Foreign Policy Initiative

The Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) was an American think tank that operated from 2009 to 2017.[1]

For the Turkish think tank, see Foreign Policy Institute.
Foreign Policy Initiative
Established2009 (2009)
Executive DirectorChristopher J. Griffin
Location
Washington, D.C.
,
U.S.
Websiteforeignpolicyi.org (since relinquished)
Dissolved2017

FPI's Board of Directors consisted of former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Eric S. Edelman, Dan Senor, Former editor of the now-defunct The Weekly Standard Bill Kristol and Brookings Institution Senior Fellow Robert Kagan. The latter two were project directors of the neoconservative Project for the New American Century.

Background and history

The Foreign Policy Initiative was founded in 2009 by Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, Dan Senor, and Robert Kagan.

The Foreign Policy Initiative advocated for the troop surge in the Afghanistan War.[2][3]

Chris Griffin, a former legislative director of Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, was hired as executive director in early 2013. He replaced Jamie Fly, who served as director for the organization's first four years and left to become an adviser for Florida Senator Marco Rubio.[4]

In 2017, it was announced Foreign Policy Initiative would shut down its operations.[1]

Issues

Foreign affairs

In an interview with Foreign Policy In Focus, Robert Kagan iterated FPI's position toward Iran, saying, "It is time to take military action against the Iranian government elements that support terrorism and its nuclear program. More diplomacy is not an adequate response."[5]

On Fox News, Griffin described what would be a "good deal" for the U.S., with regards to Iran. Iran would comply with longstanding demands from the United States, IAEA, and UN Security Council, freeze its nuclear program, and ratify the additional protocol to IAEA safeguards agreement. Griffin also said that Iran has 7,000 kg of 3.5% "low-enriched uranium," which amounts to 70 percent progress toward having a nuclear weapon. He also called out Iran to stop building and disable the heavy water nuclear reactor at Arak, which is a basis for building a plutonium-based nuclear weapon.[6]

According to Executive Director Christopher Griffin, Russia's intervention in the Crimean Peninsula was part of a trend that has resulted "in an absence of American leadership"[7] and that "'global pressure' against the American-led international order is intensifying."[8] On NBC Nightly News on April 10, 2013, Griffin noted, "What North Korea teaches us is that once a rogue regime has a nuclear weapon, we have not figured out how to reliably contain it, how to protect Americans, or how to protect our allies."[9] FPI has also called for the U.S. Department of Defense to cancel a $572 million contract with Rosoboronexport, Russia's government-owned arms exporter.[10]

FPI proposed an active U.S. role in Syria. In 2012, Slate Magazine wrote, "The most forward-looking part of the FPI's conference came when the French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy chatted with Sen. John McCain (a PNAC signatory and contributing writer). They quickly agreed that America needed to intervene in Syria, setting up a partial no-fly zone and arming rebels."[11] FPI advocated using Patriot missile-defense batteries, with Executive Director Griffin noting, "The United States and our allies could use the Patriot missile-defence batteries now deployed in southern Turkey to establish a credible threat against Assad's air power over parts of Aleppo and Idlib provinces [in northern Syria]."[12]

Board of directors

Bibliography of works on Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI)

References
  1. Gray, Rosie. "A Right-Leaning Foreign-Policy Think Tank Shuts Down". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-09-26.
  2. Dreazan, Yochi J. (September 17, 2009). "Call for an Afghan Surge". Wall Street Journal.
  3. "The neocons return". Brattleboro Reformer. September 26, 2009. Archived from the original on October 10, 2014. Retrieved December 12, 2013.
  4. Warren, Michael (January 22, 2013). "Lieberman Aide Heading to Foreign Policy Initiative". The Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on January 25, 2013.
  5. Goulka, Jeremiah (5 November 2012). "The Dogs of War Are Barking". Regions: Middle East & North Africa. Foreign Policy in Focus. ISSN 1524-1939.
  6. "Will reducing sanctions on Iran make the US vulnerable?" (Video). Fox News. 11 November 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  7. "Washington: 6 Things the White House Can Do Immediately Regarding the Russia–Ukraine Conflict". US Official News. Plus Media Solutions. 6 March 2014.
  8. Barrow, Clark. "Daily News Briefing: Lerner says she doesn't want to testify because she's getting 'death threats'". Best of Cain. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  9. "Transcript For April 10, 2013, NBC". NBC Nightly News (New York, NY: National Broadcasting Co. Inc.). 10 April 2013. Transcript accessed 26 March 2014 on Nexis.
  10. Homan, Timothy R. (20 March 2014). "The US-Russia Military Supply Chain Could Snap". The Fiscal Times. Republished by Yahoo Finance. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  11. Weigel, David (28 November 2012). "Austerity, R.I.P." Slate Magazine. New York, NY. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  12. Martin, Patrick (6 May 2013). "What are America's options for intervention in Syria?". The Globe and Mail. Toronto, Canada. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.