Glen Ridge rape

The assault occurred on March 1, 1989. The victim, who had an intellectual disability and was later determined to have an IQ of 64, left her house the afternoon of the incident to go play basketball in Carteret Park. On the way, she found a stick which she decided to keep. When she arrived at the park, many of the school's athletes were there, either watching or participating in an informal baseball practice. One of the boys came over to her and asked her to come down to a basement of a nearby house for a party. The house was adjacent to the park and the owners were in Florida, with only the grandmother being home at that time.

After initially refusing, she agreed when she was told that the boy's brother, whom she had a crush on, would go on a date with her. He put his arm around the victim and escorted her to the basement. When they reached the basement, 12 boys from the park were there. After some conversation, one of the boys removed his pants and underpants and the victim removed her shirt. At this point, a sophomore and another underclassman left. A total of six boys left while the victim undressed.

Seven boys stayed, all football players and all seniors but one. The victim was then orally raped. She was forced to bend over and the boys took turns vaginally penetrating her. The victim was then penetrated with a broom by two of those present and she was penetrated with a baseball bat. The broom and bat were covered with plastic bags coated with Vaseline. At one point during the rape, one of the athletes passively suggested that they stop. After it was over, she promised not to tell, then waited outside the house for a long time, waiting for the promised date, which never happened.

A number of boys later attempted to get the victim to come down to the basement a second time to repeat the incident. The first staff member to report the incident was a teacher who overheard a student discussing the rumors with a classmate. The student had been asked earlier to videotape a planned second incident (which never took place). The vice principal then called the police on March 22, three weeks after the assault occurred. Police interviewed the vice principal and the victim's swim coach, the latter of whom had heard about the incident from the victim herself three days after the incident. Detective Lieutenant Richard Corcoran put Detective Sheila Byron in charge of investigating the case. Byron's main focus was to establish if the victim had given consent, or whether she was incapable of giving consent.

During her interviews with the victim, it became clear to Byron that the victim did not completely understand what had happened to her, so she would not have known she could say no. During the investigation, it became clear that the victim still wanted the athletes to like her and that she did not want to get them in trouble.

Byron realized she would need independent corroboration, because the victim might not make a convincing witness in a trial. The prosecutor's office officially became involved with the investigation on April 7 and officially took control on April 12.[1]

The first public report of the incident was on May 23, 1989, by the local NBC station WNBC-TV. Over the next few days the story was picked up in newspapers across the United States and Canada. The New York Times and Washington Post ran their first articles regarding the incident on May 25, 1989,[2][3] the same day the story was picked up by newspapers in Lewiston, Maine[4] and Spokane, Washington.[5] The Los Angeles Times first carried the story in its paper on May 26, 1989, and the Toronto Star became the first foreign newspaper to carry the story, also on May 26, 1989,[6] the same day the story hit newspapers in northern Alabama[7] and Tampa, Florida.[8]

The trial took place over the course of 23 weeks from 1992 to 1993, and was presided over by Judge R. Benjamin Cohen. A pretrial ruling lifted New Jersey's rape shield law to allow testimony about the victim's past sexual history. Prosecutor Robert D. Laurino referred to the defendants as threats to their community and asked the judge to revoke their bail. He pointed to Christopher Archer as the "mastermind" behind the rape, referencing a sexual assault committed against a female college student following his arrest for the Glen Ridge rape. The defense lawyers—Thomas Ford, Alan Zegas, and Michael Querques—used what the New Jersey Law Journal called the "Lolita Defense". They suggested during cross-examinations that the victim was not a victim but a promiscuous "seductress" who aggressively started and willingly participated in the sexual acts, and the defendants needed protection from her. This strategy was received poorly throughout the trial due to its implications of victim blaming and the defense lawyers' nonchalant attitudes during courtroom breaks. The jury deliberated for eight days. While they agreed early on that the woman was incapable of saying no due to her disability, it took three more days for the jurors to determine whether or not the defendants were or should have been aware of this.

Christopher Archer and Kevin Scherzer were convicted in 1993 of a second-degree count of conspiracy and two first-degree counts of aggravated sexual assault with the bat and broom. Kyle Scherzer was found guilty of second-degree conspiracy, first-degree aggravated sexual assault by use of force or coercion and second-degree attempted aggravated sexual assault. Bryant Grober was convicted of a single third-degree conspiracy charge.[9]

Archer, Scherzer and Scherzer were all sentenced to a maximum of 15 years in a "young adult offenders" prison. Grober was sentenced to three years of probation and two hundred hours of community service. All three defendants were granted bail pending appeal.[10]

On appeal, the convictions for the minor offenses were reversed, but the convictions for the major offense of first-degree aggravated sexual assault were upheld, with Kyle Scherzer's sentence being reduced to seven years. All three began serving their sentences in 1997.[11]

In 2004, after all three had served their prison sentences, they again appealed their convictions to try to clear their names and to stay off New Jersey's sexual offender registry. The convictions were upheld.[11]

• Vanderbilt rape case

• Adubato, Steve (2008). What Were They Thinking?: Crisis Communication, The Good, the Bad and the Totally Clueless. Rutgers University Press. pp. 68–78. ISBN 978-0-8135-4361-1.
• Laufer, Peter (1994). A Question of Consent: Innocence and Complicity in the Glen Ridge Rape Case. San Francisco: Mercury House. ISBN 978-1-56279-059-2.
• Lefkowitz, Bernard (1997). Our Guys: The Glen Ridge Rape and the Life of the Perfect Suburb. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520918030.

40.788°N 74.212°W / 40.788; -74.212

• ""Our Guys" excerpt". Salon. 13 August 1997. Retrieved 2010-07-31.
• Catherine S. Manegold (19 January 1993). "Abuse Trial Forces Jury To Ride Tide Of Minutiae". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 August 2017 – via NYTimes.com.
• Our Guys: Outrage at Glen Ridge at IMDB