Titan submersible implosion

On 18 June 2023, Titan, a submersible operated by American tourism and expeditions company OceanGate, imploded during an expedition to view the wreck of Titanic in the North Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada. On board the submersible were Stockton Rush, the American CEO of OceanGate; Paul-Henri Nargeolet, a French deep-sea explorer and Titanic expert; Hamish Harding, a British businessman; Shahzada Dawood, a Pakistani-British businessman; and Dawood's son Suleman.

Titan submersible implosion
Date18 June 2023
LocationNorth Atlantic Ocean, near the wreck of Titanic
Coordinates41°43′42″N 49°56′32″W
TypeMaritime disaster
CauseFailure of the pressure hull
Participants5 passengers
OutcomeSubmersible destroyed by implosion
Deaths5 (see § Fatalities)

Communication between Titan and its mother ship, Polar Prince, was lost 1 hour 45 minutes into the dive. Authorities were alerted when it failed to resurface at the scheduled time later that day. After the submersible had been missing for four days, a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) discovered a debris field containing parts of Titan, about 500 metres (1,600 ft) from the bow of Titanic. The search area was informed by the United States Navy's (USN) sonar detection of an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion around the time communications with the submersible ceased, suggesting the pressure hull had imploded while Titan was descending, resulting in the instantaneous deaths of all five occupants.

The search and rescue operation was conducted by an international team led by the United States Coast Guard (USCG), USN, and Canadian Coast Guard.[1] Support was provided by aircraft from the Royal Canadian Air Force and United States Air National Guard, a Royal Canadian Navy ship, as well as several commercial and research vessels and ROVs.[2][3]

Numerous industry experts had raised concerns about the safety of the vessel. OceanGate executives, including Rush, had not sought certification for Titan, arguing that excessive safety protocols and regulations hindered innovation.[4]

Background

OceanGate
Main article: OceanGate
OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, who died aboard Titan, pictured in 2015

OceanGate is a private company, founded in 2009 by Stockton Rush and Guillermo Söhnlein. From 2010 until the loss of the Titan submersible, OceanGate transported paying customers in leased commercial submersibles off the coast of California, in the Gulf of Mexico, and in the Atlantic Ocean.[5] The company is based in Everett, Washington, U.S.[6]

Rush realised that visiting shipwreck sites was a way to get media attention. OceanGate had previously conducted trips to other shipwrecks, including its 2016 dive to the wreck of Andrea Doria aboard their other submersible Cyclops 1. In 2019, Rush told Smithsonian magazine: "There's only one wreck that everyone knows ... If you ask people to name something underwater, it's going to be sharks, whales, Titanic".[5]

Titanic
Main article: Wreck of Titanic

Titanic was a British ocean liner that sank in the North Atlantic Ocean on 15 April 1912, after colliding with an iceberg. More than 1,500 people died, making it the deadliest sinking of a single ship at the time.[7][8] In 1985, Robert Ballard located the wreck of Titanic on the ocean floor, 320 nautical miles (590 km; 370 mi) from the coast of Newfoundland.[9] The wreck lies at a depth of about 3,810 metres (12,500 feet; 2,080 fathoms).[10] Since its discovery, it has been a destination for research expeditions and tourism. By 2012, a century after its sinking, 140 people had visited the wreck site.[11]

Titan submersible
Main article: Titan (submersible)
Schematics of the vessel

Formerly known as Cyclops 2,[12] Titan was a five-person submersible vessel operated by OceanGate Inc. The 6.7-metre-long (22 ft), 10,432 kg (23,000 lb) vessel was constructed from carbon fibre and titanium.[13] The entire pressure vessel consisted of two titanium hemispheres with matching titanium interface rings bonded to the 142 cm (56 in) internal diameter, 2.4-metre-long (7.9 ft) carbon fibre-wound cylinder.[14] One of the titanium hemispherical end caps could be detached to provide the hatch[5] and was fitted with a 380 mm-diameter (15 in) acrylic window.[15] In 2020, Rush said that the hull, originally designed to reach 4,000 m (13,000 ft) below sea level,[16] had been downgraded to a depth rating of 3,000 m (9,800 ft) after demonstrating signs of cyclic fatigue. In 2020 and 2021, the hull was repaired or rebuilt.[17] Rush told the Travel Weekly editor-in-chief that the carbon fibre had been sourced at a discount from Boeing because it was too old for use in the company's airplanes.[18] Boeing stated they have no records of any sale to Rush or to OceanGate.[19] OceanGate had initially not sought certification for Titan, arguing that excessive safety protocols hindered innovation.[4] Lloyd's Register, a ship classification society, declined OceanGate's request to class the vessel in 2019.[20]

A picture of Logitech F710, the game controller used aboard Titan
A modified Logitech F710 wireless game controller was used to steer Titan.

Titan could move at up to 3 knots (5.6 km/h; 3.5 mph) using four electric thrusters, arrayed two horizontal and two vertical.[21] Its steering controls consisted of a Logitech F710 wireless game controller with modified analogue sticks. The University of Washington's Applied Physics Laboratory assisted with the control design on the Cyclops 1 using a Sony-brand PlayStation 3 video game controller, which was carried over to Titan, substituting with the Logitech controller.[22] The use of commercial off-the-shelf game controllers is common for remote-controlled vehicles such as unmanned aerial vehicles or bomb disposal robots,[23][24][25] whilst the United States Navy uses Xbox 360 controllers to control periscopes in Virginia-class submarines.[26]

OceanGate claimed on its website as of 2023 that Titan was "designed and engineered by OceanGate Inc. in collaboration [with] experts from NASA, Boeing, and the University of Washington" (UW).[27] A ⅓-scale model of the Cyclops 2 pressure vessel was built and tested at the Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) at UW; the model was able to sustain a pressure of 4,285 psi (29.54 MPa; 291.6 atm), corresponding to a depth of about 3,000 m (9,800 ft).[28] After the disappearance of Titan in 2023, these earlier associates distanced themselves from the Titan project. UW claimed the APL had no involvement in the "design, engineering, or testing of the Titan submersible". A Boeing spokesperson also claimed Boeing "was not a partner on Titan and did not design or build it". A NASA spokesperson said that NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center had a Space Act Agreement with OceanGate, but "did not conduct testing and manufacturing via its workforce or facilities".[27]

According to OceanGate, the vessel contained monitoring systems to continuously monitor the strength of the hull.[13] The vessel had life support for five people for 96 hours.[13] There is no GPS underwater; the support ship, which monitored the position of Titan relative to its target, sent text messages to Titan providing distances and directions.[29]

According to OceanGate, Titan had several backup systems intended to return the vessel to the surface in case of emergency, including ballasts that could be dropped, a balloon, thrusters, and sandbags held by hooks that dissolved after a certain number of hours in saltwater. Ideally, this would release the sandbags, allowing the vessel to float to the surface.[30][31] An OceanGate investor explained that if the vessel did not automatically ascend after the elapsed time, those inside could help release the ballast either by tilting the ship back and forth to dislodge it or by using a pneumatic pump to loosen the weights.[32]

Dives to Titanic

Titan dives to Titanic took place during multi-day excursions organized by OceanGate, which the company referred to as "missions". Five missions took place in the summers of 2021 and 2022.[33] Titan imploded during the fifth mission of 2023; it was the first mission of the year in which a dive came close to Titanic, due to poor weather on previous attempts.[34]

Passengers would sail to and from the wreckage site aboard a support ship and spend approximately five days in the ocean above the Titanic wreckage site. Two dives were usually attempted during each excursion, though dives were often cancelled or aborted due to weather or technical malfunctions.[33]

Each dive typically had a pilot, a guide, and three paying passengers on board.[35] Once inside the submersible, the hatch would be bolted shut and could only be reopened from the outside.[36] The descent from the surface to Titanic typically took two hours,[37] with the full dive taking about eight hours.[35] Throughout the journey, the submersible was expected to emit a safety ping every 15 minutes to be monitored by the above-water crew.[9] The vessel and surface crew were also able to communicate via short text messages.[38]

Customers who travelled to Titanic with OceanGate, referred to as "mission specialists" by the company,[39] paid US$250,000 each for the eight-day expedition.[35][40][41]

OceanGate intended to conduct multiple dives to Titanic in 2023, but the dive in which Titan was destroyed was the only one the company had launched that year.[35][37]

Safety

Because Titan operated in international waters and did not carry passengers from a port, it was not subject to safety regulations. The vessel was not certified as seaworthy by any regulatory agency or third-party organization.[42] Reporter David Pogue, who completed the expedition in 2022 as part of a CBS News Sunday Morning feature,[43] said that all passengers who enter Titan sign a waiver confirming their knowledge that it is an "experimental" vessel "that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body, and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death".[44] Television producer Mike Reiss, who also completed the expedition, said the waiver "mention[s] death three times on page one".[45] A 2019 article published in Smithsonian magazine referred to Rush as a "daredevil inventor".[5] In the article, Rush is described as having said that the U.S. Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993 "needlessly prioritized passenger safety over commercial innovation".[5][46] In a 2022 interview, Rush told CBS News, "At some point, safety just is pure waste. I mean, if you just want to be safe, don't get out of bed. Don't get in your car. Don't do anything."[47] Rush said in a 2021 interview, "I've broken some rules to make [Titan]. I think I've broken them with logic and good engineering behind me. The carbon fiber and titanium, there's a rule you don't do that. Well, I did."[48]

OceanGate claimed that Titan was the only crewed submersible that used RTM, "an integrated real-time health monitoring system".[49] The proprietary system, patented by Rush,[50] employed acoustic sensors and strain gauges at the pressure boundary to analyse the effects of increasing pressure as the watercraft ventured deeper into the ocean and to monitor the hull's integrity in real time. This supposedly would function to give early warning of problems and allow enough time to abort the descent and return to the surface.[49][51]

In October 2023 The Naval Architect journal and Royal Institution of Naval Architects news pages published an article by MJ Cianni who conducted the first design review of the Titan submersible.[52][53] A summary of Cianni's "lessons learned" was published in an interview with the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology news pages on 14 September 2023.[54]

Prior concerns

In 2018, OceanGate's director of marine operations, David Lochridge, composed a report documenting safety concerns he had about Titan. In court documents, Lochridge said that he had urged the company to have Titan assessed and certified by an agency, but OceanGate had declined to do so, citing an unwillingness to pay.[55] He also said that the transparent viewport on its forward end, due to its nonstandard and therefore experimental design, was only certified to a depth of 1,300 m (4,300 ft), only a third of the depth required to reach Titanic.[56] According to Lochridge, RTM would "only show when a component is about to fail – often milliseconds before an implosion" and could not detect existing flaws in the hull before it was too late.[57] Lochridge was also concerned that OceanGate would not perform nondestructive testing on the vessel's hull before undertaking crewed dives and alleged that he was "repeatedly told that no scan of the hull or Bond Line could be done to check for delaminations, porosity and voids of sufficient adhesion of the glue being used due to the thickness of the hull".[56][17][58]

OceanGate said that Lochridge, who was not an engineer, had refused to accept safety approvals from OceanGate's engineering team and that the company's evaluation of Titan's hull was stronger than any kind of third-party evaluation Lochridge thought necessary.[55] OceanGate sued Lochridge for allegedly breaching his confidentiality contract and making fraudulent statements. Lochridge countersued, stating that he had been wrongfully terminated as a whistleblower for bringing up concerns about Titan's ability to operate safely. The two parties settled a few months later.[59][56][60]

Later in 2018, the Marine Technology Society wrote a letter to Rush expressing "unanimous concern regarding the development of 'TITAN' and the planned Titanic Expedition", indicating that the "current experimental approach ... could result in negative outcomes (from minor to catastrophic) that would have serious consequences for everyone in the industry".[61] A signatory of the letter later told the New York Times that Rush had called him after reading it to tell him that he believed industry standards were stifling innovation.[55]

In March 2018, Rob McCallum, a leading deep sea exploration specialist, emailed Rush to warn him he was potentially risking his clients' safety and advised against the submersible's use for commercial purposes until it had been independently tested and classified: "I implore you to take every care in your testing and sea trials and to be very, very conservative." Rush replied that he was "tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation ... We have heard the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone' way too often. I take this as a serious personal insult". McCallum then sent Rush another email in which he said: "I think you are potentially placing yourself and your clients in a dangerous dynamic. In your race to Titanic you are mirroring that famous catch cry: 'She is unsinkable'". This prompted OceanGate's lawyers to threaten McCallum with legal action.[62]

In 2022, the British actor and television presenter Ross Kemp, who had previously taken part in deep sea dives for the television channel Sky History, had planned to mark the 110th anniversary of the sinking of Titanic by recording a documentary in which he would undertake a dive to the wreckage using Titan. Kemp's agent Jonathan Shalit said that the project was shelved after checks by production company Atlantic Productions deemed the submersible to be unsafe and not "fit for purpose".[63][64]

Previous incidents
External video
video icon CBS Sunday Morning / David Pogue report on OceanGate, broadcast November 27, 2022 (YouTube)

In 2022, reporter David Pogue was on board the surface ship when Titan became lost and could not locate Titanic during a dive.[65][66] Pogue's December 2022 report for CBS News Sunday Morning, which questioned Titan's safety, went viral on social media after the submersible lost contact with its support ship in June 2023.[67] In the report, Pogue commented to Rush that "it seems like this submersible has some elements of MacGyvery jerry-rigged-ness". He said that a $30 Logitech F710 wireless game controller with modified control sticks was used to steer and pitch the submersible and that construction pipes were used as ballast.[68]

In another 2022 dive to Titanic, one of the thrusters on Titan was accidentally installed backwards and the submersible started spinning in circles when trying to move forward near the sea floor. As documented by the BBC documentary Take Me to Titanic, the issue was bypassed by steering while holding the game controller sideways.[69][70] According to November 2022 court filings, OceanGate reported that, in a 2022 dive, the submersible suffered from battery issues and, as a result, had to be manually attached to a lifting platform, causing damage to external components.[71][72]

Incident

The voyage was booked in early 2023. Rush approached Las Vegas businessman Jay Bloom with two discounted tickets, intending for him and his son to be on the trip. The billionaire was offered a price of $150,000 per seat, rather than the full price of $250,000, with Rush claiming that it was "safer than crossing the street", but Bloom turned down the offer over safety concerns. At that time, the trip was scheduled for May, but bad weather delayed it to June.[73][74]

16–17 June, preparations
MV Polar Prince (seen here in 2018) transported Titan and the expedition's crew to the dive site above the wreck of Titanic.

On 16 June 2023, the expedition to Titanic departed from St. John's, Newfoundland, aboard the research and expedition ship MV Polar Prince.

The ship arrived at the dive site on 17 June. One of the occupants, Hamish Harding, posted on Facebook: "Due to the worst winter in Newfoundland in 40 years, this mission is likely to be the first and only crewed mission to Titanic in 2023. A weather window has just opened up and we are going to attempt a dive tomorrow." He also indicated that the operation was scheduled to begin around 4:00 a.m. EDT (08:00 UTC).[75]

18 June, dive and disappearance

The dive operation began on 18 June at 9:30 a.m. Newfoundland Daylight Time (NDT), or 12:00 UTC.[75][76] For the first hour and a half of the descent, Titan communicated with Polar Prince every 15 minutes, but communication stopped after a recorded communication at 11:15 a.m. (13:45 UTC).[75] James Cameron indicated that it was likely that the sub's early warning system had alerted the passengers to an impending delamination of the hull. He added "we understand from inside the community that they had dropped their ascent weights and were coming up, trying to manage an emergency."[77] A U.S. Navy acoustic detection system designed to locate military submarines detected an acoustic signature consistent with an implosion hours after Titan submerged.[78]

The submersible was expected to resurface at 4:30 p.m. (19:00 UTC).[75] At 7:10 p.m. (21:40 UTC), the U.S. Coast Guard was notified of the missing vessel.[79] The Navy reviewed its acoustic data from that time, and passed the information about the possible implosion event to the Coast Guard.[80] Titan had up to 96 hours of breathable air supply for its five passengers when it set out,[81] which would have expired on the morning of 22 June 2023 if the submersible had remained intact.[82]

18–22 June, search and rescue efforts
Photo of the Deep Energy ship
Deep Energy (pictured in the Netherlands, 2015) arrived with two ROVs on 20 June.
U.S. Coast Guard HC-130 flying over L'Atalante on 21 June

The United States Coast Guard, United States Navy, and Canadian Coast Guard led the search and rescue efforts.[1] Aircraft from the Royal Canadian Air Force and United States Air National Guard, a Royal Canadian Navy ship, and several commercial and research ships and remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROVs) also assisted in the search.[2][83][84] The search involved both a surface search and an underwater sonar search.[44]

Crews from the United States Coast Guard launched search missions 900 nautical miles (1,700 km) from the shore of Cape Cod, Massachusetts.[85][86] Joint Rescue Coordination Centre Halifax reported that a Royal Canadian Air Force Lockheed CP-140 Aurora aircraft and CCGS Kopit Hopson 1752 were participating in the search in response to a request for assistance by the Maritime Rescue Coordination Center in Boston made on 18 June at 9:43 p.m. (00:13 UTC).[2][87] The search on 19 June involved three C-130 Hercules aircraft, two from the United States and one from Canada;[88] a P-8 Poseidon anti-submarine warfare aircraft from the United States, and sonobuoys.[89] Search and rescue was hampered by low visibility weather conditions, which cleared the next day.[90]

The U.S. Coast Guard indicated that the search and rescue mission was difficult because of the remote location, weather, darkness, sea conditions, and water temperature.[91] Rear Admiral John Mauger said that they were "deploying all available assets".[40] While many submersibles are equipped with an acoustic beacon that emits sounds that can be detected underwater by rescuers, Titan did not have such a device.[91]

Digital display showing the aircraft registration, the date, the time in UTC "20:38:43z", and the text 'Can you keep an eye out outside for the next 20mins, you are in the area of the missing sub.'
Passing aircraft were asked to look out for Titan, as seen in this New York Oceanic (KZWY) ATC message, displayed in the cockpit of El Al's Boeing 787-9, 4X-EDL on 20 June.

The pipe-laying ship Deep Energy, operated by TechnipFMC, arrived on site on 20 June 2023, with two ROVs and other equipment suited to the seabed depths in the area.[84] As of 10:45 a.m. (13:15 UTC), the U.S. Coast Guard had searched 10,000 square miles (26,000 km2).[92] The New York Air National Guard's 106th Rescue Wing joined in the search and rescue mission with a HC-130J, with plans for two more to join by the end of the day.[83]

According to an internal U.S. government memo, a Canadian CP-140 Aurora's sonar picked up underwater noises while searching for the submersible.[93][94] The U.S. Coast Guard officially acknowledged the sounds early the following morning, but reported that early investigations had not yielded results.[93] Rear Admiral John Mauger of the U.S. Coast Guard said the source of the noise was unknown and may have come from the many metal objects at the site of the wreck.[95] A Canadian CP-140 Aurora plane had previously spotted a "white rectangular object" floating on the surface. A ship sent to find and identify the object was diverted to help find the source of the noise.[93] The noises were later described by the U.S. Coast Guard as being apparently unrelated to the missing vessel.[96]

CCGS John Cabot arrived on the morning of 21 June, bringing additional sonar capabilities to the search effort. Commercial vessels Skandi Vinland and Atlantic Merlin also arrived that day, as did a Coast Guard C-130 crew.[97] As of about 3:00 p.m. (17:30 UTC), five air and water vehicles were actively searching for Titan, and another five were expected to arrive in the next 24–48 hours.[98] Search and rescue assets included two ROVs, one CP-140 Aurora aircraft, and the C-130 aircraft.[98]

The U.S. Navy's Flyaway Deep Ocean Salvage System (FADOSS), a ship lift system designed to lift large and heavy objects from the deep sea, arrived in St. John's, though no ships were available to carry the system to the wreck site.[99][100] Officials estimated it would take around 24 hours to weld the FADOSS system to the deck of a carrier ship before it could set sail to the search and rescue operation.[100]

Despite rising concerns about the depletion of air supplies on Titan if it were intact, a U.S. Coast Guard spokesperson said at a press conference that "This is a search and rescue mission 100%", rather than a wreckage recovery mission.[101]

An Odysseus 6k ROV from Pelagic Research Services, travelling aboard the Canadian-flagged offshore tug MV Horizon Arctic, reached the sea floor and began its search for the missing submersible.[102][103][104] The French RV L'Atalante also deployed its ROV Victor 6000, which can reach depths of up to 6,000 m (20,000 ft) and transmit images to the surface.[105]

22 June, discovery of debris

At 1:18 p.m. (15:48 UTC) on 22 June the U.S. Coast Guard's Northeast Sector announced that a debris field had been found near the wreck of Titanic.[106][107][108] The debris, located by Pelagic Research Services' Odysseus 6k ROV five hours into its search, was later confirmed to be part of the submersible.[109][110] At 4:30 p.m. (19:00 UTC) – at a U.S. Coast Guard press conference in Boston – the Coast Guard said that the loss of the submersible was due to an implosion of the pressure chamber and that pieces of Titan had been found on the sea floor about 1,600 feet (about 500 metres) northeast of the bow of Titanic.[111][112][113][114]

The identified debris consisted of the tail cone (not part of the pressure vessel) and the forward and aft end bells – both part of the pressure vessel intended to protect the crew from the ocean environment.[115] According to the U.S. Coast Guard, the debris field was concentrated in two areas, with the aft end bell lying separate from the front end bell and the tail cone.[116][109]

Rear Admiral John Mauger of the US Coast Guard said that the debris was consistent with a "catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber".[115] Mauger stated that he did not have an answer as to whether the bodies of those on board would be recovered, but he did say that it was "an incredibly unforgiving environment".[117]

Fatalities

The implosion killed all five occupants:

Recovery operations
Aft endcap of the submersible, recovered October 4

Pelagic Research Services confirmed on 23 June that a new mission to the Titan debris field was already underway and that it had taken the Odysseus 6k ROV one hour to reach the site to continue searching and documenting debris.[129][130]

It was further reported that the debris from Titan was too heavy for Pelagic's ROV to lift and that any recovery would need to take place at a later stage.[131]

On 24 June, Polar Prince returned to St. John's harbour. In their bid to understand what caused Titan's catastrophic loss, investigators boarded the support ship. Another boat was seen in the harbour towing the launch platform which Titan used.[132]

On 28 June, Horizon Arctic returned to St. John's Harbour with the remains of Titan that were recovered from the debris field.[133] Photographs and videos showed the titanium covers on both ends of Titan intact, with the single viewport missing, mangled pieces of the tail cone, electronics, the landing frame and other debris. The debris was to be transported to the U.S. as evidence in the investigation.[134] The Coast Guard confirmed that presumed human remains were found within the debris, and that American medical professionals would conduct an analysis.[134][135][136][137] Pelagic Research Services, which was operating the Odysseus 6K ROV from Horizon Arctic, confirmed that its team had completed their mission.[138]

On 30 June, Insider published an analysis of the recovery photos by Plymouth University professor Jasper Graham-Jones. He concluded that a failure of the carbon-fibre hull was the most likely cause of the loss, given that no large pieces of carbon fibre are known to have been recovered. Another possible cause was the acrylic viewing window. He noted that the window was absent from its bell housing when it was recovered. While the salvage team may have removed the window before salvaging its bell housing, they more likely would have left it in place. However, Graham-Jones said that if the window had failed before the hull rather than after, he would have expected larger pieces of carbon fibre to be recovered.[139]

In early October, engineers recovered the rest of the debris and presumed human remains.[140]

Investigations

On 23 June, both the Canadian and the United States federal governments announced that they were launching investigations into the incident.[141][142] They were joined by authorities from France (Bureau d'Enquêtes sur les Événements de Mer, BEAmer) and the United Kingdom (Marine Accident Investigation Branch, MAIB) by 25 June; the final report will be issued to the International Maritime Organization (IMO).[143] Whether lasting reforms will result from the investigation is uncertain. While there are variety of possibile approaches, the IMO may not have appropriate regulatory authority.[144]

United States

The United States investigation is being led by the Coast Guard (USCG) with support from the National Transportation Safety Board; the Coast Guard is taking the lead because it declared the incident a "major marine casualty".[142][145] USCG Captain Jason Neubauer has been named the chief investigator for a Marine Board of Investigation.[143][146]

Canada

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) is investigating because Titan's support vessel, MV Polar Prince, is a Canadian-flagged ship.[142] A team of TSB investigators headed to the port of origin, St. John's, Newfoundland, to "gather information, conduct interviews and assess the occurrence", with other agencies also expected to be involved.[141][145][147] The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) also announced that it was performing a preliminary examination of the incident in order to determine whether to launch a full investigation, which will occur if the RCMP determine criminal, federal, or provincial laws were broken.[142][148]

Financial costs of operations

Numerous assets from the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Coast Guard were deployed to search for the submersible, and to subsequently retrieve the victims' remains. On 23 June 2023, a Washington Post analysis made by Mark Cancian, a defence budget expert, estimated the costs of U.S. Coast Guard operations alone at about USD$1.2 million of taxpayers' money as of June 23, 2023, with the additional operations to recover the submersible's debris not included. Cancian said that while the Titan search operation was funded by money already in the federal budget, the U.S. military would assume some unexpected costs, since personnel and equipment were used in an unforeseen way.[149] Deploying a single Lockheed CP-140 Aurora aircraft and 341 sonobuoys cost Canadian taxpayers at least CA$3 million, and the total Canadian contribution is likely to be much higher once all expenditures are tallied.[150]

Chris Boyer of the National Association for Search and Rescue said the search for Titan likely cost millions of dollars of public funds; however, the USCG declined to give an estimate, saying they "do not associate cost with saving a life". According to U.S. attorney Stephen Koerting, the USCG is generally prohibited by federal law from collecting reimbursement related to any search or rescue service.[151]

The incident renewed past debates about whether taxpayers should bear the cost of search and rescue missions involving wealthy persons engaged in high-risk adventuring, such as incidents involving Steve Fossett and Richard Branson.[152]

Reactions

Discussing the scale of the search and rescue response, Sean Leet, co-founder and chair of Horizon Maritime Services, the company that owns Polar Prince, said:

I've been in the marine industry since a very young age and seen a lot of different situations, and I've never seen equipment of that nature move that quickly [...] The response from the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Military, folks at the airport, the people here, various companies who were involved in the mobilization of that equipment [...] it was done flawlessly.

— Sean Leet, June 2023[153]

The scale of the search and rescue efforts and media coverage compared to those for the Messenia migrant boat disaster, which occurred days earlier, sparked criticism.[154][151] In the Ionian Sea off the coast of Pylos, Messenia, Greece, a fishing boat sank while carrying an estimated 400 to 750 migrants, resulting in nearly 100 persons confirmed dead,[155] another 100 rescued,[156] and hundreds more missing and presumed dead.[157][158] Search and rescue efforts for the migrant ship were conducted by the Hellenic Coast Guard and military.[159] Ishaan Tharoor of The Washington Post wrote that Pakistani Internet users compared and contrasted the Pakistani victims in both incidents, who were on opposite sides of Pakistan's large socioeconomic divide.[160]

According to David Scott-Beddard, the CEO of White Star Memories Ltd, a Titanic exhibition company, the likelihood of conducting future research at the Titanic wreck has decreased due to the incident.[161]

James Cameron, who directed the 1997 film Titanic, visited its wreckage site 33 times, and piloted Deepsea Challenger to the bottom of the Mariana Trench, said he was "struck by the similarity" between the submersible's implosion and the events that led to the Titanic disaster. He noted that both disasters seemed preventable, and were indirectly caused by someone deliberately ignoring safety warnings from others.[162] Cameron criticized the choice of carbon-fibre composite construction of the pressure vessel, pointing out that such material has "no strength in compression" when subject to the immense pressures at depth.[51] Cameron said that pressure hulls should be made out of contiguous materials like steel, titanium, ceramic, or acrylic, and that the wound carbon fibre of Titan's hull had seemed like a bad idea to him from the beginning.[163] He further elucidated that it was long known that a composite hull such as Titan's was vulnerable to microscopic water ingress, delamination, and progressive failure over time.[163] He also criticized Rush's real-time monitoring of the submersible's hull as an inadequate solution that would do little to prevent an implosion.[51] Cameron expressed regret for not being more outspoken about these concerns before the accident,[163] and criticized what he called "false hopes" being presented to the victims' families, when he and his colleagues realized early on that for communication and tracking (the latter housed in a separate pressure vessel, with its own battery) to be lost simultaneously, the cause was almost certainly a catastrophic implosion.[164]

The Logitech F710 game controller used to steer Titan sold out on Amazon shortly after the incident,[68] which was described as "a more benign form of disaster tourism" in a post for the New York magazine blog, the Cut.[165]

In social and mass media

The submersible became widely discussed on social media as the story developed and has been the subject of "public schadenfreude",[166] inspiring darkly humorous internet memes, namely interactive video game recreations and image macros that ridiculed the submersible's deficient construction, OceanGate's perceived poor safety record, and the individuals who died.[167] The memes were criticized as insensitive,[168] with David Pogue regarding such media as "inappropriate and a little bit sick". Some have felt the negative reaction to the victims may be a response to past news coverage of other expeditions undertaken by billionaires, often using their own companies such as Blue Origin.[169] Molly Roberts wrote in The Washington Post that those joking about the incident were demonstrating Internet users' impulses to be ironic, provocative, and angry with each other, combined with an "eat-the-rich attitude".[170]

According to psychologist Pamela Rutledge, an American expert in social media and mass media, the Titan incident was widely treated on social media as entertainment. Key elements include the allure of disasters, fascination with the wealthy, conspiracy theories, uncertainty, and the mythology surrounding Titanic, as well as the romance of rescue operations. Rutledge opined that the trend displayed a lack of accountability and empathy. She asserted there is a need for individuals to rethink the way in which they use social media.[171]

In September 2023, it was announced that a new movie about the Titan submersible incident, called Salvaged, was in development.[172]

The amount of media coverage and public attention over the Titan incident was criticized by figures such as former US President Barack Obama, who commented that the contemporaneous 2023 Messenia migrant boat disaster had received far less attention.[173]

See also

References
  1. "Unified Command established for missing submersible from Polar Prince". United States Coast Guard. 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  2. Petri, Alexandra E.; Lin, Summer (19 June 2023). "Titanic tourist submersible carrying 5 disappears on trip to see wreck in North Atlantic". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  3. Liebermann, Oren; Britzky, Haley (20 June 2023). "US military moving military and commercial assets to help submersible search efforts". CNN. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  4. Bogel-Burroughs, Nicholas; Gross, Jenny; Betts, Anna (20 June 2023). "OceanGate Was Warned of Potential for 'Catastrophic' Problems With Titanic Mission". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  5. Perrottet, Tony (June 2019). "A Deep Dive Into the Plans to Take Tourists to the 'Titanic'". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  6. Podsada, Janice (19 December 2021). "For $250K, this Everett company will take you to the Titanic". The Everett Herald. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  7. "Passenger List and Survivors of Steamship Titanic". United States Senate Inquiry. 30 July 1912. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 15 July 2011.
  8. Pathé, British. "Titanic Disaster Interviews". britishpathe.com. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  9. "Submersible used to take tourists to see Titanic wreck goes missing in Atlantic Ocean". Sky News. 19 June 2023. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  10. Ax, Joseph; O'Brien, Brendan (21 June 2023). "Crews searching for Titanic submersible detect sounds – US Coast Guard". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  11. Symonds, Matthew (April 2012). "Titanic: The archaeology of an emigrant ship". Current Archaeology (265): 14.
  12. "Christening Titan". Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023 – via YouTube.
  13. "Titan Submersible". OceanGate. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  14. Gorgan, Elena (20 June 2023). "Tourist Submarine Titan Goes Missing on Its Way to the Titanic Wreck". autoevolution.com. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  15. Sloan, Jeff (10 May 2017). "Composite submersibles: Under pressure in deep, deep waters". Composites World. Archived from the original on 4 August 2021.
  16. "OceanGate Our Submersibles". 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023.
  17. Harris, Mark (20 June 2023). "A whistleblower raised safety concerns about OceanGate's submersible in 2018. Then he was fired". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  18. Weissmann, Arnie (21 June 2023). "Mission Titanic, Part 2: Delays and an unsettling statement from the OceanGate CEO". Travel Weekly. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  19. Bella, Timothy (22 June 2023). "Titan CEO spoke of 'discount' parts, journalist invited on submersible says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  20. Cohen, Gabe (23 June 2023). "Marine certification company says it declined request to certify doomed Titan vessel". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  21. "Titan 5-Person Submersible | 4,000 meters" (PDF). OceanGate. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  22. https://www.youtube.com/eKIS2uof2F0?t=183
  23. Tassi, Paul (20 June 2023). "The Missing Titanic Submarine Was Using A $30 Video Game Controller". Forbes. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  24. Gault, Matthew (20 June 2023). "Why Did the Missing Titanic Sub Use a $40 Video Game Controller?". VICE. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023. Gamepads are so good at controlling things, that the U.S. military frequently uses them.
  25. Gach, Ethan (20 June 2023). "Why The Missing Titanic Tourist Sub Has Everyone Talking About A Cheap Old Gaming Controller". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023. The Titan was shown to be operated with a Logitech G Wireless Gamepad F710 at times in the past
  26. Andrews, Travis M. (25 September 2017). "The Navy's adding a new piece of equipment to nuclear submarines: Xbox controllers". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  27. Mayor, Grace (22 June 2022). "Boeing and University of Washington deny OceanGate's claim that they helped design the lost Titan sub". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  28. "Cyclops Next Gen: New Hull Design and Testing" (PDF). Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  29. Pogue, David (27 November 2022). "Titanic: Visiting the most famous shipwreck in the world". CBS News. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  30. Kelly, Mary Louise; Acovino, Vincent; Ermyas, Tinbete (20 June 2023). "A former passenger details what it's like inside the missing Titan submersible". NPR. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  31. "U.S. Coast Guard to bring more ships, vessels to search for lost Titanic tourist submersible". CNBC. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  32. Tucker, Emma (22 June 2023). "What it's like inside the Titanic-touring submersible that went missing with 5 people on board". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  33. Pogue, David (27 June 2023). "What I Learned on a Titanic Sub Expedition". New York. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  34. Branch, John (2 July 2023). "A Rubik's Cube, Thick Socks and Giddy Anticipation: The Last Hours of the Titan". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023.
  35. Evans, Gareth; Gozzi, Laura (19 June 2023). "Titanic tourist submersible goes missing with search under way". BBC News. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  36. Treisman, Rachel (20 June 2023). "'Tiny sub, big ocean': Why the Titanic submersible search is so challenging". NPR. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  37. "What we know about the passengers on board missing Titanic submersible". Sky News. 19 June 2023. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  38. Whittle, Patrick; Ramer, Holly (20 June 2023). "In race against clock, expanding fleet of ships searches for submersible lost near Titanic wreck". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  39. Regan, Helen; Yeung, Jessie; Renton, Adam; Said-Moorhouse, Lauren; Upright, Ed (20 June 2023). "The Titanic wreckage lies around 12,500 feet below sea level. Here's a look at the path to see it". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  40. Enokido-Lineham, Olive (19 June 2023). "UK billionaire Hamish Harding on board missing Titanic submersible, family confirms". Sky News. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  41. González, Raúl (22 June 2023). "Missing Titan submarine: How much does the search and rescue mission cost and who's paying for it?". Diario AS. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  42. Porter, Tom (21 June 2023). "The missing Titanic sub fell outside safety rules by operating in international waters beyond the law, experts say". Insider. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  43. Pogue, David (27 November 2022). "Titanic: Visiting the most famous shipwreck in the world". CBS Sunday Morning. CBS News. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  44. Murphy, Jessica (19 June 2023). "What we know about the search for the Oceangate submersible". BBC News. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  45. Baker, Sinéad. "Former passenger on Titan submersible says you have to sign a waiver that mentions death 3 times on the first page: 'So it's never far from your mind'". Insider. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  46. "H.R.1159 – Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993". United States Congress. Archived from the original on 6 January 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  47. David Pogue. "Back to Titanic Part 1". Unsung Science (Podcast). CBS News. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  48. Mi expedición al TITANIC parte 1/4 | Alan por el mundo. Event occurs at 24:16. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  49. OceanGate Staff. "Titan 5-Person Submersible | 4,000 Meters". Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  50. US patent 11119071, Richard Stockton Rush, III, "Systems and methods for curing, testing, validating, rating, and monitoring the integrity of composite structures"
  51. Broad, William J. (22 June 2023). "The director and deep-sea explorer James Cameron points to flaws in the Titan submersible's design". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  52. "The Naval Architect 2023". Royal Institution of Naval Architects. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
  53. "cyclops-class the tragic cost of entrusting non-professionals". Royal Institution of Naval Architects. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
  54. "Titan tragedy investigation set to change industry". Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology news pages. Retrieved 22 September 2023.
  55. Bogel-Burroughs, Nicholas; Gross, Jenny; Betts, Anna (20 June 2023). "OceanGate Was Warned of Potential for 'Catastrophic' Problems With Titanic Mission". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  56. Strauss, Daniel; Varkiani, Adrienne Mahsa; Aronoff, Kate; Otten, Tori; Shephard, Alex; Otten, Tori; Otten, Tori; Otten, Tori; Shephard, Alex (1 November 2022). "Missing Titanic Sub Once Faced Massive Lawsuit Over Depths It Could Safely Travel To". The New Republic. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  57. Low, Matthew; Goodwin, Grace Eliza. "The missing Titanic sub would only detect hull failure 'milliseconds before an implosion,' company executive warned in 2018". Insider. Archived from the original on 9 July 2023. Retrieved 6 July 2023.
  58. "Answer to Complaint – #7 in OceanGate Inc v. Lochridge (W.D. Wash., 2:18-cv-01083) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  59. "Complaint – #1, Att. #1 in OceanGate Inc v. Lochridge (W.D. Wash., 2:18-cv-01083) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  60. "Order Dismissing Case – #14 in OceanGate Inc v. Lochridge (W.D. Wash., 2:18-cv-01083) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  61. "Letter to OceanGate" (PDF). Marine Technology Society. 27 March 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  62. Morelle, Rebecca; Francis, Alison; Evans, Gareth (23 June 2023). "Titan sub CEO dismissed safety warnings as 'baseless cries', emails show". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  63. Wright, Gwyn (24 June 2023). "Ross Kemp turned down OceanGate submersible trip over safety fears". The Independent. Archived from the original on 29 June 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
  64. Russell, Rachel (24 June 2023). "Ross Kemp had planned to film TV show on Titanic sub". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  65. A visit to RMS Titanic (Videotape). CBS News Sunday Morning. 12 December 2022 – via YouTube.
  66. "UPDATED: 3 Ships Join in Search for Missing Submersible Titan, 2018 Lawsuit Alleged Flaws in Craft's Design". USNI News. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  67. Kanter, Jake (20 June 2023). "CBS Story On OceanGate's Missing Titanic Sub Goes Viral After Reporter David Pogue Got Jitters Over Its 'Jerry-Rigged' Design". Deadline. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  68. Edwards, Benj (20 June 2023). "Submarine missing near Titanic used a US$30 Logitech gamepad for steering". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  69. "Take Me to Titanic - Part Two". The Travel Show. BBC. 00:07:40. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  70. "The Return - Take Me To Titanic (Season 1, Episode 2)". Apple TV. 8 October 2022. 00:07:40. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  71. Wuthmann, Walter. "The company that sent a tourist submersible to the Titanic wreck has faced safety questions before". WBUR-FM. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  72. Finley, Ben; Ramer, Holly (19 June 2023). "Deep-sea craft carrying 5 people to Titanic wreckage reported missing, search underway". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  73. Ashton, Ben (23 June 2023). "Read the 'sliding door' texts that saved billionaire from Titanic sub disaster". Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  74. Simpson, Michael Lee. "Las Vegas Financier Gave Up 'Titan' Sub Seats That Went to Billionaire and His 19-Year-Old Son". Peoplemag. Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  75. "Titanic sub timeline: when did it go missing and key events in search". Reuters. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  76. "Titan submersible: timeline of missing vessel's voyage". The Guardian. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  77. "James Cameron compares submersible tragedy to Titanic sinking: 'I'm struck by the similarity of the Titanic disaster'". ABC News. Archived from the original on 7 July 2023. Retrieved 6 July 2023.
  78. Kesling, Ben; Youssef, Nancy A.; Lubold, Gordon; Paris, Costas (22 June 2023). "WSJ News Exclusive | Top Secret U.S. Navy System Heard Titan Implosion Days Ago". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  79. Winsor, Morgan (22 June 2023). "A timeline of the missing Titanic tourist submersible". ABC News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  80. Kurmelovs, Royce; Singh, Maanvi; Yang, Maya; Chao-Fong, Léonie; Lawther, Sam Jones (22 June 2023). "US navy detected likely implosion of Titan submersible hours after it began its mission". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023 – via AP News.
  81. "Titanic tourist submersible live updates: Rescuers race against time". NBC News. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  82. Vlamis, Kelsey; Lee, Lloyd; Baker, Sinéad (22 June 2023). "Missing Titanic Sub Has Likely Used All Its Oxygen, Prospects Bleak". Insider. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  83. "New York Air National Guard assisting in search for missing Titanic submersible" Archived 22 June 2023 at the Wayback Machine. WABC-TV. 21 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  84. Cooke, Ryan (20 June 2023). "U.S. air force aircraft land in St. John's with gear to aid in search for missing submersible". CBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  85. U.S. Coast Guard [@USCGNortheast] (19 June 2023). "A @USCG C-130 crew is searching for an overdue Canadian research submarine approximately 900 miles off #CapeCod" (Tweet). Retrieved 19 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  86. "Coast Guard to hold press briefing for missing submersible 900 miles east of Cape Cod" (Press release). United States Coast Guard. 19 June 2023. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  87. Halifax JRCC CCCOS [@hfxjrcc] (19 June 2023). "JRCC Halifax has tasked one Royal Canadian Air Force Aurora aircraft out of 14 Wing Greenwood in Nova Scotia for aerial search, and Canadian Coast Guard Vessel Kopit Hopson 1752 will also be assisting MRCC Boston with a surface search for the submersible" (Tweet). Retrieved 19 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  88. Da Silva, Chantal; McCausland, Phil (20 June 2023). "Behind the U.S. Coast Guard's search". NBC News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  89. Andrew-Gee, Eric; Cook, Dustin (19 June 2023). "Missing Titanic submersible prompts search operation off the coast of Newfoundland". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  90. "Visibility for aerial search has improved today, Coast Guard official says". CNN. 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  91. Gross, Jenny; Bubola, Emma; Jiménez, Jesus (19 June 2023). "Missing Submersible: Vessel Disappears During Dive to the Titanic Wreck Site". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  92. U.S. Coast Guard [@USCGNortheast] (20 June 2023). "#Update A Canadian Aircraft P3 Aurora has arrived on scene to conduct sonar searches. The R/V Polar Prince and R/V Deep Energy are continuing their surface searches. Total search area completed as of this morning is 10,000 SQ miles. #Titanic" (Tweet). Retrieved 20 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  93. Salahieh, Nouran; Levenson, Eric; Alvarez, Priscilla; Sanchez, Ray (20 June 2023). "Banging sounds heard during Titan search, according to internal US government memo". CNN. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  94. Bogel-Burroughs, Nicholas; Jiménez, Jesus; Ives, Mike (21 June 2023). "Missing Titanic Submersible: 'We Need to Have Hope': More Ships Join Search". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  95. Chao-Fong, Léonie; Henley, Jon (21 June 2023). "Titanic sub live updates: source of 'banging noises' still unknown, says US Coast Guard, as search continues". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  96. "Main takeaways from today's press conference". BBC News. 22 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  97. "Joint search continues for missing submersible, Titan" (Press release). United States Coast Guard. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  98. "Here's the team that is assisting in the search efforts for the missing sub". CNN. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  99. Britzky, Haley; Liebermann, Oren (20 June 2023). "US Navy sending experts and deep ocean salvage system to aid in submersible search". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  100. "Navy salvage system is in St. John's and preparing for mobilization, Navy official says". CNN. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  101. "Coast Guard says operation to find missing submersible is '100%' still a search and rescue mission". CNN. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  102. U.S. Coast Guard [@USCGNortheast] (22 June 2023). "The Canadian vessel Horizon Arctic has deployed an ROV that has reached the sea floor and began its search for the missing sub" (Tweet). Retrieved 22 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  103. "HORIZON ARCTIC, Offshore Tug/Supply Ship - Details and current position - IMO 9732838 - VesselFinder". vesselfinder.com. Archived from the original on 23 May 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  104. "What we know about the Horizon Arctic ROV". BBC News. 22 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  105. U.S. Coast Guard [@USCGNortheast] (22 June 2023). "The French vessel L'Atalante has just deployed their ROV" (Tweet). Retrieved 22 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  106. Whittle, Patrick; Ramer, Holly (22 June 2023). "The U.S. Coast Guard says debris field has been found near the Titanic during search for submersible". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  107. U.S. Coast Guard [@USCGNortheast] (22 June 2023). "A debris field was discovered within the search area by an ROV near the Titanic. Experts within the unified command are evaluating the information. 1/2" (Tweet). Retrieved 22 June 2023 – via Twitter.
  108. Sephton, Connor (22 June 2023). "'Debris field' discovered within search area near Titanic, US Coast Guard says". Sky News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  109. Sullivan, Shawn J.; Loehrke, Janet; Padilla, Ramon (22 June 2023). "Debris field confirmed to be missing Titanic submarine. This is where it was finally found". USA Today. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  110. Salahieh, Nouran; Cohen, Gabe; Levenson, Eric (22 June 2023). "Located debris has been assessed to be from the external body of the missing submersible, according to memo reviewed by CNN". CNN. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  111. "Watch Coast Guard press conference live: Officials give updates on missing Titanic sub". USA Today. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  112. "Submersible crew presumed dead in 'catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber'". United Press International. 22 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  113. Amos, Jonathan (20 June 2023). "Titanic sub live updates: Crew of Titan sub believed to be dead, says vessel operator". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  114. Patil, Anushka (22 June 2023). "The debris found today was 'consistent with catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber' in the submersible, Mauger said". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  115. "US Coast Guard confirms Titan sub pressure loss". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  116. "US Navy details what Titan debris was found". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  117. Debusmann, Bernd Jr (22 June 2023). "All five people on missing Titan sub are dead - Coast Guard". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  118. "Rescue teams race to find five people missing on Titanic sub". BBC News. 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  119. Naddaf, Miryam; Masood, Ehsan (23 June 2023). "Two Titan submersible passengers were prominent science philanthropists in Pakistan". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-02100-y. Archived from the original on 25 June 2023. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  120. Rutherford, Nichola (22 June 2023). "Teen on stricken Titanic sub is Strathclyde University student". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  121. Guy, Jack (26 June 2023). "Mother let son take her place on doomed Titanic trip because he 'really wanted to go'". CNN. Archived from the original on 29 June 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
  122. "Teenager on Titanic sub took Rubik's Cube to break record, mother says". BBC News. 26 June 2023. Archived from the original on 20 July 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2023. It was suppose to be Shahzada and I going down, and then I stepped back and gave this space to Suleman because he really wanted to go
  123. Finley, Ben; Ramer, Holly (20 June 2023). "UK billionaire on lost submersible vessel holds 3 Guinness World Records and was 'looking forward to conducting research' at Titanic site". Fortune. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  124. "Fastest circumnavigation via both Poles by aeroplane". Guinness World Records. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 31 August 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  125. Helmore, Edward; Cecco, Leyland (20 June 2023). "Titanic tourist submarine: desperate search for craft missing with five onboard". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  126. Hopper, Tristin (19 June 2023). "The (incredibly expensive) Titanic tourism industry that just lost a submarine". National Post. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  127. Breeden, Aurelien (20 June 2023). "Paul-Henri Nargeolet Has Made More Than 35 Titanic Site Trips". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  128. "Who is on the missing Titanic sub?". Reuters. 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  129. "East Aurora-based Pelagic Research gear, crew find Titan submersible". 23 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  130. "Wellfleet company joins efforts to find missing submersible". Archived from the original on 25 June 2023. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  131. "Titanic sub live updates: Safety investigations launched into Titan implosion deaths". 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  132. "Titan sub: Investigators board Polar Prince as it returns to harbour". BBC News. 24 June 2023. Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  133. "See photos of recovered Titan sub debris after 'catastrophic implosion' during Titanic voyage - CBS News". CBS News. 28 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
  134. "U.S. Coast Guard recovers evidence from TITAN submersible". United States Coast Guard News. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
  135. "'Presumed human remains' found in wreckage of Titan sub". Sky News. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  136. Deliso, Meredith (28 June 2023). "Salvaged debris from Titan submersible contains 'presumed human remains': US Coast Guard". ABC News. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  137. Madani, Doha (28 June 2023). "Human remains and debris from sub returned to land after fatal implosion near Titanic site". NBC News. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  138. "Ship carrying debris from Titan submersible returns to Newfoundland port". AP News. 28 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  139. Guenot, Marianne (30 June 2023). "Photos of the Titan sub's wreckage support the theory that the carbon-fiber hull failed first, expert says". Yahoo News. Business Insider. Archived from the original on 30 June 2023. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
  140. Wendling, Mike (11 October 2023). "Remaining debris from destroyed Titan sub found on Atlantic seabed". BBC. Retrieved 11 October 2023.
  141. Armstrong, Kathryn; Amos, Jonathan (23 June 2023). "Titanic sub search: What happens next". BBC News. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  142. Whittle, Patrick; McDermott, Jennifer; LeBlanc, Steve (23 June 2023). "Canada is investigating why the Titanic-bound submersible imploded". AP News. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  143. McDermott, Jennifer; Whittle, Patrick; Ramer, Holly (25 June 2023). "After the Titan implosion, the US Coast Guard wants to improve the safety of submersibles". AP News. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  144. Finley, Ben (22 June 2023). "Tourist sub's implosion draws attention to murky regulations of deep-sea expeditions". AP News. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  145. MacDonald, Michael (23 June 2023). "Canada's transportation safety board is investigating Titan submersible and its Canadian support ship". Toronto Star. The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  146. "U.S. Coast Guard convenes a Marine Board of Investigation into loss of Titan Submersible" (Press release). United States Coast Guard News. 25 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  147. "23 June 2023 - Deployment notice - Transportation Safety Board of Canada". 23 June 2023. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  148. "RCMP to investigate deaths aboard Titan sub, TSB reviewing logs". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 24 June 2023. Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  149. Horton, Alex (23 June 2023). "What the Titan search could cost — and who will pay for it". The Washington Post. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
  150. "It cost more than $2.4M for one RCAF plane to join Titanic sub search". CTV News. 6 July 2023. Archived from the original on 8 July 2023. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  151. Butera, Isabelle (22 June 2023). "As Titan sub stirs global interest, many draw attention to hundreds of migrants missing at sea". USA Today. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  152. Geller, Adam (25 June 2023). "When wealthy adventurers take huge risks, who should pay for rescue attempts?". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 25 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  153. "'We have to hold out hope,' Horizon Maritime Services representative says". CNN. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  154. Da Silva, Chantal (21 June 2023). "A tale of two disasters: Missing Titanic sub captivates the world days after deadly migrant shipwreck". NBC News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  155. Haq, Sana Noor; Labropoulou, Elinda (16 June 2023). "Relatives searching for loved ones after Greek migrant boat disaster, as hundreds more feared dead". CNN. Archived from the original on 17 June 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2023.
  156. "Greece finds no more survivors of migrant boat disaster with hundreds missing". Kalamata, Greece: NBC News. Associated Press. 15 June 2023. Archived from the original on 15 June 2023. Retrieved 15 June 2023.
  157. "At least 209 Pakistanis among victims of Greece boat wreck". Al Jazeera. 22 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  158. Jones, Sam; Smith, Helena (21 June 2023). "At least 35 people feared dead after dinghy sinks en route to Canary Islands". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  159. Kitsantonis, Niki; Engelbrecht, Cora (14 June 2023). "At Least 79 Die as Boat Carrying Migrants Sinks Near Greece". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 June 2023. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
  160. Tharoor, Ishaan (21 June 2023). "In missing submersible and migrant disaster, a tale of two Pakistans". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  161. "Future research at the Titanic wreck is unlikely after the Titan went missing, expert says". CNN. 22 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  162. Shapero, Julia (22 June 2023). "Director James Cameron 'struck' by similarities between Titan implosion, Titanic sinking". The Hill. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  163. Treisman, Rachel (23 June 2023). "James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speaking up more". NPR.org. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  164. Regan, Helen; Renton, Adam; Picheta, Rob; Sangal, Aditi; Hammond, Elise; Meyer, Matt; Powell, Tori B.; Chowdhury, Maureen (23 June 2023). "Missing Titanic sub crew killed after 'catastrophic implosion'". CNN.com. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  165. Cohen, Danielle (23 June 2023). "Missing Titan Submersible Passengers Believed Dead". The Cut. Archived from the original on 25 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  166. "Why the Titan submarine disappearance led to public schadenfreude". euronews. 25 June 2023. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  167. "Grand Theft Auto V Immortalizes Lost Titanic Submarine With Fan Mod". Kotaku. 23 June 2023. Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  168. "Controversy erupts as Roblox community creates games inspired by tragic OceanGate submersible accident". Hindustan Times. 24 June 2023. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  169. Hamedy, Saba (22 June 2023). "Search for Titanic submersible unleashes 'eat the rich' sentiment online". NBC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  170. Roberts, Molly (23 June 2023). "How social media turned the submersible tragedy into a punchline". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023. The crass jokes illustrate how the internet's gravity pulls us toward extremes. [...] At best, we're always looking for a chance to act ironic or provocative. At worst, we're looking for a chance to be angry with each other [...] Combine this impulse with the 'eat-the-rich attitude' so common among Gen Z and left-leaning Americans of all ages. The belief is that not only is every billionaire a policy failure, but also being a billionaire is a personal failure[.]
  171. Rutledge, Pamela (26 June 2023). "How Social Media Turned the Titan Tragedy into Entertainment". Fielding Graduate University. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  172. "A new movie based on OceanGate's Titan submersible tragedy is in the works: 'Salvaged". Los Angeles Times. 29 September 2023. Archived from the original on 8 October 2023. Retrieved 11 October 2023.
  173. "Obama calls out obsession with Titanic sub while migrant boat tragedy ignored". The Independent. 23 June 2023. Archived from the original on 5 July 2023. Retrieved 16 July 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.