Code of the Quipu

The book describes (necessarily by inference, as there is no written record beyond the quipu the themselves)[2] the uses of the quipu, for instance in accounting and taxation. Although 400 quipu are known to survive,[3] the book's study is based on a selection of 191 of them, described in a companion databook.[4][5] It analyzes the mathematical principles behind the use of the quipu, including a decimal form of positional notation, the concept of zero, rational numbers, and arithmetic,[6] and the way the spatial relations between the strings of a quipu recorded hierarchical and categorical information.[4]

It argues that beyond its use in recording numbers, the quipu acted as a method for planning for future events,[4] and as a writing system for the Inca,[6] and that it provides a tangible representation of "insistence", the thematic concerns in Inca culture for symmetry and spatial and hierarchical connections.[3]

The initial chapters of the book provide an introduction to Inca society and the physical organization of a quipu (involving the colors, size, direction, and hierarchy of its strings), and discussions of repeated themes in Inca society and of the place of the quipu and its makers in that society. Later chapters discuss the mathematical structure of the quipu and of the information it stores, with reference to similarly-structured data in modern society and exercises that ask students to construct quipus for representing modern data.[6][5]

The book is aimed at a general audience, and does not require any specialized knowledge of its readers, but can also be appreciated by mathematicians and anthropologists,[7][8] or possibly used as undergraduate course material.[2]

Although reviewers Sal Restivo and Susan Niles criticize the book for a lack of originality in its insights, reviewer M. P. Closs disagrees.[2][8][9] And although criticizing the book for its lack of a bibliography and index, and for leaving the false impression that Inca culture became extinct without leaving any successors, reviewer Gary Urton writes that the book "is an important contribution to ... the history of science and to our understanding of Inca thought and culture".[6] Similarly, Niles criticizes the lack of a bibliography and the lack of exercises drawn from Inca rather than modern culture, and finds the material on insistence unconvincing, but recommends the book "to all Andeanists and to anyone interested in material culture".[9] And reviewer Donald E. Thompson calls it "a delightful, clearly written, and informative book".[7]