Brian Slocum (law professor)

Brian G. Slocum is an American author and professor of law with recognized expertise in jurisprudence, statutory interpretation, legal linguistics, and administrative law.[1] Professor Brian Bix of the University of Minnesota described him as 'one of the most important scholars working at the intersection of legal interpretation and the philosophy of language'.[2] Professor Slocum's scholarship has examined and criticized the 'ordinary meaning doctrine' and how it has been used by courts to interpret language. He has won numerous awards and his publications are printed in other languages, including Chinese.[3]

Professor Brian Slocum

Education

Slocum has earned a bachelor's degree in accounting from Pacific Union College, a juris doctor degree from Harvard Law School, and an masters degree and Ph.D. in linguistics from UC Davis.

Career

Brian G. Slocum is the Stearns Weaver Miller Professor at Florida State University College of Law, where he teaches language and legal interpretation. Previously, he was a law professor and associate dean for scholarship at the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. He has also been a visiting professor at UC Davis School of Law, UC Berkeley Law School, and Stanford Law School.

Current Interests

Slocum states that he is working in the field of experimental jurisprudence, doing empirical research on how ordinary people understand the language of rules. His latest paper questions legal perspectives that claim normative values are irrelevant in determining statutory linguistic meaning.[4]

Publications

Books

Professor Slocum has written three books:

Articles

He has also published articles in many notable law journals, including:

His most-cited papers are:

  1. The Immigration Rule of Lenity and Chevron Deference (Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 17, 515, 2002)[5]
  2. The Importance of Being Ambiguous (Maryland Law Review 69, 791, 2009)[6]
  3. Canons, the Plenary Power Doctrine, and Immigration Law(Florida State University Law Review 34, 363, 2006)[7]
  4. The Meaning of Sex: Dynamic Words, Novel Applications, and Original Public Meaning (Michigan Law Review, 119, 2020)[8]
  5. Statutory Interpretation from the outside (Columbia Law Review 122, 213, 2022)[9]
  6. Ordinary meaning and corpus linguistics (Brigham Young University Law Review 2017, 1417, 2017)[10]
  7. RICO and the Legislative Supremacy Approach to Federal Criminal Lawmaking (Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 31, 639, 1999)[11]

Related Content

References
  1. "Brian G. Slocum". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
  2. Bix, Brian (2017-05-29). "Philosophy of Language and Legal Interpretation". Jurisprudence. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  3. Boyce, Madeline (2016). "Book Note: Ordinary Meaning, A Theory Of The Most Fundamental Principle Of Legal Interpretation, by Brian G. Slocum". Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 53 (3): 1124–1126. doi:10.60082/2817-5069.3056. S2CID 152025982 – via CanLII.
  4. "FSU Law Focus" (PDF).
  5. "The Immigration Rule of Lenity and Chevron Deference". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  6. "The Importance of Being Ambiguous: Substantive Canons, Stare Decisis, and the Central Role of Ambiguity Determinations in the Administrative State". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  7. "Canons, the Plenary Power Doctrine, and Immigration Law". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  8. "The Meaning of Sex: Dynamic Words, Novel Applications, and Original Public Meaning". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  9. "Statutory interpretation from the outside". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  10. "Ordinary meaning and corpus linguistics". scholar.google.com. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
  11. Slocum, Brian (1999). "RICO and the Legislative Supremacy Approach to Federal Criminal Lawmaking". Loy. U. Chi. Lj. 31: 639. Retrieved 2023-05-07.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.