Flow battery

A flow battery, or redox flow battery (after reduction–oxidation), is a type of electrochemical cell where chemical energy is provided by two chemical components dissolved in liquids that are pumped through the system on separate sides of a membrane.[2][3] Ion transfer inside the cell (accompanied by flow of electric current through an external circuit) occurs through the membrane while both liquids circulate in their own respective space. Cell voltage is chemically determined by the Nernst equation and ranges, in practical applications, from 1.0 to 2.43 volts. The energy capacity is a function of the electrolyte volume and the power is a function of the surface area of the electrodes.[4]

Redox Flow Battery
A typical flow battery consists of two tanks of liquids which are pumped past a membrane held between two electrodes.[1]

Various types of flow batteries have been demonstrated, including inorganic flow batteries[5] and organic flow batteries.[6] Under each category, flow battery design can be further classified into full flow batteries, semi-flow batteries, and membraneless flow batteries. The fundamental difference between conventional and flow batteries is that energy is stored in the electrode material in conventional batteries, while in flow batteries it is stored in the electrolyte. Patent Classifications for Flow Batteries have not been fully developed as of 2021. Cooperative Patent Classification considers RFBs as a subclass of regenerative fuel cell (H01M8/18), even though it is more appropriate to consider fuel cells as a subclass of flow batteries.

A flow battery may be used like a fuel cell (where new charged negolyte (a.k.a. reducer or fuel) and charged posolyte (a.k.a. oxidant) are added to the system) or like a rechargeable battery (where an electric power source drives regeneration of the reducer and oxidant). While flow batteries have certain technical advantages over conventional rechargeable batteries with solid electroactive materials, such as independent scaling of power ( determined by the size of the stack) and of energy (determined by the size of the tanks), long cycle and calendar life, and potentially lower total cost of ownership, all flow batteries suffer from low cycle energy efficiency (50–80%). This inferior energy efficiency stems from the need to operate flow batteries at high (>= 100 mA/cm2) current densities to reduce the effect of the internal crossover (through the membrane/separator inside each cell) and to reduce the cost of power (size of stacks). Also, most flow batteries (Zn-Cl2, Zn-Br2 and H2-LiBrO3 are exceptions) have lower specific energy (heavier weight) compared to lithium-ion batteries. The heavier weight results mostly from the need to use a solvent (usually-water) to keep the redox active species in the liquid phase.[7]

History
The log number of publication related to electrochemical power sources by year. Also shown as the magenta line is the inflation-adjusted oil price in US$/liter in linear scale















The zinc–bromine flow battery (Zn-Br2) is the oldest flow battery chemistry,[4] with John Doyle's patent US224404 filed on September 29, 1879.[8] Zn-Br2 batteries have relatively high specific energy, and they were demonstrated as power sources for electric cars in the 1970s.[9]

Walther Kangro, an Estonian chemist working in Germany, was the first to demonstrate in the 1950s flow batteries based fully on dissolved transition metal ions: Ti–Fe and Cr–Fe.[10] After some initial experimentations with Ti–Fe RFB NASA and some other groups in Japan and elsewhere selected Cr–Fe chemistry for further development. In order to reduce the effect of time-varying concentration during RFB cycling, mixed solutions (i.e. comprising both chromium and iron species in the negolyte and in the posolyte) were used. Among disadvantages of the Cr–Fe chemistry are: hydrate isomerism (i.e. the equilibrium between electrochemically active Cr3+ chloro-complexes and inactive hexa-aqua complex, which can be alleviated by adding chelating amino-ligands) and hydrogen evolution on the negode (which is mitigated by adding Pb salts for increasing the H2 overvoltage and Au salts for catalyzing the chromium electrode reaction).[11]

In the late 1980s, Sum, Rychcik and Skyllas-Kazacos[12] at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Australia demonstrated the advantages of all-vanadium RFB chemistry, such as the existence of four oxidation states within the electrochemical voltage window of the graphite-aqueous acid interface, and thus the elimination of the mixing dilution, detrimental in Cr–Fe RFBs. UNSW filed several patents related to VRFBs, that were later licensed to Japanese, Thai and Canadian corporations, which tried to commercialize this technology with variable success.[13]

In 2022, Dalian, China began operating a 400 MWh, 100 MW vanadium flow battery, then the largest of its type.[14]

Design

A flow battery is a rechargeable fuel cell in which an electrolyte containing one or more dissolved electroactive elements flows through an electrochemical cell that reversibly converts chemical energy directly to electricity. Electroactive elements are "elements in solution that can take part in an electrode reaction or that can be adsorbed on the electrode."[15] Additional electrolyte is stored externally, generally in tanks, and is usually pumped through the cell (or cells) of the reactor, although gravity feed systems are also known.[16] Flow batteries can be rapidly "recharged" by replacing the electrolyte liquid (in a similar way to refilling fuel tanks for internal combustion engines) while simultaneously recovering the spent material for recharging. Many flow batteries use carbon felt electrodes due to its low cost and adequate electrical conductivity, although these electrodes somewhat limit power density due to their low inherent activity toward many redox couples.[17][18]

In other words, a flow battery is an electrochemical cell, with the property that the ionic solution (electrolyte) is stored[19] outside of the cell (instead of in the cell around the electrodes) and can be fed into the cell in order to generate electricity. The total amount of electricity that can be generated depends on the volume of electrolyte in the tanks.

Flow batteries are governed by the design principles established by electrochemical engineering.[20]

Redox flow batteries, and to a lesser extent hybrid flow batteries, have the advantages of:

  • Independent scaling of energy (tanks) and power (stack), which allows for a cost/weight/etc. optimization for each application
  • Long cycle and calendar lives (because there are no solid-to-solid phase transitions, that cause degradation of lithium-ion and related batteries)
  • Quick response times
  • No need for "equalisation" charging (the overcharging of a battery to ensure all cells have an equal charge)
  • No harmful emissions
  • Little to no self-discharge during standing
  • Full recycling of electroactive materials

Some types also offer easy state-of-charge determination (through voltage dependence on charge), low maintenance and tolerance to overcharge/overdischarge.

They are safe because they typically do not contain flammable electrolytes, and electrolytes can be stored away from the power stack.

Flow batteries have three main disadvantages compared to batteries with solid electroactive materials[21]

  • Low energy density (you need large tanks of electrolyte to store useful amounts of energy)
  • Low charge and discharge rates (compared to other industrial electrode processes). This means that the electrodes and membrane separators need to be large, which increases the cost of power.
  • Flow batteries have a lower energy efficiency, because they operate at higher current densities to minimize the effects of the cross-over (internal self-discharge) and to reduce the cost of power.

Flow batteries typically have a higher energy efficiency than fuel cells, but lower than lithium-ion batteries.[22]

Traditional flow batteries

The redox (reduction–oxidation) cell is a reversible cell in which redox-active species are in fluid (liquid or gas) media. Redox flow batteries are rechargeable (secondary) cells.[23] Because they employ heterogeneous electron transfer rather than solid-state diffusion or intercalation they are more similar to fuel cells rather than to conventional batteries (such as lead–acid or lithium-ion). The main reason fuel cells are not considered to be batteries, is because originally (in the 1800s) fuel cells emerged as a means to produce electricity directly from fuels (and air) via a non-combustion electrochemical process. Later, particularly in the 1960s and 1990s, rechargeable fuel cells (i.e. H
2/O
2, such as unitized regenerative fuel cells in NASA's Helios Prototype) were developed.

Examples of redox flow batteries are the vanadium redox flow battery, polysulfide–bromide battery (Regenesys), iron redox flow battery (IRFB), and uranium redox flow battery.[24] Redox fuel cells are less common commercially although many systems have been proposed.[25][26][27][28]

Vanadium redox flow batteries are the most marketed flow batteries at present, due to the advantages they provide over other chemistries, despite limited energy and power densities. Since they use vanadium at both electrodes, they do not suffer cross-contamination. The limited solubility of vanadium salts, however, offsets this advantage in practice. More importantly for the commercial success of VRFBs is actually an almost perfect match of the voltage window of carbon/aqueous acid interface with the working voltage range of the vanadium redox-couples. This assures the durability of the low-cost carbon electrodes and low-impact of side reactions, such as H2 and O2 evolutions, resulting in record-long calendar (many years) and cycle(15,000–20,000 cycles) lives, which in turn results in a record low levelized cost of energy (LCOE, i.e. the system cost divided by the usable energy, the cycle life, and round-trip efficiency). The long lifetimes of flow batteries allow for the amortization of their relatively high capital cost (due to vanadium, carbon felts, bipolar plates, membranes). The levelized cost of energy for VRFBs is in the order of a few tens of $ cents or € cents per kWh, much lower than of solid-state batteries and not so far from the targets of $0.05 and €0.05, stated by US and EC government agencies.[29] The major challenges for the broad implementation include: low abundance and high costs of V2O5 (> $30 / Kg), the raw materials for VRFB; parasite reactions including hydrogen and oxygen evolution; and precipitation of V2O5 during cycling. It is the major driving force to develop alternative flow battery technologies.

Traditional flow battery chemistries have both low specific energy (which makes them too heavy for fully electric vehicles) and low specific power (which makes them too expensive for stationary energy storage). However a high power of 1.4 W/cm2 was demonstrated for hydrogen–bromine flow batteries, and a high specific energy (530 Wh/kg at the tank level) was shown for hydrogen–bromate flow batteries[30][31][32]

In 2022, DARPA SBIR-funded Influit Energy announced a nonflammable, surface-modified nanoelectrofuel made of a metal oxide suspended in an aqueous solution. The material does not settle out of the solution, even at high concentration and features and energy density higher than Lion batteries. Operating temperatures are -40 to 80 °C. They require no lithium, heavy metals, or rare-earth elements.[33][34]

Hybrid flow batteries

The hybrid flow battery uses one or more electroactive components deposited as a solid layer.[35] The major disadvantage is the loss decoupled energy and power as seen in full flow batteries from using a solid state electrode. The cell contains one battery electrode and one fuel cell electrode. This type is limited in energy by the electrode surface area. Hybrid flow batteries include the zinc–bromine, zinc–cerium,[36] soluble lead–acid,[37] and iron-salt flow batteries. Weng et al.[38] reported a vanadium–metal hydride rechargeable hybrid flow battery with an experimental OCV of 1.93 V and operating voltage of 1.70 V, relatively high values among rechargeable flow batteries with aqueous electrolytes. This hybrid battery consists of a graphite felt positive electrode operating in a mixed solution of VOSO
4and H
2SO
4, and a metal hydride negative electrode in KOH aqueous solution. The two electrolytes of different pH are separated by a bipolar membrane. The system demonstrated good reversibility and high efficiencies in coulomb (95%), energy (84%), and voltage (88%). They reported further improvements of this redox couple with achievements of increased current density, inclusion of larger 100 cm2 electrodes, and the operation of 10 large cells in series. Preliminary data using a fluctuating simulated power input tested the viability toward kWh scale storage.[39] In 2016, a high energy density Mn(VI)/Mn(VII)-Zn hybrid flow battery was proposed.[40]

A prototype zinc–polyiodide flow battery demonstrated an energy density of 167 Wh/L (watt-hours per liter). Older zinc–bromide cells reach 70 Wh/L. For comparison, lithium iron phosphate batteries store 233 Wh/L. The zinc–polyiodide battery is claimed to be safer than other flow batteries given its absence of acidic electrolytes, nonflammability and operating range of −4 to 122 °F (−20 to 50 °C) that does not require extensive cooling circuitry, which would add weight and occupy space. One unresolved issue is zinc buildup on the negative electrode that can permeate the membrane, reducing efficiency. Because of the Zn dendrite formation, Zn-halide batteries cannot operate at high current density (> 20 mA/cm2) and thus have limited power density. Adding alcohol to the electrolyte of the ZnI battery can help with the problem.[41] The drawbacks of Zn/I RFB lie at the high cost of Iodide salts (> $20 / Kg); limited area capacity of Zn deposition also losing the decoupled energy and power; and Zn dendrite formation.

When the battery is fully discharged, both tanks hold the same electrolyte solution: a mixture of positively charged zinc ions (Zn2+
) and negatively charged iodide ion, (I−
). When charged, one tank holds another negative ion, polyiodide, (I−
3). The battery produces power by pumping liquid from external tanks into the battery's stack area where the liquids are mixed. Inside the stack, zinc ions pass through a selective membrane and change into metallic zinc on the stack's negative side.[42] To further increase the energy density of the zinc–iodide flow battery, bromide ions (Br
–) are used as the complexing agent to stabilize the free iodine, forming iodine–bromide ions (I
2Br−
) as a means to free up iodide ions for charge storage.[43]

Proton flow batteries (PFB) integrate a metal hydride storage electrode into a reversible proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell. During charging, PFB combines hydrogen ions produced from splitting water with electrons and metal particles in one electrode of a fuel cell. The energy is stored in the form of a solid-state metal hydride. Discharge produces electricity and water when the process is reversed and the protons are combined with ambient oxygen. Metals less expensive than lithium can be used and provide greater energy density than lithium cells.[44][45]

Organic types

Compared to redox flow batteries that are inorganic, such as vanadium redox flow batteries and Zn-Br2 batteries, which have been developed for decades, organic redox flow batteries emerged in 2009. The primary appeal of organic redox flow batteries lies in the tunable redox properties of the active components. As of 2021, organic RFB experience low durability (i.e. calendar or cycle life, or both). For this reason, only inorganic RFB have been demonstrated on a commercial scale.[46]

Organic redox flow batteries can be further classified into aqueous (AORFBs) and non-aqueous (NAORFBs).[47][48] AORFBs use water as solvent for electrolyte materials while NAORFBs employ organic solvents. AORFBs and NAORFBs can be further divided into total and hybrid organic systems. The former use only organic electrode materials, while the latter use inorganic materials for anode or cathode. In larger-scale energy storage, lower solvent cost and higher conductivity give AORFBs greater commercial potential, as well as offering safety advantages from water-based electrolytes. NAORFBs instead provide a much larger voltage window and occupy less physical space.

pH neutral AORFBs

pH neutral AORFBs are operated at pH7 conditions, typically using NaCl as a supporting electrolyte. At pH neutral conditions, organic and organometallic molecules are more stable than at corrosive acidic and alkaline conditions. For example, K4[Fe(CN)], a common catholyte used in AORFBs, is not stable in alkaline solutions but is at pH neutral conditions.[49]

AORFBs used methyl viologen as an anolyte and 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl as a catholyte at pH neutral conditions, plus NaCL and a low-cost anion exchange membrane. This MV/TEMPO system has the highest cell voltage, 1.25 V, and, possibly, lowest capital cost ($180/kWh) reported for AORFBs. The aqueous liquid electrolytes were designed as a drop-in replacement for current systems without replacing existing infrastructure. A 600-milliwatt test battery was stable for 100 cycles with nearly 100 percent efficiency at current densities ranging from 20 to 100 mA/cm2, with optimal performance rated at 40–50 mA, at which about 70% of the battery's original voltage was retained.[50][51] Neutral AORFBs can be more environmentally friendly than acid or alkaline AORFBs while showing electrochemical performance comparable to corrosive RFBs. The MV/TEMPO AORFB has an energy density of 8.4 Wh/L with the limitation on the TEMPO side. Viologen-based flow batteries have been mainly developed by Liu's group at Utah State University. In 2019, the group reported an ultralight sulfonate–viologen/ferrocyanide AORFB stable for 1000 cycles at an energy density of 10 Wh/L, so far the most stable, energy dense AORFB.[52]

Acidic AORFBs

Quinones and their derivatives are the basis of many organic redox systems.[53][54][55] In one study, 1,2-dihydrobenzoquinone-3,5-disulfonic acid (BQDS) and 1,4-dihydrobenzoquinone-2-sulfonic acid (BQS) were employed as cathodes, and conventional Pb/PbSO4 was the anolyte in a hybrid acid AORFB. Quinones accept two units of electrical charge, compared with one in conventional catholyte, implying that such a battery could store twice as much energy in a given volume.

Another quinone 9,10-Anthraquinone-2,7-disulfonic acid (AQDS), has been evaluated.[56] AQDS undergoes rapid, reversible two-electron/two-proton reduction on a glassy carbon electrode in sulfuric acid. An aqueous flow battery with inexpensive carbon electrodes, combining the quinone/hydroquinone couple with the Br
2/Br−
 redox couple, yields a peak galvanic power density exceeding 6,000 W/m2 at 13,000 A/m2. Cycling showed > 99% storage capacity retention per cycle. Volumetric energy density was over 20 Wh/L.[57] Anthraquinone-2-sulfonic acid and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonic acid on the negative side and 1,2-dihydrobenzoquinone- 3,5-disulfonic acid on the positive side avoids the use of hazardous Br2. The battery was claimed to last for 1,000 cycles without degradation.[58] While this system appears robust, it has a low cell voltage (ca. 0.55 V) and a low energy density (< 4 Wh/L).

Hydrobromic acid used as an electrolyte has been replaced with a less toxic alkaline solution (1 M KOH) and ferrocyanide.[59] The higher pH is less corrosive, allowing the use of inexpensive polymer tanks. The increased electrical resistance in the membrane was compensated increased voltage. The cell voltage was 1.2 V.[60][61] The cell's efficiency exceeded 99%, while round-trip efficiency measured 84%. The battery offered an expected lifetime of at least 1,000 cycles. Its theoretic energy density was 19 Wh/L.[62] Ferrocyanide's chemical stability in high pH KOH solution without forming Fe(OH)2 or Fe(OH)3 needs to be verified before scale-up.

Integrating both anolyte and catholyte in the same molecule has been examined. Such bifunctional analytes[63] or combi-molecules[64] allow the same material to be used in both tanks. In one tank it is an electron donor, while in the other it is an electron recipient. This has relevant advantages such as diminishing the effect of crossover.[65] Thus, quinone diaminoanthraquinone[65] and indigo-based[63] molecules as well as TEMPO/phenazine[64] combining molecules are potential electrolytes for the development of symmetric redox-flow batteries (SRFB).

Another approach adopted a Blatter radical as the donor/recipient. It endured 275 charge and discharge cycles in tests, although it was not water-soluble.[66]

Alkaline

Quinone molecules have been used as anolytes in alkaline AROFBs. Another anolyte candidate is fluorenone, reengineered to increase its water solubility. A reversible ketone (de)hydrogenation demonstration cell operated continuously for 120 days over 1,111 charging cycles at room temperature without a catalyst, retaining 97% percent capacity. The cell offers more than double the energy density of vanadium-based systems.[67][68] The major challenge for alkaline AORFBs is the lack of a stable catholyte, holding their energy densities below 5 Wh/L. All reported alkaline AORFBs use excess potassium ferrocyanide catholyte because of the stability issue of ferrocyanide in alkaline solutions.

Metal-organic flow batteries use organic ligands to improve the properties of redox-active metals. The ligands can be chelates like EDTA, and can enable the electrolyte to be in neutral or alkaline conditions under which metal aquo complexes would otherwise precipitate. By blocking the coordination of water to the metal, organic ligands can inhibit metal-catalyzed water-splitting reactions, resulting in higher voltage all-aqueous systems. For example, the use of chromium coordinated to 1,3-propanediaminetetraacetate (PDTA), gave cell potentials of 1.62 V vs. ferrocyanide and a record 2.13 V vs. bromine.[69] Metal-organic flow batteries may be known as coordination chemistry flow batteries, which represents the technology behind Lockheed Martin's Gridstar Flow technology.[70]

Oligomer

Oligomer redox-species RFB have been proposed to reduce the crossover of the electroactive species, while using low cost membranes. Such redox-active oligomers are known as redoxymers. One system uses organic polymers and a saline solution with a cellulose membrane. The prototype underwent 10,000 charging cycles while retaining substantial capacity. The energy density was 10 Wh/L.[71] Current density reached 100 milliamperes/cm2.[72]

Another oligomer RFB employs viologen and TEMPO redoxymers in combination with low-cost dialysis membranes. Functionalized macromolecules (similar to acrylic glass or Styrofoam) dissolved in water are the active electrode material. The size-selective nanoporous membrane works like a strainer and is produced much more easily and at lower cost than conventional ion-selective membranes. It retains the big "spaghetti"-like polymer molecules, while allowing small counterions to pass.[73] The concept may solve the high cost of traditional Nafion membrane, but the design and synthesis of redox active polymer with high water solubility is not trivial. So far, RFBs with oligomer redox-species have not demonstrated competitive area-specific power. It is not clear whether low operating current density is an intrinsic feature of large redox-molecules or not.

Other types

Other flow-type batteries include the zinc–cerium battery, the zinc–bromine battery, and the hydrogen–bromine battery.

Membraneless

A membraneless battery[74] relies on laminar flow in which two liquids are pumped through a channel, where they undergo electrochemical reactions to store or release energy. The solutions stream through in parallel, with little mixing. The flow naturally separates the liquids, eliminating the need for a membrane.[75]

Membranes are often the most costly and least reliable components of batteries, as they can be corroded by repeated exposure to certain reactants. The absence of a membrane enables the use of a liquid bromine solution and hydrogen: this combination is problematic when membranes are used, because they form hydrobromic acid that can destroy the membrane. Both materials are available at low cost.[76] The design uses a small channel between two electrodes. Liquid bromine flows through the channel over a graphite cathode and hydrobromic acid flows under a porous anode. At the same time, hydrogen gas flows across the anode. The chemical reaction can be reversed to recharge the battery – a first for any membraneless design.[76] One such membraneless flow battery published in August 2013 produced a maximum power density of 0.795 mW/cm2, three times as much power as other membraneless systems— and an order of magnitude higher than lithium-ion batteries.[76]

In 2018, a macroscale membraneless redox flow battery capable of recharging and recirculation of the same electrolyte streams for multiple cycles has been demonstrated. The battery is based on immiscible organic catholyte and aqueous anolyte liquids, which exhibits high capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency during cycling.[77]

Nano-network
Semi-solid flow battery[78]

Lithium–sulfur system arranged in a network of nanoparticles eliminates the requirement that charge moves in and out of particles that are in direct contact with a conducting plate. Instead, the nanoparticle network allows electricity to flow throughout the liquid. This allows more energy to be extracted.[79]

In a Semi-solid flow battery, the positive and negative electrodes are composed of particles suspended in a carrier liquid. The positive and negative suspensions are stored in separate tanks and pumped through separate pipes into a stack of adjacent reaction chambers, where they are separated by a barrier such as a thin, porous membrane. The approach combines the basic structure of aqueous-flow batteries, which use electrode material suspended in a liquid electrolyte, with the chemistry of lithium-ion batteries in both carbon-free suspensions and slurries with conductive carbon network.[1][80][81] The carbon free semi-solid redox flow battery is also sometimes referred to as Solid Dispersion Redox Flow Battery.[82] Dissolving a material changes its chemical behavior significantly. However, suspending bits of solid material preserves the solid's characteristics. The result is a viscous suspension that flows like molasses.[83]

Flow batteries with redox-targeted solids (ROTS), also known as solid energy boosters (SEBs), is another recent development.[84][85][86][87][88][89][90] In these batteries either posolyte or negolyte or both (a.k.a. redox fluids), come in contact with a one or more solid electroactive materials, stored in tanks outside the power stack. The redox fluids comprise one or more redox couples, with redox potentials flanking the redox potential of the solid electroactive material. Such RFBs with Solid Energy Boosters (SEBs) combine the high specific energy advantage of conventional batteries (such as lithium-ion) with the decoupled energy-power advantage of flow batteries. SEB(ROTS) RFBs have several advantages compared to semi-solid RFBs, such as no need to pump viscous slurries, no precipitation /clogging , higher area-specific power, longer durability, wider chemical design space. However, because of double energy losses (one in the stack and another in the tank between the SEB(ROTS) and a mediator), such batteries suffer from a poor energy efficiency. On a system-level, the practical specific energy of traditional lithium-ion batteries is larger than that of SEB(ROTS)-flow versions of lithium-ion batteries.[91]

Comparison
Comparison of flow battery compositions
Couple Max. cell voltage (V) Average electrode power density (W/m2) Average fluid energy density Cycles
Hydrogen–lithium bromate1.115,000750 Wh/kg
Hydrogen–lithium chlorate1.410,0001400 Wh/kg
Bromine–hydrogen1.077,950
Iron–tin0.62< 200
Iron–titanium0.43< 200
Iron–chromium1.07< 200
Iron–iron1.21< 100020 Wh/L10,000
Organic (2013)0.813,00021.4 Wh/L10
Organic (2015)1.27.1 Wh/L100
MV-TEMPO 1.25 8.4 Wh/L 100
Sulfonate viologen (NH4)4[Fe(CN)6] 0.9 > 500 10 Wh/L 1,000
Metal-organic–ferrocyanide[69] 1.62 2,000 21.7 Wh/L 75
Metal-organic–bromine[69] 2.13 3,000 35 Wh/L 10
Vanadium–vanadium (sulphate)1.4~80025  Wh/L
Vanadium–vanadium (bromide)50 Wh/L2,000[2]
Sodium–bromine polysulfide1.54~800
Sodium–potassium[92]
Sulfur–oxygen-salt[93]
Zinc–bromine1.85~1,00075 Wh/kg> 2,000
Lead–acid (methanesulfonate)1.82~1,000
Zinc–cerium (methanesulfonate)2.43< 1,200–2,500
Zn-Mn(VI)/Mn(VII)1.260 Wh/L[40]

Applications

The technical merits make redox flow batteries a well-suited option for large-scale energy storage. Flow batteries are normally considered for relatively large (1 kWh – 10 MWh) stationary applications with multi-hour charge-discharge cycles.[94] Flow batteries are not cost-efficient for shorter charge/discharge times. Some examples of flow battery market niches are:

  • Grid energy storage - short and/or long-term energy storage for use by the grid
    • Load balancing – where the battery is attached to an electrical grid to store excess electrical power during off-peak hours and release electrical power during peak demand periods. The common problem limiting the use of most flow battery chemistries in this application is their low areal power (operating current density) which translates into a high cost of power.
    • Shifting energy from intermittent sources such as wind or solar for use during periods of peak demand.[95]
    • Peak shaving, where spikes of demand are met by the battery.[96]
  • UPS, where the battery is used if the main power fails to provide an uninterrupted supply.
  • Power conversion – Because all cells share the same electrolyte(s), the electrolytes may be charged using a given number of cells and discharged with a different number. As battery voltage is proportional to the number of cells used the battery can therefore act as a very powerful DC–DC converter. In addition, if the number of cells is continuously changed (on the input and/or output side) power conversion can also be AC/DC, AC/AC, or DC–AC with the frequency limited by that of the switching gear.[97]
  • Electric vehicles – Because flow batteries can be rapidly "recharged" by replacing the electrolyte, they can be used for applications where the vehicle needs to take on energy as fast as a combustion engined vehicle.[98][99] A common problem found with most RFB chemistries in the EV applications is their low energy density which translated into a short driving range. Zinc-chlorine batteries[100] and batteries with highly soluble halates are a notable exception.[101]
  • Stand-alone power system – An example of this is in cellphone base stations where no grid power is available. The battery can be used alongside solar or wind power sources to compensate for their fluctuating power levels and alongside a generator to make the most efficient use of it to save fuel.[102][103]

See also

References
  1. Qi, Zhaoxiang; Koenig, Gary M. (12 May 2017). "Review Article: Flow battery systems with solid electroactive materials". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena. 35 (4): 040801. Bibcode:2017JVSTB..35d0801Q. doi:10.1116/1.4983210. ISSN 2166-2746.
  2. Badwal, Sukhvinder P. S.; Giddey, Sarbjit S.; Munnings, Christopher; Bhatt, Anand I.; Hollenkamp, Anthony F. (24 September 2014). "Emerging electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies". Frontiers in Chemistry. 2: 79. Bibcode:2014FrCh....2...79B. doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00079. PMC 4174133. PMID 25309898.
  3. Alotto, P.; Guarnieri, M.; Moro, F. (2014). "Redox Flow Batteries for the storage of renewable energy: a review". Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 29: 325–335. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.001. hdl:11577/2682306.
  4. Yuriy V. Tolmachev "Review—Flow Batteries from 1879 to 2022 and Beyond." 2023 J. Electrochem. Soc. 170 030505. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1945-7111/acb8de/meta
  5. Hu, B.; Luo, J.; DeBruler C.; Hu, M; Wu, W.; Liu, T. L. (2019). Redox Active Inorganic Materials for Redox Flow Batteries in Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry: Inorganic Battery Materials. pp. 1–25.
  6. Luo, J.; Hu, B.; Hu, M.; Liu, T. L. (13 September 2019). "Status and Prospects of Organic Redox Flow Batteries towards Renewable Energy Storage". ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4 (9): 2220–2240. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332. S2CID 202210484.
  7. Yuriy V. Tolmachev; Svetlana V. Starodubceva (2022). "Flow batteries with solid energy boosters". Electrochemical Science and Engineering. 12 (4). doi:10.5599/jese.1363.
  8. "John doyle".
  9. C. J. Amato, in "1973 International Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition", p. 11, 1973-02-01
  10. W. Kangro Dr, 1949.; W. Kangro Dr, 1954.;W. Kangro and H. Pieper, Electrochim Acta, 7 (4), 435-448 (1962)
  11. C. Y. Sun and H. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 15 (1), 15 (2022)
  12. E. R. Sum, M. ; Skyllas-Kazacos, M., J Power Sources, 16 (2), 85-95 (1985); E. S.-K. Sum, M., J Power Sources, 15 (2-3), 179-190 (1985); M. Rychcik and M. Skyllas-Kazacos, J Power Sources, 19 (1), 45-54 (1987); M. Rychcik and M. Skyllas-Kazacos, J Power Sources, 22 (1), 59-67 (1988)
  13. G. Kear, A. A. Shah, and F. C. Walsh, Int. J. Energy Res., 36 (11), 1105-1120 (2012)
  14. "World's largest flow battery connected to the grid in China". New Atlas. 3 October 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  15. Science-Dictionary.org. "Electroactive Substance Archived 27 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine" 14 May 2013.
  16. JP patent S5671271A, Fujii, Toshinobu; Hirose, Takashi & Kondou, Naoki, "Metallohalogen secondary battery", published 1981-06-13, assigned to Meidensha Electric Mfg. Co. Ltd.
  17. Aaron, Douglas (2013). "In Situ Kinetics Studies in All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries". ECS Electrochemistry Letters. 2 (3): A29–A31. doi:10.1149/2.001303eel.
  18. McCreery, Richard L. (July 2008). "Advanced Carbon Electrode Materials for Molecular Electrochemistry". Chemical Reviews. 108 (7): 2646–2687. doi:10.1021/cr068076m. ISSN 0009-2665. PMID 18557655.
  19. "Researchers Drastically Reduce The Cost of Redox Flow Batteries [$25 Per kWh]". TechReportArticles. 29 January 2021.
  20. Arenas, L.F.; Ponce de León, C.; Walsh, F.C. (June 2017). "Engineering aspects of the design, construction and performance of modular redox flow batteries for energy storage" (PDF). Journal of Energy Storage. 11: 119–153. doi:10.1016/j.est.2017.02.007.
  21. Tolmachev, Yuriy. "Flow batteries from 1879 to 2022 and beyond." Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering (2022) (preprint).
  22. Xu, Q.; Ji, Y.N.; Qin, L.Y.; Leung, P.K.; Qiao, F.; Li, Y.S.; Su, H.N. (2018). ""Evaluation of redox flow batteries goes beyond round-trip efficiency: A technical review"". Journal of Energy Storage. 16: 108–116. doi:10.1016/j.est.2018.01.005.
  23. Linden, D.; Reddy, T.B. (2002). Handbook of Batteries (Eds.). McGraw-Hill.
  24. Shiokawa, Y.; Yamana, H.; Moriyama, H. (2000). "An Application of Actinide Elements for a Redox Flow Battery". Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 37 (3): 253–256. Bibcode:2000JNST...37..253S. doi:10.1080/18811248.2000.9714891. S2CID 97891309.
  25. US patent 567959, Borchers, William, "Process of transforming chemical energy of fuel into electrical energy", published 1896-09-22
  26. DE patent 264026, Nernst, Walther, "Brennstoffelement mit unangreifbaren Elektroden [Fuel cell with impregnable electrodes]", published 1912-06-15
  27. US patent 3682704, Keefer, Richard Mackay, "Redox fuel cell regenerated with sugar", published 1972-08-08, assigned to Electrocell Ltd.
  28. Kummer, J. T.; Oei, D. -G. (1985). "A chemically regenerative redox fuel cell. II". Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 15 (4): 619–629. doi:10.1007/BF01059304. S2CID 96195780.
  29. Spagnuolo, G.; Petrone, G.; Mattavelli, P.; Guarnieri, M. (2016). "Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: Potentials and Challenges of an Emerging Storage Technology". IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 10 (4): 20–31. doi:10.1109/MIE.2016.2611760. hdl:11577/3217695. S2CID 28206437.
  30. Cho, Kyu Taek; Tucker, Michael C.; Ding, Markus; Ridgway, Paul; Battaglia, Vincent S.; Srinivasan, Venkat; Weber, Adam Z. (2015). "Cyclic Performance Analysis of Hydrogen/Bromine Flow Batteries for Grid-Scale Energy Storage". ChemPlusChem. 80 (2): 402–411. doi:10.1002/cplu.201402043. S2CID 97168677.
  31. Yu; Tolmachev, V. (2013). "Hydrogen-halogen electrochemical cells: A review of applications and technologies". Russian Journal of Electrochemistry. 50 (4): 301–316. doi:10.1134/S1023193513120069. S2CID 97464125.
  32. Tolmachev, Yuriy V. (2015). "Energy cycle based on a high specific energy aqueous flow battery and its potential use for fully electric vehicles and for direct solar-to-chemical energy conversion". Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 19 (9): 2711–2722. doi:10.1007/s10008-015-2805-z. S2CID 97853351.
  33. Darpa Nanoelectrofuel Flow Battery, retrieved 9 August 2022
  34. Blain, Loz (9 August 2022). "Influit moves to commercialize its ultra-high density liquid batteries". New Atlas. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  35. Bartolozzi, M. (1989). "Development of redox flow batteries. A historical bibliography". Journal of Power Sources. 27 (3): 219–234. Bibcode:1989JPS....27..219B. doi:10.1016/0378-7753(89)80037-0.
  36. Leung, P. K.; Ponce-De-León, C.; Low, C. T. J.; Shah, A. A.; Walsh, F. C. (2011). "Characterization of a zinc–cerium flow battery". Journal of Power Sources. 196 (11): 5174–5185. Bibcode:2011JPS...196.5174L. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.095.
  37. Krishna, M.; Fraser, E. J.; Wills, R. G. A.; Walsh, F. C. (1 February 2018). "Developments in soluble lead flow batteries and remaining challenges: An illustrated review". Journal of Energy Storage. 15: 69–90. doi:10.1016/j.est.2017.10.020. ISSN 2352-152X.
  38. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013 volume 160, issue 9, A1384-A1389
  39. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016 volume 163, issue 1, A5180-A5187
  40. Colli, Alejandro N.; Peljo, Pekka; Girault, Hubert H. (2016). "High energy density MnO4−/MnO42− redox couple for alkaline redox flow batteries" (PDF). Chemical Communications. 52 (97): 14039–14042. doi:10.1039/C6CC08070G. PMID 27853767.
  41. Borghino, Dario (27 February 2015). "High-performance flow battery could rival lithium-ions for EVs and grid storage". Gizmag.
  42. White, Frances (25 February 2015). "New flow battery to keep big cities lit, green and safe". R&D.
  43. Weng, Guo-Ming (2017). "Unlocking the capacity of iodide for high-energy-density zinc/polyiodide and lithium/polyiodide redox flow batteries". Energy & Environmental Science. 10 (3): 735–741. doi:10.1039/C6EE03554J.
  44. "Proton flow battery simplifies hydrogen power". Gizmag.com. 13 February 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2014.
  45. Andrews, J.; Seif Mohammadi, S. (2014). "Towards a 'proton flow battery': Investigation of a reversible PEM fuel cell with integrated metal-hydride hydrogen storage". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 39 (4): 1740–1751. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.010.
  46. M.Aziz et al. Electrolyte Lifetime in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Critical Review. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120, 6467-6489.
  47. Brushett, Fikile; Vaughey, John; Jansen, Andrew (2012). "An All‐Organic Non‐aqueous Lithium‐Ion Redox Flow Battery". Advanced Functional Materials. 2 (11): 1390–1396. doi:10.1002/aenm.201200322. S2CID 97300070.
  48. Bamgbopa, Musbaudeen O.; Shao-Horn, Yang; Almheiri, Saif (2017). "The potential of non-aqueous redox flow batteries as fast-charging capable energy storage solutions: demonstration with an iron–chromium acetylacetonate chemistry". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 5 (26): 13457–13468. doi:10.1039/c7ta02022h. ISSN 2050-7488.
  49. Luo, J.; Sam, A.; Hu, B.; DeBruler C.; Liu, T. L. (2017). "Unraveling pH Dependent Cycling Stability of Ferricyanide / Ferrocyanide in Redox Flow Batteries". Nano Energy. 2017, 42: 215–221. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.057.
  50. Moss, Richard (22 December 2015). "New flow battery projected to cost 60% less than existing standard". www.gizmag.com. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  51. Liu, Tianbiao; Wei, Xiaoliang; Nie, Zimin; Sprenkle, Vincent; Wang, Wei (1 November 2015). "A Total Organic Aqueous Redox Flow Battery Employing a Low Cost and Sustainable Methyl Viologen Anolyte and 4-HO-TEMPO Catholyte". Advanced Energy Materials. 6 (3): 1501449. doi:10.1002/aenm.201501449. ISSN 1614-6840. S2CID 97838438.
  52. Luo, J.; Hu, B.; DeBruler C.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan B.; Hu, M.; Wu, W.; Liu, T. L. "Unprecedented Capacity and Stability of Ammonium Ferrocyanide Catholyte in pH Neutral Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries". Joule. 4: 149–163.
  53. Gong, K; Fang, Q; Gu, S; Li, F.S.Y.; Yan, Y (2015). "Nonaqueous redox-flow batteries: organic solvents, supporting electrolytes, and redox pairs". Energy and Environmental Science. 8 (12): 3515–3530. doi:10.1039/C5EE02341F.
  54. Xu, Y.; Wen, Y.; Cheng, J.; Yanga, Y.; Xie, Z.; Cao, G. In World Non-Grid-Connected Wind Power and Energy Conference, 2009. WNWEC 2009 IEEE: Nanjing, China, 2009, p 1.
  55. Xu, Yan; Wen, Yue-Hua; Cheng, Jie; Cao, Gao-Ping; Yang, Yu-Sheng (2010). "A study of tiron in aqueous solutions for redox flow battery application". Electrochimica Acta. 55 (3): 715–720. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.09.031. ISSN 0013-4686.
  56. WALD, MATTHEW L. (8 January 2014). "From Harvard, a Cheaper Storage Battery". New York Times. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  57. "Harvard team demonstrates new metal-free organic–inorganic aqueous flow battery; potential breakthrough for low-cost grid-scale storage". 11 January 2014.
  58. Szondy, David (29 June 2014). "New water-based organic battery is cheap, rechargeable and eco-friendly". Gizmag.
  59. "A rechargeable battery to power a home from rooftop solar panels". phys.org.
  60. Matthew Gunther,ChemistryWorld. "Flow Battery Could Smooth Irregular Wind and Solar Energy Supply". Scientific American.
  61. Alkaline quinone flow battery Lin et al. Science 2015 349 (6255), p. 1529
  62. Borghino, Dario (30 September 2015). "Greener, safer flow battery could store renewable energy on the cheap". www.gizmag.com. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  63. Carretero-González, Javier; Castillo-Martínez, Elizabeth; Armand, Michel (2016). "Highly water-soluble three-redox state organic dyes as bifunctional analytes". Energy & Environmental Science. 9 (11): 3521–3530. doi:10.1039/C6EE01883A. ISSN 1754-5692.
  64. Winsberg, Jan; Stolze, Christian; Muench, Simon; Liedl, Ferenc; Hager, Martin D.; Schubert, Ulrich S. (11 November 2016). "TEMPO/Phenazine Combi-Molecule: A Redox-Active Material for Symmetric Aqueous Redox-Flow Batteries". ACS Energy Letters. 1 (5): 976–980. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00413. ISSN 2380-8195.
  65. Potash, Rebecca A.; McKone, James R.; Conte, Sean; Abruña, Héctor D. (2016). "On the Benefits of a Symmetric Redox Flow Battery". Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 163 (3): A338–A344. doi:10.1149/2.0971602jes. ISSN 0013-4651. OSTI 1370440. S2CID 101469730.
  66. Lavars, Nick (17 March 2022). "Symmetrical flow battery may strike right balance for grid-scale storage". New Atlas. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  67. Lavars, Nick (21 May 2021). "Candle compound brings high density to grid-scale battery technology". New Atlas. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  68. Feng, Ruozhu; Zhang, Xin; Murugesan, Vijayakumar; Hollas, Aaron; Chen, Ying; Shao, Yuyan; Walter, Eric; Wellala, Nadeesha P. N.; Yan, Litao; Rosso, Kevin M.; Wang, Wei (21 May 2021). "Reversible ketone hydrogenation and dehydrogenation for aqueous organic redox flow batteries". Science. 372 (6544): 836–840. Bibcode:2021Sci...372..836F. doi:10.1126/science.abd9795. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 34016776. S2CID 234794555.
  69. Robb, Brian H.; Farrell, Jason M.; Marshak, Michael P. (2019). "Chelated Chromium Electrolyte Enabling High-Voltage Aqueous Flow Batteries". Joule. 3 (10): 2503–2512. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.002.
  70. "Energy Storage: GridStar Flow". Lockheed Martin. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  71. "Chemists present an innovative redox-flow battery based on organic polymers and water". phys.org. Phys.org. 21 October 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2015.
  72. Janoschka, Tobias; Martin, Norbert; Martin, Udo; Friebe, Christian; Morgenstern, Sabine; Hiller, Hannes; Hager, Martin D.; Schubert, Ulrich S. (2015). "An aqueous, polymer-based redox-flow battery using non-corrosive, safe, and low-cost materials". Nature. 527 (7576): 78–81. Bibcode:2015Natur.527...78J. doi:10.1038/nature15746. PMID 26503039. S2CID 4393601.
  73. Janoschka, Tobias; Martin, Norbert; Martin, Udo; Friebe, Christian; Morgenstern, Sabine; Hiller, Hannes; Hager, Martin D.; Schubert, Ulrich S. (2015). "An aqueous, polymer-based redox-flow battery using non-corrosive, safe, and low-cost materials". Nature. 527 (7576): 78–81. Bibcode:2015Natur.527...78J. doi:10.1038/nature15746. PMID 26503039. S2CID 4393601.
  74. Bamgbopa, Musbaudeen O.; Almheiri, Saif; Sun, Hong (2017). "Prospects of recently developed membraneless cell designs for redox flow batteries". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 70: 506–518. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.234. ISSN 1364-0321.
  75. Braff, William A.; Bazant, Martin Z.; Buie, Cullen R. (2013). "New rechargeable flow battery enables cheaper, large-scale energy storage". Nature Communications. 4: 2346. arXiv:1404.0917. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2346B. doi:10.1038/ncomms3346. PMID 23949161. S2CID 14719469. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  76. Braff, W. A.; Bazant, M. Z.; Buie, C. R. (2013). "Membrane-less hydrogen bromine flow battery". Nature Communications. 4: 2346. arXiv:1404.0917. Bibcode:2013NatCo...4.2346B. doi:10.1038/ncomms3346. PMID 23949161. S2CID 14719469.
  77. Bamgbopa, Musbaudeen O.; Shao-Horn, Yang; Hashaikeh, Raed; Almheiri, Saif (2018). "Cyclable membraneless redox flow batteries based on immiscible liquid electrolytes: Demonstration with all-iron redox chemistry". Electrochimica Acta. 267: 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.063. ISSN 0013-4686.
  78. Qi, Zhaoxiang; Koenig, Gary M. (2017). "Review Article: Flow battery systems with solid electroactive materials". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena. 35 (4): 040801. Bibcode:2017JVSTB..35d0801Q. doi:10.1116/1.4983210. ISSN 2166-2746.
  79. Kevin Bullis (24 April 2014). "Nanoparticle Networks Promise Cheaper Batteries for Storing Renewable Energy". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
  80. Duduta, Mihai (May 2011). "Semi-Solid Lithium Rechargeable Flow Battery". Advanced Energy Materials. 1 (4): 511–516. doi:10.1002/aenm.201100152. S2CID 97634258.
  81. Qi, Zhaoxiang; Koenig Jr., Gary M. (15 August 2016). "A carbon-free lithium-ion solid dispersion redox couple with low viscosity for redox flow batteries". Journal of Power Sources. 323: 97–106. Bibcode:2016JPS...323...97Q. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.033.
  82. Qi, Zhaoxiang; Liu, Aaron L.; Koenig Jr, Gary M. (20 February 2017). "Carbon-free Solid Dispersion LiCoO2 Redox Couple Characterization and Electrochemical Evaluation for All Solid Dispersion Redox Flow Batteries". Electrochimica Acta. 228: 91–99. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.061.
  83. Chandler, David L. (23 August 2011). "Go with the Flow – Cambridge Crude". Technology Review.
  84. Redox-Targeting-Based Flow Batteries for Large-Scale Energy Storage. Advanced Materials 2018, 30, 13.
  85. Redox targeting-based flow batteries. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 2019, 52, 17.
  86. Redox Targeting Improves Flow Batteries. Joule 2019, 3, 2066-2067.
  87. Single-Molecule Redox-Targeting Reactions for a pH-Neutral Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Battery. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 2020, 59, 14286-14291.
  88. Redox targeting of energy materials. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 2021, 29, 7.
  89. Redox Targeting of Energy Materials for Energy Storage and Conversion. Advanced Materials 2021, 2104562 (2104519).
  90. "130+ million publications organized by topic on ResearchGate". Retrieved 21 May 2023.
  91. Tolmachev, Yuriy, and Svetlana V. Starodubceva. "Flow batteries with solid energy boosters." Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering 12.4 (2022): 731-766.https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/410594
  92. Bush, Steve (20 July 2018). "Room-temperature flow battery uses liquid sodium-potassium alloy".
  93. Li, Zheng; Sam Pan, Menghsuan; Su, Liang; Tsai, Ping-Chun; Badel, Andres F.; Valle, Joseph M.; Eiler, Stephanie L.; Xiang, Kai; Brushett, Fikile R.; Chiang, Yet-Ming (11 October 2017). "Air-Breathing Aqueous Sulfur Flow Battery for Ultralow-Cost Long-Duration Electrical Storage". Joule. 1 (2): 306–327. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.007.
  94. Service, R.F. (2 November 2018). "Advances in flow batteries promise cheap backup power". Science. 362 (6414): 508–509. Bibcode:2018Sci...362..508S. doi:10.1126/science.362.6414.508. PMID 30385552. S2CID 53218660.
  95. REDT Energy. "Storing Renewable Energy". Archived from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  96. Archived 9 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  97. in WO patent 03043170, Spaziante, Placido Maria; Kampanatsanyakorn, Krisada & Zocchi, Andrea, "System for storing and/or transforming energy from sources at variable voltage and frequency", published 2003-05-22, assigned to Squirrel Holdings Ltd.
  98. "Electric Vehicle Refuelling System (EVRS) used in conjunction with Vanadium Redox Flow Technology". REDT Energy Storage. Archived from the original on 10 December 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  99. Antony Ingram (11 October 2016). "nanoFLOWCELL-powered Quant e-Limo approved for german road trials". Fox News.
  100. Amato, C. J. (1 February 1973). "A Zinc-Chloride Battery - The Missing Link to a Practical Electric Car". SAE Technical Paper Series. Vol. 1. doi:10.4271/730248 – via www.sae.org.
  101. Tolmachev, Yuriy V.; Piatkivskyi, Andrii; Ryzhov, Victor V.; Konev, Dmitry V.; Vorotyntsev, Mikhail A. (2015). "Energy cycle based on a high specific energy aqueous flow battery and its potential use for fully electric vehicles and for direct solar-to-chemical energy conversion". Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 19 (9): 2711–2722. doi:10.1007/s10008-015-2805-z. S2CID 97853351.
  102. Talk by John Davis of Deeya energy about their flow battery's use in the telecomms industry on YouTube
  103. "Performance Testing of Zinc–Bromine Flow Batteries for Remote Telecom Sites" (PDF). Retrieved 21 May 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.