2019–2020 Peruvian constitutional crisis

In the Constitution of Peru, the executive branch can dissolve Congress after a second vote of no-confidence.[14][1] The first vote of no-confidence occurred in September 2017.[13]

Demanding reforms in the Constitutional Court organic law, Vizcarra called for a vote of no confidence on 27 September 2019, stating it was "clear the democracy of our nation is at risk".[14] Vizcarra and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights criticized Congress for blocking a proposal for general elections while it quickly approved nominations to the Constitutional Court of Peru without investigating the backgrounds on nominees.[14] Vizcarra sought to reform the Constitutional Court nomination process and Congress' approval or disapproval of his proposal was seen "as a sign of confidence in his administration".[14]

The Congress scheduled the election of the new members to the Constitutional Court of Peru for September 30.

On September 30, the prime minister Salvador del Solar went to the Legislative Palace to request the approval of an amendment to the Organic Law of the Constitutional Court as a matter of confidence. However, the Congress scheduled the minister to the afternoon. While the congress started the debate for the election of the new judges, the prime minister entered the Congress hemicycle room. Del Solar addressed the lawmakers to vote to reform the Constitutional Court nomination process. However, the Congress decided to postpone the vote of the amendment to the afternoon.

The Congress named a new member to the Constitutional Court of Peru.[1] Many of the Constitutional Court nominees selected by Congress were alleged to be involved in corruption.[22] Hours later, the Congress approved the confidence motion.

Notwithstanding the affirmative vote, Vizcarra stated that the appointment of a new member of the Constitutional Court constituted a de facto vote of no confidence.[1][23] He said that it was the second act of no-confidence in his government, granting him the authority to dissolve Congress.[24] These actions by Congress, as well as the months of slow progress towards anti-corruption reforms, pushed Vizcarra to dissolve the legislative body on 30 September, with Vizcarra stating "Peruvian people, we have done all we could."[1]

Shortly after Vizcarra announced the dissolution of Congress, the legislative body refused to recognize the president's actions, declared Vizcarra as suspended from the presidency, and named Vice President Mercedes Aráoz as the interim president of Peru.[1] Despite this, Peruvian government officials stated that the actions by Congress were void as the body was officially closed at the time of their declarations.[1] By the night of 30 September, Peruvians gathered outside of the Legislative Palace of Peru to protest against Congress and demand the removal of legislators[1] while the heads of the Peruvian Armed Forces shared a photograph of themselves with Vizcarra in the Government Palace, announcing that they recognized him as president of Peru and head of the armed forces.[11][12]

During the evening of 1 October 2019, Mercedes Aráoz, whom Congress had declared interim president, resigned from office.[10] Aráoz resigned, hoping that the move would promote the new general elections proposed by Vizcarra and postponed by Congress.[10][1] President of Congress Pedro Olaechea was left momentarily speechless when informed of Aráoz's resignation during an interview.[25] At the time, no governmental institution or foreign government recognized Aráoz as president.[25]

On 10 October 2019, Olaechea, who was now President of the Permanent Assembly, submitted a claim with the Constitutional Court against the Vizcarra government over its dissolution of Congress.[26] The court, on 9 January 2020, ruled in its Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Peru over the dissolution of Congress on 30 September 2019 that the claim filed by Olaechea was unfounded, that dissolution of Congress was legal and declared that Congress preventing the executive branch from raising questions of confidence was unconstitutional.[26][27]

Vizcarra issued a decree calling for legislative elections on 26 January 2020.[10] The Organization of American States released a statement saying that the Constitutional Court could determine the legality of President Vizcarra's actions and supported his call for legislative elections, saying "It's a constructive step that elections have been called in accordance with constitutional timeframes and that the definitive decision falls to the Peruvian people".[25]

The Wall Street Journal would write, "Mr. Vizcarra's move against Congress echoed a parliamentary coup carried out in 1992 by then-President Alberto Fujimori".[9] Christine Armario of the Associated Press wrote, "The dissolution of congress has plunged Peru into its deepest constitutional crisis in nearly three decades, and it may also be the start of a final, bleak chapter for the country's most prominent political dynasty. When the legislature was last shut down in 1992, strongman Alberto Fujimori sat in the presidential palace calling the shots. Fast forward 27 years, and now it is the party led by his cherished eldest daughter that is being kicked out".[8]

Lawmakers, Fujimorists and other opponents viewed President Vizcarra's actions as a "coup" or "self-coup",[2][4][6][7] with the right-wing members of Congress saying that Vizcarra was working with leftist politicians, arguing that Peru would become "another Venezuela".[28] Former Mayor of Lima and attorney Jorge Del Castillo responded to the dissolution, stating "We call on the armed forces of Peru, we call on the national police of Peru, not to lend their support to this coup d’état. He and his ministers will end up in prison".[4] Juan Sheput, cofounder of Contigo, stated "Vizcarra, like any dictator, proposes to dissolve Congress".[3]

Public opinion polls by the Institute of Peruvian Studies (IEP) showed that 84% of respondents approved of Vizcarra's move to dissolve Congress.[23] A similar poll by Peruvian pollster CPI found 89.5% of respondents supported the dissolution of Congress.[29]

The contested President Martín Vizcarra questioned the legality of the Congressional inauguration of Vice President Mercedes Aráoz as Interim President and the members involved in this act of challenge of authority.

You can't just say 'I've sworn in as President, but I was just kidding.' Swearing into a public office in a legislative institution in front of a congressional audience is a legal action in the moment.