Crumbling skull rule

The crumbling skull rule is a well-established legal doctrine used in some tort law systems. It holds that where a plaintiff had a condition or injury that predates the tort and would have naturally deteriorated or worsened over time (e.g. a crumbling skull), the defendant is not responsible to the degree that the condition or injury would have naturally worsened over time. A defendant is only liable for the degree the injury was worsened or the hastening or acceleration of the damage caused by the tort. The crumbling skull rule should not be confused with the related thin skull rule.[1]

The concept is sometimes applied without specific reference to the crumbling skull rule, instead being expressed as a non-absolute application of the thin skull rule.[2][3]

References

Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458, at para. 34-36, online at: http://canlii.ca/t/1fr63
Kavanagh v Akhtar Matter No Ca 40492/97, [1998] NSWSC 779, online at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/1998/779.html
Jones, Tanya (2001). "The Commonwealth v WL McLean: Developments Inconsistent with the Traditional Nature of the Egg Shell Skull Principle" (PDF). James Cook University Law Review. Retrieved 22 December 2014.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458, at para. 34-36, online at: http://canlii.ca/t/1fr63

[2] Kavanagh v Akhtar Matter No Ca 40492/97, [1998] NSWSC 779, online at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/1998/779.html

[3] Jones, Tanya (2001). "The Commonwealth v WL McLean: Developments Inconsistent with the Traditional Nature of the Egg Shell Skull Principle" (PDF). James Cook University Law Review. Retrieved 22 December 2014.