Haber–Weiss reaction

The Haber–Weiss reaction generates •OH (hydroxyl radicals) from H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) and superoxide (•O2−) catalyzed by iron ions. It was first proposed by Fritz Haber and his student Joseph Joshua Weiss in 1932.[1]

This reaction has long been studied and revived in different contexts, including organic chemistry, free radicals, radiochemistry, and water radiolysis. In the 1970, with the emerging interest for the effect of free radicals onto the ageing mechanisms of living cells due to oxygen (O2), it was proposed that the Haber–Weiss reaction was a source of radicals responsible for cellular oxidative stress. However, this hypothesis was later disproved by several research works.[2] The oxidative stress toxicity is not caused by the Haber–Weiss reaction as a whole, but by the Fenton reaction, which is one specific part of it.

The reaction is kinetically slow, but is catalyzed by dissolved iron ions. The first step of the catalytic cycle involves the reduction of the ferric (Fe3+) ion into the ferrous (Fe2+) ion:

Fe3+ + •O2− → Fe2+ + O2

The second step is the Fenton reaction:

Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH− + •OH

Net reaction:

•O2− + H2O2 → •OH + OH− + O2

Haber-Weiss chain reaction

The main finding of Haber and Weiss was that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is decomposed by a chain reaction.[2]

The Haber–Weiss reaction chain proceeds by successive steps: (i) initiation, (ii) propagation and (iii) termination.

The chain is initiated by the Fenton reaction:

Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + HO– + HO•     (step 1: initiation)

Then, the reaction chain propagates by means of two successive steps:

HO• + H2O2 → H2O + O2•– + H+        (step 2: propagation)
O2•– + H+ + H2O2 → O2 + HO• + H2O    (step 3: propagation)

Finally, the chain is terminated when the hydroxyl radical is scavenged by a ferrous ion:

Fe2+ + HO• + H+ → Fe3+ + H2O        (step 4: termination)

George showed in 1947 that, in water, step 3 cannot compete with the spontaneous disproportionation of superoxide, and proposed an improved mechanism for the disappearance of hydrogen peroxide. See [3] for a summary. The reactions proposed therein are:

Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + HO– + HO•    (initiation)
Fe2+ + HO• → Fe3+ + HO–    (termination)
H2O2 + HO• → H2O + HO2•    (propagation)
Fe2+ + HO2• → Fe3+ + HO2-    (termination)
Fe3+ + HO2• → Fe2+ + H2O + H+    (termination)

Hydroperoxyl and superoxide radicals

With time, various chemical notations for the hydroperoxyl (perhydroxyl) radical coexist in the literature. Haber, Wilstätter and Weiss simply wrote HO2 or O2H, but sometimes HO2• or •O2H can also be found to stress the radical character of the species.

The hydroperoxyl radical is a weak acid and gives rise to the superoxide radical (O2•–) when it loses a proton:

HO2 → H+ + O2–
sometimes also written as:
HO2• → H+ + O2•–

A first pKa value of 4.88 for the dissociation of the hydroperoxyl radical was determined in 1970.[4] The presently accepted value is 4.7.[5] This pKa value is close to that of acetic acid. Below a pH of 4.7, the protonated hydroperoxyl radical will dominate in solution while at pH above 4.7 the superoxide radical anion will be the main species.

Effect of pH on the reaction rate

As the Haber–Weiss reaction depends on the presence of both Fe3+ and Fe2+ in solution, its kinetics is influenced by the respective solubilities of both species whose are directly function of the solution pH. As Fe3+ is about 100 times less soluble than Fe2+ in natural waters at near-neutral pH, the ferric ion concentration is the limiting factor for the reaction rate. The reaction can only proceed with a fast enough rate under sufficiently acidic conditions. At high pH, under alkaline conditions, the reaction considerably slows down because of the precipitation of Fe(OH)3 which notably lowers the concentration of the Fe3+ species in solution.

Moreover, the pH value also directly influences the acid-base dissociation equilibrium involving the hydroperoxyl and the superoxide radicals (pKa = 4.7)[5] as mentioned above.

See also

References
  1. Haber F., Weiss J. (1932). "Über die katalyse des hydroperoxydes" [On the catalysis of hydroperoxide]. Naturwissenschaften. 20 (51): 948–950. Bibcode:1932NW.....20..948H. doi:10.1007/BF01504715. S2CID 40200383.
  2. Koppenol, W.H. (2001). "The Haber-Weiss cycle – 70 years later". Redox Report. 6 (4): 229–234. doi:10.1179/135100001101536373. PMID 11642713. S2CID 35045955.
  3. W. G. Barb, J. H. Baxendale, Philip George & K. R. Hargrave (1949). "Reactions of Ferrous and Ferric Ions with Hydrogen Peroxide". Nature. 163 (4148): 692–694. Bibcode:1949Natur.163..692B. doi:10.1038/163692a0.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Behar, David; Czapski, Gideon; Rabani, Joseph; Dorfman, Leon M.; Schwarz, Harold A. (1970). "Acid dissociation constant and decay kinetics of the perhydroxyl radical". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 74 (17): 3209–3213. doi:10.1021/j100711a009. ISSN 0022-3654.
  5. Bielski, Benon H. J. (1978). "Reevaluation of the spectral and kinetic properties of HO2 and O2– free radicals". Photochemistry and Photobiology. 28 (4–5): 645–649. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1978.tb06986.x. ISSN 0031-8655. S2CID 98196074.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.