Theological differences between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church

The Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church have been in a state of official schism from one another since the East–West Schism of 1054. This schism was caused by historical and language differences, and the ensuing theological differences between the Western and Eastern churches.

For ecclesiastical differences between the two churches, see Ecclesiastical differences between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church.
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem – a centre of Christian pilgrimage long shared and disputed among the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and Catholic Churches.
This article is part of a series on
Catholic–Eastern Orthodox relations
Overview
Schisms
Reasons for the Great Schism
Further division motives
Medieval reunification attempts
Modern ecumenic relations

The main theological differences with the Catholic Church are the papal primacy[1][2][3] and the filioque clause.[1][2] In spirituality, the tenability of neo-Palamism's essence-energy distinction and of the experiential vision of God as attained in theoria and theosis are actively debated.

Although the 21st century saw a growth of anti-western sentiments with the rise of neo-Palamism, "the future of East–West rapprochement appears to be overcoming the modern polemics of neo-scholasticism and neo-Palamism".[4] Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has generally taken the approach that the schism is primarily ecclesiological in nature, that the doctrinal teachings of the Eastern Orthodox churches are generally sound, and that "the vision of the full communion to be sought is that of unity in legitimate diversity"[5] as before the division.[6]

Areas of doctrinal agreement

Both churches accept the decisions of the first seven Ecumenical Councils of the undivided Church. These are:

There is therefore doctrinal agreement on:

Both churches reject many Protestant doctrines, some important examples of which are the teachings of salvation through faith alone and sola scriptura.

East–West Schism
Changes in extent of the Empire ruled from Constantinople.
476 End of the Western Empire; 550 Conquests of Justinian I; 717 Accession of Leo the Isaurian; 867 Accession of Basil I; 1025 Death of Basil II; 1095 Eve of the First Crusade; 1170 Under Manuel I; 1270 Under Michael VIII Palaiologos; 1400 Before the fall of Constantinople

The Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church have been in a state of official schism from one another since the East–West Schism of 1054. This schism was caused by historical and language differences, and the ensuing theological differences between the Western and Eastern churches.

The Byzantine Empire permanently withdrew from the City of Rome in 751, thus ending the Byzantine Papacy. The subsequent mutual alienation of the Greek-speaking East and the Latin-speaking West led to increasing ignorance of the theological and ecclesiological developments of each tradition.

The Eastern Church and the Western Church used respectively Greek and Latin as their media of communication. Translations did not always correspond exactly. This also led to misunderstandings.

Papal primacy
Main article: Papal primacy

Papal primacy, also known as the "primacy of the Bishop of Rome," is an ecclesiastical doctrine concerning the respect and authority that is due to the pope from other bishops and their episcopal sees.

In the Eastern Orthodox Churches, some understand the primacy of the Bishop of Rome to be merely one of greater honour, regarding him as primus inter pares ("first among equals"), without effective power over other churches.[7] Other Orthodox Christian theologians, however, view primacy as authoritative power: the expression, manifestation and realization in one bishop of the power of all the bishops and of the unity of the Church.[8]

The Catholic Church attributes to the primacy of the Pope "full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered,"[9] with a power that it attributes also to the entire body of the bishops united with the pope.[10] The power that it attributes to the pope's primatial authority has limitations that are official, legal, dogmatic, and practical.[11]

In the Ravenna Document, issued in 2007, representatives of the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church jointly stated that both East and West accept the fact of the Bishop of Rome's primacy at the universal level, but that differences of understanding exist about how the primacy is to be exercised and about its scriptural and theological foundations.[12]

Filioque
Main article: Filioque

Differences over this doctrine and the question of papal primacy have been and remain primary causes of schism between the Eastern Orthodox and Western churches.[1][2] The term has been an ongoing source of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, contributing, in major part, to the East–West Schism of 1054 and proving to be an obstacle to attempts to reunify the two sides.[13][14][15]

The Filioque clause

Filioque (literally "and [from] the Son"[16]) is a Latin term added to the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (commonly known as the Nicene Creed), which is absent in the original Greek version. The Latin term Filioque is translated into the English clause "and the Son" in that creed:

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father ⟨and the Son⟩.
Who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified.

or in Latin:

Et in Spiritum Sanctum, Dominium et vivificantem:
qui ex Patre ⟨Filioque⟩ procedit
Qui cum Patre, et Filio simul adoratur. et cum glorificatur

Inclusion and rejection

The Filioque is not included in the form of the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed used in most Western Christian churches,[note 1] first appearing in the 6th century.[23] It was accepted by the popes only in 1014 and is rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Churches and Church of the East.

Consequences

Whether that term Filioque is included, as well as how it is translated and understood, can have important implications for how one understands the central Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. For some, the term implies a serious underestimation of the Father's role in the Trinity; for others, denial of what it expresses implies a serious underestimation of the role of the Son in the Trinity. Over time, the term became a symbol of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, although there have been attempts at resolving the conflict. Among the early attempts at harmonization are the works of Maximus the Confessor, who notably was canonised independently by both Eastern and Western churches.

Possible linguistic resolution

In 1995, the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity (PCPU) pointed out that the Filioque conundrum may be a problem of language, rather than a problem of theology.[24] The word ἐκπορεύεσθαι in Greek indicates a primary cause or an ultimate cause; while the Latin word procedere indicates a procession but not from an ultimate cause. The Latin version may be more accurately retranslated into Greek as προϊέναι, rather than ἐκπορεύεσθαι. Metropolitan John Zizioulas declared that PCPCU position shows positive signs of reconciliation for the Filioque issue between the Eastern and Western churches.[25]

Neo-Palamism: theoria and hesychasm

Neo-Palamism
See also: History of Eastern Orthodox theology in the 20th century

The 20th century saw the rise of neo-Palamism, c.q. "Neo-Orthodox Movement," in the Eastern Orthodox Churches. According to this point of view, which arose in defense of the Palamite distinction between essence and energia, western theology is dominated by rational philosophy, while Orthodox theology is based on the experiential vision of God and the highest truth. According to neo-Palamism, this is a main division between East and West.

Neo-Palamism has its roots in the Hesychast controversy or Palamite controversy (14th century),[26][27] in which Gregory Palamas provided a theological justification for the centuries-old Orthodox practice of hesychasm. The hesychast controversy lead to a further distinction between East and West, giving a prominent place to the contemplative practice and theology in the Eastern Orthodox Churches. The publication in 1782 of the Philokalia, which lead to a revival of hesychasm, was accepted in particular by the Slav Orthodox churches. Together with the importance attached to it in the 20th century by the Paris school of Orthodox theology, it has "led to hesychasm's becoming definitive for modern Orthodox theology as never before,"[28][29] with its Palamite Essence–energies distinction.[30]

Rational and mystical theology

According to these modern Eastern Orthodox theologians, western theology depends too much on kataphatic theology. According to Steenberg, Eastern theologians assert that Christianity in essence is apodictic truth, in contrast to the dialectic, dianoia, or rationalised knowledge which is the arrived at truth by way of philosophical speculation.[31]

While Thomas Aquinas argued that kataphatic and apophatic theology need to balance each other, Vladimir Lossky argued, based on his reading of Dionysius the Areopagite and Maximus the Confessor, that positive theology is always inferior to negative theology.[32] According to Lossky mysticism, c.q. gnosiology, is the expression of dogmatic theology par excellence,[33] while positive theology is a step along the way to the superior knowledge attained by negation.[32] According to Lossky, the difference in East and West is due to the Catholic Church's use of pagan metaphysical philosophy, and its outgrowth, scholasticism, rather than the mystical, actual experience of God called theoria, to validate the theological dogmas of Catholic Christianity. Lossky argues that therefore the Eastern Orthodox and Catholics have become "different men,"[34] stating that "Revelation sets an abyss between the truth which it declares and the truths which can be discovered by philosophical speculation."[35]

Lossky had a strong influence on 20th century Eastern Orthodox theology, and influenced John Romanides, himself also an influential theologian on his own. Romanides saw a strong dichotomy between Eastern Orthodox and western views, arguing that the influence of the Franks, and western acceptance of Augustine's theology, is the starting point of western rational theology, and the dichotomy between East and West.[36][note 2]

This same sentiment was also expressed by the early Slavophile movements (19th century) in the works of Ivan Kireevsky and Aleksey Khomyakov. The Slavophiles sought reconciliation with all various forms of Christianity, as can be seen in the works of its most famous proponent Vladimir Solovyov.

Hesychasm
Main articles: Hesychasm, Theosis (Eastern Orthodox theology), Christian contemplation, and Mysticism

Hesychasm, "to keep stillness," is a mystical tradition of contemplative prayer in the Eastern Orthodox Church, which already existed in the fourth century AD with the Desert Fathers. Its aim is theosis, deification obtained through the practice of contemplative prayer,[42][43][44][45][46] the first stage of theoria, leading to the "vision of God".[31][47][48][note 3] It consists of three stages, namely catharsis, theoria, and completion of deification, c.q. theosis.[43]

The knowledge of God is attained by theoria, "the vision of God."[50][51][52][43][note 4] This is also referred to as experiencing the uncreated light[47] of God, the light of Tabor of Christ's Transfiguration[63][64] as was seen by the apostles at Mount Tabor.

Hesychast controversy
Main articles: Essence–energies distinction and Hesychast controversy

The Hesychast controversy was a theological dispute in the Byzantine Empire during the 14th century between supporters and opponents of Gregory Palamas. Gregory Palamas of Thessaloniki (1296-1359) provided a theological justification for the practice of hesychasm. Palamas stated that there is a distinction between the essence (ousia) and the energies (energeia) of God. While God in his essence is unknowable and indeterminable, the vision of God can be attained when his energy is seen with the eyes as the Uncreated Light. Palamas formulated his ideas on this distinction as part of his defense of the Athonite monastic practice of hesychasmos against the charge of heresy brought by the humanist scholar and theologian Barlaam of Calabria.[65][66]

Eastern Orthodox theologians generally regard this distinction as a real distinction, and not just a conceptual distinction.[67] Historically, Western Christian thought has tended to reject the essence-energies distinction as real in the case of God, characterizing the view as a heretical introduction of an unacceptable division in the Trinity and suggestive of polytheism.[68][69]

Catholic views on Hesychasm

The later 20th century saw a change in the attitude of Catholic theologians to Palamas.[70] While some Western theologians see the theology of Palamas as introducing an inadmissible division within God, others have incorporated his theology into their own thinking,[71] maintaining that there is no conflict between his teaching and Catholic thought.[72]

Sergey S. Horujy states that "hesychast studies may provide fresh look at some old interconfessional divisions, disclosing unexpected points of resemblance",[73] and Jeffrey D. Finch says that "the future of East-West rapprochement appears to be overcoming the modern polemics of neo-scholasticism and neo-Palamism".[74]

Pope John Paul II repeatedly emphasized his respect for Eastern theology as an enrichment for the whole Church. While from a Catholic viewpoint there have been tensions concerning some developments of the practice of hesychasm, the Pope said, there is no denying the goodness of the intention that inspired its defence.[75][76]

Future directions

Jeffrey D. Finch claims that "the future of East–West rapprochement appears to be overcoming the modern polemics of neo-scholasticism and neo-Palamism".[4]

The Catholic Church considers that the differences between Eastern and Western theology are complementary rather than contradictory, as stated in the decree Unitatis redintegratio of the Second Vatican Council, which declared:

In the study of revelation East and West have followed different methods, and have developed differently their understanding and confession of God's truth. It is hardly surprising, then, if from time to time one tradition has come nearer to a full appreciation of some aspects of a mystery of revelation than the other, or has expressed it to better advantage. In such cases, these various theological expressions are to be considered often as mutually complementary rather than conflicting. Where the authentic theological traditions of the Eastern Church are concerned, we must recognize the admirable way in which they have their roots in Holy Scripture, and how they are nurtured and given expression in the life of the liturgy. They derive their strength too from the living tradition of the apostles and from the works of the Fathers and spiritual writers of the Eastern Churches. Thus they promote the right ordering of Christian life and, indeed, pave the way to a full vision of Christian truth.[77]

The Catholic Church's attitude was also expressed by Pope John Paul II in the image of the Church "breathing with her two lungs".[78][79] He meant that there should be a combination of the more rational, juridical, organization-minded "Latin" temperament with the intuitive, mystical and contemplative spirit found in the East.[80]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, citing documents of the Second Vatican Council and of Pope Paul VI, states:

"The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honoured by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter" (Lumen gentium 15). Those "who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church" (Unitatis redintegratio 3). With the Orthodox Churches, this communion is so profound "that it lacks little to attain the fulness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord's Eucharist" (Paul VI, Discourse, 14 December 1975; cf. Unitatis redintegratio 13-18).[81]

On 10 July 2007 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published a document,[82] approved by Pope Benedict XVI, that stated that the Eastern churches are separated from Rome (the member churches of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodoxy and the Assyrian Church of the East) and for that very reason "lack something in their condition as particular churches", and that the division also means that "the fullness of universality, which is proper to the Church governed by the Successor of Peter and the Bishops in communion with him, is not fully realised in history."[83]

On 3 July 2019, it was revealed that during a Vatican meeting with Orthodox Archbishop Job of Telmessos, who represented the Orthodox Church's Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, during the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul on 29 June 2019, Pope Francis stated that unity rather than leveling differences should be the goal between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.[84] Pope Francis also gave Bartholomew nine bone fragments which were believed to have belonged to St. Peter and which were displayed at a public Mass which was held in the Vatican in November 2013 to celebrate the "Year of Faith".[85][84] Despite holding a "cordial" meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom the Pope has had a history of good relations,[86] on 4 July 2019 tensions between the Vatican and Russian Orthodox churches still remained, with Pope Francis stating that it is unlikely that he will visit Russia unless Putin agrees to not include the Russian Orthodox Church in the visit.[87] Putin also stated to the Pope that he would not invite the Pope to Russia without this condition.[88] Pope Francis also hinted that he was willing to support the concerns of Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, which has expressed opposition to both Putin's intervention in Ukraine and the Vatican's current relationship with Putin.[89]

At the beginning of a two-day Vatican meeting with Ukrainian Greek-Catholic leaders on 5 July 2019, Pope Francis hinted that he supported the Church's concerns in Ukraine and called for greater humanitarian aid to Ukraine. The Pope previously expressed dismay over the Russian Orthodox Church's role in the conflict in Ukraine in early 2019 as well.[90] During the 5 July 2019 meeting, Pope Francis also accused the Russian Orthodox Church of attempting to manipulate "other religions" in Ukraine as well.[91]

See also

Notes
  1. The doctrine expressed by the Filioque is accepted by the Catholic Church,[17] by Anglicanism[18] and by Protestant churches in general.[19] Christians of these groups generally include it when reciting the Nicene Creed. Nonetheless, these groups recognize that Filioque is not part of the original text established at the First Council of Constantinople in 381 and they do not demand that others too should use it when saying the Creed, including in the Latin liturgical rites of the Latin Church.[20] the Catholic Church does not add the phrase corresponding to Filioque (καὶ τοῦ Υἱοῦ) to the Greek text of the Creed, where it would be associated with the verb ἐκπορεύεσθαι, but adds it in Latin, where it is associated with the verb procedere, a word of broader meaning than ἐκπορεύεσθαι, and in languages, such as English,[21] in which the verb with which it is associated also has a broader meaning than ἐκπορεύεσθαι. Pope John Paul II has recited the Nicene Creed several times with patriarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Church in Greek according to the original text.[22]
  2. According to Romanides, both Saint Thomas Aquinas' Aristoteleanism and Saint Augustine's Neoplatonism mislead and dominated Western theology. According to Romanides, Augustine did not have theoria, and many of his theological conclusions are not based on a personal experience of God, but on philosophical or logical speculation and conjecture.[36] Romanides therefore reveres Augustine as a saint, but says he does not qualify as a theologian in the Eastern Orthodox church.[37]

    According to John Romanides the Catholic Church, starting with Augustine, has removed the mystical experience (revelation) of God (theoria) from Christianity, and replaced it with the conceptualization of revelation through the philosophical speculation of metaphysics.[38][39] Romanides does not consider the metaphysics of Augustine to be Orthodox but pagan mysticism.[38]

    According to John Romanides, Augustinian theology is generally ignored in the Eastern Orthodox church.[40] According to John Romanides and George Papademetriou, some of Augustine's teachings, including his Platonic mysticism, has actually been condemned within the Eastern Orthodox condemnation of Barlaam of Calabria, at the Hesychast or Fifth Council of Constantinople 1351.[38][41][subnote 1]
  3. Theosis has also been referred to as "glorification",[38] "union with God", "becoming god by Grace", "self-realization", "the acquisition of the Holy Spirit", "experience of the uncreated light".[43][49]
  4. In classical Greek philosophy, theoria was the "intellectual vision of truth,"[53] that is, an intuitive or comprehensive understanding and vision, as opposed to a mere rational and analytical understanding. Until the sixth century the practice of what is now called mysticism was referred to by the term contemplatio, c.q. theoria.[54] According to Johnson, "[b]oth contemplation and mysticism speak of the eye of love which is looking at, gazing at, aware of divine realities."[54]

    Under the influence of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite the mystical theology came to denote the investigation of the allegorical truth of the Bible,[55] and "the spiritual awareness of the ineffable Absolute beyond the theology of divine names."[56] Theoria enabled the Fathers to perceive depths of meaning in the biblical writings that escape a purely scientific or empirical approach to interpretation.[57] The Antiochene Fathers, in particular, saw in every passage of Scripture a double meaning, both literal and spiritual.[58][subnote 2][subnote 3]
Subnotes
  1. This claim is made by Romanides in the title of his Augustine's Teachings Which Were Condemned as Those of Barlaam the Calabrian by the Ninth Ecumenical Council of 1351.
  2. The Antiochene use of theoria respected the literal meaning of Old Testament texts, while discerning in it a typological or spiritual sense, revealing in the things narrated "the face of Christ in the Old Testament".[59] According to Beck, for Clement and other Alexandrians the word theōria denoted the spiritual sense of a passage of Scripture as revealed by allegory, and they treated it as virtually synonymous with allēgoria.[60]
  3. As Frances Margaret Young notes, "Best translated in this context as a type of "insight", theoria was the act of perceiving in the wording and "story" of Scripture a moral and spiritual meaning,"[61] and may be regarded as a form of allegory,[62]

    In Hesychasm, theoria is obtained by contemplative prayer, the ceaseless and mindfull repetition of the Jesus Prayer.

References

Citations
  1. Larchet 2006, p. 188.
  2. WCCFO 1979.
  3. "FindArticles.com - CBSi". findarticles.com.
  4. Michael J. Christensen, Jeffery A. Wittung (editors), Partakers of the Divine Nature (Associated University Presses 2007 ISBN 0-8386-4111-3), p. 244
  5. "Ut Unum Sint (25 May 1995) | John Paul II". w2.vatican.va. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  6. Orientale lumen, 18 Archived December 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  7. Speciale 2011.
  8. Schmemann 1995, p. 165.
  9. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 882.
  10. Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 883.
  11. Phan 2000, pp. 486–488.
  12. Ravenna Document 2007, nn. 43–44.
  13. Congar, Yves (1959). After nine hundred years: the background of the schism between the Eastern and Western churches. Translated. New York: Fordham University Press. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-58523800-5.
  14. Meyendorff, John (1987) [©1983]. Byzantine Theology: historical trends and doctrinal themes (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Fordham University Press. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-8232-0967-5.
  15. North American Orthodox-Catholic Theological Consultation (25 October 2003). "The Filioque: a Church dividing issue?". usccb.org. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Archived from the original on 20 February 2013. Also archived as "The Filioque: a Church-dividing issue?". Archived from the original on 6 August 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) from scoba.us. New York: Standing Conference of Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas.
  16. "filioque, n". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  17. "Catechism of the Catholic Church, 246-248".
  18. "The 39 Articles of Religion (1562)". www.victorianweb.org.
  19. Lutheranism (Book of Concord Archived 2008-05-11 at the Wayback Machine, The Nicene Creed and the Filioque: A Lutheran Approach), Presbyterianism (Union Presbyterian Church, Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine, Reformed Presbyterian Church); Methodism (United Methodist Hymnal Archived 2008-05-11 at the Wayback Machine)
  20. Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity: The Greek and the Latin Traditions regarding the Procession of the Holy Spirit (scanned image of the English translation on L'Osservatore Romano of 20 September 1995); also text with Greek letters transliterated and text omitting two sentences at the start of the paragraph that it presents as beginning with "The Western tradition expresses first ..."
  21. "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Nicene Creed". www.newadvent.org.
  22. "Agreed Statement of the North American Orthodox-Catholic Theological Consultation, 25 October 2003".
  23. Grudem, Wanye (1994). Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-31028670-7.
  24. Pontificial Council for Promoting Christian Unity (20 September 1995). "The Greek and Latin traditions regarding the procession of the Holy Spirit". L'Osservatore Romano (Weekly English ed.). p. 3. Archived from the original on 3 September 2004 – via ewtn.com.
  25. Zizioulas, Ioannis (1996). "One single source: an Orthodox response to the clarification on the Filioque". 30 Days in the Church and in the World. Newton, NJ: Italcoser. 9: 42–. ISSN 0897-2435. Transcribed in Zizioulas, John. "One single source: an Orthodox response to the clarification on the Filioque". orthodoxresearchinstitute.org. [s.l.]: Orthodox Research Institute. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2011.
  26. A. N. Williams, The Ground of Union: Deification in Aquinas and Palamas, ISBN 978-0-19-512436-1
  27. An Overview of the Hsychastic Controversy by Archbishop Chrysostomos, English version: Archbishop Chrysostomos, Orthodox and Roman Catholic Relations from the Fourth Crusade to the Hesychastic Controversy (Etna, CA: Center for Traditionalist Orthodox Studies, 2001), pp. 199‒232
  28. Andrew Louth in the Oxford Companion to Christian Thought (Oxford University Press 2000 ISBN 0-19-860024-0), p. 88
  29. Gerald O'Collins, S.J. and Edward G. Farrugia, S.J., editors, A Concise Dictionary of Theology (Paulist Press 2000 ISBN 0-567-08354-3), article on Hesychasm and that on Neo-Palamism
  30. Finch 2007, p. 233.
  31. Gregory Palamas: Knowledge, Prayer and Vision. Written by M.C. Steenberg "Monachos.net - Gregory Palamas: Knowledge, Prayer and Vision". Archived from the original on 2009-11-19. Retrieved 2009-07-28.
  32. Lossky 1976, p. 26.
  33. Lossky (1976), p. 9
  34. Lossky (1976), p. 21
  35. Lossky (1976), p. 49
  36. Franks, Romans, Feudalism, and Doctrine/Empirical theology versus speculative theology, Father John S. Romanides
  37. "YAHWEH OF GLORY ACCORDING TO THE 1ST, 2ND AND 9TH ECUMENICAL COUNCILS". www.romanity.org.
  38. "SOME UNDERLYING POSITIONS OF THIS WEBSITE". www.romanity.org.
  39. Romanides, Franks, Romans, Feudalism, p.67 Archived 2010-11-05 at the Wayback Machine
  40. Franks, Romans, Feudalism, and Doctrine — [Part 3] by John Romanides
  41. Rev. Dr. George C. Papademetriou, Saint Augustine in the Greek Orthodox Tradition Archived 2010-11-05 at the Wayback Machine
  42. Archbishop Chrysostomos, Orthodox and Roman Catholic Relations from the Fourth Crusade to the Hesychastic Controversy Etna, CA: Center for Traditionalist Orthodox Studies, 2001), pp. 199‒232 .
  43. Orthodox Spirituality by Metropolitan Hierotheos Archived 2010-10-07 at the Wayback Machine
  44. Belisle, Peter-Damian (2002). The Privilege of Love: Camaldolese Benedictine Spirituality. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-2773-0.
  45. Holdaway, Gervase (2008). The Oblate Life. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-3176-8.
  46. Williams, A. N. (2007-02-01). The Divine Sense: The Intellect in Patristic Theology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-46148-1.
  47. The Difference Between Orthodox Spirituality and Other Traditions by Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos
  48. "ポルノ風俗情報配信サイト アンドロス". www.theandros.com. Archived from the original on 2010-11-30. Retrieved 2010-11-26.
  49. "On Union With God and Life of Theoria by Kallistos Katafygiotis (Kallistos Angelikoudis) greekorthodoxchrch.org". www.greekorthodoxchurch.org.
  50. What Is prayer? by Theophan the Recluse cited in The Art of Prayer: An Orthodox Anthology, p.73, compiled by Igumen Chariton of Valamo, trans, E. Kadloubovsky and E.M. Palmer, ed. Timothy Ware, 1966, Faber & Faber, London.
  51. The Illness and Cure of the Soul by Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos " Archived 2009-03-26 at the Wayback Machine Publisher: Birth of Theotokos Monastery, Greece (January 1, 2005) ISBN 978-960-7070-18-0
  52. Orthodox Psychotherapy Section The Knowledge of God according to St. Gregory Palamas by Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos published by Birth of Theotokos Monastery, Greece (January 1, 2005) ISBN 978-960-7070-27-2
  53. Thomas Keating, Open Mind, Open Heart: The Contemplative Dimension of the Gospel, p. 19
  54. Johnson 1997, p. 24.
  55. King 2002, p. 15.
  56. Dupré 2005, p. 6341.
  57. John Breck, Scripture in Tradition: The Bible and Its Interpretation in the Orthodox Church, St Vladimir's Seminary Press 2001, p. 11.
  58. Breck, Scripture in Tradition, p. 37).
  59. John Breck, The Power of the Word in the Worshiping Church (St Vladimir's Seminary Press 1986 ISBN 0-89281-153-6), pp. 75-76
  60. Breck, p. 73
  61. Frances Margaret Young, Biblical exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture (Cambridge University Press 1997 ISBN 0-521-58153-2), p. 175
  62. John J. O'Keefe, Russell R. Reno, Sanctified Vision (JHU Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-8018-8088-9), p. 15).
  63. The Uncreated Light: An Iconographiocal Study of the Transfiguration In the Eastern Church by Solrunn Nes Wm. pg 97 - 103 B. Eerdmans Publishing Company ISBN 978-0-8028-1764-8
  64. Partakers of God by Panayiotis Christou Holy Cross Orthodox Press, Brookline Mass 1984.
  65. "accusing Gregory Palamas of Messalianism" – Antonio Carile, Η Θεσσαλονίκη ως κέντρο Ορθοδόξου θεολογίας -προοπτικές στη σημερινή Ευρώπη Thessaloniki 2000, pp. 131–140, (English translation provided by the Apostoliki Diakonia of the Church of Greece).
  66. Notes on the Palamite Controversy and Related Topics by John S. Romanides, The Greek Orthodox Theological Review, Volume VI, Number 2, Winter, 1960–61. Published by the Holy Cross Greek Orthodox Theological School Press, Brookline, Massachusetts.
  67. Nichols, Aidan (1995). Light from the East: Authors and Themes in Orthodox Theology, Part 4. Sheed and Ward. p. 50. ISBN 9780722050804.
  68. "No doubt the leaders of the party held aloof from these vulgar practices of the more ignorant monks, but on the other hand they scattered broadcast perilous theological theories. Palamas taught that by asceticism one could attain a corporal, i.e. a sense view, or perception, of the Divinity. He also held that in God there was a real distinction between the Divine Essence and Its attributes, and he identified grace as one of the Divine propria making it something uncreated and infinite. These monstrous errors were denounced by the Calabrian Barlaam, by Nicephorus Gregoras, and by Acthyndinus. The conflict began in 1338 and ended only in 1368, with the solemn canonization of Palamas and the official recognition of his heresies. He was declared the 'holy doctor' and 'one of the greatest among the Fathers of the Church', and his writings were proclaimed 'the infallible guide of the Christian Faith'. Thirty years of incessant controversy and discordant councils ended with a resurrection of polytheism" (Simon Vailhé, "Greek Church" in Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909)
  69. John Meyendorff (editor), Gregory Palamas – The Triads, p. xi. Paulist Press, 1983, ISBN 978-0809124473. Retrieved on 12 September 2014.
  70. John Meyendorff (editor),Gregory Palamas - The Triads, p. xi
  71. Kallistos Ware in Oxford Companion to Christian Thought (Oxford University Press 2000 ISBN 0-19-860024-0), p. 186
  72. "Several Western scholars contend that the teaching of St. Gregory Palamas himself is compatible with Roman Catholic thought on the matter" (Michael J. Christensen, Jeffery A. Wittung (editors), Partakers of the Divine Nature (Associated University Presses 2007 ISBN 0-8386-4111-3), p. 243).
  73. Horujy, Sergey S. "Christian Anthropology and Eastern-Orthodox (Hesychast) Asceticism". Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  74. J. Christensen, Jeffery A. Wittung (editors), Partakers of the Divine Nature (Associated University Presses 2007 ISBN 0-8386-4111-3), p. 244
  75. "Pope John Paul II and the East Pope John Paul II. "Eastern Theology Has Enriched the Whole Church" (11 August 1996). English translation". Archived from the original on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
  76. "Angelus, 11 agosto 1996 - Castel Gandolfo - Giovanni Paolo II". www.vatican.va.
  77. Unitatis Redintegratio Archived March 6, 2013, at the Wayback Machine 17
  78. Ut unum sint, 54
  79. "Sacri Canones, die XVIII Octobris anno MCMXC - Constitutio Apostolica, Ioannes Paulus PP. II | Ioannes Paulus II". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  80. Stanford, Peter (2 April 2005). "Obituary: Pope John Paul II". the Guardian.
  81. "Catechism of the Catholic Church, 838".
  82. Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church Archived August 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  83. "Catholic Church only true church, Vatican says" (CBC News 10 July 2007)
  84. Service, Catholic News (2019-07-03). "Ecumenical goal is unity, not leveling differences, pope says". The Catholic Sun. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  85. "Pope gives relics of St. Peter to Orthodox patriarch". www.catholicnews.com. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  86. Culbertson, Alix (August 11, 2017). "Vladimir Putin cultivates friendship with the Pope in attempt to get one over on EU". Daily Express. London. President Vladimir Putin struck up his friendship with the Pope in 2013 when Francis wrote an open letter to the Russian leader, who was chairing the G20, telling him he opposed US military intervention in Syria.
  87. "Pope meets Putin; two leaders talk about Ukraine, Syria, Venezuela". Crux. 2019-07-04. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  88. "Pope meets Putin; two leaders talk about Ukraine, Syria, Venezuela". Archived from the original on 2019-07-04. Retrieved 2019-07-04.
  89. "What Putin wants from the Pope". Catholic Herald. 2019-07-04. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  90. "Ukrainian Greek-Catholic leaders meet with Pope at the Vatican - Vatican News". www.vaticannews.va. 2019-07-05. Retrieved 2019-12-23.
  91. "Pope Francis points out attempts to manipulate religion in Ukraine". TASS. Retrieved 2019-12-23.

Sources

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.