, A.Z.M.; Harris, R.C.; Abbott, A.; Smith, D.J.; Holwell, D.A.; Chapman, R.J.; Stanley, C.J. (2016). "The application of deep eutectic solvent ionic liquids for environmentally-friendly dissolution and recovery of precious metals". Minerals Engineering. 87: 18–24. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.09.026.
  9. Abbott, A.; Harris, R.C.; Holyoak, F.; Frisch, G.; Hartley, J.; Jenkin, G.R.T. (2015). "Electrocatalytic recovery of elements from complex mixtures using deep eutectic solvents". Green Chemistry. 17 (4): 2172–2179. doi:10.1039/C4GC02246G. hdl:2381/31850.
  10. Anggara, S.; Bevan, F.; Harris, R.C.; Hartley, J.; Frisch, G.; Jenkin, G.R.T.; Abbot, A. (2019). "Direct extraction of copper from copper sulfide minerals using deep eutectic solvents". Green Chemistry. 21 (23): 6502–6512. doi:10.1039/C9GC03213D. S2CID 209704861.
  11. Jenkin, G.R.T.; Al-Bassam, A.Z.M.; Harris, R.C.; Abbott, A.; Smith, D.J.; Holwell, D.A.; Chapman, R.J.; Stanley, C.J. (2016). "The application of deep eutectic solvent ionic liquids for environmentally-friendly dissolution and recovery of precious metals". Minerals Engineering. 87: 18–24. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2015.09.026.
  12. Ghahremaninezhad, A.; Dixon, D.G.; Asselin, E. (2013). "Electrochemical and XPS analysis of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) dissolution in sulfuric acid solution". Electrochimica Acta. 87: 97–112. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.119.
  13. Dreisinger, D.; Abed, N. (2002). "A fundamental study of the reductive leaching of chalcopyrite using metallic iron part I: kinetic analysis". Hydrometallurgy. 60 (1–3): 293–296. doi:10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00079-8.
  14. Pikna, L.; Lux, L.; Grygar, T. (2006). "Electrochemical dissolution of chalcopyrite studied by voltammetry of immobilized microparticles". Chemical Papers. 60 (4): 293–296. doi:10.2478/s11696-006-0051-7. S2CID 95349687.
  15. Abbott, A.; Al-Bassam, A.Z.M.; Goddard, A.; Harris, R.C.; Jenkin, G.R.T.; Nisbet, J.; Wieland, M. (2017). "Dissolution of pyrite and other Fe – S – As minerals using deep eutectic solvents". Green Chemistry. 19 (9): 2225–2233. doi:10.1039/C7GC00334J. hdl:2381/40192.
  16. Pateli, I.M.; Abbott, A.; Hartley, J.; Jenkin, G.R.T (2020). "Electrochemical oxidation as alternative for dissolution of metal oxides in deep eutectic solvents". Green Chemistry. 22 (23): 8360–8368. doi:10.1039/D0GC03491F. S2CID 229243585.
  17. Pateli, I.M.; Thompson, D.; Alabdullah, S.S.M; Abbott, A.; Jenkin, G.R.T.; Hartley, J. (2020). "The effect of pH and hydrogen bond donor on the dissolution of metal oxides in deep eutectic solvents". Green Chemistry. 22 (16): 5476–5486. doi:10.1039/D0GC02023K. S2CID 225401121.
  18. Abbott, A.; Boothby, D.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K. (2004). "Deep Eutectic Solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: Versatile alternatives to ionic liquids". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (29): 9142–9147. doi:10.1021/ja048266j. PMID 15264850.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.