Alexander Filipović

In reference to Berhard Pörksen's utopian idea of the "editorial society" (redaktionelle Gesellschaft), Alexander Filipović has proposed the term "post-editorial society" to describe the era of real time publication of factual claims on social media without the necessary verification processes in place that mark one of the core tenets of journalism's professional ethics: fact-checking. While only journalists needed professional verification and interpretation skills in the past, nowadays these professional skills should not be limited to the journalistic profession, but are required for all who aim to responsibly source and evaluate their information about current events. In an interview with the German newspaper taz, Filipović used the 2016 Nice truck attack and the 2016 Munich shooting as examples: "We have no editorial boards for our public communication. We saw where this leads in the cases of the terror attack in Nice and now in Munich. People turn on their cameras and spread images, videos and false information extremely fast."[5]

Filipović has commented on the ethics of online image publication in the wake of the Death of Alan Kurdi, claiming that "there are different rules for images and texts" since images "burn themselves into the retina" and "stick in our memory much quicker". He warned that "many books might be much more impressive and might say more about the different dimensions of a situation, but an iconic image with a child stays with us for many more years."[6] About another key image of the civil war in Syria, Mahmoud Raslans photo of the Syrian boy Omran Daqneesh who was injured by air strikes in Aleppo in August 2016,[7] Alexander Filipović has said in Der Tagesspiegel that it increased public pressure and could give policy makers a push: "It can accomplish a lot, because it gives suffering a face."[8]

After the French satire magazine Charlie Hebdo published a controversial caricature of the dead refugee child Alan Kurdi with the tagline "so close to the finish,"[9] Alexander Filipović connected the issues of political correctness and satire in an interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung: "There is a society-wide regulation of what counts as politically correct, of what may and may not be said in society. ... Many people equate moral reasoning in general with this political correctness. But it is something entirely different. Satire plays with these boundaries." Filipović emphasizes the constructive public role of satire and the responsibility of content consumers: "In all our discussion on the issue of satire we realize that we have trouble to argue about values and morals in public. If people would take the proper time to study the caricature in detail, if they would refrain from posting something for two days, and if they would reflect on what it might be illustrating, much would be gained."[10]