Epistolae (Spinoza)
The Epistolae (Spinoza) are the correspondence of the Dutch philosopher Benedictus de Spinoza (1633-1677) with a number of well-known learned men and with Spinoza's admirers, which Spinoza's followers in Amsterdam published after his death in the Opera Posthuma (Dutch translated edition: De nagelate schriften, 1677)[1] Spinoza preserved the letters he received as well as the rough drafts of the letters he sent; 88 letters about mostly philosophical subjects have been preserved: 50 by Spinoza and 38 by his correspondents, 52 written in Latin and 26 in Dutch. The letters concern subjects from the works by Spinoza (for instance infinity and the attributes (properties) of "God", Spinoza's concept of the universe) but also about ghosts and scientific discoveries as the vacuum.[2]
Quote on friendship
(Benedictus de Spinoza's text in Dutch:) Want voor my van al die dingen, die buyten myn maght syn, geen grooter aght als de eer te moogen hebben, van met luyde, die de waarhyt opreghtlyk beminnen, in verbont van vrientschap te treede, om dat ik geloof, dat wy niets ter werelt, dat buyten onse maght is, gerustigh konnen beminnen, dan sodanige menschen... |
(Translation) Because to me of all the things that are beyond my power, none is greater than to have the honour to enter into an alliance of friendship with people who love truth sincerely because I believe that we can love nothing beyond our power in the world more safely than such people... |
Correspondents
Benedictus de Spinoza's correspondents include,[5] with the years of their letters:
- Willem van Blijenbergh (1632–1696), 1664-1665
- A Dordrecht grain merchant, regent and writer , who corresponded with Spinoza on free will and after Spinoza's death published books opposing his Tractatus Theologico-Politicus and Ethica.[6] Letters WvB to Spinoza (Gebhardt letter number 18: 12-12-1664, 20: 16-01-1665, 22: 19-02-1665, 24: 27-03-1665) and Spinoza to WvB (Gebhardt letter number 19: 05-01-1665, 21, 23: 13-03-1665, 27: 03-06-1665).
- Johannes Bouwmeester, 1665-1666, 1673
- Hugo Boxel Danielsz, 1674[7]
- Robert Boyle, 1663
- Albert Burgh (franciscan), 1675
- The franciscan Albert Burgh (1650-1708) wrote to Spinoza from Rome to challenge his rationalistic errors and disbelief in Christ. Spinoza's answer is famous: it is ridiculous that the Roman-Catholic Church damns people who are misled by the devil for eternity, while the devil himself is not punished.[8][9][10]
- Johann Georg Graevius, 1673
- Johannes Hudde, 1666, 1671
- Gottfried Leibniz
- In 1676 Leibniz visited Spinoza to discuss metempsychosis/reincarnation as in Pythagoras's work. Leibniz kept his visit secret. In 1714 he published a moderate vision that reconciled religion and science.[6][11]
- Lodewijk Meyer, 1663
- Henry Oldenburg, 1661-1663, 1665, 1675-167
- Petrus Serrarius (Pieter Serrurier) introduced Oldenburg, secretary of the Royal Society in London, to Spinoza and served as a courier for the letters between Oldenburg and Spinoza.[12]
- Jacob Ostens, 1671
- Jan Rieuwertszn Sr., 1674
- George Hermann Schuller, 1674-1676
- Nicholas Steno, 1671
- Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus, 1674-1676
- Spinoza took the initiative for a correspondence with German physicist and mathematician Ehrenfried Walther von Tschirnhaus, who had studied in Leiden. According to Jonathan Israel Spinoza was inspired and stimulated in his later years by discussions with von Tschirnhaus about free will, human motivation and the mechanical laws of motion of Descartes. Von Tschirnhaus visited Spinoza and through Spinoza came into contact with Henry Oldenburg, secretary of the Royal Society in London.[13][14]
- Simon Joosten de Vries, 1663
- Lambert van Velthuysen, 1671, 1675
- The Utrecht physician Lambert van Velthuysen (1622-1685) had criticised Spinoza's concept of God. He accused Spinoza of a blind surrender to Fate: fatalism.[15] The God defined by Spinoza possessed no divine will, so according to Van Velthuysen this God could not be any longer the touchstone for 'good' and 'evil'. Morals and virtue were endangered this way, leading to insecurity. Furthermore, the authority of the Bible was undermined, for when God was not able to procure a moral judgment, the Bible was nothing more than rhetoric. Spinoza was not impressed and sent Van Velthuysen a strongly worded refutation.[16]
- Nonetheless Spinoza and Van Velthuysen remained in contact: starting with 1673 they visited regularly and assisted each other with publications. In the conflict of Descartes with the Utrecht theologian Gisbertus Voetius both sided with Descartes.[17]
Literature
- Nadler, Stephen (1999). Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521552103.
- Nadler, Stephen (2007). Spinoza. Amsterdam: Olympus, Amstel Uitgevers. ISBN 9789046700211. Dutch translation.
- Israel, Jonathan (2002). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. ISBN 0-19-820608-9 hbk (hardback); ISBN 0-199-25456-7 sbk (softback).
References
- Publications by, for example, the Italian publishing house Quodlibet: quodlibet.it Opera posthuma F. Mignini ed., Amsterdam 1677. Photografic reproduction.
- "Spinoza Web. About". spinozaweb.org. Spinoza’s Web project of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University. 2023. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
- Carl Gebhardt letter number XIX (=19) "Epistolarum numeri". Concordance on the last two pages. "Epistolae Doctorum Quorundam Virorum Ad B. D. S. Et Auctoris Responsiones Ad aliorum ejus Operum elucidationem non parùm facientes. BARUCH DE SPINOZA OPERA Hrsg. von Carl Gebhardt, Heidelberg: Carl Winters, 1925. 4 Bände" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 4 March 2023.
- "Index Epistolarum". Archived from the original on 8 August 2020. Retrieved 1 July 2020.
- "Spinoza Web. Letters". spinozaweb.org. Spinoza’s Web project of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University. 2023. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
- Nadler (2007)
- Coppens, Gunther (2004) Spinoza et Boxel: Revue de métaphysique et de morale (No. 41), pp. 59-72.
- Nadler (2007), pp. 426-431.
- Andrew, Bostom (13 February 2012). "Spinoza on Islam". andrewbostom.org.
- Spinoza, Baruch (2003). Correspondence of Spinoza. Translated by A. Wolf. Kessinger Publishing, LLC. p. 354.
- Israel (2002) p. 506.
- Nadler (2007), p. 271.
- Nadler (2007), p. 420.
- Israel (2002), pp. 637-641.
- Kuypers, Etienne L.G.E. (1993): Sporen van Spinoza, p. 138 Google Boeken
- Coppens, Gunther; Theo Verbeek, Han van Ruler and others (2004) books.google.nl Spinoza en het Dutch cartesianisme (Gunther Coppens, Ed.), Acco, Leuven, p. 61
- Krop, Henri: Spinoza en het calvinistisch cartesianisme van Lambertus Van Velthuysen (1622-1685), in: Coppens, Gunther; Theo Verbeek, Han van Ruler and others (2004), p. 61-78
External links
- wikisource Epistolae (Benedictus de Spinoza) Epistolae 1-4, 8, other answer op 6, 15, 26-29, 39-42, 50, 61-71, 72? ("LXII" (62) error, should be LXXII (72)?)
- "Index Epistolarum". users.telenet.be/rwmeijer/spinoza. Archived from the original on 8 August 2020. Retrieved 1 July 2020.
- "Epistolae Doctorum Quorundam Virorum Ad B.D.S. Et Auctoris Responsiones Ad aliorum ejus Operum elucidationem non parùm facientes" (PDF). spinoza.tk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-07-06. Retrieved 7 November 2021. PDF of the Latin text.
- "Explanation". home.kpn.nl/rudolf.meijer. Retrieved 7 November 2021. Latin text of an anthology of the letters (Epistolae). Furthermore full text of three works by Benedictus de Spinoza: Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata, Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione and Tractatus Politicus.
- "Bienvenue sur l'espace de documentation de Spinoza et Nous". spinozaetnous.org (in French). Retrieved 7 November 2021.. Latin text with a French translation, incomplete.